Saccharomyces cerevisiae, commonly known as baker's yeast, is a eukaryotic organism with an extensive history of safe use in research and industrial applications . It is well-suited for the expression of membrane proteins due to its ability to properly fold and target these proteins, as well as perform necessary post-translational modifications .
Membrane proteins in S. cerevisiae are crucial for various cellular functions, including transport, signaling, and cell-cell interactions. The expression of these proteins in yeast offers several advantages, including cost-effectiveness, ease of genetic manipulation, and the ability to perform complex post-translational modifications .
The expression of recombinant proteins like YBR064W in S. cerevisiae typically involves the use of episomal expression plasmids and selection markers to ensure high levels of protein production. The yeast's robust DNA repair and recombination machinery facilitate efficient transformation and expression of heterologous proteins .
Recombinant proteins like YBR064W are available from various suppliers, such as CUSABIO TECHNOLOGY LLC, which offers a range of recombinant proteins for research purposes .
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| CAS No. | Not Available |
| Chemical Name | Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Putative uncharacterized membrane protein YBR064W |
| Molecular Formula | Not Available |
| Molecular Weight | Not Available |
| Supplier | CUSABIO TECHNOLOGY LLC |
| Advantage | Description |
|---|---|
| Cost-Effectiveness | Inexpensive growth and maintenance compared to mammalian cells. |
| Genetic Manipulation | Easy genetic manipulation for expressing heterologous proteins. |
| Post-Translational Modifications | Ability to perform complex post-translational modifications necessary for protein function. |
| Safety | Generally regarded as safe (GRAS) for use in research and industrial applications. |
While YBR064W is naturally found in S. cerevisiae, E. coli has been successfully used as an expression system for recombinant production. The recombinant form with an N-terminal His-tag expressed in E. coli provides good yield and maintains the protein's structural integrity .
| Expression System | Advantages | Challenges | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid growth | Potential folding issues with membrane proteins | Structural studies, antibody production |
| S. cerevisiae | Native environment, proper folding | Lower yield, more complex maintenance | Functional studies, protein-protein interactions |
| Mammalian cells | Complex PTMs if needed | Expensive, time-consuming | When studying in heterologous systems |
For optimal expression in E. coli, induction conditions should be carefully controlled, with typical protocols using IPTG at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to allow proper folding of membrane proteins.
Recombinant YBR064W demonstrates moderate stability under laboratory conditions. The lyophilized powder form provides excellent long-term stability, while reconstituted protein requires careful handling. Storage recommendations include keeping the protein at -20°C/-80°C, with working aliquots maintained at 4°C for up to one week . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce protein integrity and should be avoided.
The protein is typically stored in Tris/PBS-based buffer containing 6% Trehalose at pH 8, which helps maintain stability . Trehalose acts as a cryoprotectant and helps preserve protein structure during freezing and lyophilization processes. Researchers should monitor protein degradation using SDS-PAGE before critical experiments.
The His-tagged recombinant YBR064W can be effectively purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC). A typical purification protocol involves:
Cell lysis using mechanical disruption with appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside)
Clarification by centrifugation (typically 20,000×g for 30 minutes)
IMAC purification using Ni-NTA or similar resin
Size exclusion chromatography for final polishing
This approach typically yields protein with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE . For membrane proteins like YBR064W, maintaining the correct detergent concentration throughout purification is critical to prevent aggregation while preserving native-like structure.
For researchers studying YBR064W, combining SDS-PAGE for routine purity assessment with at least one orthogonal method (typically mass spectrometry) is recommended for definitive protein validation before proceeding to functional studies.
Since YBR064W is supplied as a lyophilized powder , proper reconstitution is critical for maintaining function. A methodological approach includes:
Equilibrate the lyophilized protein to room temperature before opening
Reconstitute using a buffer matching the final application (typically Tris/PBS at pH 8)
For membrane protein studies, incorporate appropriate detergents or lipids:
For detergent micelles: 0.1-0.5% DDM or LMNG
For proteoliposomes: E. coli polar lipids or synthetic mixtures (POPC:POPE:POPG)
Gentle mixing without vortexing to prevent denaturation
Centrifugation (14,000×g, 10 min) to remove any insoluble material
Validation of proper folding using circular dichroism or fluorescence spectroscopy
When designing reconstitution protocols, researchers should consider the membrane environment needed for the specific functional assay being performed.
