Recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica Bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH (purH), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default glycerol concentration is 50% and serves as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us for prioritized development.
Synonyms
purH; RB10113; Bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH [Includes: Phosphoribosylaminoimidazolecarboxamide formyltransferase; EC 2.1.2.3; AICAR transformylase); IMP cyclohydrolase; EC 3.5.4.10; ATIC; IMP synthase; Inosinicase)]
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhodopirellula baltica (strain DSM 10527 / NCIMB 13988 / SH1)
Target Names
purH
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Rhodopirellula baltica and why is it significant for purine biosynthesis research?

Rhodopirellula baltica SH1(T) is a marine aerobic, heterotrophic bacterium belonging to the phylum Planctomycetes. It was isolated from the water column of the Kieler Bight, a bay in the southwestern Baltic Sea . R. baltica has become an important model organism for studying various metabolic pathways due to its complete genome sequence availability and distinct morphological properties.

The significance of R. baltica in research stems from several unique characteristics:

  • It contributes to remineralization of biomass in natural environments

  • It possesses a distinctive cell compartmentalization with an intracellular structure called the pirellulosome

  • Its proteome analysis has revealed 1,267 unique proteins (17.3% of total putative protein-coding ORFs), including proteins involved in major metabolic pathways

  • The organism exhibits different cell morphologies and gene expression patterns throughout its life cycle

  • It demonstrates biogeographical distribution in European seas, suggesting environmental adaptation capabilities

The study of purine biosynthesis in R. baltica provides insights into fundamental metabolic processes in marine bacteria and potential adaptations to their specific ecological niche.

What is the bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH and its role in nucleotide metabolism?

The bifunctional purine biosynthesis protein PurH plays a crucial role in the final steps of de novo purine biosynthesis pathway. PurH typically contains two functional domains:

  • An N-terminal IMP cyclohydrolase (PurH2) domain

  • A C-terminal folate-dependent aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) formyltransferase (PurH1) domain

These domains catalyze the final two steps in the biosynthesis of inosine 5'-monophosphate (IMP), which is a precursor for both adenine and guanine nucleotides. Specifically, PurH catalyzes the conversion of 5-formamidoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (FAICAR) to IMP .

While most non-archaeal organisms possess a bifunctional PurH, archaea show variability in how they catalyze this final step. Some archaea use separate enzymes: either a PurH2-type IMP cyclohydrolase that naturally occurs unfused to the AICAR formyltransferase domain, or alternative enzymes like PurO (known as the "euryarchaeal signature protein") .

Kinetic characterization of archaeal PurH2 has shown a Km of 7.8 ± 1.8 μM and kcat of 1.32 ± 0.14 s-1, demonstrating its efficiency in converting FAICAR to IMP in vitro . Understanding the structure and function of PurH across different species provides valuable insights into the evolution and adaptation of purine biosynthesis pathways.

Basic Considerations:

Effective experimental design for characterizing recombinant R. baltica PurH requires systematic planning following these key steps:

  • Define your variables clearly:

    • Independent variable: typically experimental conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, substrate concentration)

    • Dependent variable: measurable outcomes (e.g., enzyme activity, protein yield)

  • Formulate a specific, testable hypothesis about PurH function

  • Design experimental treatments to manipulate your independent variables

  • Assign subjects to groups (between-subjects or within-subjects design)

  • Plan measurement methods for your dependent variables

Advanced Design Framework:

For more sophisticated characterization of R. baltica PurH, consider:

  • Implementing optimal design theory to minimize parameter uncertainty in enzyme kinetics studies

  • Using multifactorial experimental designs to assess interaction effects between variables

  • Controlling for extraneous variables that might influence results

Table 1: Example Experimental Design Matrix for R. baltica PurH Characterization

ExperimentpHTemperature (°C)Substrate Concentration (μM)Cofactor PresentPurpose
16.5255YesBaseline activity measurement
26.52550YesSubstrate saturation analysis
36.5375YesTemperature effect assessment
47.5255YespH effect assessment
56.5255NoCofactor dependency analysis

When designing these experiments, ensure that you:

  • Create a consistent protocol that connects research objectives to appropriate design

