RcACBP mimics the native protein’s ability to:
Transport Acyl-CoA Esters: Facilitates the movement of long-chain acyl-CoAs (C16–C20) between subcellular compartments (e.g., ER, mitochondria) .
Regulate Enzyme Activity: Modulates enzymes like glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase and lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase by buffering acyl-CoA pools .
Stress Response: Interacts with transcription factors (e.g., AREB1, RAP2.12) to mediate abiotic stress signaling .
Recombinant RcACBP exhibits differential affinities for acyl-CoA esters, as inferred from homologs:
| Acyl-CoA Species | Binding Affinity (Kd, μM) | Citation |
|---|---|---|
| C18:1-CoA | ~2–5 | |
| C16:0-CoA | ~10–20 | |
| C12:0-CoA | ~17 (cooperative binding) |
RcACBP has potential in:
Lipid Engineering: Enhancing oilseed crops’ fatty acid profiles by optimizing acyl-CoA trafficking .
Stress Tolerance: Engineering plants with RcACBP overexpression to improve drought or salinity resistance .
Pharmaceuticals: As a scaffold for designing acyl-CoA mimetics to target metabolic disorders .
Recombinant RcACBP is typically produced via bacterial systems (e.g., E. coli BL21(DE3)) with a His-tag for affinity chromatography . Purification involves:
Cloning: PCR amplification of ACBP coding sequences with flanking restriction sites (e.g., SacII/NotI) .
Induction: IPTG-mediated expression at 16°C for soluble protein production .
Chromatography: Ni-NTA followed by size-exclusion chromatography .
What are Acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) and what is their function in Ricinus communis?
Acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) are a family of proteins characterized by their ability to bind acyl-CoA esters with high specificity and affinity. They contain a conserved acyl-CoA-binding (ACB) domain that facilitates this binding. In plants including Ricinus communis (castor bean), ACBPs play crucial roles in lipid metabolism, transport, and signaling pathways.
Plant ACBPs generally participate in intracellular transport of acyl-CoA esters, protection of acyl-CoA esters from hydrolysis, regulation of lipid biosynthesis and metabolism, responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, and lipid trafficking between different cellular compartments . Based on studies in other plants like Arabidopsis and rice, we can infer that Ricinus communis ACBPs likely play important roles in castor oil biosynthesis, which is rich in ricinoleic acid, a unique fatty acid that constitutes approximately 90% of castor oil.
How are recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs produced and purified?
Recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs can be produced using bacterial expression systems, most commonly Escherichia coli. Commercially available recombinant Ricinus communis Acyl CoA Binding protein is expressed in E. coli with purity >90% and supplied in PBS buffer (pH 7.4) with 50% glycerol .
A general methodology for producing recombinant plant ACBPs involves:
Cloning the ACBP gene from Ricinus communis cDNA into a suitable expression vector
Adding a tag (commonly polyHis-tag) to facilitate purification
Transforming the construct into E. coli expression strains (e.g., BL21(DE3))
Inducing protein expression with IPTG
Lysing cells and purifying the recombinant protein using affinity chromatography
Further purification using ion-exchange chromatography or gel filtration
For instance, researchers have successfully produced and purified a recombinant polyHis-tagged N-terminal fragment of a related lipid-binding protein from Brassica napus, which could serve as a methodological reference for Ricinus communis ACBP production .
What are the structural characteristics of Ricinus communis ACBPs?
Plant ACBPs are typically classified into four classes based on their domain architecture:
Class I: Small ACBPs (10 kDa) containing only the ACB domain
Class II: Ankyrin-repeat containing ACBPs with the ACB domain and ankyrin repeats
Class III: Large ACBPs with the ACB domain and other domains
Class IV: Kelch-motif containing ACBPs with the ACB domain and kelch motifs
The core ACB domain is highly conserved and forms a binding pocket for acyl-CoA. Recombinant N-terminal fragments of plant acyltransferases like DGAT1 can bind acyl-CoA and potentially self-associate to form dimers and tetramers . Similar properties might exist for Ricinus communis ACBPs, especially if they function in multiprotein complexes involved in lipid metabolism.
