Recombinant YBR076C-A is commercially available through specialized biotechnology suppliers. Key suppliers include:
| Supplier | Product Catalog No. | Price Range | Delivery Form |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative BioMart | RFL30607SF | Upon inquiry | Lyophilized powder |
| CUSABIO TECHNOLOGY LLC | CB615636553 | Not disclosed | Not specified |
Expression Systems: Exclusively produced in E. coli using standard recombinant protocols .
Applications: Primarily used in biochemical assays (e.g., SDS-PAGE) and structural studies .
While YBR076C-A lacks annotated molecular functions, bioinformatics tools suggest potential roles:
Putative Pathways: Though not experimentally validated, it may participate in RNA-binding or mitochondrial processes, as inferred from paralogs like RMD9 (involved in mitochondrial regulation) .
Interactions: No direct protein-protein interactions have been reported, and pathway associations remain speculative .
| Domain Type | Residues | Potential Function |
|---|---|---|
| N-terminal region | 1–130 | Unstructured, polar regions |
| Pentatricopeptide repeats | 130–675 (predicted) | RNA-binding (homology to RMD9) |
YBR076C-A’s recombinant availability positions it as a candidate for:
Structural Studies: Cryo-EM or NMR to resolve its 3D structure.
Functional Screens: High-throughput assays to identify binding partners or enzymatic activity.
Comparative Genomics: Analysis of orthologs in other fungi to infer conserved roles.
YBR076C-A represents one of the uncharacterized open reading frames in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. While specific numerical values associated with YBR076C-A (51.68987815, 142.1093608) have been documented in research contexts, the functional characterization remains incomplete . The protein belongs to the category of putative uncharacterized proteins, indicating that its existence has been predicted through computational analysis of the yeast genome, but experimental verification of its expression and function requires further investigation. As with many uncharacterized proteins, its biological significance might be underestimated despite potentially contributing to important cellular processes.
Confirming the expression of putative uncharacterized proteins like YBR076C-A typically employs multiple complementary approaches:
RT-PCR and qPCR to detect and quantify mRNA transcripts
Western blotting with specific antibodies or epitope tagging to verify protein expression
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics to identify the protein in cellular extracts
For epitope tagging approaches, techniques similar to those used in other yeast studies can be applied, such as adding a His-tag to the protein and confirming expression through Western blotting with anti-His antibodies, as demonstrated in studies with other recombinant yeast proteins . The expression vector pGAPZαC has proven effective for such constructs in S. cerevisiae, allowing for selection of transformants using Zeocin resistance .
To construct a YBR076C-A overexpression strain, researchers should follow this methodological approach:
PCR amplification of the YBR076C-A gene with appropriate restriction enzyme sites incorporated into primers
Inclusion of a Kozak consensus sequence for optimal expression
Ligation of the PCR product into an expression vector (e.g., pGAPZαC)
Linearization of the recombinant plasmid with an appropriate restriction enzyme (e.g., AvrII)
Transformation into S. cerevisiae via electroporation
Selection of transformants on media containing appropriate antibiotics (e.g., Zeocin)
Confirmation of successful transformation and expression via PCR and Western blotting
This methodology parallels successful approaches used with other yeast genes, such as ari1, where linearization of the vector with AvrII enzyme followed by electroporation transformation has proven effective .
For determining subcellular localization of YBR076C-A, researchers should consider implementing:
Fluorescent protein fusion constructs (GFP, YFP, mCherry) for live-cell imaging
Immunofluorescence microscopy using antibodies against native protein or epitope tags
Subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting
Co-localization with known organelle markers
These approaches should be combined with controls for validating specific localization patterns. When constructing fusion proteins, both N-terminal and C-terminal tagging should be attempted as protein function may be disrupted differently depending on tag position. Comparing the localization patterns under different growth conditions may provide insights into conditional functionality.
Given the context in which YBR076C-A was mentioned alongside RNA-binding proteins , investigating its potential RNA interaction capabilities would be valuable:
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) using tagged YBR076C-A to identify associated RNAs
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) to detect direct RNA binding
UV crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) to identify in vivo RNA binding sites
Structural analysis using techniques like NMR or X-ray crystallography to identify potential RNA-binding domains
Mutational analysis of predicted RNA-binding motifs to confirm functional relevance
Comparative analysis with known RNA-binding proteins from S. cerevisiae, particularly those studied at research centers like CIPF and IBV-CSIC, could provide valuable insights into YBR076C-A's potential role in RNA processing or metabolism .
