Recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica S-adenosylmethionine synthase (metK)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is essential for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us; we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
metK; RB5444S-adenosylmethionine synthase; AdoMet synthase; EC 2.5.1.6; MAT; Methionine adenosyltransferase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-395
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rhodopirellula baltica (strain DSM 10527 / NCIMB 13988 / SH1)
Target Names
metK
Target Protein Sequence
MSNESGRFLF TSESVSMGHP DKLADRISDS ILDALLAQDP HSRVACETLV TTGLAVIAGE ISSKADVDYE KIVRDTIVAV GYDDPDIGID GKTCEVQIRL DAQSPDIAQG VNSDEASGKD IGAGDQGLMF GYACKDTPEL MPLPIALSHR IINRITEARF NKEVDWLRPD NKSQVTVEYD GNRPVRIEAV VVSAQHGPDV SHDEIEKFVI ENVVKPSIPA ELDKGDIKYH INPTGKFIIG GPHGDCGLTG RKIIVDTYGG WGRHGGGAFS GKDSTKVDRS AAYMARYVAK NIVAAGLAER CEVQLAYAIG VTEPVSVHVD TEGTGKIEDA KLCELIREHF PLTPGGIIDH LQLRRPVFVE TTAGGHFGRD GEGFTWEKTD KADALAEAAG ATATA
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This recombinant Rhodopirellula baltica S-adenosylmethionine synthase (MetK) catalyzes the formation of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) from methionine and ATP. This synthesis involves two sequential steps: AdoMet formation followed by tripolyphosphate hydrolysis, which precedes AdoMet release from the enzyme.
Database Links

KEGG: rba:RB5444

STRING: 243090.RB5444

Protein Families
AdoMet synthase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Rhodopirellula baltica and why is its MetK enzyme of research interest?

Rhodopirellula baltica is a marine halotolerant Planctomycete with unusual cell structures, including intracellular membrane-enclosed nucleoids (pirellulosomes). This organism has ecological importance in marine environments, particularly in association with marine macroalgae where it forms epiphytic communities . The MetK enzyme (S-adenosylmethionine synthase) is of particular interest because it synthesizes S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), a major methyl donor critical for numerous cellular processes . R. baltica's unique cellular compartmentalization and marine adaptations make its MetK an interesting target for comparative studies of metabolic compartmentalization in bacteria with complex cellular structures.

What is the genomic context of the metK gene in R. baltica?

The metK gene in R. baltica is part of its completely sequenced genome. R. baltica possesses a complete set of genes for the synthesis of complex organic molecules with potential applications in pharmaceutical fields, including vitamin and amino acid biosynthesis pathways . While the specific genomic context of metK is not directly described in the available literature, the genome annotation has revealed that R. baltica has numerous genes involved in central metabolism, including those necessary for energy production that would support SAM synthesis . Gene expression studies using whole genome microarrays have provided insights into how R. baltica's genes are regulated during different growth phases, which likely includes regulation of the metK gene depending on cellular methylation demands .

What expression systems are most effective for producing recombinant R. baltica MetK?

For expressing recombinant R. baltica MetK, E. coli-based expression systems typically offer the best balance of yield and convenience. The BL21(DE3) strain or its derivatives are recommended starting points due to their reduced protease activity. When designing the expression construct, consider that R. baltica grows optimally in marine conditions, so its codon usage might differ from E. coli. Codon optimization of the metK gene sequence for E. coli expression can significantly improve protein yields. Expression vectors with the T7 promoter system under IPTG control (such as pET series vectors) have proven effective for expressing recombinant proteins from marine organisms. Additionally, consider adding purification tags (His6, GST, or MBP) to facilitate downstream purification processes while ensuring the tag doesn't interfere with enzyme activity.

What specialized purification techniques should be considered for R. baltica MetK?

Purification of recombinant R. baltica MetK requires careful consideration of the protein's properties. A typical purification protocol would include:

  • Initial capture using affinity chromatography (if tagged) or ion exchange chromatography

  • Intermediate purification via hydrophobic interaction chromatography

  • Polishing step using size exclusion chromatography

Consider that R. baltica is a marine organism adapted to elevated salt concentrations, so its MetK might demonstrate enhanced stability in buffers containing 300-500 mM NaCl . During purification, maintain temperatures between 4-10°C to minimize proteolytic degradation. Additionally, include ATP, methionine, or Mg²⁺ in purification buffers to stabilize the enzyme's active site. Monitor enzyme activity throughout purification to ensure the active conformation is maintained.

