Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Actin-related protein 2 (ARP2)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Molecular Structure and Homology

ARP2 shares significant homology with conventional actin, particularly in subdomains 1 and 2, which are essential for ATP binding and filament nucleation . Key conserved residues include:

ResidueFunctionConservation
D12ATP bindingIdentical in actin, ARP2, and Arp3
K19ATP stabilizationConserved across species
D158Actin filament interactionCritical for nucleation
K214Barbed-end polymerizationMutations impair activity

Homology models based on bovine Arp2/3 complex structures reveal that ARP2’s barbed end interfaces with actin filaments, while its pointed end interacts with ARP3 .

Functional Role in the Arp2/3 Complex

ARP2 is indispensable for the Arp2/3 complex’s actin-nucleating activity. Key findings include:

  • Nucleation Mechanism: ARP2 and ARP3 mimic actin monomers to form a template for filament branching. Mutations at ARP2’s barbed end (e.g., arp2-1) reduce nucleation efficiency by 12-fold .

  • VCA Binding: The ARPC1 subunit mediates high-affinity binding (K<sub>d</sub> ≈ 0.45 µM) to the VCA domain of nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs), which is essential for complex activation .

  • Genetic Interactions: ARP2 mutants (arp2-1, arp2-2) exhibit synthetic lethality with NPF deletions (e.g., las17Δ), underscoring cooperative roles in actin patch assembly .

Key Biochemical Properties

PropertyWild-Type ARP2/3Mutant ARP2/3 (e.g., 4DKK)
Barbed-end nucleation rateHigh12-fold reduction
F-actin binding affinity0.3 µMSeverely impaired
Branch stabilityStableRapid dissociation

Cellular Phenotypes of ARP2 Mutants

  • Actin Aggregates: Δarp2 strains lose actin patches and accumulate disorganized cables .

  • Endocytic Defects: Impaired internalization of α-factor and uracil permease due to disrupted cortical actin .

  • Suppression by Calmodulin: Overexpression of calmodulin rescues actin organization and endocytosis in ARC35 (Arp2/3 subunit) mutants, linking ARP2 to calcium signaling .

Critical Surface Residues

Charged residues on ARPC2 and ARPC4 (e.g., 4DKK mutation in ARPC4) reduce F-actin binding and nucleation, confirming their role in complex activation .

Nucleation-Promoting Factors (NPFs)

  • Las17p (Yeast WASP): Directly interacts with ARP2/3 via its VCA domain and recruits it to cortical patches .

  • Genetic Redundancy: las17Δ synthetic lethality with myo3Δ myo5Δ highlights overlapping roles of NPFs in actin assembly .

Applications and Implications

Recombinant ARP2 facilitates:

  • Mechanistic Studies: Elucidating Arp2/3 activation by NPFs and F-actin .