To investigate YBR076C-A function through phenotypic analysis, researchers should implement:
Growth curve analysis comparing wild-type and YBR076C-A deletion/overexpression strains under various conditions
Stress tolerance assays (oxidative, osmotic, temperature, nutrient limitation)
Cell cycle analysis to detect potential roles in division or morphology
Metabolic profiling to identify affected biochemical pathways
Genetic interaction screens to place YBR076C-A in functional networks
When conducting growth assays, researchers should monitor not only maximum OD600 values but also lag phases and growth rates, as these parameters have proven informative in similar studies with engineered S. cerevisiae strains . Documentation of growth patterns at multiple time points (e.g., 24h, 48h, 72h, 96h, 120h, 144h) provides comprehensive characterization of potential phenotypes .
RNA-Seq experimental design for studying YBR076C-A should include:
Multiple biological replicates (minimum 3) of wild-type, deletion, and overexpression strains
Time-course sampling to capture early, middle, and late transcriptional responses
Varied growth conditions to identify condition-specific effects
Strand-specific library preparation to capture antisense transcription
Deeper sequencing (>30 million reads per sample) to detect subtle expression changes
Inclusion of spike-in controls for accurate normalization
Analysis should focus on both differential gene expression and alternative splicing patterns, as uncharacterized proteins may play roles in post-transcriptional regulation. Special attention should be given to genes encoding mRNA processing factors, as YBR076C-A might be involved in RNA metabolism pathways .
When designing synthetic recombinant populations to study YBR076C-A interactions, researchers should consider:
Pairwise crossing strategy rather than simple mixing of strains, as this maximizes and maintains greater genetic variation
Inclusion of 8-12 parental strains to increase genetic diversity, which enhances the potential for detecting genetic interactions
Selection of diverse genetic backgrounds to capture a wider range of potential phenotypic effects
Development of inbred lines for fine QTL mapping of YBR076C-A-related traits
Research indicates that "more genetic variation is initially present and maintained when population construction includes a round of pairwise crossing" compared to simple mixing of strains . This approach provides greater adaptive potential and increases the likelihood of detecting meaningful genetic interactions with YBR076C-A.
For CRISPR-Cas9 based manipulation of YBR076C-A, researchers should implement:
Design of specific gRNAs targeting YBR076C-A with minimal off-target effects
Generation of precise deletions, insertions, or point mutations rather than complete gene deletion
Creation of conditional alleles using inducible degradation tags
Introduction of epitope tags at the endogenous locus for studying native expression
Base editing for introducing specific amino acid changes without double-strand breaks
When designing repair templates, include appropriate homology arms (40-60 bp) flanking the desired modification. For studying potential interactions with other proteins, consider multiplex CRISPR to simultaneously modify YBR076C-A and candidate interacting partners to assess genetic interactions.
For detecting potentially low-abundance proteins like YBR076C-A:
Employ sample fractionation techniques to reduce proteome complexity
Utilize targeted proteomics approaches like selected reaction monitoring (SRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)
Implement protein enrichment strategies such as affinity purification
Apply state-of-the-art mass spectrometry methods with high sensitivity
Consider proximity labeling techniques like BioID or APEX to identify proteins in close proximity
When designing experiments, include multiple biological replicates and appropriate controls to distinguish genuine signals from background. Integration of transcriptomic data can help prioritize potential peptides for targeted detection efforts.
To map the protein interaction network of YBR076C-A:
Tandem affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (TAP-MS)
Yeast two-hybrid screening against a comprehensive S. cerevisiae library
Proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID, TurboID) followed by streptavidin pulldown
Co-immunoprecipitation with epitope-tagged YBR076C-A
Protein complementation assays (split-GFP, split-luciferase)
The resulting interaction data should be validated using orthogonal methods and analyzed in the context of existing interactome data. Particular attention should be paid to interactions with RNA-binding proteins or components of RNA processing machinery, given the potential connection of YBR076C-A to these processes .
To assess evolutionary conservation of YBR076C-A:
Perform BLAST and HMM-based searches across fungal genomes
Conduct phylogenetic analysis to establish orthologous relationships
Compare sequence conservation patterns to identify functional domains
Analyze synteny relationships to detect genomic context conservation
Examine selection pressure through dN/dS ratio analysis
Conservation analysis should extend beyond simple sequence similarity to include structural features and potential functional motifs. The presence or absence of YBR076C-A orthologs in different yeast species adapted to various environments may provide clues about its functional importance in specific ecological niches.