Studies of recombinant plant ACBPs have shown that the ACB domain contains approximately 90 amino acids and forms a four-α-helix bundle structure that creates a binding site for the acyl-CoA molecule . The binding pocket accommodates both the adenine nucleotide and the fatty acyl chain of the acyl-CoA molecule.
What is the subcellular localization of Ricinus communis ACBPs?
Different ACBP classes typically show distinct subcellular localizations that correspond to their functional roles in lipid metabolism. Based on information about ACBPs from other plant species, particularly rice (Oryza sativa), we can infer potential localizations for Ricinus communis ACBPs:
In rice, the subcellular localization of OsACBPs has been determined through GFP fusion proteins:
OsACBP1 and OsACBP2: cytosol
OsACBP3: multi-localization
OsACBP4 and OsACBP5: endoplasmic reticulum (ER)
The localization of Ricinus communis ACBPs would need to be experimentally determined using similar methods: fusion with GFP and observation via confocal microscopy in transient expression systems. This subcellular distribution likely reflects the involvement of different ACBP isoforms in specific aspects of lipid metabolism and trafficking that occur in distinct cellular compartments.
How do Ricinus communis ACBPs compare to ACBPs from other plant species?
Plant ACBP family composition shows similarities across species:
Arabidopsis thaliana: Six ACBPs (AtACBP1-6)
Ricinus communis likely has a similar number of ACBP genes
Phylogenetic analyses using 16 plant genomes have shown that:
The ACBP family diversified as land plants evolved
Classes I and IV show lineage-specific gene expansion
Functional comparisons indicate that:
Rice ACBPs show ubiquitous expression with OsACBP4, OsACBP5, and OsACBP6 being stress-responsive
Plant ACBPs generally have roles in lipid metabolism, transport, and stress responses
Ricinus communis ACBPs might have specialized functions related to castor oil biosynthesis, particularly in handling ricinoleic acid
Binding preferences differ between plant species and within ACBP families:
Different ACBPs have varying affinities for different acyl-CoA chain lengths
Rice and Arabidopsis ACBPs bind acyl-CoA esters of various chain lengths with different specificities
What are the specific binding affinities of Ricinus communis ACBPs for different acyl-CoA esters?
While specific binding affinities for Ricinus communis ACBPs have not been extensively characterized, insights from other plant ACBPs provide valuable reference points:
Recombinant ACBPs from Arabidopsis and rice bind acyl-CoA esters with varying affinities:
AtACBP1 and AtACBP3 displayed high affinity to very-long-chain (VLC) species
AtACBP3 to AtACBP6 and OsACBPs bind medium-chain species
All AtACBPs and OsACBPs bind long-chain acyl-CoA esters at different affinities
The N-terminal fragment of BnDGAT1 (a lipid metabolism enzyme) binds acyl-CoAs in a cooperative fashion, with different affinities for different acyl-CoAs:
Greater affinity for erucoyl-CoA (22:1cis Δ13) than oleoyl-CoA (18:1cis Δ9)
Dissociation constants of about 17 μM for oleoyl-CoA and 2 μM for erucoyl-CoA
To determine binding affinities for Ricinus communis ACBPs, researchers could use:
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) as used for other plant ACBPs
Scatchard plot analysis to determine dissociation constants and investigate potential cooperative binding
These experiments should test binding with various acyl-CoAs relevant to castor bean metabolism, particularly ricinoleoyl-CoA, which is important in castor oil biosynthesis.
How can I optimize expression systems for producing functional recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs?
