Recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica Ribosomal protein S6 modification protein (rimK)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for custom preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs unless dry ice is specifically requested. Advance notice is required for dry ice shipments, and additional fees will apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may serve as a useful reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
The tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rimK; RB7299; Probable alpha-L-glutamate ligase; EC 6.3.2.-
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-405
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhodopirellula baltica (strain DSM 10527 / NCIMB 13988 / SH1)
Target Names
rimK
Target Protein Sequence
MKLAILSCSP RCYSTRRLVE AAEQRGIKAK VLNTLKFAID LAEGEPDLYY RSKQLSDYDG VLPRIGASIT YFGTAVVRQF EQMDVFCANS SAGISNSRDK LRSLQILSRH QIGIPKTTFV RDRKDILPAI ERVGGSPVII KLLEGTQGVG VILAENVKVA EAIIETLQST KQNVLVQQFV AESRGKDIRA FVIGDRVVAA MRRVAVGNEF RSNVHRGGQT EAVVLDETYA ETAVRAAQIM GLRVAGVDML EGTNGPQVME VNSSPGLEGI ESATKLDIAG AIIDYMSAQV DFPEVDVRQR LTVSRGYGVT ELHVRDGSDY VGKTIDESGL PELDINVLTL YRGTTVIPNP RLKRTLEPHD RLLCFGKLEA MRGMVPEKVR KQRRPKIKRL PDSAATIHAE SSRDD
Uniprot No.

Q&A

What is Rhodopirellula baltica and why is it significant as a model organism?

Rhodopirellula baltica is a marine bacterium belonging to the phylum Planctomycetes, originally isolated from the water column in the Kiel Fjord (Baltic Sea). This organism has gained significance in scientific research due to several unique biological characteristics. R. baltica exhibits peptidoglycan-free proteinaceous cell walls, intracellular compartmentalization, and reproduces via budding—creating a distinct life cycle with both motile and sessile morphotypes similar to Caulobacter crescentus .

The organism's genome sequencing has revealed significant biotechnological potential, including numerous sulfatases, carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes), and a distinctive C1-metabolism pathway. Approximately half of its genes currently lack assigned functions, indicating substantial untapped genetic potential . Additionally, R. baltica demonstrates salt resistance and the ability to maintain a sessile lifestyle—both valuable traits for potential biotechnological applications .

Its life cycle involves cellular morphology changes from swarmer cells to sessile cells with holdfast substances, making it an excellent model for studying cellular differentiation and adaptation mechanisms in marine environments .

What are the optimal storage conditions for preserving rimK protein stability?

The stability and shelf life of recombinant rimK protein depend on multiple factors including storage state, buffer ingredients, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein itself. Based on empirical data, the following storage guidelines should be followed:

For liquid formulations:

  • Store at -20°C to -80°C

  • Expected shelf life: approximately 6 months

  • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week

For lyophilized formulations:

  • Store at -20°C to -80°C

  • Expected shelf life: approximately 12 months

The addition of glycerol as a cryoprotectant is recommended, typically at a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard default). This helps prevent protein degradation during freeze-thaw cycles and extends the functional shelf life of the preparation .

What is the recommended reconstitution protocol for lyophilized rimK protein?

For optimal reconstitution of lyophilized rimK protein, the following methodological approach is recommended:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial containing lyophilized protein to ensure all contents settle at the bottom

  • Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to achieve a final concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the standard recommendation)

  • Aliquot the reconstituted protein into smaller volumes to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

  • Store aliquots at -20°C to -80°C for long-term preservation

This reconstitution protocol helps maintain protein integrity and functionality while minimizing degradation. The addition of glycerol serves as a cryoprotectant that prevents ice crystal formation during freezing, thus protecting the protein's structural integrity .

How does gene expression of rimK vary throughout the Rhodopirellula baltica life cycle?

The expression patterns of genes in R. baltica, including rimK, vary significantly throughout its life cycle in response to environmental conditions and morphological changes. Transcriptional profiling using whole genome microarray analysis has revealed distinctive gene expression patterns corresponding to different growth phases.