For inferring YBR076C-A function through comparative analysis:
Conduct domain-based searches to identify distant homologs with known functions
Perform structural prediction and comparison with characterized proteins
Analyze shared motifs that might indicate similar biochemical activities
Examine co-evolution patterns with functionally related proteins
Assess expression correlation patterns across species
This approach may reveal functional connections not apparent from direct sequence comparison. For instance, examining whether YBR076C-A contains features similar to known RNA-binding domains could provide insights, especially given its mention in the context of research on RNA-binding proteins .
For comprehensive analysis of YBR076C-A expression:
Examine expression across different growth phases (lag, log, stationary)
Test various stress conditions (nutrient limitation, temperature shifts, chemical stressors)
Compare expression in different carbon sources and media compositions
Analyze expression during specialized processes (sporulation, mating, biofilm formation)
Consider time-course experiments to capture dynamic expression changes
Based on studies of other yeast genes, expression levels may vary significantly over time, with peak expression potentially occurring at specific phases of growth. For instance, studies with ari1 showed maximum expression at 120 hours of culturing . Similar temporal dynamics might exist for YBR076C-A.
For reliable qPCR analysis of YBR076C-A:
| Component | Recommendation |
|---|---|
| Reference genes | Use multiple stable reference genes (ACT1, TDH3, ALG9) |
| Primer design | Target unique regions with no genomic duplications |
| Controls | Include no-template and no-RT controls |
| Replication | Minimum of 3 biological and 3 technical replicates |
| Time points | Sample at multiple time points (e.g., 24h, 48h, 72h, 96h, 120h, 144h) |
| Data analysis | Apply appropriate normalization and statistical testing |
Expression changes should be reported as fold-changes relative to appropriate controls. When studying gene expression in engineered strains, patterns may differ significantly from wild-type strains under stress conditions, as observed with the ari1 gene where expression increased dramatically (up to 74-fold) in engineered strains compared to wild-type under furfural stress .
For characterizing proteins lacking recognized domains:
De novo structural prediction using methods like AlphaFold2
Chemical and enzymatic activity screening to identify potential biochemical functions
Suppressor screens to identify genetic interactors
Systematic mutagenesis to identify critical residues
Heterologous expression in different cellular contexts to observe phenotypic effects
These approaches can be particularly valuable for uncharacterized proteins like YBR076C-A, where conventional homology-based functional prediction may be limited. The situation with YBR076C-A parallels challenges faced in the characterization of many uncharacterized human proteins, where despite extensive study of canonical proteins, "there are still hundreds to thousands of uncharacterized canonical and non-canonical isoforms as their biological functions are yet to be revealed" .
When facing inconsistent results:
Systematically evaluate experimental conditions that might explain variability
Test multiple genetic backgrounds to identify strain-specific effects
Consider conditional functionality dependent on specific environmental factors
Examine potential post-translational modifications affecting protein function
Investigate potential genetic redundancy that might mask phenotypes
Data inconsistencies should be transparently reported rather than selectively presenting consistent results. Comprehensive documentation of experimental conditions is essential for understanding context-dependent functions, particularly for uncharacterized proteins that may have subtle or condition-specific roles.
Advanced high-throughput strategies include:
Pooled CRISPR screens with various selective conditions
Systematic genetic interaction mapping using SGA or E-MAP approaches
Metabolomic profiling under various conditions
Ribosome profiling to assess translational impacts
ChIP-seq or CUT&RUN to identify potential DNA-binding activities if nuclear localization is observed
The integration of multiple omics datasets can provide complementary insights that might not be apparent from any single approach. As noted in studies of uncharacterized proteins, "much more collaborative efforts are required to unveil the mysteries of the cellular functions of uncharacterized proteins" .
Investigation of YBR076C-A may contribute to fundamental knowledge by:
Revealing novel regulatory mechanisms in gene expression
Uncovering previously unknown stress response pathways
Identifying new components of RNA processing machinery
Elucidating cellular adaptation mechanisms to environmental changes
Discovering unexpected functional roles of uncharacterized genomic regions
The study of uncharacterized proteins has repeatedly revealed surprising new biological functions and pathways. As demonstrated in research on other previously uncharacterized proteins, seemingly minor proteins can have significant impacts on cellular processes ranging from transcription and translation to stress responses and metabolic regulation .