Several strategies can be employed to optimize recombinant ACBP production:
Expression vector selection:
pET vectors for T7-driven expression in E. coli
pGEX vectors for GST-fusion proteins
Consider codon optimization for E. coli expression
Expression host optimization:
E. coli BL21(DE3) or derivatives like Rosetta for rare codon usage
For membrane-associated ACBPs, consider specialized E. coli strains
Induction conditions:
Test various IPTG concentrations (0.1-1.0 mM)
Lower temperature induction (16-25°C) to improve folding
Extended induction times (overnight) at lower temperatures
Solubility enhancement:
Addition of solubility tags (MBP, SUMO, TRX)
Co-expression with chaperones
For hydrophobic ACBPs, addition of mild detergents or lipids
Purification optimization:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins
Ion exchange chromatography as a second purification step
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing
Functional assessment:
Acyl-CoA binding assays (Lipidex-1000 or ITC)
Circular dichroism to confirm proper folding
Thermal shift assays to assess stability
A recombinant N-terminal fragment of BnDGAT1 was successfully produced as a His-tagged protein and retained acyl-CoA binding functionality, providing a methodological template .
What role do Ricinus communis ACBPs play in lipid metabolism and castor oil biosynthesis?
Potential roles of Ricinus communis ACBPs in castor oil biosynthesis include:
Acyl-CoA transport and protection:
Binding and transport of acyl-CoA esters between different cellular compartments
Protection of acyl-CoA from hydrolysis, maintaining an active acyl-CoA pool
Regulation of fatty acid biosynthesis:
Potential interaction with fatty acid synthase (FAS) and fatty acid elongation (FAE) complexes
Regulation of feedback inhibition by maintaining appropriate acyl-CoA concentrations
Potential role in ricinoleic acid metabolism:
Binding and transporting ricinoleoyl-CoA, the activated form of the predominant fatty acid in castor oil
Potential interaction with oleate Δ12-hydroxylase (FAH12), which converts oleic acid to ricinoleic acid
Interaction with acyltransferases:
Acyl-CoA binding proteins might modulate acyltransferase activity
Potential interaction with DGAT and PDAT enzymes involved in triacylglycerol assembly
Compartmentalization of lipid metabolism:
Different ACBPs localize to different subcellular compartments
This might facilitate coordination of lipid metabolism between organelles
Experimental approaches to investigate these roles could include gene expression analysis in developing castor bean seeds, protein-protein interaction studies, genetic manipulation of Ricinus communis ACBPs, and lipidomic analysis of transgenic lines.
How do environmental stresses affect the expression and function of Ricinus communis ACBPs?
Plant ACBPs generally play roles in stress responses:
Plant ACBPs have roles in both abiotic and biotic stress responses
They interact with lipids and proteins in these stress response pathways
In rice, certain ACBP isoforms showed stress-responsive expression:
OsACBP4, OsACBP5, and OsACBP6 were identified as stress-responsive
The multidomain rice ACBPs appear to be associated with stress responses
Based on this information, Ricinus communis ACBPs might be regulated by various stresses such as drought, temperature extremes, salt stress, pathogen attack, and oxidative stress.
To investigate stress effects on Ricinus communis ACBPs:
Gene expression analysis:
qRT-PCR to measure ACBP transcript levels under various stress conditions
RNA-seq to examine global transcriptional changes including ACBPs
Protein analysis:
Western blotting to quantify ACBP protein levels
Post-translational modification analysis under stress
Functional studies:
Metabolite profiling to detect changes in lipid composition
Overexpression/silencing studies under stress conditions
Comparative analysis:
Compare stress responses of different ACBP isoforms
Correlation between stress responses and subcellular localization
What methods can be used to study the protein-protein interactions of Ricinus communis ACBPs?
