Recombinant Rickettsia felis 50S ribosomal protein L11 (rplK)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
rplK; RF_1150; 50S ribosomal protein L11
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-145
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Rickettsia felis (strain ATCC VR-1525 / URRWXCal2) (Rickettsia azadi)
Target Names
rplK
Target Protein Sequence
MSQKAIKGYI NLIIPAGGAT PAPPIGPALG QRKVNIKTFC DEFNNSTKDT EKGVPLPTLI TVYEDSSFSF KIKTPPASYF LKKYARITKG SSATKKEAVV GKVTMDDCRE IAKLKMPDLN TKDIEAATKI ICGSAASIGL EVVGN
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
This protein is a component of the ribosomal stalk, facilitating ribosome interaction with GTP-bound translation factors.
Database Links

KEGG: rfe:RF_1150

STRING: 315456.RF_1150

Protein Families
Universal ribosomal protein uL11 family

Q&A

What is the 50S ribosomal protein L11 (rplK) in Rickettsia felis and what is its function?

The 50S ribosomal protein L11 (rplK) is a critical component of the bacterial ribosome, specifically forming part of the ribosomal stalk which facilitates interactions between the ribosome and GTP-bound translation factors . In Rickettsia species, this protein belongs to the universal ribosomal protein uL11 family and plays an essential role in protein synthesis by contributing to the structure and function of the ribosomal complex . The protein's conservation across bacterial species makes it a significant target for both fundamental research and potential diagnostic applications. Though specific data for R. felis rplK is limited in the provided sources, related Rickettsia species like R. rickettsii have L11 proteins of approximately 145 amino acids with a molecular mass of around 15.4 kDa .

How does Rickettsia felis rplK compare structurally to other Rickettsia species?

While the search results don't provide direct comparative data for R. felis rplK specifically, ribosomal proteins are generally highly conserved among closely related bacterial species. Based on data from R. rickettsii, we can infer that R. felis rplK likely has a similar structure and amino acid sequence . The universal ribosomal protein uL11 family, to which rplK belongs, shows conservation in structure and function across bacterial species, though species-specific variations do exist. These variations may be important for understanding species-specific biological characteristics and developing targeted diagnostic tools. Researchers interested in detailed structural comparisons would need to align sequences from different Rickettsia species and perform structural prediction analyses to identify conserved domains and variable regions.

What detection methods are currently used for identifying Rickettsia felis in research settings?

Current detection methods for R. felis include conventional PCR, real-time PCR, and more sensitive reverse transcription real-time PCR (RT-rtPCR) assays. A particularly effective approach targets the 23S ribosomal RNA, which has demonstrated a 100-fold higher analytical sensitivity for Rickettsia detection compared to assays targeting single-copy genes like the 50S ribosomal protein L16 gene . A duplex RT-rtPCR assay has been developed that targets 23S rRNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the specific detection and discrimination of R. felis and R. typhi in clinical specimens . Quantitative real-time PCR assays have also been utilized to measure R. felis load in fleas, detecting a mean of 3.9×10^6 R. felis 17-kDa gene copies per flea during active feeding .

What are the optimal expression systems for producing functionally active recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK?

For recombinant expression of R. felis rplK, researchers should consider several expression systems with their respective advantages and limitations. E. coli-based expression systems remain the most widely used for bacterial proteins due to their rapid growth, high yields, and ease of genetic manipulation. When expressing R. felis rplK in E. coli, codon optimization may be necessary due to potential codon usage bias between Rickettsia and E. coli. For functional studies requiring post-translational modifications, eukaryotic expression systems such as yeast or insect cells might be more appropriate. The choice of affinity tags (His-tag, GST, MBP) should be carefully considered based on the intended downstream applications, as they can affect protein folding, solubility, and functionality. Optimization of expression conditions including temperature (typically lower temperatures of 16-25°C promote proper folding), induction parameters, and media composition is critical for maximizing yield of soluble, properly folded recombinant rplK.