Given that YBR064W is a putative uncharacterized membrane protein, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches to elucidate its function:
Genetic approaches:
CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts in S. cerevisiae to observe phenotypic effects
Synthetic genetic arrays to identify genetic interactions
Complementation studies with mutant variants
Biochemical approaches:
Structural approaches:
Cryo-EM studies of the purified protein in detergent or lipid nanodiscs
X-ray crystallography (challenging for membrane proteins)
NMR for dynamics studies of specific domains
Quasi-experimental designs can help establish causality when randomized experiments are infeasible . For instance, regression discontinuity designs or instrumental variable approaches may help identify causal relationships between YBR064W function and cellular phenotypes in complex biological systems.
Comparative genomics provides valuable insights for uncharacterized proteins like YBR064W. A methodological approach includes:
Perform sequence homology searches across species using BLAST and HMM-based methods
Identify conserved domains and motifs through tools like InterPro and PFAM
Examine genomic context in S. cerevisiae and related yeast species
Analyze co-expression patterns with genes of known function
Investigate protein structure prediction using AlphaFold2 or similar tools
This approach allows researchers to move beyond the "putative uncharacterized" designation by generating testable hypotheses about YBR064W function based on evolutionary conservation patterns.
For understanding YBR064W in a broader cellular context:
Transcriptomics:
RNA-seq analysis comparing wild-type and YBR064W deletion strains
Identification of differentially expressed genes to infer pathway involvement
Proteomics:
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX) using YBR064W as bait
Quantitative proteomics to identify proteins affected by YBR064W deletion
Metabolomics:
Untargeted metabolomics to identify metabolic alterations in YBR064W mutants
Flux analysis to determine impact on specific metabolic pathways
Network analysis:
Integration of multi-omics data to position YBR064W in cellular networks
Pathway enrichment analysis of interacting partners
These systems approaches can reveal unexpected connections between YBR064W and cellular processes, generating novel hypotheses for targeted experimental validation.
For membrane proteins like YBR064W, protein engineering approaches such as fusion to solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO) or truncation of highly hydrophobic regions may improve handling while preserving essential structural features for study.
When confronted with contradictory data:
Methodological validation:
Verify antibody specificity using knockout controls
Employ multiple orthogonal techniques for localization (fluorescence microscopy, subcellular fractionation)
Use different epitope tags (N-terminal vs. C-terminal) to control for tagging artifacts
Condition-dependent analysis:
Test different growth conditions and stress responses
Examine cell-cycle dependence of localization/function
Investigate strain-specific differences
Technical reconciliation:
Develop a unified experimental framework to test competing hypotheses
Use collaborative blind testing to eliminate experimenter bias
Apply statistical approaches like meta-analysis to resolve contradictions
The quasi-experimental design principles discussed in search result can be valuable when designing experiments to resolve conflicting data, particularly by carefully controlling for confounding variables and establishing appropriate control groups.
Rigorous controls are essential for interaction studies involving YBR064W:
For pull-down experiments:
Empty vector/tag-only negative control
Known non-interacting protein negative control
Competitive binding with untagged protein
RNase/DNase treatment to eliminate nucleic acid-mediated interactions
For localization studies:
Marker proteins for different cellular compartments
Multiple fixation and permeabilization methods
Live cell imaging to eliminate fixation artifacts
For functional assays:
Temperature-sensitive mutants as positive controls
Proper wild-type and deletion controls
Complementation controls to verify specificity
Implementing these controls helps distinguish true biological interactions from technical artifacts, a critical consideration when working with putative uncharacterized proteins like YBR064W where functional information is limited.
YBR064W research can contribute to broader membrane protein biology through:
Serving as a model for studying membrane protein folding and topology in eukaryotes
Providing insights into membrane protein quality control mechanisms
Expanding our understanding of the approximately 30% of proteins encoded by the S. cerevisiae genome that remain functionally uncharacterized
Future studies could leverage approaches like those used with other recombinant S. cerevisiae systems, where whole recombinant yeast has been engineered to express target proteins for immunological studies . Such approaches might reveal unexpected functions for YBR064W in cellular processes beyond current predictions.
Several cutting-edge technologies hold particular promise:
Cryo-electron tomography for visualizing YBR064W in its native membrane environment
Single-particle cryo-EM for high-resolution structural determination
AlphaFold2 and RoseTTAFold for computational structure prediction
Native mass spectrometry for analyzing intact membrane protein complexes
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for dynamics and interaction mapping
Single-molecule FRET for conformational dynamics studies
These technologies, when applied to the recombinant His-tagged YBR064W described in the literature , could provide unprecedented insights into this uncharacterized protein's structure and function.