  • Drug Discovery: Targeting ARP2’s ATP-binding site or VCA interface could modulate pathological actin dynamics (e.g., cancer metastasis) .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We preferentially ship the in-stock format. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery time varies by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specifics. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipment, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you have a specific tag type requirement, please inform us.
Synonyms
ARP2; ACT2; YDL029W; D2778Actin-related protein 2; Actin-like protein ARP2; Actin-like protein 2
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-391
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) (Baker's yeast)
Target Names
ARP2
Target Protein Sequence
MDPHNPIVLD QGTGFVKIGR AGENFPDYTF PSIVGRPILR AEERASVATP LKDIMIGDEA SEVRSYLQIS YPMENGIIKN WTDMELLWDY AFFEQMKLPS TSNGKILLTE PPMNPLKNRE KMCEVMFEKY DFGGVYVAIQ AVLALYAQGL SSGVVVDSGD GVTHIVPVYE SVVLSHLTRR LDVAGRDVTR HLIDLLSRRG YAFNRTADFE TVRQIKEKLC YVSYDLDLDT KLARETTALV ESYELPDGRT IKVGQERFEA PECLFQPGLV DVEQPGVGEL LFNTVQSADV DIRSSLYKAI VLSGGSSMYP GLPSRLEKEL KQLWFSRVLH NDPSRLDKFK VRIEDPPRRK HMVFIGGAVL ASIMADKDHM WLSKQEWQES GPSAMTKFGP R
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
ARP2 is the ATP-binding component of the Arp2/3 complex, which regulates actin polymerization. With an activating nucleation-promoting factor (NPF), it forms branched actin networks. It appears to contact the pointed end of the daughter actin filament.
Gene References Into Functions
Research articles related to ARP2 function: 1. ARP2's role in actin filament nucleation (PMID: 27417392) 2. WASP's role in destabilizing the inactive state of Arp2/3 (PMID: 27325766) 3. Las17's ability to nucleate actin independently of Arp2/3 (PMID: 27911716) 4. The role of Arp2/3 regulators in establishing functional networks (PMID: 23200048) 5. ARPC1/Arc40 as a contact site for the VCA domain of WASP family activators (PMID: 15485833) 6. WASp's role in stabilizing p35-dependent closure of the Arp2/3 complex (PMID: 15592479) 7. Importance of Arp2-Arp3 nucleotide binding for actin nucleating activity (PMID: 15657399) 8. Yeast Arp2/3 complex and Las17p WA in actin polymerization (PMID: 15857833) 9. Defects in endocytosis and actin network disassembly in Arp2 ATP-hydrolysis mutants (PMID: 16862144) 10. Arp2p in auto-regulation of actin assembly and disassembly during endocytosis (PMID: 17978096) 11. Arp2's regulation of Atg9 movement dynamics (PMID: 18287533) 12. Key surfaces of p35/ARPC2 in Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin assembly (PMID: 18381280)
Database Links

KEGG: sce:YDL029W

STRING: 4932.YDL029W

Protein Families
Actin family, ARP2 subfamily
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm, cytoskeleton, actin patch.

Q&A

What is the Arp2/3 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and what is its primary function?

The Arp2/3 complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a seven-subunit protein complex that includes the actin-related protein Arp2. It serves as a principal actin nucleation factor that generates branched actin filaments in response to cellular signals. The complex positions actin monomers to initiate new actin filaments, playing a crucial role in regulating actin dynamics throughout the cell .

In yeast, the Arp2/3 complex mediates the formation of branched actin networks in the cytoplasm that provide force for cellular processes including membrane growth, establishment of cell polarity, endocytosis, and organelle movement. Additionally, the complex promotes actin polymerization in the nucleus, thereby participating in gene transcription regulation and DNA repair processes .

Why is Arp2 essential for Saccharomyces cerevisiae viability?

Arp2p is an essential yeast protein, demonstrated by the fact that disruption of the ARP2 gene leads to a terminal phenotype characterized by the presence of a single large bud. This indicates that Arp2p is critical for completion of the cell cycle. Molecular analysis reveals that Arp2 is essential for the functionality of the Arp2/3 complex, as versions of the complex lacking Arp2 (ΔArp2 Arp2/3 complex) are inactive in actin nucleation assays, confirming that Arp2 is required to form a functional branch point in the actin network .

The essential nature of Arp2 derives from its central roles in:

  • Maintaining proper actin cytoskeleton organization

  • Enabling endocytosis (severely reduced in arp2 mutants)

  • Establishing polar growth and proper budding patterns

  • Facilitating mitochondrial movement and inheritance

Where is Arp2 localized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells?

Arp2p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae displays a distinctive localization pattern that correlates with its functions:

  • Plasma membrane proximity: Immunofluorescence using specific peptide antibodies reveals punctate staining under the plasma membrane, which partially colocalizes with actin .

  • Mitochondrial association: Remarkably, Arp2p and Arc15p (another subunit of the Arp2/3 complex) show tight, actin-independent association with isolated yeast mitochondria. Colocalization studies confirm Arp2p presence at mitochondria in intact cells .

