Antibodies: Monoclonal antibodies targeting YGR137W (e.g., CSB-PA345669XA01SVG) .
Protein Variants: Full-length recombinant protein (CSB-CF345669SVG) .
Labelled as a "dubious" ORF in Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) , indicating uncertain biological relevance.
No Gene Ontology (GO) terms for molecular function, biological process, or cellular component are curated .
Indirect evidence suggests potential involvement in RNA binding , though no direct mechanistic studies exist.
No interacting proteins or pathways have been experimentally confirmed .
The production of YGR137W highlights its use as a model for studying uncharacterized yeast proteins. Key open questions include:
Identifying interaction partners via yeast two-hybrid or co-IP assays.
Assessing cellular localization and expression patterns.
Despite its dubious annotation, YGR137W serves as a case study for probing orphan genes in yeast, with implications for genome annotation accuracy and functional genomics .
Determining subcellular localization requires a multi-faceted approach:
Fluorescent protein tagging: Fusion of YGR137W with GFP variants such as GFPdeg (which is rapidly degraded in the cytoplasm but protected in organelles) can reveal localization. This approach has successfully identified uncharacterized proteins potentially localized to mitochondria (UPMs) in yeast .
Bioinformatic prediction tools: Tools like DeepLoc-1.0 can predict protein localization based on sequence characteristics. For mitochondrial localization specifically, researchers should check for N-terminal mitochondrial localization signals .
Subcellular fractionation: Physical separation of cellular compartments followed by Western blot analysis can confirm the presence of YGR137W in specific organelles.
Immunolocalization: Using antibodies against YGR137W or epitope tags in fixed cells can visually confirm localization patterns.
Correlation with expression patterns: Analysis of expression during specific cellular states (e.g., post-diauxic shift when mitochondria develop) may provide functional clues .
Function inference requires multiple complementary approaches:
Network-based function prediction: Analyze protein-protein interaction networks to predict function based on interaction partners. This approach correctly predicts functional categories for 72% of characterized proteins with at least one partner of known function .
Gene deletion phenotypic analysis: Systematic evaluation of growth rates, stress responses, and metabolic profiles in YGR137W deletion strains across various conditions.
Expression correlation analysis: Identifying genes with similar expression patterns under various conditions may reveal functional relationships.
Evolutionary profiling: Examining the presence/absence pattern of YGR137W across species can provide functional clues.
Structure prediction and domain analysis: Computational analysis of predicted structural features and conserved domains.
Integration of multi-omics data: Combining transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome data to place YGR137W in biological context .
Optimal expression of YGR137W requires careful selection of expression components:
Vector selection:
Promoter options:
Secretion signal sequences:
Codon optimization:
Expression strain selection:
Enhancing secretion while managing hyperglycosylation requires specific strategies:
Managing hyperglycosylation:
Directed evolution approaches targeting residues that affect glycosylation sites, which has been shown to reduce glycosylation degrees below 10% in peroxidases and laccases
Mutations that reduce residence time in the Golgi apparatus can decrease hyperglycosylation
Expression in glycosylation-deficient strains (e.g., och1Δ mutants)
Enhancing secretion:
Introduction of random mutations in processing regions of the native gene to adapt to S. cerevisiae proteases
Engineering KEX2 Golgi protease cleavage sites, which has been shown to enhance secretion up to 10-fold in some cases
Optimizing the C-terminal tail, which can significantly impact processing efficiency
Signal peptide optimization:
Co-expression strategies:
Co-express chaperones to assist protein folding
Optimize expression levels to prevent ER stress response activation
Comprehensive characterization requires multiple analytical approaches:
Purity assessment:
SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining or silver staining
Size exclusion chromatography (SEC)
Capillary electrophoresis
Glycosylation analysis:
PNGase F or Endo H treatment followed by mobility shift analysis
Mass spectrometry to identify glycosylation sites and patterns
Lectin blotting to characterize glycan structures
Structural characterization:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy for secondary structure analysis
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) for thermal stability
Limited proteolysis to identify stable domains
Functional assays:
If function is unknown, activity screening against various substrates
Binding assays with potential interaction partners identified through bioinformatics
Comparison with orthologous proteins from related species
Mass spectrometry:
Intact mass analysis to confirm expression of full-length protein
Peptide mapping for sequence coverage confirmation
Post-translational modification identification
Systematic deletion studies require careful experimental design:
Creating precise deletion constructs:
Complete ORF removal while preserving regulatory elements
Use of marker cassettes with loxP sites for marker recycling
Construction of conditional alleles for essential genes
Phenotypic screening approach:
Systematic phenotyping under multiple growth conditions (carbon sources, temperatures, stressors)
High-throughput fitness profiling in the presence of various chemicals
Analysis of chronological lifespan (CLS) and replicative lifespan (RLS), as YGR137W deletion has been shown to increase both CLS and RLS in previous studies
Molecular phenotyping:
Transcriptome analysis to identify affected pathways
Metabolomic profiling to detect metabolic alterations
Systematic genetic interaction mapping (e.g., synthetic genetic array analysis)
Control considerations:
Multiple complementary methods should be employed:
Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS):
Tagging YGR137W with affinity tags (e.g., TAP, FLAG, HA)
Gentle cell lysis to preserve native complexes
Quantitative MS analysis with appropriate controls to filter non-specific interactions
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Library screening approaches using YGR137W as bait
Targeted Y2H with suspected interaction partners
Verification using reverse Y2H configurations
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusions to YGR137W to identify proximal proteins
Controlled expression to minimize artifacts
Analysis under different growth conditions
Co-localization studies:
Dual-fluorescent tagging of YGR137W and potential partners
Live-cell imaging to capture dynamic interactions
FRET or BiFC to confirm direct interactions
Network inference from genomic data:
Given previous findings of uncharacterized mitochondrial proteins in yeast, comprehensive investigation requires:
Mitochondrial phenotype analysis:
Respiratory growth assessment on non-fermentable carbon sources (e.g., glycerol)
Measurement of oxygen consumption rates
Mitochondrial membrane potential assessment using fluorescent dyes
Analysis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, which have been shown to be altered in some uncharacterized protein deletions
Mitochondrial DNA maintenance:
Mitochondrial morphology:
Fluorescence microscopy using mitochondrial markers
Electron microscopy for ultrastructural analysis
Time-lapse imaging to assess dynamics
Biochemical approaches:
Submitochondrial fractionation to determine precise localization
In organello import assays to confirm mitochondrial targeting
Analysis of mitochondrial enzymatic activities
Gene expression analysis:
S. cerevisiae offers powerful directed evolution capabilities for YGR137W studies:
In vivo DNA recombination strategies:
Mutagenesis approaches:
Selection strategies:
Design functional screens based on predicted activities
Growth-based selections under specific stress conditions
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for variants with desired properties
Screening methodology:
Analytical considerations:
Deep sequencing of selected populations
Structural analysis of beneficial mutations
Epistasis mapping among multiple mutations
Modern computational biology offers multiple prediction strategies:
Sequence-based approaches:
Structure prediction tools:
AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold for tertiary structure prediction
Analysis of predicted binding pockets and catalytic sites
Molecular dynamics simulations to identify functional states
Network-based inference:
Integrative approaches:
Bayesian integration of multiple data types
Machine learning models trained on characterized proteins
Evolutionary coupling analysis for co-evolving residues
Comparative genomics:
Phylogenetic profiling across yeast species
Synteny analysis to identify conserved genomic context
Analysis of selection pressure on different protein regions
Comprehensive multi-omics integration requires sophisticated approaches:
Data collection strategy:
Transcriptome profiling of YGR137W deletion vs. wild-type under multiple conditions
Proteome analysis focusing on changes in abundance and post-translational modifications
Metabolome analysis to identify altered metabolic pathways
Genetic interaction mapping through systematic double mutant generation
Integration methodologies:
Construction of probabilistic networks incorporating diverse data types
Machine learning approaches for pattern recognition across datasets
Pathway and network analysis to identify enriched biological processes
Validation approaches:
Targeted experiments to test predictions from integrated analyses
Cross-validation using independent datasets
Literature-based validation of predicted functional relationships
Analytical frameworks:
Bayesian network models for causal inference
Matrix factorization techniques for dimensionality reduction
Graph-based algorithms for network module detection
Experimental design considerations:
Expression troubleshooting requires systematic problem-solving:
Low expression levels:
Try different promoter strengths and induction conditions
Optimize codon usage for S. cerevisiae preferences
Consider chromosomal integration for stable expression
Test different growth media and conditions
Protein misfolding:
Co-express molecular chaperones to assist folding
Lower expression temperature to slow folding kinetics
Create fusion proteins with solubility-enhancing tags
Try different strain backgrounds with varied folding capacities
Proteolytic degradation:
Use protease-deficient strains (e.g., pep4Δ)
Add protease inhibitors during extraction
Optimize harvest timing to minimize exposure to proteases
Design constructs to remove protease-sensitive regions
Secretion bottlenecks:
Hyperglycosylation:
Purification troubleshooting requires multiple strategies:
Solubility problems:
Screen multiple extraction buffers varying pH, salt, and detergents
Test mild solubilization agents like sarkosyl or non-ionic detergents
Use fusion tags known to enhance solubility (e.g., MBP, SUMO)
Consider on-column refolding approaches
Low binding to affinity resins:
Test alternative tag positions (N-terminal vs. C-terminal)
Optimize binding conditions (buffer composition, temperature, flow rate)
Try different affinity tags (His, FLAG, GST) that may perform differently
Include additives to reduce non-specific interactions
Contamination with host proteins:
Implement multi-step purification strategies
Use more stringent washing conditions
Consider ion exchange or hydrophobic interaction chromatography as additional steps
Validate with mass spectrometry to identify persistent contaminants
Protein instability:
Aggregation during concentration:
Use gentle concentration methods (e.g., dialysis against PEG)
Add solubilizing agents during concentration
Determine concentration limits before aggregation occurs
Consider alternative buffer systems
Rigorous validation requires comprehensive controls:
Expression validation:
Western blotting with tag-specific and, if available, protein-specific antibodies
Mass spectrometry confirmation of protein identity
qRT-PCR to verify transcript levels
Use wild-type cells as negative controls for tagged proteins
Localization controls:
Include well-characterized proteins with known localizations as reference markers
Verify with multiple tagging approaches (N-terminal, C-terminal, internal)
Use fractionation approaches to complement microscopy data
Test localization under multiple conditions to detect potential dynamics
Functional assays:
Include both positive and negative controls for each assay
Perform dose-response analyses to establish specificity
Use multiple independent methods to verify key findings
Perform rescue experiments with wild-type protein
Phenotypic analysis:
Test multiple independently derived deletion strains
Complement deletions with plasmid-borne wild-type gene
Compare phenotypes across different strain backgrounds
Use appropriate reference strains with similar characteristics
Interaction studies:
Include non-specific binding controls (e.g., unrelated proteins with same tag)
Verify key interactions with multiple methods
Test interactions under native expression levels
Apply quantitative filtering to remove non-specific interactions
| Promoter | Type | Strength | Regulation | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEF1 | Constitutive | Strong | None | High-level constant expression |
| GPD (TDH3) | Constitutive | Strong | None | High-level constant expression |
| GAL1/10 | Inducible | Very strong | Induced by galactose, repressed by glucose | Controlled expression of potentially toxic proteins |
| ADH1 | Constitutive | Moderate | None | Moderate expression levels |
| CUP1 | Inducible | Variable | Induced by copper | Titratable expression |
| MET25 | Repressible | Moderate | Repressed by methionine | Controlled expression |
| XPR2 | Inducible | Strong | Active at pH >6, requires peptone | High-level expression in Y. lipolytica |
| EYK1 | Inducible | Variable | Induced by erythritol/erythrulose | Alternative induction system for Y. lipolytica |
| Vector Type | Copy Number | Stability | Expression Level | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrative Plasmids (YIp) | 1 (integrated) | Very high | Moderate | Stable expression without selection |
| Episomal Plasmids (YEp) | 5-30 copies | Moderate | High | Maximum protein production |
| Centromeric Plasmids (YCp) | 1-2 copies | High | Low-moderate | More stable than YEp with moderate expression |