Recombinant Rickettsia prowazekii Uncharacterized protein RP436 (RP436)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, but this can be adjusted as needed.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The specific tag type is determined during the production process. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
RP436; Uncharacterized protein RP436
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-141
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Rickettsia prowazekii (strain Madrid E)
Target Names
RP436
Target Protein Sequence
MNQFEAYSLLFVDSFVSNLIISFQNELIFHSMQMLVGYNRLIMLLVAICSSLSGNTVNYL FGKIVLNIFYASKNEQNILRHKNLTKLYYQYETFIIFLISFPFWGCFVSLFSGFFKTKFL KFLSIGCLAKACYYASKIYIF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

KEGG: rpr:RP436

STRING: 272947.RP436

Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the amino acid sequence and structural characteristics of Recombinant Rickettsia prowazekii RP436 protein?

The full-length Rickettsia prowazekii Uncharacterized protein RP436 consists of 141 amino acids with the following sequence:

MNQFEAYSLLFVDSFVSNLIISFQNELIFHSMQMLVGYNRLIMLLVAICSSLSGNTVNYL FGKIVLNIFYASKNEQNILRHKNLTKLYYQYETFIIFLISFPFWGCFVSLFSGFFKTKFL KFLSIGCLAKACYYASKIYIF

The protein's structure remains largely uncharacterized, but sequence analysis suggests it contains hydrophobic regions that may indicate membrane-associated properties. Computational prediction methods suggest potential transmembrane domains, particularly in the middle portion of the sequence. When working with this protein, researchers should consider these potential structural characteristics when designing isolation and purification protocols.

What expression systems are used for producing recombinant RP436 protein?

The recombinant RP436 protein is typically expressed in E. coli expression systems with an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes . This system allows for relatively high protein yields while maintaining proper folding of the recombinant protein. The E. coli expression system offers several advantages for RP436 production:

  • Cost-effective scale-up capabilities

  • Well-established protocols for induction and harvesting

  • Compatibility with His-tag purification systems

  • Relatively short production timeframes (typically 24-48 hours post-induction)

When designing experiments with this protein, researchers should consider that the His-tag may affect certain functional studies and might need to be cleaved for specific applications.

What are the optimal storage conditions for maintaining RP436 protein stability?

The recombinant RP436 protein is supplied as a lyophilized powder and requires specific handling conditions to maintain stability . The recommended storage protocol involves:

  • Initial receipt: Store at -20°C/-80°C

  • After reconstitution: Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

  • Long-term storage: Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (with 50% being the default recommendation) and store at -20°C/-80°C in small aliquots

Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly compromise protein integrity and should be avoided . For experimental planning, researchers should prepare appropriately sized aliquots during initial reconstitution to minimize the need for repeated thawing of the same sample.

What is the recommended reconstitution protocol for lyophilized RP436 protein?

The optimal reconstitution protocol for RP436 involves the following methodological steps:

  • Briefly centrifuge the vial prior to opening to collect all material at the bottom

  • Reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • For long-term storage, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (typically 50%)

  • Aliquot the reconstituted protein solution to minimize freeze-thaw cycles

The protein is supplied in a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0 , which helps maintain stability during the lyophilization process. When designing reconstitution protocols for specific experiments, researchers should consider the buffer compatibility with downstream applications.

How can RP436 protein purity be verified for experimental applications?

The commercially available recombinant RP436 protein is reported to have a purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE . Researchers should independently verify protein purity using the following methodological approaches:

  • SDS-PAGE analysis with Coomassie or silver staining

    • Compare against protein standards to estimate purity percentage

    • Look for bands at approximately 16-17 kDa (141 amino acids plus His-tag)

  • Western blot analysis using anti-His antibodies

    • Confirms the presence of the full-length tagged protein

    • Can detect potential degradation products

  • Mass spectrometry

    • For absolute confirmation of protein identity and purity

    • Particularly important for critical applications requiring high purity

For experiments requiring exceptional purity, researchers may need to implement additional purification steps such as size exclusion chromatography or ion exchange chromatography after the initial affinity purification.

What experimental approaches can be used to investigate the function of RP436 in Rickettsia prowazekii?

As an uncharacterized protein, determining RP436's function requires multiple complementary approaches:

  • Comparative genomics analysis

    • Compare RP436 sequence with related rickettsial species

    • Identify conserved domains that may suggest functional roles

    • Examine genomic context for potential operonic relationships

  • Protein-protein interaction studies

    • Yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Co-immunoprecipitation with host cell proteins

    • Cross-linking studies followed by mass spectrometry

  • Localization studies

    • Fluorescent tagging of RP436 in live Rickettsia

    • Immunogold electron microscopy

    • Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting

  • Expression pattern analysis

    • RT-PCR to measure expression during different growth phases

    • Examine expression during host cell infection using RNA-Seq

    • Quantify expression under different stress conditions

Understanding the function of uncharacterized proteins like RP436 is essential for comprehending Rickettsia pathogenesis and may reveal potential therapeutic targets.

How does RP436 relate to other small molecular components in Rickettsia prowazekii pathogenesis?

While direct evidence for RP436's role in pathogenesis remains limited, research on Rickettsia prowazekii has identified various small molecular components that contribute to bacterial virulence. Recent RNA sequencing studies of infected human microvascular endothelial cells (HMECs) have revealed:

  • The presence of 35 trans-acting and 23 cis-acting small RNAs in R. prowazekii

  • Evidence for post-transcriptional regulation of bacterial physiology, metabolism, and virulence factors

  • Specific expression patterns of small RNAs during different phases of host cell infection

RP436, as an uncharacterized protein, may interact with these regulatory RNAs or participate in pathways controlled by them. Integrated research approaches combining proteomics with transcriptomics could help establish potential relationships between RP436 and small RNAs in Rickettsia prowazekii pathogenesis.