Several techniques can be employed to study protein-protein interactions of Ricinus communis ACBPs:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Generate antibodies against Ricinus communis ACBPs
Immunoprecipitate ACBPs from plant extracts and identify interacting proteins by mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening:
Use Ricinus communis ACBPs as bait proteins
Screen against a cDNA library from castor bean, particularly from developing seeds
Verify interactions with directed Y2H assays
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC):
Fuse ACBPs to one half of a split fluorescent protein
Fuse potential interacting proteins to the complementary half
Transient expression in plant cells and visualization via confocal microscopy
Pull-down assays:
Express recombinant tagged ACBPs (as in commercial preparations)
Incubate with plant extracts and isolate complexes via affinity purification
Identify binding partners via mass spectrometry
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified ACBPs on sensor chips
Flow potential interacting proteins over the surface
Measure binding kinetics and affinities
Crosslinking studies:
Similar to approaches showing that BnDGAT1 fragments self-associated to form a tetramer
Use chemical crosslinkers to stabilize protein complexes
Analyze via SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry
These approaches would help identify proteins that interact with Ricinus communis ACBPs, potentially revealing their roles in lipid metabolism networks and stress response pathways.
How can recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs be used to study lipid trafficking mechanisms?
Recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs can serve as valuable tools for studying lipid trafficking:
In vitro lipid binding assays:
Using purified recombinant ACBPs to measure binding affinities for different lipid species
Similar to approaches showing that recombinant ACBPs bind not only acyl-CoA but also phospholipids like PC, PA, and PE
Fluorescent lipid trafficking:
Labeling lipids with fluorescent tags
Using recombinant ACBPs to track lipid movement in artificial membrane systems
Comparing trafficking efficiency with different ACBP isoforms
Reconstitution experiments:
Incorporating recombinant ACBPs into liposomes or artificial membrane systems
Measuring rates of lipid transfer between membrane compartments
Determining the effects of acyl chain length and saturation on transfer rates
Competitive binding studies:
Using recombinant ACBPs to compete with native lipid transfer systems
Identifying specific lipid species preferentially trafficked by different ACBP isoforms
Structure-function analysis:
Creating mutant variants of recombinant ACBPs
Testing how specific amino acid changes affect lipid binding and transfer
Correlating structural features with lipid trafficking capabilities
Interaction with membrane systems:
Studying how recombinant ACBPs interact with lipid bilayers
Determining whether ACBPs extract lipids from membranes or dock at membrane surfaces
Investigating potential membrane fusion or remodeling activities
Plant ACBPs are involved in nonvesicular lipid transport mechanisms , and recombinant Ricinus communis ACBPs could help elucidate these pathways, particularly those related to castor oil biosynthesis.
What are the crystallization conditions for structural studies of Ricinus communis ACBPs?
While specific crystallization conditions for Ricinus communis ACBPs are not yet reported, strategies can be developed based on successful crystallization of related plant lipid-binding proteins:
Initial screening approaches:
Commercial sparse matrix screens (Hampton Research, Molecular Dimensions)
Varying pH (5.0-9.0), precipitants (PEG, ammonium sulfate), and salt concentrations
Testing at different temperatures (4°C and 20°C)
Protein preparation considerations:
High purity (>95%) recombinant protein
Concentration range: 5-15 mg/mL
Buffer optimization to enhance stability (potentially PBS buffer with glycerol)
Consider removal of His-tag if it interferes with crystallization
Optimization strategies:
Seeding from initial microcrystals
Additive screening
Surface entropy reduction through mutation of surface residues
Co-crystallization with acyl-CoA ligands to stabilize protein conformation
Data collection considerations:
In-house X-ray source for initial screening
Synchrotron radiation for high-resolution data collection
Cryoprotection optimization to prevent ice formation
The successful crystallization of a recombinant polyHis-tagged N-terminal fragment of DGAT1 from Brassica napus indicates that plant lipid-binding proteins can be crystallized, suggesting Ricinus communis ACBPs might be amenable to similar approaches.
How do post-translational modifications affect Ricinus communis ACBP function?