How can researchers optimize purification protocols for recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK to ensure structural integrity?

Purification of recombinant R. felis rplK requires a strategic approach to maintain protein integrity while achieving high purity. Based on general practices for ribosomal proteins, a multi-step purification process is recommended, beginning with an affinity chromatography step utilizing the fusion tag (e.g., His-tag captured by Ni-NTA resin). Buffer conditions should be optimized to include appropriate salt concentrations (typically 150-300 mM NaCl) to reduce non-specific interactions while maintaining protein solubility. The addition of reducing agents such as DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-5 mM) helps prevent oxidation of cysteine residues. Following initial capture, researchers should implement secondary purification steps such as ion exchange chromatography or size exclusion chromatography to remove contaminants and aggregates. Careful monitoring of protein stability throughout the purification process using dynamic light scattering or thermal shift assays can help identify optimal buffer conditions. For structural studies, removal of the affinity tag using specific proteases (TEV, thrombin, etc.) may be necessary, followed by a final polishing step to ensure high purity.

What are the challenges in developing specific antibodies against Rickettsia felis rplK due to conservation among bacterial species?

Developing highly specific antibodies against R. felis rplK presents significant challenges due to the high conservation of ribosomal proteins across bacterial species. The primary challenge is identifying unique epitopes that distinguish R. felis rplK from homologous proteins in other bacteria. Researchers should perform detailed sequence alignments to identify regions unique to R. felis rplK, focusing on surface-exposed loops or termini that tend to have higher sequence variability. A combined approach using both polyclonal antibodies against the whole protein and monoclonal antibodies targeting specific epitopes may provide the best specificity. Cross-reactivity testing against rplK from closely related Rickettsia species, particularly R. typhi which is often co-endemic, is essential to validate antibody specificity. Additionally, absorption techniques can be employed to remove antibodies that cross-react with homologous proteins from other species. For applications requiring extreme specificity, phage display or ribosome display technologies could be used to select high-affinity antibodies against unique epitopes of R. felis rplK.

How does the analytical sensitivity of rplK-based detection methods compare to other gene targets for Rickettsia felis?

Detection methods targeting single-copy genes like rplK generally show lower analytical sensitivity compared to those targeting multi-copy elements such as ribosomal RNA. Data from comparative studies shows that 23S rRNA RT-rtPCR assays have approximately 100-fold higher analytical sensitivity for Rickettsia detection than assays targeting single-copy ribosomal protein genes like the 50S ribosomal protein L16 . Specifically, the LOD (limit of detection) of the 23S rRNA RT-rtPCR assay for R. felis is as low as 0.1 genomic copies per reaction, whereas single-copy gene targets typically require 10-100 copies for reliable detection . This significant difference in sensitivity is critical for applications involving samples with low pathogen loads. The table below illustrates the comparative sensitivity between 23S rRNA RT-rtPCR and ompB rtPCR for R. felis detection:

R. felis Genomic Copies/ReactionR. felis 23S rRNA RT-rtPCR DetectionR. felis ompB rtPCR Detection
1,0005/5 (Mean Ct: 22.32)5/5 (Mean Ct: 30.97)
1005/5 (Mean Ct: 25.56)5/5 (Mean Ct: 34.07)
105/5 (Mean Ct: 28.94)4/5 (Mean Ct: 36.85)
15/5 (Mean Ct: 32.31)1/5 (Mean Ct: 38.09)
0.15/5 (Mean Ct: 35.87)1/5 (Mean Ct: 38.14)
0.014/5 (Mean Ct: 41.15)0/5 (Not Detected)

These sensitivity differences highlight the importance of target selection based on the specific application requirements .

What methodological considerations are important when designing PCR-based assays targeting the rplK gene of Rickettsia felis?