This dual localization pattern supports Arp2's multiple functions in cellular processes, including endocytosis at the cell cortex and mitochondrial movement/inheritance through its mitochondrial association.

What is the recommended protocol for purifying endogenous Arp2/3 complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

The purification of endogenous Arp2/3 complex from wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a multi-step process that yields milligram quantities of purified complex suitable for biochemical studies. The recommended protocol includes:

  • Cell growth and harvesting: Grow yeast cultures to appropriate density and harvest by centrifugation

  • Cell lysis: Break open cells using mechanical disruption (typically glass beads)

  • Initial clarification: Remove cell debris through centrifugation

  • Ion exchange chromatography: Apply clarified lysate to an appropriate ion exchange column

  • Affinity purification: Use specific affinity methods, potentially involving GST-tagged VCA domain of nucleation-promoting factors which bind the Arp2/3 complex

  • Gel filtration: Apply concentrated fractions to a gel filtration column for final purification

This protocol typically produces material of sufficient purity and quantity (milligram amounts) for detailed biochemical and structural studies . The advantage of purifying from S. cerevisiae is that it provides fully assembled, native complex with all seven subunits in their properly modified state.

How can I generate and select temperature-sensitive arp2 mutations for functional studies?

To generate and select temperature-sensitive arp2 mutations for functional studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, follow this methodological approach:

  • PCR mutagenesis: Perform error-prone PCR mutagenesis on the ARP2 gene to generate a library of random mutations.

  • Transformation and selection system: Use an ade2/SUP11 sectoring screen system to identify temperature-sensitive mutations.

    • Transform the mutagenized ARP2 library into a strain carrying a wild-type ARP2 gene on a plasmid with the SUP11 suppressor.

    • Select transformants that can form colonies at permissive temperature (25°C) but not at restrictive temperature (37°C).

  • Phenotypic verification: Verify temperature sensitivity by testing growth on appropriate media at different temperatures.

  • Mutation identification: Sequence the isolated temperature-sensitive alleles to identify the specific mutation(s).

For example, the arp2-H330L mutant described in the literature was created using this approach and exhibits temperature sensitivity, osmosensitivity, and altered actin cytoskeleton at non-permissive temperature . This specific mutation has been valuable for studying Arp2p functions in membrane growth, polarity, endocytosis, and budding pattern establishment.

What methods are effective for quantifying Arp2 protein levels in yeast cells?

Effective quantification of Arp2 protein levels in yeast cells can be achieved through several complementary approaches:

  • Quantitative Western blotting:

    • Generate lysates from a known number of yeast cells

    • Separate proteins by SDS-PAGE alongside purified recombinant Arp2 standards of known concentration

    • Transfer to membrane and probe with specific anti-Arp2 antibodies

    • Compare band densities of cellular Arp2 against the standard curve of recombinant protein

    • Calculate molecules per cell based on cell count and total protein detected

  • Immunoprecipitation-based quantification:

    • Use antibody-coupled beads to immunoprecipitate Arp2 from cell extracts

    • Quantify the immunoprecipitated protein by Western blotting

    • Compare with standards or total cell extract

  • Fluorescence-based approaches:

    • Generate strains expressing Arp2-GFP fusion proteins

    • Quantify fluorescence intensity using microscopy or flow cytometry

    • Compare against standard curves of known GFP concentrations

Each of these methods has advantages and limitations, with Western blotting providing good precision when properly controlled with recombinant standards .

How does the Arp2/3 complex contribute to mitochondrial movement and inheritance in yeast?

The Arp2/3 complex plays a critical role in mitochondrial movement and inheritance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through several mechanisms:

  • Direct mitochondrial association: Arp2p and Arc15p show tight, actin-independent association with isolated yeast mitochondria, with Arp2p colocalizing with mitochondria in intact cells.

  • Actin cloud formation: Arp2p mediates the formation of actin clouds around mitochondria in intact yeast, which depends on functional Arp2p.