What are the common challenges in heterologous expression of R. baltica MetK and how can they be addressed?

Common challenges include:

ChallengeSolution Approach
Protein insolubilityLower induction temperature (16-20°C); co-express with chaperones; use solubility-enhancing fusion tags (MBP, SUMO)
Low expression levelsOptimize codon usage; test different E. coli strains; optimize induction parameters (IPTG concentration, duration)
Improper foldingInclude osmolytes in growth medium; optimize cell lysis conditions; add stabilizing cofactors
Proteolytic degradationAdd protease inhibitors; use protease-deficient expression strains; optimize purification speed
Loss of activityInclude SAM pathway metabolites in buffers; maintain reducing environment with DTT or β-mercaptoethanol

R. baltica proteins often have unique structural features adapted to marine environments, which may affect heterologous expression . Consider expression trials incorporating marine-mimicking conditions (elevated salt, specific pH) to improve proper folding and stability.

What are the optimal conditions for measuring R. baltica MetK enzymatic activity?

Optimal assay conditions for R. baltica MetK activity typically include:

  • Buffer composition: 100 mM Tris-HCl or HEPES buffer (pH 7.5-8.0)

  • Salt concentration: 200-400 mM NaCl (reflecting marine environment adaptation)

  • Required cofactors: 5-10 mM MgCl₂ (essential for ATP binding)

  • Substrates: ATP (1-2 mM) and methionine (1-5 mM)

  • Temperature: 25-30°C (reflecting R. baltica's mesophilic nature)

  • Reducing agents: 1-5 mM DTT or β-mercaptoethanol to maintain cysteine residues in reduced state

Activity can be measured by several methods:

  • Coupled enzyme assays monitoring phosphate release

  • HPLC-based detection of SAM formation

  • Radioactive assays using labeled substrates

  • Spectrophotometric methods tracking consumption of ATP

Consider that R. baltica's natural marine environment may influence its enzyme kinetics, potentially requiring higher salt concentrations for optimal activity compared to terrestrial bacterial MetK enzymes.

How does the life cycle of R. baltica affect MetK expression and activity?

R. baltica exhibits a complex life cycle with distinct morphological states, including motile swarmer cells and sessile cells that form rosettes . Gene expression studies have shown that R. baltica differentially regulates numerous genes throughout its growth phases . While specific data on MetK regulation is not directly reported in the search results, it's reasonable to hypothesize that:

To investigate these patterns, researchers should design time-course experiments using qRT-PCR or proteomics approaches targeting MetK expression across growth phases. Correlating MetK activity with growth stages would provide insights into how this enzyme's function is integrated into R. baltica's complex life cycle.

How do sodium concentration and other environmental factors affect R. baltica MetK activity?

As a marine organism, R. baltica is adapted to sodium-rich environments and possesses numerous sodium-dependent transporters and metabolic systems . This adaptation likely extends to its MetK enzyme's function. Key environmental factors affecting R. baltica MetK activity include:

Environmental FactorExpected Effect on MetK Activity
Sodium concentrationEnhanced activity at 300-500 mM Na⁺; possible Na⁺-dependent structural stabilization
pHOptimal activity likely in slightly alkaline range (pH 7.5-8.2) reflecting marine conditions
TemperatureMaximum activity around 28-30°C with significant activity retained at lower temperatures
Oxygen availabilityAs an aerobic organism, R. baltica's MetK likely functions optimally under aerobic conditions
Nutrient limitationPossible regulatory effects on MetK expression during nitrogen or carbon limitation

R. baltica possesses numerous sodium-dependent systems, including Na⁺-translocating NADH:quinone dehydrogenase, Na⁺ efflux decarboxylase, and Na⁺-translocating F-type ATPases . This suggests that its central metabolic enzymes, including MetK, may have evolved to function optimally in sodium-rich environments. Investigating the specific effects of varying sodium concentrations on MetK activity would provide valuable insights into the enzyme's adaptation to marine conditions.

How does R. baltica MetK compare to similar enzymes in other Planctomycetes and marine bacteria?

R. baltica MetK likely shares core catalytic mechanisms with other bacterial MetK enzymes but may possess unique adaptations reflecting its marine planctomycete lifestyle. Comparative analysis should focus on:

  • Sequence homology: R. baltica MetK likely shows highest sequence similarity to other Planctomycetes, with more divergence from proteobacterial homologs. The unique evolutionary position of Planctomycetes suggests potential distinctive features in their MetK sequences.

