Recombinant S-layer protein 1

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Production and Engineering Strategies

Recombinant S-layer proteins are typically produced in heterologous systems like Bacillus megaterium or Escherichia coli. For example:

  • HA-tagged SslA: A hemagglutinin epitope-fused S-layer protein from Sporosarcina ureae was secreted efficiently by B. megaterium, retaining self-assembly properties .

  • Truncation mutants: Removing C-terminal residues (e.g., rSbpA<sub>31–918</sub>) alters lattice symmetry from square (13.1 nm spacing) to oblique (10.4 × 7.9 nm) .

Table 1: Engineered S-layer Fusion Proteins

ApplicationS-Layer ProteinFused DomainDomain LengthSource
Vaccine DevelopmentrSbpABet v1 (birch pollen allergen)116 aa
Diagnostic SensorsrSbpACamelid anti-PSA antibody117 aa
Drug DeliveryrSbpAEnhanced GFP (EGFP)238 aa

Vaccine Development

  • Allergen Display: Recombinant SbpA fused to Bet v1 induced a Th1/Th0 immune response, reducing allergenic reactivity in murine models .

  • Pathogen Antigens: Helicobacter pylori antigens displayed on S-layers elicited protective antibodies in preclinical trials .

Diagnostics and Biosensing

  • Label-Free Detection: rSbpA/anti-PSA fusion proteins recrystallized on gold chips enabled prostate-specific antigen detection via surface plasmon resonance (SPR) .

  • Epitope Mimicry: EBV F1 mimotopes on S-layers achieved 98.2% specificity in serodiagnostics .

Nanotechnology

  • Liposome Coating: EGFP-tagged S-layers visualized liposome uptake in eukaryotic cells, demonstrating potential for targeted drug delivery .

Mechanistic Insights

  • Growth-Phase Dynamics: In Bacillus cereus, S-layer composition shifts from SL2 (early exponential phase) to EA1 (stationary phase), regulated by Spo0A and CcpA transcription factors .

  • Localization Patterns: SL2 accumulates at cell poles during active growth, while EA1 forms diffuse patches during stress .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will preferentially ship the available format. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specific delivery times. All proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice shipment in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
; S-layer protein 1; 102 KDa parasporal endotoxin; Fragments
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-43
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. konkukian
Target Protein Sequence
SATVELYSNL AAKGLAVEFT STSLKAALLN ILSVDGVPAT TAK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The S-layer is a paracrystalline monolayer of proteins coating the bacterial surface.
Subcellular Location
Secreted, cell wall, S-layer.

Q&A

What are S-layer proteins and what structural characteristics make them valuable for recombinant applications?

S-layer proteins (SLPs) are self-assembling, crystalline proteins that coat the cell surfaces of many prokaryotes. Their value stems from their ability to form highly ordered, two-dimensional arrays with defined symmetry patterns (typically p2, p4, or p6 lattices). These proteins typically consist of a single protein or glycoprotein species with well-defined domains .

The atomic resolution structures of Lactobacillus S-layer proteins (like SlpA and SlpX from L. acidophilus and L. amylovorus) reveal domain swapping as a critical feature for integration and assembly. This architecture creates a nanopatterned surface with precise spacing between functional groups, making them excellent scaffolds for displaying biomolecules in defined arrangements .

Methodologically, researchers typically analyze S-layer structures using:

  • X-ray crystallography for atomic resolution structures

  • Electron microscopy combined with image reconstruction for lattice parameters

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to understand assembly mechanisms

  • Mutagenesis studies to identify critical residues for self-assembly

How do natural S-layer proteins differ from recombinant versions in terms of production and modification?

Natural S-layer proteins are produced by their native host organisms and often undergo species-specific post-translational modifications, particularly glycosylation. Most S-layer proteins (except those from certain gram-negative bacteria like Caulobacter and Campylobacter species) are produced with N-terminal secretion signal peptides that are cleaved after translocation through the plasma membrane .

