Recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica Flavohemoprotein (hmp)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder

Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for customized fulfillment.

Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.

Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.

Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is crucial for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.

The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.

Synonyms
hmp; fhp; RB12262; Flavohemoprotein; Flavohemoglobin; Hemoglobin-like protein; Nitric oxide dioxygenase; NO oxygenase; NOD; EC 1.14.12.17
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-408
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhodopirellula baltica (strain DSM 10527 / NCIMB 13988 / SH1)
Target Names
hmp
Target Protein Sequence
MLSEKTIRIV KEITPLVAAN AETITRRFYE RMFEANPEVK AFFNQAHQHS GGQQKALAGA ICAYFTHIDN PAVLMPAVEL IAQKHVSLGI KPEHYPIVGS NLLAAIGDVM GDAATPEIVE AVSEAYGFLA DIFIGREGAI YEEQASMPGG WNGTRTFVVT KKVRESEIVT SFYLKPEDEG PLPPFKPGQY ITVHMDHPHT PTSPRNYSLS DCASQPHYRI SVKREERLVP DAPDGLISNH LHDGIEEGHR IELGPPCGEF TVDPATIAKP IVLIAGGIGV TPLLSMAKSI VHANPNAELH FIQAARNSKV HAFADELRRL AQAGPNVHTK VIYDSPLPGD VEEGKCDEAG FVTENQIRES TPFTDADFYF CGPKPFMKNV HSCLRELGVD EHRVRYEFFG PKEELVAV
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Rhodopirellula baltica and what makes it significant for protein expression studies?

Rhodopirellula baltica SH 1T is a marine member of the phylum Planctomycetes isolated from the Kiel Fjord in the Baltic Sea. It possesses several unique characteristics that make it valuable for research, including peptidoglycan-free proteinaceous cell walls, intracellular compartmentalization, and reproduction via budding that results in a life cycle with both motile and sessile morphotypes . The organism's genome contains many biotechnologically promising features, including unique sulfatases, carbohydrate-active enzymes, and a distinctive C1-metabolism pathway . These features, along with its ability to adapt to various environmental conditions, make R. baltica an interesting source for recombinant protein expression studies.

What culture conditions are optimal for growing R. baltica prior to protein extraction?

When designing culture conditions, it's important to note that supplementation with certain carbon sources like NAG can trigger biofilm formation in R. baltica, resulting in a decrease in culture optical density . This phenomenon should be considered when planning growth experiments for protein extraction.

Medium TypeCompositionGrowth CharacteristicsApplications
MM2 (Maintain Medium 2)Chemically defined, carbon-freeSurvival without growthControlled studies
MM2 + GlucoseMM2 with glucoseModerate growthMetabolic studies
MM2 + NAGMM2 with N-acetylglucosamineModerate growth, biofilm formationBiofilm studies
M2 medium brothComplex marine mediumOptimal growthBiomass production

What are flavohemoproteins and what functions do they typically serve in bacteria?

Flavohemoproteins (hmp) are bacterial proteins containing both flavin and heme domains. These proteins are widely distributed across bacterial species and typically serve several critical functions:

  • Detoxification of nitric oxide (NO) through dioxygenase activity

  • Oxygen sensing and signaling

  • Protection against nitrosative stress

  • Participation in redox reactions

The structure typically consists of a globin domain containing a b-type heme at the N-terminus and a flavin-binding reductase domain at the C-terminus. The reductase domain usually binds FAD (flavin adenine dinucleotide) and can utilize NAD(P)H as an electron donor. In the case of R. baltica, the flavohemoprotein would likely play roles in adaptation to varying oxygen levels and protection against nitrosative stress in the marine environment.

How does the life cycle of R. baltica affect protein expression patterns?

R. baltica exhibits a complex life cycle similar to Caulobacter crescentus, with distinct morphological stages that affect gene expression patterns . Transcriptomic analysis has revealed significant differences in gene expression throughout the growth cycle:

  • Early exponential phase (44h): Dominated by swarmer and budding cells with high expression of genes related to DNA replication, amino acid metabolism, and carbohydrate metabolism

  • Mid-exponential phase (62h): Decreased expression of metabolism-related genes

  • Transition phase (82h): Increased expression of stress response genes and cell wall-related genes

  • Stationary phase (96h+): Dominated by rosette formations with significant upregulation of genes for energy production, amino acid biosynthesis, signal transduction, stress response, and protein folding

When designing experiments to express and extract flavohemoprotein from R. baltica, researchers should consider these growth phase-specific expression patterns. The timing of harvest will significantly impact protein yield and potentially the post-translational modifications present in the target protein.

