Saccharomyces cerevisiae Altered Inheritance of Mitochondria protein 36, Mitochondrial (AIM36), also known as FMP39 or YMR157C, is a protein of unknown function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . A null mutant of AIM36 exhibits reduced respiratory growth and an elevated frequency of mitochondrial genome loss . The authentic, non-tagged protein is detected in purified mitochondria during high-throughput studies .
The gene name for AIM36 is AIM36, with synonyms including FMP39 and SCY_4331 . The protein is also referred to as Found in Mitochondria Protein 39 . The UniProt ID for AIM36 is A6ZML5 .
| Category | Information |
|---|---|
| Gene Name | AIM36 |
| Synonyms | AIM36; FMP39; SCY_4331; Found in mitochondria protein 39 |
| UniProt ID | A6ZML5 |
| Protein Names | Altered inheritance of mitochondria protein 36, mitochondrial |
| Found in mitochondria protein 39 | |
| Organism | Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
Recombinant AIM36 is produced in E. coli as a full-length protein (amino acids 41-255) fused to an N-terminal His tag . The molecular weight of the recombinant protein is around 24.4 kDa . The protein's purity is greater than 90%, as determined by SDS-PAGE . It is supplied as a lyophilized powder from a Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 .
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Source | E. coli |
| Tag | His |
| Protein Length | Full Length (41-255 aa) |
| Form | Lyophilized powder |
| Purity | Greater than 90% by SDS-PAGE |
| Molecular Weight | 24.4 kDa |
| Storage Buffer | Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose, pH 8.0 |
| Storage | Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt, aliquoting is necessary for multiple use. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. |
| Reconstitution | Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% of glycerol (final concentration) for long-term storage. |
| AA Sequence | SSTDSSTKRSNKSDKIDAPGFKKIFLVAIIGTVIFVKTVQSLDKNKPKTTLSEEEFENVVKGLKRRVAIFPQGEVDIKFSLSPSIEETRKVLQKSQGDDINELQFVDPVKVIDYYRTLRDDRYEALLNEYYKKYGCDTYAYNLPTGMLVMLLGRYFKENFKAGDKLVVVNFPHSIADATRFENEVSIVSKIFVPRKLSGSDVCKYYETVGKADII |
AIM36 is a mitochondrial protein involved in maintaining the integrity of the mitochondrial genome and respiratory function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Mitochondria are essential organelles responsible for cellular energy production through oxidative phosphorylation . The inheritance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is critical for respiratory metabolism, and AIM36 appears to play a role in this process .
Yeast Two-Hybrid Assays: Yeast two-hybrid assays have been used to study protein-protein interactions in S. cerevisiae . For example, Rev7, another protein in S. cerevisiae, interacts with the MRX complex, which is involved in DNA repair .
Mitochondrial Transformation: Saccharomyces cerevisiae is used for genetic transformation of mitochondria to generate alterations in mtDNA . This process involves delivering DNA sequences into yeast mitochondria via microprojectile bombardment and incorporating them into mtDNA through homologous recombination .
Xylose Metabolism: Engineered strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae can metabolize xylose, expressing genes for aldose reductase (XYL1), xylitol dehydrogenase (XYL2), and D-xylulokinase (XYL3 or XKS1) .
AIM36 (Altered inheritance of mitochondria protein 36, mitochondrial) is a protein encoded by the AIM36 gene (YMR157C) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is also known as FMP39 (Found in mitochondria protein 39) . This protein is localized to the mitochondria and plays a role in the proper inheritance of mitochondria during cell division in yeast.
The protein is classified as part of the mitochondrial proteome and has been identified through systematic screens for genes affecting mitochondrial function and inheritance. The specific molecular mechanisms by which AIM36 influences mitochondrial inheritance remain an active area of research, but studies suggest it contributes to mitochondrial membrane organization and dynamics during cell division.
Recombinant AIM36 protein is typically produced using E. coli expression systems. The general methodology involves:
Cloning the AIM36 gene sequence (codons 41-255, excluding the mitochondrial targeting sequence) into a bacterial expression vector with an N-terminal His-tag .