Recombinant production typically involves:

  • Cloning the S-layer gene into an appropriate expression vector

  • Selecting an optimal signal peptide for proper cellular targeting (periplasmic targeting is often crucial)

  • Co-expression with necessary modification enzymes if post-translational modifications are required

  • Optimized purification protocols that maintain the protein's native conformation and self-assembly capability

For example, researchers successfully produced the SgsE protein from Geobacillus stearothermophilus in E. coli by using the PelB signal peptide for periplasmic targeting, which was a crucial prerequisite for subsequent protein glycosylation .

What are the principal methods for isolating and purifying recombinant S-layer proteins?

Isolating and purifying recombinant S-layer proteins requires specialized approaches:

  • Cellular targeting and extraction:

    • Periplasmic targeting using signal peptides like PelB is often preferred

    • Osmotic shock or selective membrane disruption to release periplasmic contents

    • Gentle lysis methods to prevent aggregation or denaturation

  • Purification techniques:

    • Affinity chromatography using engineered tags (His-tag, Strep-tag)

    • Ion exchange chromatography based on protein pI

    • Size exclusion chromatography to separate monomers from assembled structures

    • Specialized methods to maintain solubility (chaotropic agents followed by controlled dialysis)

  • Quality assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to confirm protein identity and purity

    • Mass spectrometry to verify intact mass and modifications

    • Negative staining electron microscopy to assess self-assembly capability

Researchers working with the SgsE glycoprotein successfully purified it from the periplasmic fraction of E. coli with complete glycosylation, demonstrating that recombinant glycosylation is fully compatible with the S-layer protein self-assembly system .

How can glycosylation sites be engineered in S-layer proteins while maintaining self-assembly properties?

Engineering glycosylation sites in S-layer proteins requires a sophisticated understanding of both protein structure and glycosylation mechanisms:

  • Conversion of O-glycosylation to N-glycosylation sites:

    • Identify naturally accessible O-glycosylation sites on the protein surface

    • Engineer these sites to contain the bacterial N-glycosylation consensus sequence (D/E-X-N-Z-S/T, where X and Z can be any amino acid except proline)

    • Ensure the site remains accessible to oligosaccharyltransferases

  • Experimental approach:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis to introduce the consensus sequence

    • Co-expression with appropriate glycosylation machinery (e.g., the pgl system from C. jejuni)

    • Verification of glycosylation using glycan-specific antibodies or mass spectrometry

  • Validation of assembly properties:

    • Electron microscopy to confirm lattice formation

    • Image reconstruction to analyze lattice parameters

    • Comparison with native protein assembly patterns

For example, researchers modified threonine 620 of the SgsE protein by inserting the N-glycosylation consensus sequence from C. jejuni, enabling the transfer of a heptasaccharide to the protein via the oligosaccharyltransferase PglB. Importantly, electron microscopy confirmed that this modification was fully compatible with the protein's self-assembly capability .

What experimental approaches are used to characterize the nanolattice structures formed by recombinant S-layer proteins?

Characterization of S-layer nanolattices requires specialized techniques:

TechniqueInformation ObtainedExperimental Considerations
Negative-stain EMLattice symmetry, unit cell dimensionsSample preparation critical for accurate imaging
Cryo-EMHigher-resolution structural detailsRequires specialized equipment and expertise
Atomic Force MicroscopyTopographical features, layer thicknessWorks best with flat, well-ordered samples
Small-angle X-ray ScatteringSolution-state analysis of assemblyUseful for monitoring assembly kinetics
Image ReconstructionEnhanced visualization of lattice patternsRequires multiple images and specialized software
Computational ModelingIntegration of experimental data with theoretical modelsEssential for visualizing modification sites

Researchers have effectively used a combined electron microscopy–modeling approach to visualize the periodic, nanometer-scale display of glycans on self-assembled S-layer neoglycoprotein monolayers. In one example, space-filling models of Glc(GalNAc)₅Bac heptasaccharides were positioned onto the subunits of the SgsE nanolattice with a periodicity defined by the base vectors of the SgsE p2 lattice (11.6 and 9.4 nm) .