What are the challenges in determining the membrane topology of RP436?

Determining the membrane topology of RP436 presents several methodological challenges:

  • Hydrophobic nature of potential transmembrane domains

    • Requires specialized solubilization protocols

    • May form aggregates during purification

  • Limited structural information

    • No crystal structure currently available

    • Computational predictions have inherent limitations

  • Technical approaches for topology determination

    • Protease protection assays

    • Site-directed fluorescence labeling

    • Cysteine scanning mutagenesis

  • Expression challenges

    • Native levels in Rickettsia may be too low for direct analysis

    • Recombinant systems may not replicate native folding/insertion

A comprehensive experimental design would involve creating fusion constructs with reporter proteins at various positions, combined with membrane fractionation studies and protease accessibility assays to map exposed regions.

How can researchers design experiments to investigate RP436 interactions with host cell proteins?

Investigating host-pathogen protein interactions requires careful experimental design. For RP436, researchers should consider:

  • Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS)

    • Express tagged RP436 in host cells or during infection

    • Capture protein complexes using anti-tag antibodies

    • Identify interacting partners by mass spectrometry

    • Validate key interactions with co-immunoprecipitation

  • Proximity-dependent labeling approaches

    • BioID or APEX2 fusion to RP436

    • Expression during infection cycle

    • Identification of proteins in close proximity

    • Spatial mapping of interaction networks

  • Yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Use RP436 as bait against host cell cDNA libraries

    • Focus on endothelial cell libraries for physiological relevance

    • Validate interactions in mammalian cells

  • Functional validation studies

    • siRNA knockdown of identified host factors

    • Assessment of bacterial invasion and replication

    • Complementation studies with mutated interaction domains

These approaches should be integrated with controls for non-specific interactions and validation across multiple experimental systems.

How should researchers optimize experimental designs for studying RP436 expression during infection?

When designing experiments to study RP436 expression during infection, researchers should implement robust statistical approaches similar to those used in panel data experimental designs . Key methodological considerations include:

  • Time-series sampling

    • Multiple timepoints before and after infection

    • Consideration of serial correlation in measurements

    • Appropriate controls at each timepoint

  • Statistical power calculations

    • Serial-correlation-robust (SCR) power calculation techniques

    • Estimation of required sample sizes based on expected effect sizes

    • Consideration of both biological and technical replicates

  • Normalization strategies

    • Selection of appropriate reference genes

    • Accounting for variation in bacterial load

    • Controlling for host cell responses that might affect measurements

  • Validation approaches

    • Multiple detection methods (RT-PCR, Western blot, immunofluorescence)

    • Correlation of protein expression with bacterial viability/growth

    • Integration with global transcriptomic/proteomic datasets

Properly designed experiments with robust statistical analysis are essential for generating reliable data on RP436 expression patterns during infection.

What controls should be included when analyzing RP436 localization in infected cells?

Analyzing protein localization requires rigorous controls to ensure valid interpretations. For RP436 localization studies, researchers should include:

  • Antibody specificity controls

    • Pre-immune serum controls

    • Peptide competition assays

    • Testing in uninfected cells

    • Testing in cells infected with RP436-deletion mutants (if available)

  • Subcellular marker controls

    • Co-staining with established organelle markers

    • Verification with multiple independent markers

    • Z-stack imaging to confirm true co-localization

  • Time-course controls

    • Analysis at multiple infection timepoints

    • Correlation with bacterial life cycle stages

    • Dynamic versus static localization patterns

  • Fixation method controls

    • Comparison of different fixation protocols

    • Live-cell imaging validation where possible

    • Assessment of potential fixation artifacts

What approaches can be used to develop a functional knockout system for studying RP436?

Developing functional genetic systems for obligate intracellular bacteria like Rickettsia presents significant challenges. For studying RP436 function through knockout approaches, researchers should consider:

  • Transposon mutagenesis

    • Random insertion libraries

    • Screening for viable mutants

    • Characterization of insertion sites

    • Phenotypic analysis of growth and virulence

  • CRISPR-Cas9 adapted systems

    • Delivery of components via electroporation

    • Design of guide RNAs specific to RP436

    • Screening methods for successful editing

    • Complementation strategies to verify specificity

  • Conditional knockdown approaches

    • Inducible antisense RNA systems

    • Degradation domain fusion strategies

    • Riboswitch-controlled expression

  • Host-cell based interference

    • Expression of intrabodies targeting RP436

    • Host-delivered siRNAs targeting RP436 mRNA

    • Creation of dominant-negative forms in trans

Each approach has advantages and limitations that researchers should evaluate based on their specific experimental questions and available resources.

How can computational approaches contribute to understanding RP436 function?

Computational approaches offer valuable insights for uncharacterized proteins like RP436:

  • Structural prediction methods

    • Ab initio modeling using Rosetta or AlphaFold

    • Homology modeling based on distant relatives

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of membrane interaction

    • Prediction of post-translational modifications

  • Systems biology integration

    • Network analysis of protein-protein interactions

    • Metabolic pathway modeling

    • Integration with transcriptomic data from infection models

    • Evolutionary analysis across Rickettsia species

  • Machine learning approaches

    • Functional annotation based on sequence patterns

    • Prediction of binding sites and interaction partners

    • Classification based on evolutionary conservation patterns

  • Comparative genomics

    • Analysis of genetic context across related species

    • Identification of co-evolved gene clusters

    • Assessment of selection pressure on the RP436 gene

These computational approaches should guide experimental design rather than replace experimental validation, serving to generate testable hypotheses about RP436 function.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.