  • Include proper controls for each experimental condition

  • Consider the marine origin of R. baltica when selecting buffer conditions

Isotachophoresis as a Primary Purification Method

Isotachophoresis (ITP) is particularly effective for purifying recombinant proteins from R. baltica at preparative scales (10-500 mg range). This electrophoretic procedure offers several advantages:

  • It is based on the principle of protein mixtures moving at the same speed within a stacking gel, with components aligning in bands in order of decreasing electrophoretic mobility

  • The width of each band is proportional to the quantity of the corresponding component

  • The system is simple, uses well-understood physical properties, and can produce sterile products of clinical grade

  • It is scalable from analytical to preparative protein loads with consistently high protein yields (>80%) and purity levels (>95% for full-length recombinant protein)

  • It can be used for both cationic and anionic purification of proteins in their native form

For proteins with pI below 7.5, standard buffer systems (pH 7.5-9.0) are suitable, while proteins with higher pIs require cationic ITP .

Multi-step Purification Strategies

For comprehensive purification of R. baltica proteins, researchers have successfully employed different pre-analytical protein and peptide separation techniques:

  • One-dimensional electrophoresis (1-DE)

  • Two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE)

  • HPLC separation prior to mass spectrometry

Using this approach, researchers identified 1,115 non-redundant proteins from R. baltica's intracellular proteome and cell wall protein fractions . The combination of these techniques allows for the separation of proteins that might co-migrate in a single dimension.

For recombinant proteins expressed with affinity tags (such as His-tags), initial purification using affinity chromatography (e.g., Ni-NTA) followed by isotachophoresis has proven effective .

Fundamental Kinetic Analysis Approaches

When analyzing kinetic data for R. baltica PurH, researchers should:

  • Calculate basic kinetic parameters:

    • Km (Michaelis constant): Determine substrate concentration at half-maximal velocity

    • kcat (turnover number): Calculate the number of substrate molecules converted per enzyme molecule per second

    • kcat/Km: Assess catalytic efficiency

  • Implement appropriate data visualization methods:

    • Michaelis-Menten plots for direct visualization of enzyme kinetics

    • Lineweaver-Burk plots for linear transformation of kinetic data

    • Eadie-Hofstee or Hanes-Woolf plots as alternative linearization methods

  • Apply statistical tests to evaluate significance:

    • Use regression analysis for parameter estimation

    • Calculate confidence intervals for kinetic parameters

    • Perform statistical comparisons between experimental conditions

Advanced Data Analysis Strategies

For more sophisticated analysis of R. baltica PurH activity:

  • Implement global fitting approaches to simultaneously analyze multiple datasets

  • Use computational modeling to:

    • Simulate enzyme behavior under different conditions

    • Predict the effects of mutations on enzyme function

    • Integrate kinetic data with structural information

  • Apply statistical design of experiments (DOE) principles:

    • Create statistically sound experimental designs

    • Identify optimal conditions for enzyme activity

    • Detect interaction effects between variables

Table 2: Example Data Analysis Workflow for R. baltica PurH Kinetics

Analysis StepMethodsExpected Outcome
Data CleaningCheck for outliers and errorsValidated dataset ready for analysis
Parameter CalculationNon-linear regressionKm, kcat, and kcat/Km values
Statistical ValidationConfidence interval determinationReliability assessment of parameters
VisualizationGeneration of appropriate plotsClear presentation of kinetic relationships
Comparative AnalysisStatistical tests between conditionsIdentification of significant differences
IntegrationCorrelation with structural dataStructure-function relationships

How does R. baltica's unique cell compartmentalization affect PurH localization and function?

R. baltica possesses a distinctive cellular organization with compartmentalization that influences protein localization and function. Understanding this compartmentalization is crucial for interpreting PurH function within the cellular context.

