While YCR097W-A remains uncharacterized, computational tools suggest potential roles in RNA-protein interactions. The catRAPID algorithm predicts interactions with >40 yeast proteins, including:
| Predicted Interactor | UniProt ID | catRAPID Score | RIP-Chip Detection |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC18 | Q05933 | 3.95 | Not detected |
| DXO1 | Q06349 | 3.95 | Not detected |
| TY1A-LR4 | P0C2I8 | 3.94 | Not detected |
| RPL42A/B | P0CX27/28 | 3.91 | Not detected |
| VTS1 | Q08831 | 3.83 | Not detected |
Data compiled from RNA interaction predictions .
RNA-binding potential: High catRAPID scores (3.9–3.95) suggest possible RNA-binding activity, though experimental validation is absent .
Functional Partners: Hypothetical interactions span ribosomal proteins (RPL42A/B), retrotransposons (TY1A variants), and RNA-processing enzymes (DXO1) .
Antibodies targeting YCR097W-A enable its detection in yeast lysates:
| Antibody Type | Host | Applications | Purity/Format |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclonal (Rabbit) | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | ELISA, Western blot | Antigen-affinity purified; liquid with 0.03% Proclin 300 |
Specificity: Antibodies may cross-react with homologs or isoforms, necessitating orthogonal validation .
Experimental Use Only: Not approved for diagnostic or therapeutic applications .
Functional Elucidation: No direct evidence links YCR097W-A to cellular pathways, though its predicted interactions hint at roles in RNA metabolism or translation .
Structural Studies: Crystallization or cryo-EM could resolve its 3D structure and binding motifs.
Knockout Models: Yeast deletion strains may reveal phenotypic effects, guiding functional studies .
STRING: 4932.YCR097W-A
YCR097W-A is a putative uncharacterized protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Based on genomic analyses, it is located on chromosome XVI. The gene appears to be positioned near silent mating-type loci, specifically flanking the silent HMR and HML loci along with YCRWDDta12 . This genomic positioning suggests potential involvement in mating-type regulation mechanisms, though its precise function remains to be fully characterized.
For initial characterization of YCR097W-A, a multi-faceted approach is recommended:
Gene deletion analysis: Generate deletion mutants (ycr097w-aΔ) to observe phenotypic changes. This technique has been successful in characterizing other uncharacterized ORFs in S. cerevisiae .
Transcriptomic profiling: Perform RNA-seq or microarray analysis comparing wild-type and deletion mutants to identify genes with altered expression. Similar approaches have been productive for characterizing other putative zinc finger proteins .
Protein localization: Use GFP-tagging to determine subcellular localization, which can provide clues to function.
Proteomic analysis: Conduct affinity capture-MS experiments to identify potential protein-protein interactions.
Phenotypic screening: Subject deletion mutants to various stress conditions to observe differential responses compared to wild-type.
The genomic context of YCR097W-A provides important clues about its potential function. YCR097W-A is located near silent mating loci in S. cerevisiae, specifically flanking the HMR and HML loci . This positioning suggests several hypotheses:
Mating-type regulation: The proximity to silent mating loci suggests YCR097W-A might be involved in silencing mechanisms or mating-type switching.
Chromatin organization: It may participate in establishing or maintaining chromatin boundaries near these silenced regions.
Evolutionary significance: The gene's location suggests it might have evolved alongside the mating-type determination system.
Transcriptional regulation: Similar to other proteins in this genomic region, it might function in regulating gene expression through interaction with silencing factors.
Interestingly, a related observation was made in Candida glabrata, where loci similar to YCR097W-A were found flanking mating-type-like (MTL) genes , suggesting conserved positioning across yeast species.
To investigate potential interactions between YCR097W-A and silencing machinery at HM loci, researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Using tagged YCR097W-A protein, perform ChIP followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) to identify genomic binding sites. Compare binding patterns near HMR/HML versus genome-wide.
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Conduct Co-IP experiments to identify direct protein interactions with known silencing factors (Sir2, Sir3, Sir4).
Genetic interaction screens: Create double mutants of ycr097w-aΔ with deletions of known silencing factors and assess epistatic relationships.
RNA expression analysis at silent loci: Use RT-qPCR to measure expression of normally silenced genes at HM loci in wild-type versus ycr097w-aΔ strains.
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis: Perform SGA to identify genome-wide genetic interactions with ycr097w-aΔ, focusing on interactions with genes involved in silencing.