When designing PCR-based assays targeting the R. felis rplK gene, researchers must carefully consider several methodological factors to ensure specificity and sensitivity. Primer design should focus on regions that are conserved within R. felis but sufficiently different from other Rickettsia species, particularly R. typhi which can co-circulate in the same geographic areas . In silico analysis using multiple sequence alignments of rplK sequences from various Rickettsia species is essential for identifying potential species-specific regions. Optimization of PCR conditions including annealing temperature, magnesium concentration, and cycle number is critical for maximizing sensitivity while maintaining specificity. For quantitative applications, the development of standard curves using recombinant plasmids containing the target sequence is necessary for accurate quantification. When developing duplex or multiplex assays, careful attention must be paid to primer-primer interactions and the selection of compatible fluorophores with minimal spectral overlap . Validation of the assay should include analytical sensitivity testing using serial dilutions of genomic DNA and specificity testing against a panel of related Rickettsia species and common co-infecting pathogens.

How can researchers differentiate between Rickettsia felis and closely related species using molecular targets like rplK?

Differentiating R. felis from closely related species requires strategic selection of molecular targets and careful assay design. While single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within conserved genes like rplK can be useful for species discrimination, researchers have found greater success with targets like 23S rRNA that contain species-specific SNPs . A successful approach demonstrated in the literature involves identification of species-specific SNPs through BLAST searches and multiple sequence alignment of the target gene across multiple Rickettsia species . For R. felis specifically, researchers identified a G1333A SNP in the 23S rRNA that is unique to this species, enabling specific detection when targeted with appropriate probes . When developing discriminatory assays, dual-labeled allelic discrimination probes that specifically target these SNPs can provide excellent specificity. Validation testing should include a diverse panel of Rickettsia species, with particular attention to genetic near-neighbors such as "Candidatus Rickettsia senegalensis" . For optimal differentiation, a duplex or multiplex approach targeting multiple genetic loci simultaneously may provide the highest confidence in species identification.

What approaches can researchers use to study the interaction between rplK and other ribosomal components in Rickettsia felis?

Studying interactions between rplK and other ribosomal components in R. felis requires sophisticated biochemical and structural approaches. Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) using antibodies against rplK can identify interacting proteins when coupled with mass spectrometry analysis. For more direct interaction studies, techniques such as bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) can detect protein-protein interactions in real-time by tagging rplK and potential interacting partners with appropriate donor and acceptor molecules. Structural approaches such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) are particularly valuable for visualizing rplK within the context of the entire ribosomal complex, providing insights into its spatial relationships with other components. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can map interaction interfaces by identifying regions protected from deuterium exchange upon complex formation. For functional validation of interactions, site-directed mutagenesis of key residues in rplK followed by functional assays can determine which interactions are critical for ribosomal function. In silico molecular modeling and docking simulations can also provide valuable hypotheses about potential interaction sites that can then be validated experimentally.

How can researchers investigate the role of rplK in the pathogenesis of Rickettsia felis infections?

Investigating the role of rplK in R. felis pathogenesis requires a multi-faceted approach that addresses both bacterial and host aspects. Since direct genetic manipulation of obligate intracellular bacteria like Rickettsia is challenging, heterologous expression systems are valuable tools. Researchers can express recombinant R. felis rplK in model organisms or cell culture systems to observe effects on host cell processes. Cell-based assays using purified recombinant rplK can assess effects on host cell viability, cytokine production, and cellular signaling pathways. To determine if rplK is exposed to the host immune system during infection, immunofluorescence microscopy using anti-rplK antibodies can visualize its localization during different stages of infection. The development of rplK-specific neutralizing antibodies and testing their effect on R. felis infection in cell culture can provide insights into whether rplK is accessible to the immune system and potentially involved in host-pathogen interactions. Animal models, though challenging with R. felis, can be used to evaluate immune responses to recombinant rplK and assess its potential as a vaccine candidate .

What animal models are most appropriate for studying recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK in vivo applications?