Cell Structure and Protein Localization

R. baltica contains an intracellular compartment called the pirellulosome . Proteome analysis has provided insights into protein localization within this compartmentalized structure:

  • Proteins without predictable signal peptides are typically localized in the intracellular compartment (pirellulosome)

  • Proteins with housekeeping functions in glycolysis, TCA cycle, amino acid biosynthesis, protein quality control, and translation are predominantly found in the pirellulosome

  • Proteins involved in major metabolic pathways, likely including purine metabolism enzymes like PurH, would be expected to localize to this compartment

Implications for PurH Function

The localization of PurH within R. baltica's unique cellular architecture has several potential implications:

  • Spatial organization may influence enzyme efficiency through substrate channeling and proximity to other enzymes in the purine biosynthesis pathway

  • Compartmentalization could affect regulation of enzyme activity in response to cellular metabolic needs

  • The proteome analysis of R. baltica revealed that 146 of the identified proteins contained predicted signal peptides, suggesting their translocation to different cellular compartments . The absence of signal peptides in housekeeping enzymes indicates their retention within the pirellulosome

  • The presence of proteins in multiple spots on 2-DE gels suggests post-translational modifications, which could influence enzyme activity and localization

A comprehensive understanding of PurH localization requires integrating proteomics data with functional studies to determine how compartmentalization affects enzyme activity in vivo.

What methods are recommended for presenting R. baltica PurH research findings?

Effective presentation of research findings on R. baltica PurH requires careful consideration of data visualization and reporting formats. The following methods can enhance the clarity and impact of your research:

Tables, Figures, and Text Integration

When presenting PurH research, consider these key principles:

  • Ensure tables and figures are self-explanatory with clear titles, labels, and formatting that can be understood without referring to the main text

  • Use tables and figures to complement the text, not repeat it - the text should highlight key points and significance without duplicating exact values

  • Maintain consistency between data presented in tables/figures and information in the main text

  • Choose the appropriate format based on the nature and amount of data:

    • Tables for precise numerical values and structured data

    • Figures for visualizing trends and patterns

    • Text for describing complex relationships

Specific Recommendations for PurH Data Presentation

For enzyme kinetics data:

  • Present Michaelis-Menten or Lineweaver-Burk plots to illustrate enzyme behavior

  • Include tables of kinetic parameters with statistical measures (standard errors, confidence intervals)

  • Use bar charts to compare kinetic parameters under different conditions

For protein purification results:

  • Show SDS-PAGE images with molecular weight markers to document protein purity

  • Present tables summarizing purification steps with yields and specific activity

  • Include chromatograms or elution profiles when relevant

Table 3: Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Presentation Methods for PurH Research

Presentation MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
TablesProvide precise numerical values; Allow exact comparisons; Present structured data efficiently May not visualize trends well; Can become cluttered with large datasets; Less impactful visually
FiguresEffectively visualize trends and patterns; Create visual impact; Allow "at-a-glance" understanding May sacrifice precision of exact values; Can oversimplify complex relationships; Require careful design to avoid misrepresentation
TextCan describe complex relationships; Provides context and interpretation; Connects findings to broader significance Less effective for presenting numerical data; Can become lengthy and dense; May obscure key findings in narrative

How does R. baltica PurH compare to PurH proteins in other organisms?

Understanding the evolutionary and functional relationships between R. baltica PurH and homologs in other organisms provides valuable context for research. While direct comparative data for R. baltica PurH specifically is limited, we can draw insights from related research on PurH proteins across different species.

Structural and Functional Diversity of PurH

The bifunctional nature of PurH shows interesting variations across different domains of life:

  • In most non-archaeal organisms, PurH exists as a bifunctional protein with fused AICAR formyltransferase (PurH1) and IMP cyclohydrolase (PurH2) domains

  • In archaea, there is variability in how the final step of purine biosynthesis is catalyzed:

    • Some archaea use a PurH2-type IMP cyclohydrolase that naturally occurs unfused to an AICAR formyltransferase domain

    • Others use PurO (the "euryarchaeal signature protein")

    • Some crenarchaea use an unidentified IMP cyclohydrolase

Kinetic Properties Comparison

Kinetic characterization of archaeal PurH2 variants provides a baseline for comparing enzyme efficiency:

  • Archaeoglobus fulgidus PurH2: Km = 7.8 ± 1.8 μM, kcat = 1.32 ± 0.14 s-1

  • Thermococcus kodakarensis PurO: Km = 1.56 ± 0.39 μM, kcat = 0.48 ± 0.04 s-1

These values represent the first characterization of an archaeal PurH2 that naturally occurs unfused to an AICAR formyltransferase domain, providing important comparative data for studying other PurH proteins including those from R. baltica .