  • Impact on mitochondrial motility: Cells with mutations in ARP2 or ARC15 genes display:

    • Decreased velocities of mitochondrial movement

    • Complete loss of directed movement

    • Defects in mitochondrial morphology

  • Actin dynamics requirement: Reduced actin dynamics (even with intact actin cytoskeletal structure) results in decreased velocity and extent of mitochondrial movement.

These findings support that mitochondrial movement in yeast is actin polymerization-driven and requires the Arp2/3 complex. This represents a distinct function from the complex's better-known role in endocytosis and cell polarity .

The importance of this function lies in ensuring proper mitochondrial inheritance during cell division, as mitochondria must undergo a series of cell cycle-linked motility events to transfer from mother to daughter cells, including polarization toward the bud site in G1 phase and linear movement into developing buds in S phase.

What structural and biochemical changes occur in Arp2/3 complexes lacking the Arp2 subunit?

When the Arp2 subunit is absent from the Arp2/3 complex (ΔArp2 Arp2/3 complex), several significant structural and biochemical changes occur:

These findings highlight Arp2's essential role in the nucleation mechanism while revealing which functions of the complex are Arp2-dependent versus Arp2-independent.

How do mutations in ARP2 affect the actin cytoskeleton and related cellular processes?

Mutations in the ARP2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae produce profound effects on the actin cytoskeleton and multiple cellular processes:

MutationCytoskeletal EffectsCellular Process ImpactsTemperature SensitivityReference
arp2-H330LAltered actin cytoskeleton structureRandom budding patterns in both haploid and diploid cells; Severely reduced endocytosis at all temperaturesTemperature-sensitive, osmosensitive
ARP2 deletionTerminal phenotype with single large budCell cycle arrestLethal
ARP2/ARC15 mutationsDisrupted actin cloud formation around mitochondriaDecreased mitochondrial movement velocity; Loss of directed mitochondrial movement; Abnormal mitochondrial morphologyVariable

The temperature-sensitive arp2-H330L mutant has been particularly valuable for research as it allows conditional inhibition of Arp2 function. At non-permissive temperatures, this mutant exhibits:

  • Disrupted actin organization: The normal polarized distribution of actin patches is lost

  • Polarity defects: Random budding patterns emerge in both haploid and diploid cells

  • Endocytic deficiency: Lucifer yellow uptake (a marker of endocytosis) is severely reduced

  • Genetic interactions: Shows interaction with cdc10-1, a gene encoding a neck filament-associated protein necessary for polarized growth and cytokinesis

These effects demonstrate that Arp2p is an essential component of the actin cytoskeleton involved in multiple fundamental cellular processes including polarized growth, endocytosis, and organelle movement.

How is the activity of the Arp2/3 complex regulated in yeast cells?

The activity of the Arp2/3 complex in yeast cells is regulated through multiple sophisticated mechanisms:

  • Nucleation-promoting factors (NPFs):

    • The primary activators of Arp2/3 complex

    • Include proteins from the WASp/Scar family

    • Bind to and activate the complex, facilitating the activating conformational change

    • Recruit the first actin monomer for the daughter branch formation

    • Examples in yeast include Las17p (yeast WASp homolog) and the type I myosins Myo3p and Myo5p

  • Negative regulators:

    • Proteins like Arpin directly inhibit Arp2/3 activity to destabilize actin structures

    • Gadkin can sequester the Arp2/3 complex to specific cellular locations (e.g., endosomal vesicles), preventing its activity elsewhere

    • These regulators help control directional persistence and migration speed by inducing pauses in actin-based motility

  • ATP binding and hydrolysis:

    • Arp2 is an ATP-binding component of the complex

    • ATP binding and hydrolysis regulate conformational changes necessary for activation

    • The ATP-bound state of Arp2 is required for efficient nucleation

  • Post-translational modifications:

    • Phosphorylation of specific subunits modulates complex activity

    • These modifications can affect complex assembly, localization, and interaction with regulators

  • Upstream signaling pathways:

    • Small GTPases (particularly Cdc42) regulate NPF activity

    • Phosphoinositides contribute to proper localization and activation

Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is crucial for studying Arp2/3 complex function in specific cellular contexts and for designing experimental approaches to manipulate its activity.