Selecting appropriate animal models for studying R. felis proteins presents significant challenges due to the limited pathogenicity observed in laboratory animals. Multiple mouse strains including A/J, BALB/c, C3H/HeJ, and C3H/HeN have been evaluated, with C3H/HeN showing the most promising results for R. parkeri infection . For R. felis specifically, C3H/HeN mice demonstrated detectable levels of rickettsial DNA in the spleen and liver after intravenous inoculation with high doses (1 × 10^6 organisms), but interestingly, no mice exhibited overt clinical signs of illness or pathology . BALB/c mice have also been used successfully to demonstrate transient rickettsemia after exposure to R. felis through infected Anopheles gambiae mosquito bites, with bacteremia present for 1-2 days post-exposure . When designing in vivo studies with recombinant rplK, researchers should consider focusing on immunological readouts such as antibody production, T-cell responses, and cytokine profiles rather than overt clinical disease. For more advanced studies, humanized mouse models or natural reservoir models (such as cat or rodent models) might provide more relevant insights into the role of rplK in R. felis biology and pathogenesis.

What are the main technical challenges in producing high-yield recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK and how can they be overcome?

Producing high-yield recombinant R. felis rplK presents several technical challenges that researchers must address. Protein solubility is often a major concern, as ribosomal proteins can form inclusion bodies when overexpressed in heterologous systems. To overcome this challenge, researchers can employ solubility-enhancing fusion partners such as maltose-binding protein (MBP) or NusA, or optimize expression conditions including lower induction temperatures (16-20°C) and reduced inducer concentrations. Codon usage differences between Rickettsia and expression hosts like E. coli can lead to poor translation efficiency; this can be addressed through codon optimization of the synthetic gene or by using specialized E. coli strains supplemented with rare codons. Protein stability during purification can be enhanced by optimizing buffer conditions (pH 7.0-8.0, 150-300 mM NaCl) and including stabilizing additives such as glycerol (5-10%), reducing agents, and protease inhibitors. For difficult-to-express proteins, cell-free expression systems offer an alternative approach that can bypass issues associated with cellular toxicity. Scale-up considerations are also important; researchers should establish reproducible purification protocols that maintain protein quality at larger scales, potentially utilizing automated chromatography systems for consistency.

How can researchers address the challenge of potential cross-reactivity when working with antibodies against Rickettsia felis rplK?

Cross-reactivity of antibodies against R. felis rplK with homologous proteins from other bacterial species is a significant challenge that requires strategic approaches to overcome. Researchers should implement a comprehensive validation process that includes ELISA, Western blotting, and immunofluorescence assays against a panel of both closely related Rickettsia species and common environmental bacteria. Antibody purification techniques such as affinity chromatography using recombinant R. felis rplK can improve specificity by enriching for target-specific antibodies. Pre-absorption procedures with lysates from related bacterial species can remove cross-reactive antibodies, significantly improving specificity. For applications requiring extreme specificity, epitope mapping can identify unique regions within rplK that are specific to R. felis, followed by generation of monoclonal antibodies or epitope-specific polyclonal antibodies targeting these regions. Competitive binding assays can also be used to assess specificity, where unlabeled rplK from different species competes with labeled R. felis rplK for antibody binding. For diagnostic applications, a dual-target approach combining rplK with another R. felis-specific protein marker can substantially reduce false positives due to cross-reactivity.

What strategies can be employed to improve the solubility and stability of recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK during purification and storage?

Improving solubility and stability of recombinant R. felis rplK requires careful optimization at each stage of production and storage. During gene design, researchers should consider removing or modifying hydrophobic patches that may promote aggregation while preserving functional domains. Expression with solubility-enhancing fusion partners such as MBP, GST, or SUMO can dramatically improve initial solubility. Buffer optimization is critical; testing different buffer systems (HEPES, Tris, phosphate) at various pH values (typically 7.0-8.0) with different salt concentrations can identify conditions that maximize stability. The addition of stabilizing agents such as glycerol (5-20%), sugars (trehalose, sucrose), or amino acids (arginine, glutamate) can prevent aggregation and improve long-term stability. For proteins prone to oxidation, maintaining reducing conditions with agents like DTT, β-mercaptoethanol, or TCEP is essential. Storage stability can be enhanced by flash-freezing aliquots in liquid nitrogen rather than slow freezing, and lyophilization may be considered for very long-term storage. Thermal shift assays and dynamic light scattering can be used to systematically screen buffer conditions and additives to identify formulations that maximize stability. For applications requiring extended stability at higher temperatures, engineering thermostable variants through rational design or directed evolution approaches may be considered.