A proposed experimental design would include generating strains with epitope-tagged YCR097W-A, followed by ChIP-seq to identify binding sites near HM loci. Expression of normally silenced genes should be measured in wild-type versus mutant backgrounds using the following RT-qPCR approach:
| Target Gene | Primer Sequence (Forward) | Primer Sequence (Reverse) | Expected Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HMLα1 | 5'-CGPIF1 sequence-3' | 5'-CGPIR2 sequence-3' | ~560 |
| HMLα2 | 5'-12.36F1 sequence-3' | 5'-P1RACE1 sequence-3' | ~560 |
| HMRa1 | 5'-A1RACE1 sequence-3' | 5'-CGAR1 sequence-3' | ~450 |
| HMRa2 | 5'-P1RACE1 sequence-3' | 5'-CGPF1 sequence-3' | ~450 |
| ACT1 (control) | Standard actin primers | Standard actin primers | ~500 |
This approach is similar to methods used in analyzing the mating-type loci in Candida glabrata .
Transcriptomic analysis is a powerful approach to characterize the function of putative uncharacterized proteins like YCR097W-A. Based on successful approaches used for similar proteins , the following methodology is recommended:
Experimental design: Generate single (ycr097w-aΔ) and double mutants with functionally related genes, along with wild-type controls.
RNA preparation and analysis: Extract total RNA from exponentially growing cultures under both standard and stress conditions.
Microarray or RNA-seq analysis: Compare gene expression profiles between wild-type and mutant strains.
Data analysis: Apply hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and functional categorization using Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS).
Validation: Confirm key expression changes using real-time PCR for selected genes.
When a similar approach was applied to characterize other putative zinc finger proteins (YPR013C and YPR015C), researchers found significant alterations in gene expression patterns:
| Strain Type | Number of Genes with Altered Expression | Major Functional Categories Affected |
|---|---|---|
| Single mutant (ypr013cΔ) | 79 genes | Transcription, cell cycle regulation |
| Single mutant (ypr015cΔ) | 185 genes | Cell cycle, stress response |
| Double mutant | 426 genes | Transcription, cell rescue, defense mechanisms |
Notably, 80% of alterations in the double mutant were not observed in either single mutant, revealing synergistic effects . This approach could similarly reveal functional pathways influenced by YCR097W-A.
The evolutionary significance of YCR097W-A can be investigated through comparative genomics approaches. Given limited direct information, we can draw insights from similar analyses:
Ortholog identification: Search for orthologs across yeast species using BLAST and synteny analysis, particularly focusing on close relatives of S. cerevisiae.
Sequence conservation analysis: Calculate evolutionary rates (dN/dS ratios) to determine selection pressures.
Synteny analysis: Examine conservation of gene order surrounding YCR097W-A across species.
Functional domain prediction: Identify conserved functional domains that might indicate ancestral functions.
An interesting comparative example comes from studies of M dsRNAs in killer yeast systems, where the klus preprotoxin shows high conservation with S. cerevisiae YFR020W ORF, suggesting an evolutionary relationship . Similarly, examining YCR097W-A's conservation pattern could reveal important evolutionary insights.
Researchers should pay particular attention to the conservation of positioning relative to mating-type loci across different yeast species, as similar positioning has been observed between S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata , suggesting functional constraints maintained through evolution.
For optimal expression of recombinant YCR097W-A, researchers should consider the following methodological approaches:
Expression system selection:
Homologous expression in S. cerevisiae: Use strong inducible promoters (GAL1, CUP1) for native folding and modifications
Heterologous expression in E. coli: Consider using BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains with codon optimization
Purification strategy:
N-terminal or C-terminal tagging (His6, GST, or MBP) based on structural predictions
Test multiple tag positions to determine optimal configuration for protein stability
Include protease inhibitors during lysis to prevent degradation
Solubility optimization:
If membrane-associated, test various detergents (DDM, CHAPS, Triton X-100)
Consider low-temperature induction (16-18°C) to improve folding
Test various buffer conditions with different pH values and salt concentrations
Functional preservation verification:
Develop activity assays based on predicted functions
Use circular dichroism to confirm proper folding
Verify oligomeric state by size exclusion chromatography
For S. cerevisiae expression, researchers should streak cells on fresh YPD agar plates for experimental purposes and use standard growth conditions (30°C, aerobic). If the protein associates with DNA, consider expressing in strains with simplified mating-type loci to avoid confounding interactions.
Resolving contradictions in functional data for YCR097W-A requires systematic analysis and integration of multiple experimental approaches:
| Contradiction Type | Possible Causes | Resolution Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Localization discrepancies | Tag interference, overexpression artifacts | Use different tagging approaches, endogenous expression levels |
| Phenotypic differences | Strain background effects, environmental variation | Standardize strains, test multiple conditions |
| Interaction partner conflicts | Method-specific biases, transient interactions | Use complementary methods (Y2H, BioID, Co-IP) |
| Transcriptional effects | Direct vs. indirect regulation | Combine ChIP-seq with time-course expression analysis |
Success in resolving such contradictions has been demonstrated in studies of zinc finger proteins where microarray analysis complemented protein interaction data from affinity capture-MS and proteome chip technology, revealing that observed interaction effects manifested in transcriptional regulation patterns .