Transforming the construct into an E. coli expression strain.
Inducing protein expression under optimized conditions.
Purifying the protein using nickel-affinity chromatography based on the His-tag.
Additional purification steps such as size-exclusion chromatography may be implemented to achieve higher purity.
The final product is often lyophilized and stored with trehalose as a stabilizing agent .
For optimal storage and handling, the purified protein should be aliquoted and stored at -20°C to -80°C to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles that may compromise protein integrity .
Several experimental systems are employed to study AIM36 function in vivo:
Gene deletion studies: AIM36 knockout strains are created using homologous recombination to replace the gene with a selectable marker. These strains are then analyzed for alterations in mitochondrial morphology, inheritance patterns, and cellular respiration.
Fluorescent tagging: AIM36 can be fused with GFP or other fluorescent proteins to track its localization and dynamics in living cells.
Red mutant hunts: This classical yeast genetics approach can identify mutations affecting AIM36 function or interacting pathways by screening for red colonies that indicate defects in respiratory capacity .
Yeast mating assays: Confrontation tests using different mating types can help characterize the impact of AIM36 mutations on mitochondrial inheritance during sexual reproduction .
When designing experiments to study AIM36's role in mitochondrial inheritance, researchers should consider:
Control for strain background effects: Different laboratory yeast strains may have subtle differences in mitochondrial behavior. Always include appropriate wild-type controls of the same genetic background .
Temporal resolution: Mitochondrial inheritance is a dynamic process. Time-lapse microscopy with appropriate temporal resolution is essential to capture key events.
Cell cycle synchronization: Since mitochondrial inheritance is coordinated with the cell cycle, methods to synchronize yeast cultures (such as alpha-factor arrest-release) should be considered to obtain coherent observations.
Quantitative metrics: Develop clear quantitative metrics for assessing mitochondrial inheritance defects, such as:
Percentage of daughter cells receiving mitochondria
Volume/mass of mitochondria transferred to daughter cells
Time required for complete inheritance
Combinatorial genetic approaches: Consider creating double mutants with genes known to affect mitochondrial dynamics (e.g., fission/fusion machinery) to position AIM36 in the broader network of mitochondrial inheritance.
Systematic mutation analysis of AIM36 can be performed using the following methodological approach:
UV mutagenesis protocol:
Prepare yeast cultures at approximately 10^6 cells/ml
Perform serial dilutions to achieve approximately 10^3 cells per plate
Expose plates to calibrated UV-C radiation for varying durations
Incubate plates at 30°C for 2-3 days until colonies are 2-3mm in diameter
Screen for phenotypes of interest (e.g., red colonies indicating respiratory defects)
Targeted mutagenesis approaches:
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of functional domains
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing for precise mutations
Characterization workflow:
| Mutation Screening Steps | Timeline | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| Initial mutagenesis | Day 0-1 | Use appropriate UV dosage to achieve 10-30% survival rate |
| Colony growth | Days 2-4 | Maintain at 30°C for optimal growth |
| Phenotypic screening | Day 5 | Screen for red/white colony color on YED media |
| Mutant isolation | Days 6-7 | Pick and restreak candidates to confirm stable phenotype |
| Complementation testing | Days 8-11 | Cross with known mutants to identify affected pathways |
| Final characterization | Days 12-14 | Classify mutations based on all collected data |
Several complementary approaches are recommended for analyzing AIM36 protein-protein interactions:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Express epitope-tagged AIM36 (e.g., His-tag as in commercially available constructs)
Solubilize mitochondrial membranes with appropriate detergents
Perform pull-down assays followed by mass spectrometry to identify interacting proteins
Validate interactions with reciprocal Co-IPs and Western blotting
Proximity-based labeling:
Create fusion proteins of AIM36 with BioID or APEX2
Allow in vivo biotinylation of proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
This approach captures both stable and transient interactions in the native cellular environment
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use the mature form of AIM36 (amino acids 41-255) as bait
Screen against cDNA libraries or focused mitochondrial protein libraries
Validate hits using orthogonal methods
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET):
Create fluorescent protein fusions with AIM36 and candidate interactors
Measure FRET efficiency in living cells
This approach provides spatial information about interactions within mitochondria
When interpreting interaction data, researchers should consider that membrane proteins like AIM36 may require specific conditions to maintain proper folding and interaction capacity during experimental manipulation.