What techniques can be used to study Arp2/3 complex dynamics in live yeast cells?

Several advanced techniques enable the study of Arp2/3 complex dynamics in live yeast cells:

  • Fluorescent protein tagging:

    • Genomic integration of GFP, mCherry, or other fluorescent protein tags to Arp2 or other complex subunits

    • Enables visualization of complex localization and dynamics

    • Example approach: Create a functional Arp2-GFP fusion by integrating GFP at the C-terminus of the endogenous ARP2 gene

  • Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP):

    • Selectively bleach fluorescently-tagged Arp2/3 complex in specific cellular regions

    • Monitor recovery of fluorescence to measure complex dynamics, assembly/disassembly rates

    • Provides quantitative data on complex turnover in different cellular structures

  • Single-particle tracking:

    • Track individual Arp2/3 complexes labeled with photoactivatable or photoswitchable fluorescent proteins

    • Analyze movement patterns, residence times, and interaction kinetics

    • Requires super-resolution microscopy techniques for optimal results

  • Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):

    • Tag Arp2/3 complex subunits and interaction partners with appropriate FRET pairs

    • Monitor conformational changes and protein-protein interactions in real-time

    • Example: FRET between Arp2-CFP and Arp3-YFP to detect activation-related conformational changes

  • Optogenetic manipulation:

    • Fuse light-sensitive domains to Arp2/3 regulators

    • Spatiotemporally control Arp2/3 activation/inhibition with light stimulation

    • Observe resultant changes in actin dynamics and cellular processes

These techniques can be combined with genetic manipulations (temperature-sensitive mutants, inducible expression systems) to dissect specific aspects of Arp2/3 complex function in various cellular processes such as endocytosis, mitochondrial movement, and polarized growth.

Comparing Arp2/3 Complex Across Species

Comparative studies of Arp2 across species provide valuable insights into actin cytoskeleton evolution:

These evolutionary insights help researchers understand how fundamental cellular processes have been conserved while allowing for specialization and complexity in different organisms. The study of yeast Arp2 thus provides a window into both conserved mechanisms and evolutionary innovations in cytoskeletal regulation .

What are common pitfalls when working with recombinant Arp2 and how can they be avoided?

When working with recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arp2, researchers often encounter several challenges that can be addressed with appropriate techniques:

ChallengeCommon CausesSolutions
Low expression yieldToxicity of overexpression; Protein misfolding; Poor codon optimizationUse inducible expression systems; Co-express with other Arp2/3 complex subunits; Optimize codons for expression host; Lower induction temperature
InsolubilityImproper folding; Aggregation; Hydrophobic patches exposedExpress as fusion with solubility tags (MBP, SUMO); Use mild detergents; Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration); Co-express with chaperones
Loss of activityIncorrect folding; Missing post-translational modifications; Absence of other complex subunitsExpress in eukaryotic systems; Purify entire complex rather than individual subunits; Include ATP in buffers
Instability during purificationProteolytic degradation; Oxidation; AggregationInclude protease inhibitors; Add reducing agents; Maintain low temperature; Use gentle purification methods
Poor antibody recognitionConformational epitopes; Masked binding sitesUse multiple antibodies targeting different epitopes; Optimize sample preparation conditions

A particularly effective approach for functional studies is to purify the entire endogenous Arp2/3 complex from yeast rather than working with recombinant Arp2 alone. This ensures proper assembly of all seven subunits with native post-translational modifications .

For structural studies requiring large amounts of protein, co-expression of multiple or all subunits in a suitable host system often improves yield and stability, as the subunits can stabilize each other during folding and purification.

How can I verify that recombinant Arp2 is correctly folded and functional?