  • Salt adaptation: Compared to terrestrial bacteria, R. baltica MetK would be expected to have surface amino acid compositions favoring function in elevated salt conditions, potentially with more acidic residues on the protein surface to maintain solubility in marine environments .

  • Structural compartmentalization: R. baltica's complex cellular organization with membrane-enclosed compartments raises questions about the localization and potential compartment-specific adaptations of its MetK enzyme .

  • Regulatory elements: The regulation of metK in R. baltica might differ from other bacteria, potentially influenced by its unique life cycle transitions between motile and sessile states .

Genomic context analysis of metK across diverse Planctomycetes could reveal conserved gene neighborhoods that might indicate functional associations specific to this phylum. Additionally, examining whether R. baltica possesses multiple metK paralogs (as seen with some of its other genes like dnaA ) would provide insights into potential functional specialization.

What unique structural features might R. baltica MetK possess due to its marine adaptation?

R. baltica's adaptation to marine environments likely influences its MetK structure in several ways:

  • Halophilic adaptations: Likely includes an increased proportion of acidic residues on the protein surface, reduced hydrophobic surface area, and increased negative surface charge to maintain solubility and activity in elevated salt concentrations .

  • Amino acid composition: R. baltica proteins often display unusual compositions rich in cysteine and proline, with unique planctomycete-specific motifs . These features may be present in its MetK, potentially contributing to unique structural stability.

  • Cofactor binding: The binding sites for ATP, methionine, and magnesium might feature adaptations that optimize function in fluctuating marine salt concentrations, potentially with more flexible binding pockets.

  • Oligomerization interfaces: If R. baltica MetK forms dimers or tetramers (common for MetK enzymes), the interfaces might feature salt-bridge networks optimized for stability in marine conditions.

  • Conformational flexibility: May possess regions of enhanced flexibility to accommodate changes in cellular osmolarity that would be encountered in marine environments.

Structural biology approaches including X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM would be valuable for identifying these unique features, complemented by molecular dynamics simulations to understand how structure responds to varying salt concentrations.

How can R. baltica MetK be used as a model for studying enzyme adaptation to marine environments?

R. baltica MetK provides an excellent model system for studying marine enzyme adaptation for several reasons:

  • Comparative biochemistry: By characterizing kinetic parameters (kcat, KM) of R. baltica MetK across varying salt concentrations and comparing with terrestrial homologs, researchers can quantify the degree of marine adaptation.

  • Structure-function relationships: Solving the crystal structure of R. baltica MetK would allow identification of specific adaptive features that can then be validated through site-directed mutagenesis.

  • Evolutionary biology: As Planctomycetes represent a distinct bacterial lineage with unique cellular features, R. baltica MetK offers insights into how conserved metabolic enzymes adapt to both phylogenetic constraints and environmental pressures.

  • Marine biotechnology applications: Understanding salt adaptation in R. baltica MetK could inform engineering of other enzymes for enhanced function in high-salt conditions.

Experimental approaches should include:

  • Parallel characterization of MetK from R. baltica and terrestrial bacteria across salt gradients

  • Chimeric enzyme construction swapping domains between marine and terrestrial MetK homologs

  • Directed evolution experiments to identify critical residues for salt tolerance

  • In silico modeling of ion interactions with the enzyme surface

These studies would contribute to our broader understanding of how essential metabolic enzymes adapt to extreme or specialized environments.

What role might MetK play in R. baltica's complex life cycle and morphological transitions?

R. baltica undergoes a complex life cycle with transitions between motile swarmer cells and sessile rosette-forming cells . The role of MetK in these transitions remains unexplored but several hypotheses can be proposed:

  • Methylation-dependent regulation: SAM produced by MetK serves as the primary methyl donor for methylation of DNA, RNA, proteins, and small molecules, potentially regulating gene expression during life cycle transitions.

  • Cell wall modification: R. baltica has a proteinaceous cell wall rather than peptidoglycan , and methylation could play a role in modifying cell wall proteins during the transition from motile to sessile states.

  • Biofilm formation: In the sessile state, R. baltica produces holdfast material . Methylation reactions might be involved in the synthesis or modification of extracellular polymeric substances in biofilms.

  • Signaling: SAM-dependent methylation could modify signaling molecules that coordinate population-level behaviors during growth phase transitions.