Research on AIM36 in yeast provides valuable insights that can be extrapolated to understand mitochondrial inheritance in higher organisms:
Conserved mechanisms: While AIM36 itself may not have direct orthologs in mammals, many mechanisms of mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance are conserved across species. Studies in yeast can reveal fundamental principles applicable to human cells.
Disease relevance: Understanding mitochondrial inheritance in yeast models can inform research on human mitochondrial diseases. Approximately 1 in 5,000 people suffer from mitochondrial diseases, and 1 in 8 women in the general population carries mitochondrial DNA mutations that can be transmitted to offspring .
Bottleneck phenomenon: Both yeast and human cells exhibit a genetic bottleneck effect during mitochondrial inheritance, where only a subset of the mitochondrial DNA population is transmitted to the next generation. This phenomenon affects the segregation of mitochondrial mutations .
Maternal inheritance patterns: While yeast has biparental inheritance of mitochondria (though with some bias), humans exhibit strict maternal inheritance. Nevertheless, the cellular machinery controlling mitochondrial segregation during cell division shares common features .
Selection processes: Both systems show evidence of selection processes acting on mitochondrial genomes during inheritance, which influence the transmission of deleterious mutations .
Researchers studying AIM36 should consider these parallels when designing experiments and interpreting results in the broader context of mitochondrial biology across species.
Characterizing the biochemical properties of recombinant AIM36 requires multiple complementary approaches:
Protein quality assessment:
Membrane association studies:
Liposome binding assays with various lipid compositions mimicking mitochondrial membranes
Membrane insertion analysis using protease protection assays
Detergent solubility profiling to determine optimal conditions for maintaining native conformation
Reconstitution experiments:
Reconstituting recombinant AIM36 into proteoliposomes
Measuring effects on membrane properties (fluidity, curvature)
Assessing interactions with other mitochondrial proteins in the reconstituted system
Functional assays:
ATPase activity measurements (if applicable)
Membrane potential sensitivity assays
Protein folding stability under various pH and salt conditions
For reproducible results, it's critical to follow proper handling protocols including avoiding repeated freeze-thaw cycles and maintaining the protein in appropriate buffer conditions with stabilizing agents such as trehalose .
Isolating native AIM36 from yeast mitochondria requires a careful sequential approach:
Yeast culture optimization:
Grow Saccharomyces cerevisiae in rich medium with a non-fermentable carbon source (e.g., glycerol) to induce mitochondrial proliferation
Harvest cells during logarithmic growth phase when mitochondrial content is highest
Mitochondrial isolation:
Enzymatically digest the cell wall with zymolyase to create spheroplasts
Gently lyse spheroplasts using Dounce homogenization
Separate mitochondria through differential centrifugation
Further purify mitochondria using Percoll gradient centrifugation
AIM36 extraction and purification:
Solubilize mitochondrial membranes with mild detergents (e.g., digitonin or DDM)
Perform immunoprecipitation using AIM36-specific antibodies
Alternatively, use affinity chromatography if working with tagged versions of AIM36
Validation of purified protein:
Western blot analysis with AIM36-specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry analysis to confirm identity
Activity assays to verify native conformation
This approach preserves the native state of AIM36 including post-translational modifications and associated binding partners that may be absent in recombinant systems.