How can researchers control the density and arrangement of functional groups on recombinant S-layer protein lattices?

Controlling functional group density on S-layer lattices is achieved through:

  • Co-assembly strategies:

    • Mixing modified and unmodified S-layer protein monomers at defined ratios

    • Creating heteromeric assemblies with precise distribution of functional elements

    • Optimizing assembly conditions to promote uniform integration

  • Experimental implementation:

    • Prepare separate batches of modified and unmodified protein

    • Mix at predetermined ratios before initiating assembly

    • Monitor assembly using electron microscopy or light scattering techniques

    • Verify functional group distribution using labeled antibodies or probes

  • Applications:

    • Creating surfaces with controlled densities of specific ligands

    • Optimizing spacing between functional groups for specific interactions

    • Developing multifunctional surfaces with different biological activities

Researchers have demonstrated this concept by creating self-assembled A_SgsE_T12-O7 monolayers where only every second subunit carries the O7 polysaccharide modification, corresponding to a 1:1 mixture of modified and unmodified subunits. This approach offers an attractive option for producing multifunctional self-assembly nanolattices with precisely controlled functional group densities .

What expression systems and cellular targeting strategies are most effective for recombinant S-layer protein production?

Successful recombinant S-layer protein production depends on choosing appropriate expression systems and targeting strategies:

Expression HostAdvantagesLimitationsOptimal Applications
E. coliFast growth, high yields, genetic tractabilityLimited post-translational modificationsBasic structural studies, simple modifications
Bacillus speciesNatural S-layer producers, better foldingMore complex genetics, slower growthComplex S-layer proteins, natural modifications
Yeast systemsEukaryotic modifications possibleDifferent glycosylation patternsApplications requiring eukaryotic-type glycans

For cellular targeting, periplasmic direction using signal sequences like PelB has proven particularly effective. This approach:

  • Reduces the formation of inclusion bodies

  • Provides an oxidizing environment for disulfide bond formation

  • Creates a cellular compartment accessible for post-translational modifications

  • Facilitates easier extraction without complete cell lysis

When expressing the SgsE protein in E. coli, researchers identified periplasmic targeting as a critical prerequisite for protein glycosylation, demonstrating that proper cellular localization is essential for successful post-translational modification of recombinant S-layer proteins .

How do secondary cell wall polymers influence S-layer protein assembly and how can this knowledge be applied to recombinant systems?

Secondary cell wall polymers (SCWPs) play crucial roles in S-layer assembly:

  • Natural interactions:

    • S-layer proteins often contain specific domains (like SLH motifs) that recognize SCWPs

    • These interactions anchor the S-layer to the cell surface

    • SCWPs can modulate the self-assembly process

  • Experimental findings:

    • Studies with the SbsB protein from B. stearothermophilus revealed that SCWPs inhibit in vitro self-assembly

    • SCWPs keep S-layer proteins in a water-soluble state

    • They enhance recrystallization onto solid supports

    • SCWPs protect S-layer proteins against proteolytic attack

  • Applications in recombinant systems:

    • Co-expression or co-purification with specific SCWPs can improve solubility

    • Controlled removal of SCWPs can trigger assembly at desired locations

    • SCWPs can be used as targeting molecules for directing assembly to specific surfaces

Affinity studies have shown that SLH motifs at the N-terminal part of S-layer proteins recognize SCWPs composed mainly of N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylmannosamine, not the peptidoglycan itself. This highly specific lectin-type recognition mechanism provides valuable insights for designing recombinant S-layer systems with controlled assembly properties .

How can recombinant S-layer proteins be engineered for vaccine development and immunological applications?

Engineering S-layer proteins for vaccine applications involves:

  • Antigen display strategies:

    • Genetic fusion of antigenic epitopes to accessible regions of the S-layer protein

    • Position optimization to ensure proper epitope exposure while maintaining assembly

    • Co-display of immunostimulatory molecules to enhance immune responses

  • Methodological approach:

    • Identify surface-exposed, flexible regions that tolerate insertions

    • Create fusion constructs with epitopes of interest

    • Express and purify the recombinant proteins

    • Verify epitope presentation using antibody binding studies

    • Assess immunogenicity in appropriate model systems

  • Advantages of S-layer display:

    • Regular, repetitive display of antigens enhances immune recognition

    • Self-adjuvanting properties of bacterial proteins

    • Stability under various conditions

    • Potential for oral delivery due to resistance to degradation

The structure of assembled S-layers provides a foundation for employing designed S-layer proteins as therapeutic agents in inflammatory diseases and opens broad avenues for vaccine development by presenting antigens in a highly organized, multivalent format .

What methods can be used to incorporate non-natural functional molecules into recombinant S-layer proteins?

Incorporating non-natural molecules into S-layer proteins requires specialized approaches:

  • Glycoengineering approach:

    • Engineer glycosylation sites at specific positions

    • Express the protein with glycosylation machinery capable of transferring modified glycans

    • Use oligosaccharyltransferases like PglB to transfer the desired glycan structures

  • Chemical conjugation methods:

    • Introduce unique reactive groups (e.g., cysteines) at defined positions

    • Perform site-specific chemical modifications using bioorthogonal chemistry

    • Verify modification using mass spectrometry or specific detection methods

  • Expressed protein ligation and related techniques:

    • Use split inteins or sortase-mediated approaches for site-specific modification

    • Create fusion proteins with removable purification tags

    • Perform enzymatic ligation with synthetic molecules

Researchers have successfully transferred both a heptasaccharide from C. jejuni and the O7 polysaccharide from E. coli onto engineered S-layer proteins using the oligosaccharyltransferase PglB, demonstrating the feasibility of incorporating complex non-natural glycans onto S-layer scaffolds .

How can researchers troubleshoot common problems in recombinant S-layer protein expression and assembly?

Common problems and their solutions include:

ProblemPossible CausesTroubleshooting Approach
Low expression yieldsToxicity to host, poor codon usage, protein instabilityOptimize codons, use controlled induction, test different host strains, add stabilizing tags
Protein aggregationImproper folding, premature self-assemblyTarget to periplasm, co-express chaperones, optimize extraction conditions
Loss of self-assembly capabilityStructural disruption, improper modificationsVerify protein integrity by mass spec, test different buffer conditions, use step-wise dialysis
Incomplete glycosylationInaccessible sites, inefficient glycosylation machineryOptimize site positioning, increase glycosylation enzyme expression, extend culture time
Heterogeneous productsVariable modifications, proteolytic degradationUse protease-deficient strains, optimize purification, add protease inhibitors

For example, when working with SgsE neoglycoproteins, researchers found that proper periplasmic targeting was essential for achieving complete glycosylation. This demonstrates the importance of considering cellular compartmentalization when troubleshooting recombinant S-layer protein production .

What analytical techniques are most effective for confirming successful glycosylation of recombinant S-layer proteins?

Verifying S-layer protein glycosylation requires multiple complementary techniques:

Researchers successfully confirmed the glycosylation of SgsE neoglycoproteins using Western immunoblotting with glycan-specific antibodies (anti-pgl antibody for the C. jejuni heptasaccharide), demonstrating complete glycosylation of the S-layer protein after purification from the periplasmic fraction .

How can recombinant S-layer proteins be designed for drug delivery and nanomedicine applications?

Designing S-layer proteins for drug delivery involves:

  • Structural considerations:

    • Engineering binding sites or cavities for drug molecules

    • Creating stimuli-responsive elements for controlled release

    • Modifying surface properties for improved biocompatibility and circulation

  • Methodological approach:

    • Identify suitable S-layer proteins with appropriate pore sizes and assembly properties

    • Engineer specific binding sites for drugs or drug carriers

    • Create fusion proteins with targeting ligands for specific cell types

    • Develop assembly protocols compatible with drug loading

  • Delivery strategies:

    • Coating liposomes or nanoparticles with S-layer proteins

    • Creating S-layer nanocapsules with encapsulated drugs

    • Developing S-layer patches for transdermal delivery

    • Engineering glycosylated S-layers that target specific receptors

The highly ordered, nanopatterned structure of S-layer lattices makes them promising candidates for drug delivery applications. Their self-assembly properties allow them to coat various surfaces, including planar solid supports, liposomes, or porous structures like membranes, offering a wide repertoire of opportunities for integration in both in vitro and in vivo systems .

What are the current limitations in S-layer protein engineering that require further methodological advances?

Current limitations requiring methodological advances include:

  • Structural prediction challenges:

    • Difficulty predicting how modifications will affect self-assembly

    • Limited high-resolution structural data for many S-layer proteins

    • Need for better computational tools to design modifications

  • Expression and production limitations:

    • Challenges in scaling up production for clinical or industrial applications

    • Difficulty expressing some S-layer proteins in heterologous hosts

    • Incomplete or heterogeneous post-translational modifications

  • Assembly control:

    • Limited understanding of the kinetics and thermodynamics of assembly

    • Difficulty controlling orientation on surfaces

    • Challenges in creating mixed lattices with precise arrangements

  • Application barriers:

    • Insufficient in vivo data on biocompatibility and immunogenicity

    • Need for improved methods to characterize complex assemblies

    • Lack of standardized protocols for various applications

Developing more comprehensive structural models, improved expression systems, and better characterization techniques will be essential for advancing S-layer protein engineering beyond its current limitations.

How might advanced computational approaches improve the design of recombinant S-layer proteins?

Advanced computational approaches offer significant potential for S-layer protein design:

  • Structural prediction methods:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict assembly behavior

    • Machine learning approaches to identify optimal modification sites

    • Quantum mechanical calculations for energy landscapes of protein-protein interactions

  • Design algorithms:

    • Computational screening of potential fusion sites

    • De novo design of modified assembly interfaces

    • Optimization of glycosylation sites for specific glycan structures

  • Systems biology integration:

    • Modeling of expression systems for improved yields

    • Prediction of host cell responses to recombinant protein production

    • Integration of multiple datasets to guide experimental design

  • Validation approaches:

    • Virtual screening of designed proteins against potential binding partners

    • Simulation of assembly processes under various conditions

    • Prediction of functional properties based on structural features

Combining these computational approaches with experimental validation will accelerate the development of recombinant S-layer proteins with precisely tailored properties for specific applications.

What emerging applications of recombinant S-layer proteins show the most promise for future development?

Several emerging applications show particular promise:

  • Precision immunotherapeutics:

    • S-layer-based vaccines with precisely arranged antigenic determinants

    • Immunomodulatory assemblies that can suppress or enhance specific immune responses

    • Personalized cancer vaccines displaying patient-specific neoantigens

  • Advanced biomaterials:

    • Self-healing coatings with enzymatic repair capabilities

    • Stimuli-responsive materials for smart drug delivery

    • Biomimetic surfaces for tissue engineering

  • Synthetic biology tools:

    • Engineered cellular envelopes for new bacterial properties

    • Artificial organelles with specialized functions

    • Modular biosensing platforms with multiple detection capabilities

  • Nanotechnology applications:

    • Templates for metallic or semiconductor nanopatterns

    • Molecular sieves with precisely defined pore sizes

    • Energy capture and conversion systems based on ordered protein arrays

The integration of carbohydrates into S-layer protein systems is particularly promising, as it combines the precision of protein self-assembly with the diverse recognition properties of glycans, opening new strategies for influencing and controlling complex biological systems .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.