Evolutionary Implications

The diversity of PurH forms across different organisms suggests multiple evolutionary solutions to the same enzymatic function. This has implications for understanding the evolution of purine biosynthesis pathways and the adaptation of these pathways to different ecological niches, such as the marine environment from which R. baltica was isolated .

Comparative genomic approaches can further enhance our understanding by identifying orthologous genes and their conservation across species, as well as analyzing G+C content (R. baltica has 53-57 mol% G+C) .

What factors should be considered when designing growth media for expressing recombinant R. baltica PurH?

Optimizing growth media for the expression of recombinant R. baltica PurH requires consideration of both the native environment of R. baltica and the specific requirements for protein expression. This careful optimization can significantly impact protein yield and activity.

Environmental Adaptations of R. baltica

R. baltica was isolated from marine environments, which influences its growth requirements:

  • Temperature considerations:

    • R. baltica strains have been isolated from environments with temperatures ranging from 5.2°C in the North Sea to 21.5°C in the Mediterranean Sea

    • This temperature range should inform expression conditions, even in heterologous systems

  • Salinity factors:

    • Salinity values at R. baltica sampling sites varied from 21 to 38.2 practical salinity units

    • R. baltica SH1T shows tolerance to this salinity range, suggesting ionic strength may affect protein folding and stability

Media Composition for Optimal Expression

When designing growth media for recombinant expression:

  • Carbon source selection:

    • R. baltica has been successfully grown in defined mineral medium with glucose as a sole carbon source

    • Transcriptional profiling during growth can help understand nutrient utilization patterns

  • Nutrient requirements:

    • Consider supplementing media with components that promote proper protein folding

    • Monitor growth phase-dependent expression, as R. baltica shows different gene expression patterns throughout its life cycle

  • Induction conditions:

    • Optimize induction timing based on growth phase, as R. baltica proteins may be differentially expressed during various growth stages

    • Consider temperature shifts during induction to mimic natural environmental conditions

Table 4: Considerations for Media Design Based on R. baltica's Native Environment

FactorNative ConditionsImplications for Expression
Temperature5.2-21.5°C range in natural habitats Consider lower expression temperatures; Test temperature ranges
Salinity21-38.2 practical salinity units Evaluate salt effects on protein folding; Adjust buffer ionic strength
Growth PhaseDifferent morphologies and gene expression patterns throughout life cycle Time induction to match native expression patterns; Monitor growth phases
Oxygen LevelsAerobic growth conditions Ensure sufficient aeration during expression; Consider oxygen limitation effects
pHMarine environment pHOptimize pH for enzyme stability and activity

How can proteome analysis techniques be applied to study R. baltica PurH in the context of the organism's metabolic network?

Proteome analysis techniques offer powerful approaches to study R. baltica PurH within its broader metabolic context. These methods can reveal protein-protein interactions, co-expression patterns, and functional relationships that are not evident from studying the isolated protein.

Comprehensive Proteome Mapping Strategies

Previous proteome studies of R. baltica have employed effective methodologies that can be applied to understand PurH's role:

  • Combined separation techniques:

    • Different pre-analytical protein separation methods (1-D and 2-DE, HPLC) prior to mass spectrometry

    • This approach identified 1,115 non-redundant proteins from intracellular and cell wall fractions

  • Functional categorization:

    • Identified proteins were classified into role categories according to Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs)

    • This classification helps place proteins like PurH in their functional context

  • Cellular localization prediction:

    • Bioinformatic tools can predict potential cellular locations of proteins

    • Absence of predictable signal peptides indicates localization in the intracellular compartment (pirellulosome)

Integrative Approaches for Metabolic Context

To understand PurH within R. baltica's metabolic network:

  • Compare experimental and theoretical proteomes:

    • Proteins that are abundant in 2-DE gels and have genes predicted to be highly expressed are often linked to housekeeping functions (including purine metabolism)

    • This comparison helps identify the relative importance of specific metabolic pathways

  • Analyze post-translational modifications:

    • Detection of proteins in multiple spots on 2-DE gels indicates post-translational modifications

    • These modifications may regulate enzyme activity or protein-protein interactions

  • Apply transcriptional profiling:

    • Monitor gene expression throughout growth curves using whole genome microarray approaches

    • This reveals co-expressed genes and helps understand metabolic shifts during different growth phases

  • Construct metabolic pathway maps:

    • Based on comprehensive proteome analysis, deduce global schemas of major metabolic pathways in growing R. baltica cells

    • Position PurH within these pathways to understand its metabolic context

By integrating these proteome analysis techniques, researchers can gain insights into how PurH functions within R. baltica's unique cellular architecture and metabolic network, potentially revealing regulatory mechanisms and metabolic interactions specific to this organism.