To effectively analyze AIM36 gene expression patterns:
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR):
Design primers specific to AIM36 (YMR157C) with careful attention to avoid amplification of homologous sequences
Select appropriate reference genes for normalization (ACT1, TDH3, and ALG9 are commonly used in yeast)
Test expression under different carbon sources, growth phases, and stress conditions
Northern blot analysis:
Provides information about transcript size and alternative splicing
Useful for validating qRT-PCR results with an orthogonal method
RNA-Seq:
Offers genome-wide context for AIM36 expression changes
Reveals co-regulated genes that may function in the same pathway
Identifies potential regulatory elements through correlation analysis
Reporter gene assays:
Clone the AIM36 promoter upstream of a reporter gene (e.g., GFP or lacZ)
Measure reporter activity under various conditions to map regulatory elements
Perform deletion analysis of the promoter to identify critical regulatory sequences
| Experimental Condition | Expected Effect on AIM36 Expression | Methodological Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fermentable carbon source (glucose) | Lower expression | Use standardized culture conditions |
| Non-fermentable carbon source (glycerol) | Higher expression | Monitor growth phase carefully |
| Mitochondrial stress (e.g., ROS inducers) | Potential upregulation | Include positive control genes |
| Stationary phase | May show altered regulation | Compare with log phase expression |
| Oxygen limitation | Potential regulatory effect | Control oxygen levels precisely |
When analyzing expression data, consider the broader context of mitochondrial biogenesis and inheritance, as AIM36 regulation likely coordinates with other genes involved in these processes.
Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of AIM36 deletion requires a multi-faceted approach:
Acute depletion systems:
Employ auxin-inducible degron (AID) tags to rapidly deplete AIM36 protein
Use tetracycline-repressible promoters for controlled expression shutdown
Compare acute vs. chronic effects to separate primary from adaptive responses
Complementation strategies:
Reintroduce wild-type AIM36 to confirm phenotype rescue
Test structure-function relationships with mutant variants
Use orthologous genes from related species to assess functional conservation
Temporal analysis:
Establish a detailed timeline of events following AIM36 depletion
Early events (minutes to hours) are more likely to represent direct effects
Late events (many hours to days) may represent indirect or compensatory responses
Proximity-based methods:
Use APEX2 or BioID fusions to identify proteins in direct physical proximity to AIM36
Compare the immediate interaction neighborhood with broader affected pathways
In vitro reconstitution:
Purify component systems and test if AIM36 directly affects biochemical processes
Reconstitute minimal systems to test sufficiency for specific functions
This systematic approach helps researchers establish causality rather than mere correlation in the functional analysis of AIM36.
Studying AIM36 in the context of mitochondrial genetic bottlenecks requires specialized approaches:
Heteroplasmy establishment:
Create yeast strains with mixed populations of wild-type and marked mitochondrial genomes
Use mitochondrial-targeted restriction endonucleases or CRISPR systems to induce specific mitochondrial DNA modifications
Validate heteroplasmy levels using qPCR or next-generation sequencing
Single-cell lineage tracking:
Isolate individual cells and follow the mitochondrial genotype through multiple generations
Use microfluidic devices to trap mother cells and collect daughter cells for analysis
Apply fluorescent markers to distinguish different mitochondrial genotypes in living cells
Quantitative inheritance analysis:
Measure the variance in heteroplasmy levels between mother and daughter cells
Calculate bottleneck size using statistical models based on the observed segregation patterns
Compare bottleneck effects in wild-type versus AIM36 mutant strains
Integration with human mitochondrial inheritance models:
This integrated approach can reveal whether AIM36 plays a role in controlling the mitochondrial genetic bottleneck, which has important implications for understanding both basic mitochondrial biology and inheritance of mitochondrial diseases.
To elucidate structure-function relationships in AIM36:
This systematic approach allows researchers to create a detailed map of which protein regions contribute to specific aspects of AIM36 function in mitochondrial inheritance.