For effective functional prediction of YCR097W-A, a multi-layered bioinformatic approach is recommended:
Sequence-based analysis:
PSI-BLAST for distant homology detection
InterProScan for motif and domain identification
PSIPRED for secondary structure prediction
TMHMM for transmembrane region prediction
SignalP for signal peptide identification
Structural prediction:
AlphaFold2 for tertiary structure prediction
Structure-based function prediction using ProFunc
Molecular docking simulations with predicted interactors
Genomic context analysis:
Integrated analysis:
FunCoup for network-based function prediction
CAFA-based tools for Gene Ontology term prediction
YeastNet for yeast-specific functional inference
The pipeline should particularly focus on the protein's genomic context near silent mating-type loci, as this positioning appears to be conserved between S. cerevisiae and C. glabrata . This conservation suggests functional constraints that might inform prediction algorithms.
A recommended workflow would integrate these approaches in a decision tree format, with higher weight given to experimental evidence from related proteins and genomic context information, which has proven valuable in characterizing other uncharacterized ORFs in yeast .
Several emerging technologies hold promise for accelerating the characterization of putative uncharacterized proteins like YCR097W-A:
CRISPR-based technologies:
CRISPRi for tunable repression to study dosage effects
CRISPRa for overexpression phenotypes
CRISPR base editing for studying effects of specific amino acid changes
Proximity labeling technologies:
BioID or TurboID for identifying neighborhood proteins
APEX2 for temporal-specific interaction mapping
Split-BioID for conditional interaction studies
Single-cell technologies:
scRNA-seq to characterize heterogeneity in response to YCR097W-A deletion
scATAC-seq to identify chromatin accessibility changes
Cryo-EM and integrative structural biology:
High-resolution structural determination of YCR097W-A alone and in complexes
Integrative modeling combining crosslinking mass spectrometry with computational prediction
Synthetic biology approaches:
Minimal genome studies to determine essentiality in reduced genetic backgrounds
Synthetic genetic interaction mapping using enhanced methodology
The most promising approach may be combining CRISPR-based genome editing with high-throughput phenotypic screening, similar to methods that have successfully characterized other zinc finger proteins involved in transcriptional regulation . This would allow for precise genetic manipulation coupled with comprehensive phenotypic analysis.
When publishing findings on uncharacterized proteins like YCR097W-A, researchers should follow these strategic approaches:
Evidence integration framework:
Present multiple lines of evidence supporting functional claims
Clearly distinguish between direct experimental evidence and predictions
Use a standardized confidence scoring system for functional assignments
Comparative contextualization:
Transparency in limitations:
Explicitly acknowledge technical limitations and alternative interpretations
Discuss potential confounding factors in experimental approaches
Present negative results alongside positive findings
Data presentation best practices:
| Data Type | Recommended Presentation | Common Pitfalls to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Structural predictions | Include confidence scores, compare multiple algorithms | Overinterpreting low-confidence regions |
| Interaction data | Specify detection method, validation approach | Claiming biological relevance without functional validation |
| Phenotypic observations | Quantitative metrics with statistical analysis | Reporting strain-specific phenotypes as general |
| Omics data | Processed data plus raw data repository | Cherry-picking supportive results only |
Future direction framing:
Propose specific testable hypotheses based on current findings
Suggest most critical next experiments for function validation
Outline potential broader impacts of complete characterization
Successful examples of this approach include the transcriptomic profiling of zinc finger protein mutants, where researchers clearly distinguished between direct observations and interpretations while suggesting specific follow-up experiments such as ChIP-on-chip assays .
Researchers investigating YCR097W-A should utilize these specialized resources:
S. cerevisiae-specific databases:
Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD): Comprehensive repository of genetic and molecular biology data
YEASTRACT: Transcription factor associations and regulatory networks
FungiDB: Integrative genomic database for fungi
Yeast Deletion Collection: Access to ycr097w-aΔ strains
Functional genomics resources:
Structural biology tools:
PDB: Repository of protein structures
AlphaFold DB: AI-predicted structures
ModBase: Comparative protein structure models
Evolutionary analysis resources:
Fungal Orthogroups Repository
YGOB: Yeast Gene Order Browser for synteny analysis
Experimental protocol repositories:
Protocols.io: Community-contributed yeast protocols
AddGene: Plasmids for yeast protein expression