A comprehensive experimental approach to investigate these hypotheses would include:

  • Temporal transcriptomics and proteomics to track MetK expression throughout the life cycle

  • MetK inhibition studies to observe effects on morphological transitions

  • Fluorescent tagging to track MetK localization during different growth phases

  • Metabolomic analysis to measure SAM levels during life cycle transitions

These studies would provide insights into how this fundamental metabolic enzyme might be integrated into complex bacterial developmental processes.

What methodological approaches are most effective for studying potential interactions between R. baltica MetK and sRNAs?

The search results indicate that in Sinorhizobium meliloti, MetK was identified as a binding partner of three sRNAs . While this interaction hasn't been specifically demonstrated in R. baltica, similar regulatory mechanisms might exist. To investigate potential MetK-sRNA interactions in R. baltica:

  • Computational prediction:

    • Use RNA interaction prediction tools to identify potential binding sites between R. baltica MetK mRNA and known R. baltica sRNAs

    • Compare R. baltica MetK mRNA structure with those from bacteria where sRNA interactions have been confirmed

  • Experimental validation:

    • RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to detect direct binding between MetK mRNA and candidate sRNAs

    • RNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (RIP-seq) to identify sRNAs associated with MetK mRNA in vivo

    • Fluorescence in situ hybridization to visualize co-localization of MetK mRNA and candidate sRNAs

  • Functional characterization:

    • Construct sRNA deletion mutants and measure effects on MetK expression levels

    • Design reporter constructs with MetK 5' UTR fused to reporter genes to monitor sRNA-dependent regulation

    • Perform ribosome profiling to assess translational effects of sRNA interactions with MetK mRNA

  • Physiological relevance:

    • Test how environmental stressors affect these interactions

    • Determine how these interactions change throughout R. baltica's life cycle

This multi-faceted approach would provide comprehensive insights into potential post-transcriptional regulation of MetK by sRNAs in R. baltica, potentially revealing novel regulatory mechanisms in Planctomycetes.

How should researchers address apparent contradictions in R. baltica MetK experimental data?

When encountering contradictory data regarding R. baltica MetK, researchers should systematically:

  • Assess methodological differences:

    • Compare protein preparation methods (tags, purification protocols)

    • Evaluate buffer compositions and assay conditions

    • Review enzyme storage conditions and age of preparations

    • Examine experimental temperature, pH, and salt concentrations

  • Consider biological variables:

    • Growth phase differences in source material

    • Potential post-translational modifications

    • Presence of isoforms or paralogs

    • Effects of R. baltica's complex life cycle on protein properties

  • Statistical approaches:

    • Conduct meta-analysis of available data

    • Perform power analysis to ensure adequate sampling

    • Use statistical methods appropriate for multivariate analysis

    • Consider Bayesian approaches to integrate prior knowledge

  • Experimental resolution strategies:

    • Design experiments specifically targeting contradictory findings

    • Obtain the enzyme through multiple expression systems

    • Perform side-by-side comparisons under identical conditions

    • Consider collaborative cross-validation between laboratories

When publishing, transparently report all experimental conditions, acknowledge limitations, and directly address contradictions with previous literature. This rigorous approach ensures advancement of knowledge despite initial data discrepancies.

What are appropriate controls when studying the effects of environmental conditions on R. baltica MetK activity?

When investigating environmental effects on R. baltica MetK activity, comprehensive controls should include:

Control TypeDescriptionPurpose
Positive enzyme controlWell-characterized MetK from model organism (E. coli)Validates assay functionality
Negative controlsReaction mixtures lacking ATP, methionine, or enzymeEstablishes baseline and identifies non-specific activity
Buffer controlsIdentical reactions in different buffers without variable factorIdentifies buffer-specific effects
Stability controlsEnzyme pre-incubated under test conditions before activity measurementDistinguishes between activity effects and stability effects
Species comparisonParallel testing of MetK from terrestrial bacteriaConfirms marine-specific adaptations
Time course controlsActivity measurements at multiple time pointsEnsures linearity and identifies time-dependent effects
Specificity controlsAlternative substrates or inhibitorsConfirms mechanism and specificity

Additionally, include controls for:

  • Salt type effects (NaCl vs. KCl) to distinguish specific ion effects

  • Osmolarity effects (using non-ionic osmolytes) to separate ionic from osmotic effects

  • Temperature-dependent effects across physiologically relevant ranges

These comprehensive controls help distinguish direct environmental effects on MetK catalysis from indirect effects on protein stability or substrate binding, enabling more accurate interpretation of R. baltica's enzymatic adaptations to marine environments.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.