Detecting subtle phenotypes in AIM36 mutant strains requires highly sensitive methods:
High-resolution microscopy techniques:
Super-resolution microscopy (PALM/STORM, STED) for detailed mitochondrial morphology
Live-cell time-lapse imaging with optimized temporal resolution
Quantitative image analysis using machine learning algorithms for unbiased detection of subtle morphological changes
Single-cell analysis:
Microfluidic-based single-cell isolation and phenotyping
Flow cytometry with mitochondrial dyes to detect heterogeneity in populations
Single-cell transcriptomics to identify compensatory responses
Metabolic profiling:
High-sensitivity respirometry to detect minor changes in respiratory capacity
Metabolomics to identify shifts in mitochondrial metabolism
Isotope labeling to track metabolic flux through specific pathways
Genetic interaction mapping:
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis to identify genetic interactions
Chemical-genetic screens to find conditions that enhance subtle phenotypes
Dosage suppression screens to identify functional relationships
Competitive growth assays:
Long-term competition experiments between wild-type and mutant strains
Barcode sequencing for highly quantitative fitness measurements
Growth under varying environmental conditions to reveal condition-specific defects
These approaches can reveal phenotypes that might be missed by conventional assays, providing deeper insight into AIM36 function.
Positioning AIM36 within the broader mitochondrial functional network through systems biology requires:
Multi-omics integration:
Combine proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics data from AIM36 mutants
Use computational methods to integrate diverse datasets
Apply network analysis to identify functional modules affected by AIM36 disruption
Genetic interaction mapping:
Perform systematic genetic interaction screens (e.g., synthetic genetic array)
Create a genetic interaction profile for AIM36
Compare with profiles of other mitochondrial genes to identify functional neighborhoods
Protein interaction network analysis:
Map all physical interactions of AIM36 using AP-MS or BioID approaches
Extend to second-degree interactions to build a comprehensive network
Apply clustering algorithms to identify functional modules
Dynamic network modeling:
Develop mathematical models of mitochondrial inheritance incorporating AIM36
Test model predictions experimentally
Refine models iteratively based on new experimental data
Comparative genomics:
Analyze conservation patterns of AIM36 and interacting partners across species
Identify co-evolution patterns suggesting functional relationships
Use evolutionary information to predict function of uncharacterized domains
Research on AIM36 in yeast can inform therapeutic approaches for human mitochondrial diseases in several ways:
Mechanistic insights into mitochondrial inheritance:
Prediction of disease progression:
Therapeutic target identification:
Discovery of conserved pathways that could be targeted in human cells
Screening platforms using humanized yeast to identify compounds affecting mitochondrial inheritance
Development of strategies to shift heteroplasmy levels away from pathogenic mutations
Gene therapy approaches:
Insights from yeast mitochondrial biology informing mitochondrial gene editing strategies
Understanding mitochondrial genetic bottlenecks to optimize timing of therapeutic interventions
Identification of critical periods when interventions might be most effective
While AIM36 itself may not have a direct human ortholog, the cellular machinery governing mitochondrial inheritance has significant conservation between yeast and humans, making these translational connections valuable for therapeutic development.
The most promising future research directions include:
Structural biology:
Solving the high-resolution structure of AIM36
Mapping interaction surfaces with binding partners
Understanding how AIM36 interacts with mitochondrial membranes
Integration with mitochondrial dynamics:
Investigating AIM36's relationship with mitochondrial fission and fusion machinery
Exploring connections to the mitochondrial contact site and cristae organizing system (MICOS)
Understanding how AIM36 coordinates with cytoskeletal elements during inheritance
Single-molecule approaches:
Tracking AIM36 molecules in living cells using super-resolution microscopy
Measuring binding kinetics and stoichiometry in native contexts
Visualizing AIM36's role in mitochondrial membrane organization
Evolutionary perspectives:
Comparative analysis of AIM36 across fungal species with different mitochondrial inheritance patterns
Identification of functional analogs in higher eukaryotes
Understanding how mitochondrial inheritance machinery has evolved
Integration with human disease models:
These research directions will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of AIM36's role in mitochondrial biology and potentially reveal new approaches for addressing mitochondrial diseases in humans.