Growth PhaseCell MorphologyUpregulated Gene CategoriesDownregulated Gene Categories% Regulated Genes
Early Exponential (44h vs 62h)Swarmer and budding cellsDNA replication, Amino acid metabolism, Carbohydrate metabolism-2%
Mid-Exponential (62h)Mixed morphology-Oxidases, Peptidases, Lipases1%
Transition (82h vs 62h)Single cells, budding cells, rosettesGlutamate dehydrogenase, Stress response proteins-3%
Stationary (240h vs 82h)Mostly rosettesEnergy production, Amino acid biosynthesis, Stress response, Protein foldingCarbon metabolism, Translation control12%

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant R. baltica flavohemoprotein?

When expressing recombinant R. baltica flavohemoprotein, researchers should consider several factors to optimize production:

  • Host selection: E. coli is the most common heterologous host, but its cytoplasmic environment differs significantly from R. baltica. Consider using marine bacterial expression systems or salt-tolerant E. coli strains.

  • Codon optimization: R. baltica's GC content and codon usage may differ from standard expression hosts. Synthetic gene constructs with optimized codons can significantly improve expression.

  • Fusion partners: Adding solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO, TrxA) can improve protein folding and solubility. For flavohemoproteins, ensure that fusion partners do not interfere with heme or flavin incorporation.

  • Media supplementation: Add δ-aminolevulinic acid (0.5-1.0 mM) to enhance heme biosynthesis and riboflavin (10-20 μM) to improve flavin incorporation during expression.

  • Induction conditions: Lower temperatures (16-20°C) and longer induction times (overnight) often improve the folding of complex multi-domain proteins like flavohemoproteins.

The adaptation of R. baltica to salt conditions suggests that expression in the presence of NaCl (0.5-3% w/v) may help maintain proper protein folding and incorporation of cofactors .

What are the critical considerations for purifying functional flavohemoprotein from R. baltica?

Purification of functional R. baltica flavohemoprotein requires special attention to maintain the integrity of both the heme and flavin domains:

  • Buffer composition: Include salt (250-500 mM NaCl) to mimic the marine environment of R. baltica. Maintain pH between 7.0-8.0 to preserve both heme and flavin domains.

  • Reducing agents: Include mild reducing agents (1-5 mM β-mercaptoethanol or 0.5-1 mM DTT) to prevent oxidation of sensitive residues, but avoid stronger reducing agents that might affect the heme iron.

  • Chromatography sequence:

    • Initial capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins

    • Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography (typically Q-Sepharose at pH 8.0)

    • Polishing: Size exclusion chromatography to separate aggregates and ensure homogeneity

  • Spectroscopic monitoring: Monitor the heme:protein ratio by measuring the absorbance ratio (A410/A280) throughout purification. Well-incorporated heme typically gives a ratio of 1.0-1.5.

  • Storage conditions: Store purified protein with 10% glycerol at -80°C. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which can cause loss of heme and flavin cofactors.

Given that R. baltica proteins show different expression patterns under various growth conditions , assess protein stability and activity immediately after purification to ensure functional integrity.

What spectroscopic methods are most suitable for characterizing the heme and flavin domains of R. baltica flavohemoprotein?

Comprehensive characterization of R. baltica flavohemoprotein requires multiple spectroscopic approaches:

  • UV-Visible Spectroscopy:

    • Oxidized heme typically shows a Soret band at ~410 nm and Q bands at 530-570 nm

    • Reduced heme exhibits a shifted Soret band (~420 nm) and altered Q bands

    • Flavin domain shows characteristic peaks at 370-450 nm

    • Monitor ligand binding (NO, CO, O₂) through spectral shifts

  • Resonance Raman Spectroscopy:

    • Provides information about heme coordination state and protein interactions

    • Detects structural changes upon ligand binding

    • Identifies the spin and oxidation state of the heme iron

  • Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR):

    • Characterizes the electronic structure of the heme iron

    • Detects formation of radical species during catalysis

    • Provides information about the coordination environment

  • Circular Dichroism (CD):

    • Far-UV (190-250 nm): Secondary structure composition

    • Near-UV (250-320 nm): Tertiary structure around aromatic residues

    • Visible (350-600 nm): Heme and flavin environments

MethodInformation ObtainedTechnical ParametersSample Requirements
UV-VisibleRedox state, Ligand binding250-700 nm scan range, 1 nm resolution1-10 μM protein, 1 ml volume
Resonance RamanHeme coordination, Fe-ligand bondsExcitation at 413 nm, 10-20 mW power50-100 μM protein, 50 μl volume
EPRFe oxidation/spin stateX-band (9 GHz), 4-100K temperature100-200 μM protein, 200 μl volume
CDSecondary structure, Cofactor environment0.1 cm path length, N₂-purged chamber0.1-1.0 mg/ml protein, 200 μl volume

How can I design experiments to study the nitric oxide detoxification activity of R. baltica flavohemoprotein?