Verifying the correct folding and functionality of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arp2 requires multiple complementary approaches:

For the most rigorous functional verification, a pyrene-actin polymerization assay is considered the gold standard. In this assay, purified Arp2/3 complex containing the recombinant Arp2 is mixed with pyrene-labeled actin monomers and an activating NPF fragment. Functional complex will show accelerated actin polymerization compared to controls lacking either the complex or the NPF .

What are the best approaches for introducing specific mutations into ARP2 for structure-function studies?

For structure-function studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arp2, several sophisticated approaches can be used to introduce specific mutations:

  • CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing:

    • Design guide RNAs targeting the ARP2 locus

    • Provide repair template containing desired mutation(s)

    • Screen transformants for incorporation of mutation

    • Advantages: Mutations are introduced at the endogenous locus, maintaining native expression levels and regulation

  • Plasmid shuffling strategy:

    • Start with a strain where chromosomal ARP2 is deleted and viability is maintained by wild-type ARP2 on a URA3-marked plasmid

    • Transform with a second plasmid carrying the mutant arp2 allele and a different marker

    • Select for loss of the URA3 plasmid using 5-FOA

    • Survivors will rely on the mutant arp2 allele if it's functional

    • Advantages: Efficient for testing multiple mutations; Allows study of lethal mutations when combined with conditional promoters

  • Site-directed mutagenesis approaches:

    • Use PCR-based methods (QuikChange or Q5 site-directed mutagenesis) to introduce mutations into ARP2 gene on a plasmid

    • Validate by sequencing before transformation into yeast

    • Advantages: Quick generation of multiple mutants; Compatible with diverse expression systems

  • Structure-guided rational design:

    • Use available structural data to identify key residues for specific functions:

      • ATP binding pocket mutations (affecting nucleotide hydrolysis)

      • Interface residues (affecting interactions with other complex subunits)

      • Surface residues (potentially affecting NPF binding or actin interactions)

    • Introduce conservative and non-conservative substitutions to test functional hypotheses

  • Chimeric protein construction:

    • Swap domains between Arp2 and conventional actin or between Arp2 from different species

    • Identify regions responsible for specific functions or species-specific differences

    • Advantages: Reveals functional domains; Tests evolutionary conservation

A particularly effective experimental design combines these approaches with conditional expression systems (temperature-sensitive alleles, auxin-inducible degron tags, or regulatable promoters) to allow temporal control over mutant protein expression .

What are the emerging areas of research involving S. cerevisiae Arp2/3 complex?

Several exciting emerging areas of research involving the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arp2/3 complex are expanding our understanding of this essential protein assembly:

  • Nuclear functions of Arp2/3 complex:

    • Investigation of roles in gene transcription regulation

    • Involvement in DNA repair mechanisms

    • Chromatin remodeling activities

    • Nuclear actin network formation and dynamics

  • Interplay with membrane remodeling machinery:

    • Coordination with endocytic proteins and membrane curvature sensors

    • Role in vesicle fission and fusion events

    • Lipid composition effects on Arp2/3 activity and localization

  • Mechanobiology of Arp2/3-dependent processes:

    • Force generation mechanisms during actin polymerization

    • Mechanosensing roles in different cellular compartments

    • Quantitative analysis of forces produced by branched actin networks

  • Computational modeling and synthetic biology approaches:

    • In silico modeling of Arp2/3 complex dynamics

    • Synthetic reconstitution of branched actin networks

    • Design of artificial Arp2/3 regulators for precise control of actin dynamics

  • Role in cellular stress responses:

    • Adaptation of actin cytoskeleton to environmental stresses

    • Heat shock, oxidative stress, and osmotic stress responses

    • Nutrient sensing and metabolic regulation

  • Mitochondrial-cytoskeletal interactions:

    • Further exploration of the unique role of Arp2/3 in mitochondrial dynamics

    • Mechanisms of Arp2/3-dependent mitochondrial inheritance

    • Integration with mitochondrial fission/fusion machinery

These research areas are being facilitated by advances in super-resolution microscopy, cryo-electron microscopy, optogenetics, and genome editing technologies that allow unprecedented visualization and manipulation of Arp2/3 complex in living cells.