Potential post-translational modifications (PTMs) that might affect Ricinus communis ACBP function include:
Phosphorylation:
Could regulate binding affinity for acyl-CoA
Might affect protein-protein interactions
Could regulate subcellular localization
Redox modifications:
Oxidation of cysteine residues might affect protein structure and function
Could serve as a mechanism for sensing oxidative stress
May regulate oligomerization (relating to self-association of lipid-binding proteins)
Ubiquitination:
Regulation of protein turnover
Potential non-degradative signaling roles
Might affect protein interactions and localization
Glycosylation:
Potentially affecting protein stability
Might influence interaction with membranes
Could affect protein trafficking
To study these PTMs in Ricinus communis ACBPs, researchers could:
Use mass spectrometry to identify PTMs in native ACBPs
Create site-directed mutants to mimic or prevent specific modifications
Test the functional consequences on acyl-CoA binding using methods like those established for other lipid-binding proteins
Examine conditions that induce or remove PTMs, particularly in stress responses
Compare PTM patterns across different developmental stages, particularly during seed development when castor oil biosynthesis is active
What are the best experimental approaches to study the physiological roles of different Ricinus communis ACBP isoforms?
Several complementary experimental approaches can be employed:
Gene expression analysis:
Quantitative RT-PCR to analyze expression patterns of different ACBP isoforms
RNA-seq to examine co-expression networks
In situ hybridization to determine tissue-specific expression
Similar to approaches used for rice ACBPs under normal growth and stress conditions
Protein localization:
GFP fusion constructs to determine subcellular localization
Immunolocalization with isoform-specific antibodies
Genetic manipulation:
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to create knockout mutants
RNAi to silence specific isoforms
Overexpression studies
Complementation of mutants with specific isoforms
Biochemical characterization:
Recombinant protein production for each isoform
In vitro binding assays to determine substrate preferences
Similar to approaches used to study acyl-CoA binding properties of other plant proteins
Physiological analysis:
Phenotypic characterization of mutants/transgenic plants
Lipid profiling to detect alterations in lipid composition
Stress response assays, relating to known roles of plant ACBPs in stress responses
Protein interaction studies:
Yeast two-hybrid or co-immunoprecipitation to identify interacting partners
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) to confirm interactions in planta
Functional complementation:
Cross-species complementation (e.g., expressing Ricinus communis ACBPs in Arabidopsis acbp mutants)
Similar to expressing OsACBP6 in the Arabidopsis pxa1 mutant
These approaches, particularly when used in combination, would provide comprehensive insights into the physiological roles of different Ricinus communis ACBP isoforms.
How can I design experiments to investigate the role of Ricinus communis ACBPs in stress response pathways?
Based on the known roles of plant ACBPs in abiotic and biotic stress responses and evidence for stress-responsive expression of rice ACBPs , several experimental approaches can be designed:
Expression analysis under stress conditions:
Expose Ricinus communis plants to various stresses (drought, salt, cold, heat, pathogens)
Monitor expression changes of different ACBP isoforms using qRT-PCR
Perform time-course experiments to track dynamic responses
Compare expression in different tissues to identify tissue-specific stress responses
Transgenic approaches:
Generate ACBP overexpression lines in Ricinus communis
Create RNAi or CRISPR knockout lines for specific ACBPs
Evaluate stress tolerance phenotypes
Analyze changes in stress-responsive marker genes
Protein-level responses:
Develop isoform-specific antibodies to track protein levels under stress
Analyze post-translational modifications in response to stress
Examine changes in subcellular localization during stress
Metabolite analysis:
Lipidomic profiling under stress conditions in wild-type and ACBP-modified plants
Analysis of stress-related metabolites (e.g., jasmonates, salicylic acid)
Investigation of membrane lipid remodeling during stress
Protein interaction studies:
Identify stress-specific protein interactions using techniques like:
Co-immunoprecipitation under stress conditions
Yeast two-hybrid screening with stress-induced cDNA libraries
Bimolecular fluorescence complementation in stressed cells
Comparative genomics:
Compare stress responses of Ricinus communis ACBPs with those of other plants
Identify conserved stress-responsive elements in ACBP promoters
Functional complementation: