The Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae DUP240 protein YAR023C is a recombinant protein derived from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This protein is part of the DUP240 multigene family, which consists of 10 paralogs, with YAR023C being one of the three solo open reading frames (ORFs) not organized in tandem repeats . The recombinant form of this protein is often used in research to study its function and evolutionary dynamics.
Expression and Tagging: The recombinant YAR023C protein is typically expressed in Escherichia coli and is often tagged with a His-tag to facilitate purification .
Sequence and Length: The full-length protein consists of 179 amino acids (1-179aa) .
Purity: Recombinant proteins are usually purified to a high degree, often greater than 85% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
The DUP240 family, including YAR023C, is a subject of interest in evolutionary studies. These proteins are membrane-associated and not essential for cell viability . The solo ORFs, such as YAR023C, YCR007c, and YHL044w, are conserved across different S. cerevisiae strains, indicating stable chromosomal locations and less involvement in chromosomal reshaping compared to tandem repeats .
Mutation Fixation: YAR023C and YHL044w tend to fix mutations more easily than YCR007c, suggesting different evolutionary pressures within the same multigene family .
Evolutionary Constraints: The ds/dn ratios indicate that YAR023C and YHL044w may evolve more rapidly than other genes, including those specific to Ascomycetes .
Recombinant YAR023C protein is available from various suppliers, such as Creative Biomart and MyBioSource, and can be used in a range of applications including ELISA and Western Blot for protein detection . The protein's recombinant form allows researchers to study its function and interactions in a controlled manner.
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Expression Host | Escherichia coli |
| Tag | N-terminal His-tag |
| Sequence Length | 1-179 amino acids |
| Purity | ≥ 85% by SDS-PAGE |
| Paralog | Mutation Fixation | Evolutionary Constraints |
|---|---|---|
| YAR023C | High | Less stringent selection |
| YCR007c | Lower | More stringent selection |
| YHL044w | High | Less stringent selection |
YAR023C is a member of the DUP240 protein family in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The full-length protein consists of 179 amino acids with the following sequence: MINFLLFVLTILATLTNIWFSGVLSPAMVIRICLGGSMVVLQIWSFSRPISNETFRTKLL LEVITHRPSIAGKEWKTITYNMNQYLFKAGLWKTPYHFFCEHQCYEFFKDLIKGKYPDVQ WDTANTQPFISVPENQAATQNSDVEPTVKWCLFKAAEIQAHAVREYWQSQYPDVGIPAI .
Like other DUP240 family proteins, YAR023C likely has two predicted transmembrane domains separated by a short inter-helix linker, as well as three conserved domains . The transmembrane topology is critical for its localization and function in the cell membrane.
YAR023C belongs to the DUP240 gene family, which includes other members such as YAR028W (also known as KTD1 or killer toxin defense) and UIP3. These proteins share structural similarities but have evolved distinct functions. Recent research has identified YAR028W as playing a critical role in defense against killer toxin K28, while the specific function of YAR023C remains under investigation .
Evolutionary analysis suggests that DUP240 proteins may have diversified through gene duplication events, allowing for specialization of different family members. The presence of conserved domains across family members indicates shared ancestral functions, while variations in the inter-helix linker and C-terminal regions likely contribute to their functional divergence.
YAR023C can be successfully expressed in multiple heterologous systems:
| Expression System | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, rapid expression, cost-effective | Limited post-translational modifications |
| Yeast | Native-like post-translational modifications, good yield | Longer expression time than E. coli |
| Insect cells | Complex post-translational modifications | Requires baculovirus expression system |
| Mammalian cells | Most complex post-translational modifications | Lower yield, higher cost |
For structural studies, E. coli expression with an N-terminal His-tag has been demonstrated to be effective, yielding protein with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE . For functional studies requiring proper protein folding and activity, yeast expression systems may provide advantages due to more native-like post-translational modifications .
Optimizing YAR023C stability requires careful consideration of buffer composition and storage conditions. Recombinant YAR023C is typically provided in a Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 to enhance stability . The addition of trehalose is critical as it acts as a cryoprotectant that prevents protein denaturation during freeze-thaw cycles.
For reconstitution, it is recommended to:
Briefly centrifuge the vial containing lyophilized protein
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (optimally 50%)
Aliquot into smaller volumes to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Store at -20°C/-80°C for long-term storage
Working aliquots may be stored at 4°C for up to one week, but repeated freezing and thawing should be avoided as it significantly reduces protein activity and integrity .
When designing experiments to investigate YAR023C function, researchers should consider:
Appropriate controls: Include both positive and negative controls. For deletion studies, complementation with the wild-type gene should be performed to confirm phenotypic changes are due to the absence of YAR023C.
Strain background considerations: Different yeast strain backgrounds (e.g., BY vs. RM) may have significant genetic differences that affect experimental outcomes. Researchers should characterize their strain background thoroughly and consider how genetic background may influence results .
Variable isolation: Clearly define and control variables in the experimental design:
Independent variable: The factor being manipulated (e.g., YAR023C expression levels)
Dependent variable: The outcome being measured (e.g., cell growth, toxin resistance)
Controlled variables: Factors kept constant (e.g., temperature, media composition)
Replication: Include at least three technical replicates for each experimental condition and conduct biological replicates as well to ensure reliability and reproducibility of results .
Chimeric protein analysis: When investigating functional domains, design chimeras that transition between YAR023C and related proteins at the boundaries of transmembrane helices or conserved domains to identify regions important for specific functions .
Characterizing membrane topology of YAR023C requires a combination of computational prediction and experimental validation approaches:
Computational prediction:
Use topology prediction algorithms (e.g., TMHMM, Phobius) to identify potential transmembrane regions
Analyze hydrophobicity plots to confirm transmembrane domain boundaries
Compare with known DUP240 family proteins like YAR028W/KTD1
Experimental validation:
Protease protection assays: Treating intact cells or membrane fractions with proteases to determine which regions are accessible
Glycosylation mapping: Introducing glycosylation sites at various positions to determine luminal/cytoplasmic orientation
GFP-fusion analysis: Creating fusions with GFP at N- and C-termini to visualize localization
Cysteine accessibility methods: Introducing cysteine residues and testing their accessibility to membrane-impermeable thiol-reactive reagents
Structural analysis:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to determine secondary structure content
NMR or X-ray crystallography for high-resolution structural information
Comparative analysis with the characterized transmembrane topology of related DUP240 proteins provides additional insights, particularly the two predicted transmembrane domains separated by the inter-helix linker that has been shown to be functionally important in YAR028W .
While direct evidence for YAR023C in killer toxin defense is limited, strong evidence exists for its family member YAR028W (KTD1). Comprehensive genetic analysis has revealed that:
Linkage analysis of BY × RM cross segregants identified a QTL on chromosome I where genetic differences caused variation in K28 toxin resistance .
The YAR028W gene from the BY strain provides strong protection against K28 toxin when expressed in sensitive strains, while a frameshift mutation in the RM allele abolishes this protection .
Deletion of YAR028W (yar028wΔ) in the BY background results in hypersensitivity to K28 toxin .
Analysis of genetic variations in YAR023C across different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains can provide insights into its functional evolution. Similar to what has been observed with YAR028W, where the RM strain contains a frameshift mutation that abolishes its protective function against K28 toxin , variations in YAR023C may lead to functional differences.
To systematically analyze such variations:
Sequence alignment: Compare YAR023C sequences from different yeast strains to identify polymorphisms.
Functional complementation: Express YAR023C variants in a deletion background and assess phenotypic rescue.
Domain swapping: Create chimeric proteins between variants to identify which regions are responsible for functional differences.
Evolutionary analysis: Calculate the ratio of non-synonymous to synonymous substitutions (dN/dS) to determine if the gene is under positive selection, which would suggest a role in adaptation to different environments or in host-pathogen interactions.
Expression analysis: Use ribosome footprinting data to confirm translation and identify potential differences in expression levels or translation efficiency between strains .
Studies of the related DUP240 protein YAR028W (KTD1) have identified the inter-helix linker and C-terminus as critical for its function in killer toxin defense . By extension, these regions may also be important for YAR023C function:
Inter-helix linker: In YAR028W, chimeras with different inter-helix linkers showed dramatic differences in K28 protection ability, suggesting this region may be involved in toxin recognition or interaction with cell wall components .