Gene regulation in R. baltica follows this general pattern across its growth curve:

Growth Phase ComparisonNumber of Regulated GenesGenes Encoding Hypothetical Proteins
62h vs. 44h (early-log to mid-log)149 (2%)84 (56%)
82h vs. 62h (mid-log to late-log)90 (1%)40 (44%)
96h vs. 82h (late-log to early stationary)235 (3%)139 (59%)
240h vs. 82h (late-log to late stationary)863 (12%)499 (58%)

During exponential growth phases (early-log to late-log), relatively few genes (maximum 2% of total genes) show differential regulation, reflecting the stable and favorable nutritional conditions. As cultures transition to stationary phase, significantly more genes become differentially regulated in response to nutrient depletion and increased cell density .

For rimK specifically, researchers should examine its expression pattern in the context of these growth phases, particularly noting whether it follows the general pattern of minimal regulation during exponential growth or shows significant regulation during transition to stationary phase. This expression pattern may provide insights into rimK's role in cellular adaptation to changing environmental conditions and potential involvement in morphological differentiation between swarmer cells, budding cells, and rosette formations .

What experimental design approaches are recommended for studying rimK function in Rhodopirellula baltica?

When designing experiments to investigate rimK function in R. baltica, researchers should implement a comprehensive approach that accounts for the organism's unique life cycle and morphological changes. The following experimental design framework is recommended:

  • Experimental Objective Definition:

    • Clearly define research questions regarding rimK function

    • Determine specific hypotheses about rimK's role in ribosomal protein modification

    • Identify potential interactions with other cellular processes

  • Design Construction:

    • Determine appropriate replication levels based on expected variability

    • Implement proper randomization to minimize bias

    • Consider blocked designs to control for batch effects or environmental variations

  • Execution Plan:

    • Develop protocols for consistent culture conditions across experiments

    • Establish standardized sampling timepoints corresponding to different life cycle stages

    • Include controls for morphotype variations (swarmer cells, budding cells, rosettes)

  • Model Selection:

    • Choose appropriate statistical models based on experimental questions

    • Consider mixed models when incorporating multiple factors

    • Implement response surface methodology if optimizing conditions for rimK activity

  • Analysis Approach:

    • Apply appropriate statistical methods for data interpretation

    • Utilize R statistical software for reproducible analysis

    • Consider multivariate approaches when examining rimK within broader cellular contexts

For experiments specifically targeting rimK function across morphotypes, a split-plot design may be particularly valuable, as it allows for efficient investigation of multiple factors while controlling for batch effects . Additionally, researchers should consider mixture experiments when studying rimK interactions with other proteins or substrates, as these designs efficiently explore combinatorial spaces .

How can researchers differentiate between rimK roles in different morphotypes of Rhodopirellula baltica?

Differentiating the specific roles of rimK across the different morphotypes of R. baltica (swarmer cells, budding cells, and rosette formations) presents a methodological challenge that requires an integrated experimental approach:

  • Morphotype Isolation and Characterization:

    • Implement density gradient centrifugation to separate morphotypes

    • Use microscopic examination to confirm morphotype purity

    • Characterize each morphotype based on motility, cell structure, and attachment properties

  • Transcriptional Profiling Across Morphotypes:

    • Apply whole genome microarray analysis to compare rimK expression across isolated morphotypes

    • Perform quantitative PCR validation of expression levels

    • Conduct time-course experiments to track expression changes during morphotype transitions

  • Protein Localization Studies:

    • Develop fluorescent protein fusion constructs with rimK

    • Implement immunolocalization techniques with morphotype-specific markers

    • Utilize confocal microscopy for subcellular localization analysis

  • Functional Assays:

    • Develop in vitro assays for rimK activity using recombinant protein

    • Compare substrate specificity and kinetic parameters across conditions mimicking different morphotypes

    • Analyze post-translational modifications of ribosomal protein S6 in different morphotypes

  • Genetic Manipulation Approaches:

    • Generate conditional knockdown or overexpression systems for rimK

    • Assess morphotype-specific phenotypes resulting from altered rimK expression

    • Implement complementation studies to confirm phenotype specificity

When analyzing experimental data, it's crucial to account for the fact that R. baltica cultures cannot be perfectly synchronized . Therefore, statistical approaches should incorporate mixed models that account for the heterogeneity of morphotypes present at any given time point. Researchers should also consider the temporal dynamics of morphotype transitions when interpreting results, as rimK may play different roles during transition states versus stable morphotypes.