To investigate the NO detoxification function of R. baltica flavohemoprotein, design experiments that address both the enzymatic mechanism and the physiological relevance:

  • NO Consumption Assays:

    • Use an NO-specific electrode to directly measure NO consumption rates

    • Compare activity under aerobic vs. microaerobic conditions

    • Determine kinetic parameters (Km for NO typically 0.1-1.0 μM)

    • Test the effect of different electron donors (NADH vs. NADPH)

  • Product Analysis:

    • Quantify nitrate formation using ion chromatography or colorimetric methods

    • Determine the stoichiometry of NO:O₂ consumption (theoretical 1:1 ratio)

    • Use isotopically labeled NO (¹⁵NO) and analyze products by mass spectrometry

  • Electron Transfer Studies:

    • Monitor NAD(P)H oxidation at 340 nm concurrently with NO consumption

    • Calculate coupling efficiency between electron consumption and NO oxidation

    • Investigate the effect of flavin domain mutations on electron transfer rates

  • Physiological Relevance:

    • Compare activity at different salt concentrations to mimic marine conditions

    • Test activity at temperatures relevant to R. baltica's habitat (4-25°C)

    • Examine pH dependence across the range found in marine environments (pH 7.5-8.4)

Given R. baltica's adaptation to marine environments, particular attention should be paid to the salt dependence of flavohemoprotein activity, as high salt concentrations may affect protein-protein interactions and substrate binding.

What approaches can be used to study the structural dynamics of R. baltica flavohemoprotein?

Understanding the structural dynamics of R. baltica flavohemoprotein requires integrating multiple experimental approaches:

  • X-ray Crystallography:

    • Obtain structures of different functional states (apo, holo, substrate-bound)

    • Use micro-seeding techniques to improve crystal quality

    • Consider crystallization with stabilizing ligands (e.g., imidazole, CO)

    • Attempt time-resolved crystallography with NO or O₂ to capture reaction intermediates

  • Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Map solvent accessibility changes upon substrate binding

    • Identify flexible regions that may be involved in domain communication

    • Compare exchange rates in different functional states

    • Analyze the effect of salt concentration on protein dynamics

  • Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS):

    • Determine solution structure and conformational changes

    • Characterize domain arrangements in different states

    • Assess oligomerization state under varying conditions

    • Provide constraints for computational modeling

  • Single-Molecule FRET:

    • Engineer cysteine pairs for fluorophore attachment at domain interfaces

    • Monitor inter-domain distance changes during catalysis

    • Detect conformational heterogeneity in the protein population

    • Assess the effect of substrates on protein conformational dynamics

  • Molecular Dynamics Simulations:

    • Model protein behavior in explicit solvent with appropriate ion concentrations

    • Simulate gas diffusion pathways for NO and O₂

    • Identify conserved water networks and salt bridges

    • Predict the effect of marine conditions on protein flexibility

How can site-directed mutagenesis be applied to investigate critical residues in R. baltica flavohemoprotein?

Site-directed mutagenesis provides powerful insights into structure-function relationships in flavohemoproteins:

  • Key Residues to Target:

    • Proximal histidine: The heme iron coordinating residue (typically His) is essential for proper heme binding and reactivity

    • Distal pocket residues: Amino acids that stabilize bound ligands (typically Tyr, Gln, or Arg)

    • FAD-binding residues: Conserved motifs that anchor the flavin cofactor

    • Domain interface: Residues that facilitate electron transfer between domains

    • NADH-binding site: Residues involved in electron donor recognition

  • Mutation Design Strategy:

    • Conservative mutations: Replace with similarly sized residues to probe specific interactions (e.g., His→Asn, Tyr→Phe)

    • Charge alterations: Modify electrostatic interactions (e.g., Arg→Ala, Glu→Gln)

    • Size variations: Alter steric constraints (e.g., Val→Ile, Ala→Val)

    • Polarity changes: Modify hydrogen bonding networks (e.g., Ser→Ala, Thr→Val)

  • Functional Assays for Mutants:

    • Heme and flavin incorporation: Spectroscopic analysis of cofactor binding

    • NO dioxygenase activity: Measure activity changes in mutants

    • Electron transfer efficiency: Compare NADH oxidation rates

    • Ligand binding kinetics: Determine kon and koff rates for NO and O₂

    • Protein stability: Thermal denaturation studies to assess structural integrity

Target RegionResidue FunctionSuggested MutationsExpected EffectAssessment Method
Heme PocketFe coordinationHis→Ala, His→CysLoss of heme bindingUV-Vis spectroscopy
Distal PocketLigand stabilizationTyr→Phe, Gln→AsnAltered NO affinityStopped-flow kinetics
FAD BindingFlavin positioningSer→Ala, Arg→LysReduced FAD incorporationFluorescence
Domain InterfaceElectron transferAsp→Asn, Glu→GlnSlower catalysisSteady-state kinetics
NADH BindingCofactor specificityGly→Ala, Ser→ThrChanged NADH vs. NADPH preferenceActivity assays

How does the secondary metabolite production in R. baltica affect recombinant protein expression?

Rhodopirellula baltica is known to produce various secondary metabolites whose production can be influenced by different carbon sources and growth conditions . This metabolite production can significantly impact recombinant protein expression:

  • Carbon Source Effects:

    • When cultivated with glucose, R. baltica produces secondary metabolites resulting in distinct HPLC chromatogram peaks compared to growth with NAG

    • These metabolic differences likely reflect alterations in cellular physiology that may affect recombinant protein production

  • Growth Phase Considerations:

    • Secondary metabolite production changes significantly between growth phases

    • The transition from exponential to stationary phase shows the most dramatic shifts in metabolite profiles

    • Timing recombinant protein induction to specific growth phases can help manage interference from secondary metabolites

  • Antimicrobial Compounds:

    • R. baltica produces compounds with antimicrobial activity, as demonstrated by growth inhibition assays

    • These compounds could potentially affect the growth of expression hosts if they accumulate during recombinant protein production

  • Mitigation Strategies:

    • Use adsorption resins (e.g., XAD) in the culture medium to continuously remove potentially interfering secondary metabolites

    • Select carbon sources that minimize production of interfering compounds

    • Consider two-phase fermentation strategies to separate growth and protein production phases

The ability of R. baltica to produce diverse secondary metabolites under different conditions highlights the importance of carefully optimizing expression conditions when producing recombinant proteins from this organism.

What are the most promising applications for recombinant R. baltica flavohemoprotein in research?

Recombinant R. baltica flavohemoprotein offers several promising research applications:

  • Environmental Sensing Tools: The protein's ability to respond to NO and O₂ levels makes it valuable for developing biosensors for marine environmental monitoring.

  • Biocatalysis: The dual-domain nature with both oxidoreductase and NO dioxygenase activities offers potential for stereoselective biotransformations in pharmaceutical synthesis.

  • Stress Response Models: As a model for studying bacterial adaptation to nitrosative and oxidative stress in marine environments, particularly under changing ocean conditions.

  • Protein Engineering Platform: The unique properties of a flavohemoprotein from a marine Planctomycetes provide a novel starting point for protein engineering to develop enzymes with enhanced stability in high-salt conditions.

  • Structural Biology: The study of domain communication between heme and flavin domains contributes to our understanding of complex multi-domain proteins and allostery.

These applications leverage the unique properties of R. baltica as a marine Planctomycetes with distinctive cellular features and potential for producing bioactive compounds .

What future research directions should be prioritized for R. baltica flavohemoprotein studies?

Several key research directions would significantly advance our understanding of R. baltica flavohemoprotein:

  • Ecological Role Investigation: Determine how the flavohemoprotein contributes to R. baltica's adaptation to diverse marine environments and its role in the organism's unique life cycle.

  • Comparative Analysis: Conduct systematic comparisons with flavohemoproteins from other marine bacteria to identify adaptations specific to the Planctomycetes phylum.

  • In vivo Studies: Develop genetic tools for R. baltica to enable gene knockout and complementation studies to determine the physiological role of flavohemoprotein.

  • Structural Determination: Resolve high-resolution structures in different functional states to understand the conformational changes during catalysis.

  • Salt Adaptation Mechanisms: Investigate how the protein maintains structure and function under marine salt conditions, potentially identifying novel stabilization strategies.

  • Biotechnological Applications: Explore the potential of R. baltica flavohemoprotein for applications in bioremediation of NO-contaminated environments or as biocatalysts in pharmaceutical synthesis.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.