How might rplK be utilized in the development of novel diagnostic tools for Rickettsia felis infection?

The potential of rplK in novel diagnostic tool development for R. felis infections spans multiple technological platforms. Recombinant rplK could serve as a capture antigen in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for detecting anti-rplK antibodies in patient sera, providing evidence of past infection. For direct pathogen detection, rplK-specific antibodies could be incorporated into immunochromatographic lateral flow assays for point-of-care testing, though sensitivity would likely be lower than nucleic acid-based methods. While single-copy genes like rplK show lower sensitivity than multi-copy targets like 23S rRNA, the development of isothermal amplification methods such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) targeting rplK could improve sensitivity while maintaining specificity . Novel approaches like CRISPR-Cas-based nucleic acid detection systems could be designed to target rplK with high specificity, potentially enabling rapid detection with sensitivity approaching that of PCR. For multiplexed detection systems, rplK could be included as part of a panel of R. felis-specific targets to increase diagnostic confidence. The integration of these detection methods with microfluidic platforms or smartphone-based readers could expand access to diagnostics in resource-limited settings where R. felis infections may be endemic.

What is the potential of Rickettsia felis rplK as a target for novel antimicrobial development?

The essential nature of rplK in bacterial protein synthesis makes it a promising target for novel antimicrobial development against R. felis. Structure-based drug design approaches could be employed once the three-dimensional structure of R. felis rplK is determined, focusing on identifying small molecules that disrupt its interaction with GTP-bound translation factors or its incorporation into the ribosomal complex . High-throughput screening assays could be developed to identify compounds that specifically bind to R. felis rplK and disrupt its function, potentially using fluorescence-based or surface plasmon resonance assays to detect binding. The development of peptide mimetics that compete with rplK for binding to interacting partners within the ribosome represents another promising approach. Comparative analysis of rplK structures across different bacterial species could identify unique structural features in R. felis rplK that could be exploited for selective targeting. RNA-based therapeutics such as antisense oligonucleotides or RNA interference approaches targeting rplK mRNA could be explored as alternative strategies to conventional small molecule antibiotics. The successful development of such targeted antimicrobials would be particularly valuable given the challenges of treating intracellular bacterial infections like those caused by Rickettsia species.

How can recombinant Rickettsia felis rplK contribute to next-generation vaccine development strategies?

Recombinant R. felis rplK presents several opportunities for next-generation vaccine development strategies against rickettsioses. As a highly conserved bacterial protein, rplK could potentially elicit cross-protective immunity against multiple Rickettsia species, addressing the challenge of species-specific protection. Structure-guided antigen design could be employed to focus the immune response on protective epitopes within rplK while minimizing regions that might induce non-neutralizing or potentially harmful immune responses. Researchers could develop multi-epitope constructs that combine immunogenic regions of rplK with epitopes from other Rickettsia antigens to create broadly protective vaccine candidates. Modern delivery platforms such as mRNA vaccines encoding R. felis rplK or nanoparticle-based delivery systems presenting rplK on their surface could enhance immunogenicity and cellular uptake. Adjuvant optimization would be crucial, with particular focus on adjuvants that promote strong cell-mediated immunity, which is essential for control of intracellular pathogens like Rickettsia. Animal models, despite their limitations for R. felis infection, would be valuable for evaluating immune responses to rplK-based vaccines, focusing on correlates of protection such as antibody titers, T-cell responses, and cytokine profiles before advancing to potential human studies .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.