Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Putative Uncharacterized Protein YEL050W-A (YEL050W-A) is a protein derived from the baker’s yeast S. cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508/S288c). Despite its designation as "uncharacterized," this protein has been produced recombinantly for research purposes, with its amino acid sequence and structural properties documented in commercial and scientific databases . The protein is encoded by the YEL050W-A gene, a small open reading frame (smORF167) on chromosome V .
Genomic Context: The YEL050W-A locus overlaps with YEL050W-B on the opposite strand, a feature common in yeast genomes .
Functional Clues: Proteins encoded by smORFs (small open reading frames) in yeast often regulate stress responses, DNA repair, or metabolic pathways . For example, MRX complex proteins (Mre11, Rad50, Xrs2) interact with uncharacterized partners during DNA repair . While direct evidence linking YEL050W-A to these pathways is absent, its recombinant availability suggests utility in probing such interactions.
Despite its availability, significant gaps persist:
Functional Annotation: No peer-reviewed studies directly investigate YEL050W-A’s role in S. cerevisiae.
Evolutionary Conservation: Homologs in other fungi or eukaryotes remain unidentified, limiting comparative analyses.
Industrial Relevance: Unlike characterized yeast proteins (e.g., enzymes in bioethanol production ), YEL050W-A’s practical utility is undefined.
YEL050W-A is a putative uncharacterized protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a sequence length of 63 amino acids. It can be produced recombinantly in E. coli with a His-tag for purification purposes. According to current databases, there are no annotated phenotypes associated with this protein, suggesting limited functional characterization to date . The protein represents one of many uncharacterized proteins in the yeast genome, which has been completely sequenced but still contains approximately 60% of genes with no assigned function .
When beginning characterization of an uncharacterized protein like YEL050W-A, researchers should first determine basic physicochemical properties using computational and experimental approaches:
Molecular weight, isoelectric point, and extinction coefficient using tools like Expasy's ProtParam
Hydrophobicity profile (GRAVY value) to predict solubility characteristics
Instability index (values below 40 indicate stability)
Secondary structure predictions
Potential post-translational modification sites
These parameters provide baseline information about protein behavior in solution and guide purification strategies. Similar approaches have been successfully applied to annotate uncharacterized proteins in other organisms with approximately 83% accuracy .
Based on available information, the following protocol is recommended:
Step | Procedure | Notes |
---|---|---|
1. Expression system | E. coli with His-tag vector | BL21(DE3) strain recommended |
2. Expression conditions | IPTG induction (0.5-1mM) at OD600 0.6-0.8 | Test multiple temperatures (18°C, 25°C, 37°C) |
3. Cell lysis | Sonication or pressure homogenization | Buffer: 50mM Tris pH 8.0, 300mM NaCl, 10mM imidazole |
4. Purification | Ni-NTA affinity chromatography | Include protease inhibitors |
5. Secondary purification | Size exclusion chromatography | Analyze protein state (monomer/oligomer) |
6. Quality control | SDS-PAGE, Western blot, mass spectrometry | Confirm identity and purity |
For a small protein like YEL050W-A (63 amino acids), special attention should be paid to prevent aggregation and maintain stability throughout the purification process .
A comprehensive bioinformatic analysis should include:
Sequence homology searches using BLAST, HHpred, and HMMER against multiple databases
Structural prediction using Swiss-Model, Phyre2, and AlphaFold2
Domain and motif identification using InterProScan, PFAM, and PROSITE
Subcellular localization prediction with tools like PSORT, TargetP, and DeepLoc
Analysis of conserved residues across different yeast species
Promoter analysis to identify potential regulatory elements
Integration with existing yeast interactome data
Each prediction should be assigned a confidence score based on multiple lines of evidence, following similar approaches used for uncharacterized protein annotation in other organisms .
A systematic genetic approach would include:
Generation of deletion strains in multiple genetic backgrounds to account for strain-specific effects
Construction of overexpression strains using constitutive and inducible promoters
Creation of conditional alleles (temperature-sensitive, auxin-inducible degron)
GFP/RFP tagging for localization studies
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis to identify genetic interactions
High-throughput phenotypic screening under various stress conditions
Integration with yeast evolution experiments to study adaptive roles
The lack of currently annotated phenotypes for YEL050W-A suggests subtle functions that may only be revealed under specific conditions or genetic backgrounds .
For a small protein like YEL050W-A, the following interaction methods are recommended:
Method | Advantages | Considerations for YEL050W-A |
---|---|---|
Yeast Two-Hybrid | Detects binary interactions in vivo | Use highly selective procedures to minimize false positives |
Affinity Purification-MS | Identifies protein complexes | May require optimization for small bait proteins |
BioID or TurboID | Detects proximal proteins | Good for transient interactions |
Protein Complementation Assays | In vivo validation | Confirm tag positioning doesn't disrupt function |
Cross-linking MS | Captures direct interactions | Special protocols for small proteins required |
In vitro pull-downs | Confirms direct binding | Use purified recombinant protein |
The most comprehensive approach would combine multiple methods, as demonstrated in previous systematic studies of yeast protein interactions. Two-hybrid methods in particular have been successful in characterizing networks of interactions between yeast proteins .
Evolution experiments can provide unique insights into YEL050W-A function:
Generate diverse starting populations through crosses of distinct yeast strains
Verify efficient mating and viable spore production among founder strains
Impose selection under various environmental conditions:
Different carbon sources
Chemical stressors
Temperature variation
Nutrient limitation
Track adaptation using whole-genome sequencing at multiple timepoints
Compare wild-type strains with YEL050W-A deletion strains to identify differential adaptation
Analyze whether YEL050W-A undergoes functional changes during adaptation
This approach has proven valuable for understanding gene function in previous yeast evolution experiments featuring standing genetic variation .
Despite the current lack of annotated phenotypes , a comprehensive phenotypic analysis should include:
Growth rate measurements across >100 conditions (temperature, pH, carbon sources, stress)
Chemical genomic profiling using diverse compound libraries
Morphological profiling using high-content microscopy
Metabolic profiling using mass spectrometry
Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry
Transcriptional profiling using RNA-seq under diverse conditions
Lipidomic analysis to identify membrane-related phenotypes
Data should be analyzed using multivariate statistics to detect subtle phenotypes that may not be apparent from single-condition experiments.
When facing contradictory results:
Systematically evaluate strain background effects:
Repeat key experiments in at least three distinct genetic backgrounds
Create isogenic strains differing only in YEL050W-A status
Test epistatic interactions with related pathway components:
Double deletion analysis
Overexpression screens
Chemical-genetic interactions
Consider condition-specific functionality:
Test function across growth phases (log, diauxic shift, stationary)
Evaluate under precise environmental conditions
Examine meiotic vs. mitotic roles
Apply quantitative rather than qualitative measurements:
Use high-precision growth measurements
Apply statistical models to account for variability
Integrate multi-omics data for systems-level understanding
Collaborate with independent laboratories to validate key findings
A comprehensive systems biology approach would include:
Comparative transcriptomics:
RNA-seq comparing wild-type and YEL050W-A deletion strains
Analysis across multiple conditions and time points
Proteomics analysis:
Whole-cell proteome comparison
Phosphoproteomics to identify signaling changes
Protein turnover analysis
Metabolomics profiling:
Primary metabolite changes
Lipid composition analysis
Flux analysis using labeled precursors
Integration of datasets using:
Network analysis to identify affected pathways
Machine learning approaches to predict functional associations
Bayesian integration of heterogeneous data types
Comparison with existing datasets for other uncharacterized proteins
This multi-faceted approach has proven successful in functional annotation of uncharacterized proteins in other organisms .
Rigorous statistical analysis should include:
Experimental design optimization:
Power analysis to determine sample size requirements
Randomization and blocking to minimize batch effects
Inclusion of appropriate positive and negative controls
Data analysis approach:
Normalization methods appropriate to data type
Multiple testing correction (FDR, Bonferroni)
Consideration of effect size, not just statistical significance
Appropriate transformation for non-normal data
Advanced statistical methods:
Mixed-effects models for complex designs
Multivariate analysis for high-dimensional datasets
Time-series analysis for dynamic processes
Bayesian approaches for integrating prior knowledge
Validation strategies:
Cross-validation of predictive models
Independent biological replicates
Orthogonal experimental approaches
Key resources include:
Resource Type | Specific Resources | Application for YEL050W-A Research |
---|---|---|
Genome Databases | Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD), UniProt | Sequence information, known annotations |
Structural Databases | PDB, AlphaFold DB, ModBase | Structural predictions and homology |
Interaction Databases | BioGRID, STRING, IntAct | Potential interaction partners |
Expression Databases | SPELL, Expression Atlas | Condition-specific expression patterns |
Pathway Databases | KEGG, BioCyc, WikiPathways | Potential pathway involvement |
Analysis Tools | Cytoscape, R/Bioconductor, Galaxy | Data integration and visualization |
Yeast Collections | Yeast Deletion Collection, GFP Collection | Genetic manipulation resources |
Currently, YEL050W-A has limited annotations in these databases, highlighting the need for further experimental characterization .
For optimal collaborative research:
Identify complementary expertise partners:
Structural biologists for protein structure determination
Systems biologists for network analysis
Evolutionary biologists for comparative genomics
Biochemists for enzymatic characterization
Computational biologists for prediction and modeling
Develop a structured collaboration plan:
Clear division of responsibilities
Regular communication schedule
Data sharing protocols
Authorship and intellectual property agreements
Utilize shared resources:
Core facilities for specialized techniques
Computational infrastructure for data analysis
Strain and plasmid repositories
Consider joining larger consortium efforts focused on uncharacterized protein annotation
This collaborative approach reflects successful strategies used in comprehensive yeast protein characterization projects .