What methodological approaches can detect interactions between rimK and other cellular components?

Detecting and characterizing interactions between rimK and other cellular components in R. baltica requires a multi-faceted methodological approach:

  • Protein-Protein Interaction Studies:

    • Implement bacterial two-hybrid systems adapted for marine organisms

    • Conduct co-immunoprecipitation experiments followed by mass spectrometry

    • Perform proximity labeling approaches such as BioID or APEX to identify proximity partners in vivo

    • Utilize surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry for quantitative interaction analysis

  • Functional Genomics Approaches:

    • Conduct correlation analysis of gene expression patterns throughout growth phases

    • Identify genes with similar expression profiles to rimK using clustering algorithms

    • Apply network analysis to position rimK within cellular pathways

  • Structural Biology Methods:

    • Determine the three-dimensional structure of rimK using X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM

    • Perform in silico docking studies to predict potential interaction partners

    • Implement hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify binding interfaces

  • High-Throughput Screening:

    • Develop reporter systems to monitor rimK activity or interactions

    • Screen chemical libraries for modulators of rimK function

    • Implement genetic screens to identify genetic modifiers of rimK phenotypes

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Combine transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to create comprehensive interaction maps

    • Apply machine learning approaches to predict functional interactions

    • Develop mathematical models of rimK within cellular pathways

The experimental design should carefully consider the growth conditions and life cycle stage of R. baltica, as interactions may be dynamic and dependent on morphotype . Additionally, researchers should be aware that approximately half of R. baltica genes lack assigned functions , meaning that uncharacterized proteins identified as interaction partners will require further investigation to determine their roles.

What are the potential biotechnological applications of Rhodopirellula baltica rimK?

Rhodopirellula baltica rimK presents several promising avenues for biotechnological exploitation, particularly given the organism's unique biological properties and genetic potential:

  • Enzyme Engineering Applications:

    • Development of modified rimK variants with enhanced substrate specificity

    • Creation of chimeric enzymes combining rimK domains with other functional modules

    • Optimization of rimK for industrial-scale protein modification processes

  • Protein Modification Systems:

    • Utilization of rimK for site-specific modification of recombinant proteins

    • Development of novel post-translational modification tools for protein engineering

    • Creation of customized ribosomal protein modifications for structural biology applications

  • Marine Biotechnology Integration:

    • Application of rimK in marine-derived protein production systems

    • Development of salt-resistant protein modification processes

    • Integration with other marine enzymes for novel biotransformation pathways

  • Immobilization Technology:

    • Exploitation of R. baltica's sessile lifestyle characteristics for immobilized enzyme systems

    • Development of rimK-containing biocatalytic surfaces

    • Creation of self-immobilizing enzyme systems based on R. baltica holdfast mechanisms

  • Bioinformatic Tool Development:

    • Utilization of rimK sequence and structural information for prediction algorithms

    • Development of search tools for identifying related protein modification enzymes

    • Creation of databases focused on ribosomal protein modification systems

For researchers pursuing these applications, it's crucial to note that R. baltica exhibits salt resistance and can form biofilms through its sessile lifestyle . These properties may be particularly valuable when developing immobilized enzyme systems or processes requiring resistance to high salt concentrations, which are common in industrial settings. Furthermore, the fact that rimK belongs to a model organism with a unique life cycle provides opportunities for expression system development that leverages natural regulation mechanisms .

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing rimK experimental data?

When analyzing experimental data related to Rhodopirellula baltica rimK, researchers should implement robust statistical approaches that account for the organism's unique biological characteristics and experimental constraints:

  • Growth Curve Analysis:

    • Implement nonlinear mixed-effects models to account for biological variability

    • Apply time-series analysis methods for expression data across growth phases

    • Use changepoint detection algorithms to identify significant transitions in rimK expression

  • Differential Expression Analysis:

    • Apply appropriate normalization methods for transcriptomic data

    • Implement multiple testing correction to control false discovery rates

    • Consider batch effect correction methods when combining data from multiple experiments

  • Experimental Design Statistics:

    • Utilize power analysis to determine appropriate sample sizes

    • Implement response surface methodology for optimization experiments

    • Apply split-plot analysis for experiments with multiple hard-to-change factors

  • Morphotype Comparison Methods:

    • Develop classification algorithms for automated morphotype identification

    • Implement multivariate methods to analyze differences between morphotypes

    • Apply clustering algorithms to identify patterns in morphotype-specific data

  • R-based Implementation:

    • Utilize specialized R packages for experimental design and analysis

    • Implement reproducible analysis workflows with R Markdown

    • Develop custom functions for R. baltica-specific analyses

When designing experiments, researchers should be particularly mindful of the inability to perfectly synchronize R. baltica cultures . This limitation necessitates statistical approaches that can account for heterogeneous cell populations. Mixed-effects models are particularly valuable in this context, as they can accommodate the nested structure of the data (measurements within time points within experimental runs) while accounting for both fixed effects (e.g., temperature, media composition) and random effects (e.g., batch-to-batch variability) .

How can researchers optimize protein expression conditions for recombinant rimK production?

Optimizing protein expression conditions for recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica rimK requires a systematic approach that considers both the unique properties of the protein and the expression system being utilized:

  • Expression System Selection:

    • Evaluate prokaryotic (E. coli, Pseudomonas) versus eukaryotic (yeast) expression systems

    • Consider marine expression hosts for maintaining native protein folding

    • Assess the advantages of cell-free expression systems for difficult-to-express proteins

  • Optimization Design Strategy:

    • Implement factorial designs to screen multiple parameters simultaneously

    • Apply response surface methodology (RSM) for fine-tuning expression conditions

    • Utilize blocked response surface (BRS) designs to control for batch effects

  • Key Parameters for Optimization:

    • Temperature: Test gradient from 15°C to 37°C to balance growth rate and protein folding

    • Induction timing: Optimize based on growth phase monitoring

    • Inducer concentration: Implement gradient designs to determine optimal levels

    • Media composition: Test marine-mimicking media versus standard expression media

    • Salt concentration: Evaluate the effect of varying salt levels on protein yield and activity

  • Protein Solubility Enhancement:

    • Test co-expression with molecular chaperones

    • Evaluate fusion tags beyond standard purification tags

    • Implement directed evolution approaches to enhance solubility

  • Purification Strategy Optimization:

    • Develop custom buffer systems based on rimK stability profile

    • Optimize the concentration of glycerol for storage (5-50% range)

    • Implement quality control measures to ensure >85% purity by SDS-PAGE

When optimizing expression conditions, researchers should consider implementing a sequential experimental design approach. This would begin with fractional factorial designs to identify significant factors, followed by response surface methodology to optimize these factors, and finally confirmation runs to validate the optimized conditions . This approach minimizes the number of experiments required while maximizing the information gained.

For analytical validation of the optimized conditions, a combination of SDS-PAGE for purity assessment, activity assays for functional validation, and mass spectrometry for structural verification is recommended .

How should researchers address contradictory data when studying rimK function?

When researchers encounter contradictory data while studying Rhodopirellula baltica rimK function, a systematic approach to resolving these contradictions is essential:

  • Contradiction Characterization:

    • Clearly define the nature and extent of the contradictory results

    • Determine whether contradictions are qualitative or quantitative

    • Assess whether contradictions occur at the level of data, analysis, or interpretation

  • Methodological Validation:

    • Re-examine experimental designs for potential confounding variables

    • Verify that appropriate controls were implemented in all experiments

    • Confirm that statistical analyses were correctly applied and interpreted

  • Biological Variability Assessment:

    • Consider R. baltica's complex life cycle as a potential source of variability

    • Evaluate whether contradictions correlate with different morphotypes

    • Assess whether growth conditions were consistent across experiments

  • Reconciliation Strategies:

    • Design bridging experiments specifically targeting contradictory results

    • Implement orthogonal methodologies to validate key findings

    • Consider meta-analysis approaches when multiple datasets are available

  • Contextual Integration:

    • Evaluate contradictions in the broader context of Planctomycetes biology

    • Consider evolutionary conservation of rimK function across related species

    • Assess whether contradictions might represent genuine biological complexity rather than experimental error

When addressing contradictions specifically related to rimK expression or function across different growth phases, researchers should carefully consider that approximately 1-12% of R. baltica genes show differential regulation depending on the growth phase comparison . This natural biological variability necessitates robust experimental designs with sufficient replication and careful timing of sample collection.