C-terminus: Replacement of the C-terminal 88 amino acids of YAR028W with the corresponding region from another DUP240 family member (UIP3) completely abolished K28 resistance, indicating this region is essential for functional specificity .
For YAR023C, targeted mutagenesis of these regions coupled with functional assays would help determine:
Whether similar functional domains exist
If these regions confer specific interactions with particular molecules
How structural differences in these regions contribute to potentially distinct functions compared to other DUP240 family members
Optimal expression and purification of recombinant YAR023C involves several key considerations:
When expressing in E. coli, codon optimization for the host organism may improve expression levels, particularly for eukaryotic proteins. For functional studies, expression in S. cerevisiae may provide advantages due to native post-translational modifications and proper folding environment .
Creating chimeric constructs between YAR023C and other DUP240 family members provides a powerful approach to identify functional domains. Based on successful strategies with YAR028W , researchers should:
Identify domain boundaries: Use computational analysis to identify:
Transmembrane helices
Inter-helix linker
Conserved domains
C-terminal region
Design chimera construction strategy:
Create transitions at natural domain boundaries
Use overlap extension PCR or Gibson assembly for seamless fusion
Maintain reading frame across fusion junctions
Include epitope tags for detection if necessary
Functional validation:
Express chimeras in appropriate deletion backgrounds
Test for complementation of phenotypes
Compare activity levels quantitatively
Sequential domain swapping: Follow a systematic approach:
Swap entire N-terminal or C-terminal halves first
Narrow down to individual domains
Focus on fine mapping of regions showing functional differences
For example, with YAR028W, chimeras transitioning between Ktd1p and Uip3p at the boundaries of transmembrane helices or conserved domains revealed that the inter-helix linker and C-terminus were critical for K28 toxin protection . A similar approach with YAR023C could reveal domains important for its specific functions.
Several quantitative methods can be employed to analyze YAR023C-mediated phenotypes:
Each of these methods should include appropriate controls and statistical analysis to ensure reliable and reproducible results.
Understanding YAR023C's structure and function could lead to several biotechnological applications:
Stress resistance engineering: If YAR023C contributes to stress or toxin resistance like its family member YAR028W, it could be used to engineer yeast strains with enhanced tolerance to industrial conditions.
Biosensor development: The specificity of DUP240 proteins for certain environmental factors or toxins could be exploited to develop biosensors that detect specific compounds.
Protein scaffold engineering: The membrane topology and domain structure of YAR023C could serve as a scaffold for designing proteins with novel functions, particularly for membrane-associated applications.
Yeast surface display: YAR023C could potentially be utilized in yeast surface display systems for protein engineering or antibody development.
Drug discovery platform: If YAR023C interacts with specific molecules, it could serve as a target or tool in drug discovery efforts focused on antifungal compounds.
These applications would build upon fundamental research into YAR023C's natural function and would require detailed structural and functional characterization.
To elucidate the natural biological function of YAR023C, researchers should consider a multi-faceted approach:
Comprehensive phenotypic analysis:
Create precise deletion and overexpression strains
Subject these strains to various stress conditions (chemical, temperature, pH)
Test resistance to different yeast killer toxins beyond K28
Analyze cellular physiology and morphology under different conditions
Evolutionary and comparative genomics:
Protein interaction studies:
Identify binding partners through co-immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectrometry
Validate interactions using orthogonal methods (yeast two-hybrid, FRET)
Determine subcellular localization under different conditions
Structural biology approaches:
Obtain high-resolution structure through X-ray crystallography or cryo-EM
Use structure to guide functional hypotheses and mutagenesis
Compare with structures of related proteins with known functions
Systems biology integration:
Analyze transcriptomics and proteomics data in response to YAR023C deletion or overexpression
Integrate with existing datasets on DUP240 family proteins
Model potential functions based on system-wide effects
By combining these approaches, researchers can develop and test specific hypotheses about YAR023C function, potentially revealing its role in yeast biology and evolution.