What are the technical challenges in expressing and purifying functional recombinant R. baltica PurH?

Expressing and purifying functional recombinant proteins from marine bacteria like R. baltica presents several technical challenges that researchers must address to obtain active enzymes for characterization and functional studies.

Expression Challenges

  • Codon usage optimization:

    • R. baltica may have different codon preferences compared to common expression hosts like E. coli

    • Codon optimization or use of strains with rare tRNAs may be necessary

  • Protein folding issues:

    • Marine organisms may have adapted protein folding to their environmental conditions

    • Expression at lower temperatures or in the presence of osmolytes might improve folding

  • Post-translational modifications:

    • R. baltica proteins may require specific post-translational modifications for activity

    • Some modifications might be absent in heterologous expression systems

Purification Challenges

  • Solubility concerns:

    • Recombinant proteins can form inclusion bodies requiring solubilization

    • Some proteins may need denaturation with agents like 6M guanidine-HCl or SDS

  • Maintaining activity:

    • Purification conditions may affect enzyme activity

    • Buffer composition, pH, and additives should be optimized to maintain function

  • Contamination with host proteins:

    • Host proteins with similar properties may co-purify with the target protein

    • Multiple purification steps may be necessary for high purity

Solutions from Previous Studies

Researchers have successfully addressed similar challenges using various strategies:

  • Isotachophoresis for purification:

    • This electrophoretic procedure has been effective for protein purification on a preparative scale

    • It achieves high yields (>80%) and purity levels (>95% for full-length protein)

  • Functional verification approaches:

    • Complementation assays in E. coli auxotrophs have confirmed function of recombinant proteins

    • For example, archaeal PurH2 allowed growth of E. coli purine auxotroph lacking the purH2 gene

  • Multi-step purification strategies:

    • Initial purification using affinity chromatography (e.g., Ni-NTA for His-tagged proteins)

    • Followed by isotachophoresis or other high-resolution separation techniques

Table 5: Troubleshooting Guide for R. baltica PurH Expression and Purification

ChallengePossible CausesPotential Solutions
Low expression levelsCodon bias; Toxicity to hostOptimize codons; Use regulated expression systems; Try different host strains
Inclusion body formationImproper folding; OverexpressionLower expression temperature; Co-express chaperones; Use solubility tags
Loss of activity during purificationDenaturation; Cofactor lossOptimize buffer conditions; Add stabilizing agents; Include cofactors in buffers
Impurities in final preparationSimilar properties to host proteinsImplement multi-step purification; Use isotachophoresis for final polishing
Heterogeneous protein populationProteolytic degradation; Incomplete translationAdd protease inhibitors; Optimize expression conditions; Purify full-length protein by isotachophoresis

How can researchers validate the functional activity of purified recombinant R. baltica PurH?

Validating the functional activity of purified recombinant R. baltica PurH requires a multi-faceted approach combining biochemical assays, structural characterization, and functional complementation. These methods provide comprehensive evidence of proper folding and catalytic competence.

Enzyme Activity Assays

  • Direct activity measurement:

    • Monitor the conversion of FAICAR to IMP using spectrophotometric methods

    • Determine kinetic parameters (Km, kcat) under various conditions to characterize enzyme efficiency

  • Coupled enzyme assays:

    • Link PurH activity to detectable reactions using auxiliary enzymes

    • This approach can increase sensitivity for detecting low activity levels

  • Product verification:

    • Confirm formation of IMP using chromatographic methods (HPLC) or mass spectrometry

    • Compare product formation to established standards

Structural Validation

  • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy:

    • Assess secondary structure elements to confirm proper folding

    • Compare spectra with known PurH proteins from other organisms

  • Size exclusion chromatography:

    • Verify oligomeric state and homogeneity of the purified protein

    • Detect aggregation or improper assembly that might affect function

  • Thermal shift assays:

    • Evaluate protein stability under different buffer conditions

    • Optimize stabilizing factors for long-term storage and functional studies

Functional Complementation

  • Genetic complementation:

    • Express R. baltica PurH in E. coli purine auxotrophs lacking purH

    • Assess growth restoration on purine-deficient media

  • In vitro reconstitution:

    • Combine purified R. baltica PurH with other enzymes in the purine biosynthesis pathway

    • Measure complete pathway functionality from upstream precursors to IMP

Table 6: Comprehensive Validation Strategy for R. baltica PurH Activity

Validation ApproachMethodologyExpected OutcomesAdvantages
Biochemical ActivitySpectrophotometric assays; HPLC analysisKinetic parameters (Km, kcat); Confirmation of IMP formation Direct evidence of catalytic activity; Quantitative assessment of enzyme efficiency
Structural IntegrityCD spectroscopy; Size exclusion chromatography; Thermal shift assaysSecondary structure profile; Oligomeric state confirmation; Stability parametersVerification of proper folding; Insight into protein stability; Detection of aggregation
Genetic ComplementationGrowth of E. coli purH auxotrophs expressing R. baltica PurHRestoration of growth on purine-deficient media In vivo validation of function; Assessment in cellular context
Pathway ReconstitutionCombined purified enzymes of purine pathwayComplete pathway functionalityEvaluation of protein in its metabolic context; Detection of substrate channeling

The combination of these validation approaches provides robust evidence for the functional activity of purified recombinant R. baltica PurH, ensuring reliable results in subsequent structural and functional studies.

How might the marine environment of R. baltica influence PurH structure and function?

The marine origin of R. baltica likely influences the structural and functional properties of its enzymes, including PurH. Adaptations to this environment may confer unique characteristics that distinguish R. baltica PurH from homologs in terrestrial organisms.

Environmental Adaptations

  • Temperature adaptations:

    • R. baltica strains have been isolated from environments with temperatures ranging from 5.2°C in the North Sea to 21.5°C in the Mediterranean Sea

    • These moderate temperatures may influence protein flexibility and thermostability

  • Salinity effects:

    • Marine environments have higher salt concentrations than freshwater

    • R. baltica exhibits salt resistance and can tolerate salinity values from 21 to 38.2 practical salinity units

    • This may lead to adaptations in protein surface charge distribution and ion interactions

  • Pressure considerations:

    • Marine bacteria experience different hydrostatic pressures depending on depth

    • Pressure adaptations might affect protein volume changes during catalysis

Potential Molecular Adaptations

At the molecular level, these environmental factors might influence PurH through:

  • Amino acid composition biases:

    • Marine enzymes often show preferences for certain amino acids to maintain solubility in high salt

    • Changes in surface residues may affect protein-solvent interactions

  • Structural flexibility:

    • Cold-adapted enzymes typically display increased flexibility in catalytic regions

    • This would be evident in lower activation energy requirements for catalysis

  • Cofactor binding adaptations:

    • Modified cofactor binding sites might compensate for altered availability or stability of cofactors in marine environments

  • Allosteric regulation:

    • Environmental sensing mechanisms may have evolved to regulate enzyme activity in response to changing marine conditions

    • This might be reflected in unique regulatory domains or interaction sites

The study of R. baltica PurH provides an opportunity to understand how purine biosynthesis enzymes have adapted to marine environments, potentially revealing novel structural and functional features that could inform biotechnological applications.

What data analysis workflow is recommended for processing proteomics data related to R. baltica PurH?

A robust data analysis workflow is essential for extracting meaningful insights from proteomics data related to R. baltica PurH. This workflow should integrate both basic data cleaning steps and advanced analytical techniques to ensure reliable results.