Additionally, the high proportion of hypothetical proteins among regulated genes (44-59%) suggests that rimK may interact with proteins of unknown function, potentially contributing to seemingly contradictory results when these interactions are not accounted for in experimental design or data interpretation.

What are the current knowledge gaps in understanding rimK function in Rhodopirellula baltica?

Despite significant advances in our understanding of Rhodopirellula baltica biology, several important knowledge gaps remain regarding rimK function:

  • Functional Characterization:

    • The precise substrate specificity of rimK in R. baltica remains incompletely characterized

    • The kinetic parameters and reaction mechanisms require further elucidation

    • The three-dimensional structure has not been fully determined, limiting structure-function analyses

  • Regulatory Networks:

    • The transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of rimK expression remains poorly understood

    • Environmental signals that modulate rimK activity have not been systematically identified

    • Integration of rimK function within broader cellular pathways requires further investigation

  • Morphotype-Specific Functions:

    • The potentially distinct roles of rimK in different cell morphotypes (swarmer, budding, rosette) need clarification

    • The contribution of rimK to morphotype transitions remains speculative

    • The subcellular localization of rimK protein across different morphotypes is unknown

  • Evolutionary Context:

    • The evolutionary conservation and divergence of rimK function across the Planctomycetes phylum lacks comprehensive analysis

    • The potential acquisition of unique functions in the R. baltica lineage has not been fully explored

    • Comparative analyses with related proteins in other bacterial phyla remain limited

  • Biotechnological Applications:

    • The full spectrum of potential applications for rimK in protein engineering requires systematic evaluation

    • Optimization parameters for industrial-scale application have not been established

    • The compatibility of rimK with existing biotechnological platforms needs assessment

Addressing these knowledge gaps will require integrated experimental approaches combining molecular biology, biochemistry, structural biology, and systems biology. Particular attention should be paid to the unique characteristics of R. baltica, including its complex life cycle, marine habitat adaptation, and the high proportion of hypothetical proteins in its genome . These factors may contribute to novel and unexpected functions of rimK that extend beyond conventional ribosomal protein modification activities.

What resources and techniques should researchers prioritize when beginning work with rimK?

Researchers initiating studies on Rhodopirellula baltica rimK should prioritize the following resources and techniques to establish a strong foundation for their investigations:

  • Recombinant Protein Resources:

    • Access to high-quality recombinant rimK protein (>85% purity by SDS-PAGE)

    • Proper storage protocols to maintain protein stability (-20°C to -80°C with appropriate glycerol concentration)

    • Standardized reconstitution methods to ensure consistent experimental conditions

  • Experimental Design Expertise:

    • Familiarization with factorial and response surface design principles for optimization experiments

    • Implementation of appropriate statistical power calculations for sample size determination

    • Development of robust randomization and blocking strategies to control for confounding variables

  • R. baltica Culture Methods:

    • Mastery of growth conditions that support the organism's complete life cycle

    • Microscopic examination techniques to monitor morphotype distributions

    • Understanding of sampling strategies appropriate for different growth phases

  • Analytical Techniques:

    • Protein characterization methods (mass spectrometry, circular dichroism, activity assays)

    • Transcriptional analysis approaches (qPCR, RNA-seq) for expression studies

    • Imaging technologies for morphotype characterization and protein localization

  • Computational Resources:

    • R statistical environment for experimental design and data analysis

    • Bioinformatic tools for sequence analysis and comparative genomics

    • Structural prediction software for protein modeling

New researchers should be particularly mindful of R. baltica's complex biology, including its multiple morphotypes and the inability to perfectly synchronize cultures . These characteristics necessitate careful experimental design and appropriate statistical methods to account for population heterogeneity.

Additionally, researchers should leverage the fact that R. baltica is considered a model organism for the Planctomycetes phylum , which means there is a growing body of knowledge and techniques specifically adapted for this organism. Collaboration with established research groups in this field can provide valuable insights and access to specialized resources that may not be widely available.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.