How might new structural biology techniques advance our understanding of Arp2/3 complex mechanisms?

Advanced structural biology techniques are poised to revolutionize our understanding of Arp2/3 complex mechanisms in several key ways:

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):

    • Near-atomic resolution structures of Arp2/3 complex in different activation states

    • Visualization of conformational changes during activation

    • Structures of the complex with various regulatory proteins

    • Direct observation of branched actin network architecture in cellular contexts

    • Potential benefits: Reveals transient intermediates and dynamic assemblies previously inaccessible by crystallography

  • Integrative structural biology approaches:

    • Combining multiple techniques (X-ray crystallography, NMR, SAXS, cryo-EM, crosslinking mass spectrometry)

    • Building comprehensive structural models of dynamic Arp2/3-containing assemblies

    • Mapping protein-protein interaction networks with structural precision

    • Potential benefits: Provides complementary structural information across different resolution scales

  • Time-resolved structural techniques:

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture structural intermediates during activation

    • Time-resolved FRET to monitor conformational changes in solution

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to track dynamic structural changes

    • Potential benefits: Elucidates reaction mechanisms and transition states

  • In-cell structural biology:

    • Cryo-electron tomography of Arp2/3 complex in its native cellular environment

    • In-cell NMR to monitor structural changes in living cells

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to link structure with function

    • Potential benefits: Reveals physiologically relevant conformations and interactions

  • AlphaFold2 and machine learning approaches:

    • Prediction of complex assembly and regulatory interactions

    • Modeling of conformational changes and functional dynamics

    • Integration with experimental data for hybrid structural models

    • Potential benefits: Accelerates hypothesis generation and experimental design

These advanced techniques would particularly benefit investigations of:

  • The precise mechanism of Arp2/3 complex activation and conformational changes

  • Structural basis for regulation by different NPFs and inhibitory proteins

  • Assembly and architecture of branched actin networks in different cellular contexts

  • Species-specific structural differences that explain functional variations

What are the implications of Arp2/3 complex research for understanding human diseases?

Research on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arp2/3 complex has significant implications for understanding human diseases, as the complex structure and core functions are highly conserved from yeast to humans:

  • Cancer progression and metastasis:

    • Dysregulation of Arp2/3 complex contributes to altered cell migration in cancer cells

    • Expression levels of Arp2/3 regulators correlate with cancer progression

    • Arpin (negative regulator) shows inverse correlation with breast cancer metastasis

    • Low Arpin levels are associated with elevated WAVE complex expression and poor survival

    • Yeast models provide fundamental insights into mechanisms that are conserved in human cells

  • Immune system disorders:

    • Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome results from mutations in WASp, a key Arp2/3 activator

    • Defective immune cell migration, phagocytosis, and immune synapse formation occur

    • Basic mechanisms of Arp2/3 regulation elucidated in yeast inform therapeutic approaches

  • Neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases:

    • Arp2/3 complex is critical for neuronal development, axon guidance, and synapse formation

    • Dysregulation is implicated in conditions like autism spectrum disorders

    • Yeast studies on actin dynamics provide models for understanding cytoskeletal dysfunction

  • Infectious diseases:

    • Pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes hijack Arp2/3 complex for intracellular motility

    • Understanding the fundamental mechanics of Arp2/3 function helps develop anti-infective strategies

    • Yeast as a model system reveals conserved mechanisms of cytoskeletal manipulation by pathogens

  • Mitochondrial disorders:

    • The unique role of Arp2/3 in yeast mitochondrial movement and inheritance may have parallels in human cells

    • Mitochondrial dynamics are critical in numerous human diseases

    • Insights from yeast models may reveal new aspects of mitochondrial biology relevant to human health

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.