Proteomics-Specific Analysis Approaches

For proteomics data specifically related to R. baltica PurH:

  • Protein identification and validation:

    • Use database searching algorithms to identify proteins from mass spectrometry data

    • Apply statistical filters to control false discovery rates

    • Validate identifications using multiple peptides per protein

  • Quantitative analysis:

    • For relative quantification, use approaches like spectral counting or intensity-based methods

    • For absolute quantification, consider isotope-labeled standards

    • Compare protein abundance across different conditions or growth phases

  • Functional annotation:

    • Classify identified proteins into functional categories using COGs

    • Predict cellular locations using bioinformatic tools

    • Map proteins to metabolic pathways to understand functional context

  • Post-translational modification analysis:

    • Identify proteins present in multiple spots on 2-DE gels, indicating modifications

    • Characterize specific modifications using specialized mass spectrometry techniques

    • Assess the impact of modifications on protein function

Table 7: Integrated Data Analysis Workflow for R. baltica Proteomics

Analysis PhaseKey StepsTools/ApproachesExpected Outcomes
Data PreparationClean data; Check for completeness; Handle missing values Quality control scripts; Outlier detection algorithmsValidated dataset ready for analysis
Protein IdentificationDatabase searching; Peptide mapping; Statistical validation MALDI-MS; PMF algorithms; FDR control methodsConfident protein identifications
Quantitative AnalysisRelative/absolute quantification; Statistical comparisonsSpectral counting; Intensity-based methods; Statistical testsProtein abundance patterns across conditions
Functional ClassificationCategorize proteins; Predict localization; Map to pathways COG database; Signal peptide prediction; Pathway mapping toolsFunctional context of identified proteins
Integration & InterpretationConnect findings to biological questions; Develop hypothesesSystems biology approaches; Network analysisBiological insights and new research directions

By following this structured workflow, researchers can efficiently process proteomics data related to R. baltica PurH, ensuring robust results and meaningful biological insights.

How does the bifunctional nature of PurH affect experimental approaches to studying the enzyme?

The bifunctional nature of PurH, with its distinct AICAR formyltransferase (PurH1) and IMP cyclohydrolase (PurH2) domains, presents both challenges and opportunities for experimental investigation. Understanding these implications is crucial for designing effective research strategies.

Structural and Functional Complexity

  • Domain organization considerations:

    • The bifunctional nature means two distinct catalytic activities reside in a single polypeptide chain

    • This raises questions about interdomain communication and potential substrate channeling

    • Structural studies must account for domain orientation and interactions

  • Evolutionary context:

    • While most non-archaeal organisms use bifunctional PurH, some archaea utilize separate enzymes

    • Archaeoglobus fulgidus PurH2 represents a naturally occurring unfused IMP cyclohydrolase domain

    • Comparative studies can provide insights into the advantages of domain fusion versus separation

Experimental Design Adaptations

The bifunctional nature of PurH necessitates specific experimental approaches:

  • Domain-specific activity assays:

    • Design assays that can measure each activity independently

    • Consider the interdependence of the reactions in the native enzyme

  • Protein engineering strategies:

    • Express individual domains to study their independent functions

    • Create chimeric proteins with domains from different organisms to explore compatibility

    • Introduce mutations at domain interfaces to probe interdomain communication

  • Kinetic analysis complications:

    • The sequential nature of the reactions may create complex kinetic patterns

    • Product inhibition from one domain may affect the other domain's activity

    • Design experiments that can distinguish these effects

Table 8: Experimental Strategies for Studying Bifunctional Enzymes Like PurH

AspectChallengeExperimental ApproachExpected Insights
Domain-Specific ActivityIsolating individual catalytic functionsExpress separate domains; Use domain-specific substrates and inhibitors Independent catalytic parameters; Domain-specific inhibition profiles
Interdomain CommunicationUnderstanding how domains influence each otherSite-directed mutagenesis at domain interfaces; Chimeric protein constructionMechanisms of allosteric regulation; Structural requirements for activity
Substrate ChannelingDetermining if intermediates transfer between domainsIsotope tracing; Kinetic analysis of intermediate releaseEfficiency of coupled reactions; Channeling mechanisms
Evolutionary ImplicationsUnderstanding why some organisms use bifunctional vs. separate enzymesComparative biochemistry; Phylogenetic analysis Selective advantages of fusion; Evolutionary history of purine biosynthesis

By adapting experimental approaches to address the bifunctional nature of PurH, researchers can gain deeper insights into both the mechanistic details of this enzyme's function and the evolutionary factors that have shaped its structure.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.