YKR075W-A is a recombinant protein derived from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene YKR075W-A (UniProt ID: Q8TGM9). Key characteristics include:
Property | Detail |
---|---|
Protein Type | Transmembrane protein |
Expression Host | E. coli (in vitro expression system) |
Tag | N-terminal 10×His-tag |
Protein Length | Full-length (89 amino acids) |
Source Organism | Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain S288c, Baker’s yeast) |
This protein is commercially available under product codes CSB-CF819497SVG (Cusabio) and RFL36463SF (Creative BioMart) .
Cloning Strategy: Full-length protein cloned into bacterial vectors for expression.
Storage: Lyophilized or liquid forms stored at -20°C/-80°C. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles .
Transmembrane Nature: Predicted to localize to cellular membranes, though specific functions remain unclear.
Lack of Expression Data: No gene expression profiles or regulatory data are available in public databases (e.g., SGD) .
While no specific pathways or interactions are documented, the transmembrane topology suggests potential roles in:
Membrane transport or signaling.
Protein-protein interactions (e.g., as part of a larger complex).
Creative BioMart lists pathways such as "Uncharacterized" or "UPF0479" in association with YKR075W-A, but no experimental validation exists .
YKR075W-A remains a target for studies aimed at elucidating its function. Potential avenues include:
Functional Screens: Yeast two-hybrid assays to identify interacting partners.
Localization Studies: Fluorescence microscopy to confirm subcellular localization.
Phenotypic Analysis: Deletion or overexpression in S. cerevisiae to assess viability or metabolic changes.
Current limitations include the absence of expression data and functional annotations in databases like SGD .
YKR075W-A is a putative uncharacterized protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) consisting of 89 amino acids. The full amino acid sequence is: MSSNFTKALSLLSIEALISSTSSVTQHSVFFFKADFRFFVCFWSIWFWTGDISFSLLSML VKSGPYNTVTSVSLFQLMDSGLDLEFCKP . This protein has been classified as "putative uncharacterized" because its precise function in vivo has not been fully elucidated. The protein is often produced recombinantly with a histidine tag to facilitate purification and subsequent experimental analysis. Its UniProt ID is Q8TGM9, which can be used to access additional structural and functional information from protein databases .
Recombinant YKR075W-A protein is typically expressed in Escherichia coli expression systems rather than in its native Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The process involves:
Cloning the YKR075W-A gene into an appropriate expression vector
Transforming the construct into E. coli cells
Inducing protein expression under optimized conditions
Cell lysis to release the recombinant protein
Purification using affinity chromatography, typically with Ni-NTA resin that binds to the histidine tag
The purified protein is often obtained as a lyophilized powder with purity greater than 90% as determined by SDS-PAGE . For research applications, the protein can be reconstituted in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, with the addition of 5-50% glycerol for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C .
The optimal storage conditions for YKR075W-A protein are:
Storage Form | Condition | Duration | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Lyophilized | -20°C/-80°C | Long-term | Store upon receipt |
Reconstituted | 4°C | Up to one week | For working aliquots |
Reconstituted with glycerol | -20°C/-80°C | Long-term | 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) |
It is important to note that repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can lead to protein degradation and loss of activity. The manufacturer's default final concentration of glycerol is typically 50%, which researchers can use as a reference . The storage buffer generally consists of Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0 .
Characterizing an uncharacterized protein like YKR075W-A requires a multi-faceted approach:
Structural Analysis: X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, or cryo-electron microscopy to determine the three-dimensional structure.
Sequence Analysis: Bioinformatic approaches comparing the sequence with characterized proteins to identify potential functional domains or motifs.
Interactome Mapping: Yeast two-hybrid screening, co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry, or proximity labeling to identify protein interaction partners.
Gene Expression Analysis: RT-qPCR, RNA-seq, or microarray analysis to determine when and where the gene is expressed.
Phenotypic Analysis: CRISPR-mediated knockout or knockdown experiments followed by comprehensive phenotypic screening.
The integration of these approaches provides a more robust characterization than any single method. For example, structural information combined with interaction data can suggest potential biochemical functions, while expression patterns can indicate physiological contexts in which the protein functions.
The amino acid sequence of YKR075W-A contains hydrophobic regions that suggest potential membrane association. To investigate this property, researchers should design experiments that address both structural predictions and functional validation:
Experimental Design Approach:
In silico analysis:
Hydropathy plotting to identify potential transmembrane domains
Secondary structure prediction to identify alpha-helical regions that might insert into membranes
Comparison with known membrane protein motifs
Biochemical validation:
Membrane fractionation studies to determine if the native protein localizes to membrane fractions
Protease protection assays to determine topology
Fluorescence microscopy with GFP-tagged constructs to visualize cellular localization
Biophysical characterization:
Circular dichroism spectroscopy in the presence of membrane mimetics
FRET-based assays to measure insertion into lipid bilayers
Atomic force microscopy to visualize protein-membrane interactions
This experimental design follows the principle of triangulation, using multiple independent approaches to confirm membrane association and characterize the nature of this association.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact protein function. For YKR075W-A, a comprehensive PTM analysis should include:
Methodological Framework:
Mass Spectrometry-Based Approaches:
Bottom-up proteomics: Digestion of the protein followed by LC-MS/MS analysis
Top-down proteomics: Analysis of the intact protein to preserve PTM combinations
Targeted MS approaches: Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for quantification of specific modifications
Site-Specific Mutagenesis:
Mutation of potential modification sites (e.g., Ser, Thr, Tyr for phosphorylation)
Functional assays comparing wild-type and mutant proteins
PTM-Specific Detection Methods:
Phosphorylation: 32P labeling, phospho-specific antibodies, Phos-tag gels
Glycosylation: Lectin blotting, PNGase F treatment
Ubiquitination: Immunoprecipitation with ubiquitin antibodies
Temporal Dynamics:
Pulse-chase experiments to monitor modification kinetics
Cell cycle synchronization to detect cell cycle-dependent modifications
By combining these approaches, researchers can build a comprehensive map of YKR075W-A modifications and their functional implications.
Robust experimental design for YKR075W-A functional studies requires carefully selected controls:
Control Framework:
Positive Controls:
Well-characterized proteins with similar structural features
Synthetic peptides corresponding to functional domains
Negative Controls:
Heat-denatured YKR075W-A protein
Unrelated proteins with similar size/tag system
Buffer-only conditions
Internal Controls:
Wild-type YKR075W-A alongside mutant variants
Dose-response curves to establish concentration dependence
System Controls:
Yeast strains with YKR075W-A deletion
Complementation assays with the recombinant protein
Technical Controls:
Multiple biological replicates (minimum n=3)
Different protein batches to account for preparation variability
This control framework adheres to the principles of good experimental design by incorporating specificity controls, activity controls, and technical validation elements.
When faced with contradictory data regarding YKR075W-A function, researchers should implement a systematic troubleshooting and validation strategy:
Resolution Framework:
Methodological Validation:
Cross-validate findings using orthogonal techniques
Vary experimental conditions systematically to identify parameter-dependent effects
Conduct inter-laboratory validation studies
Sample Authentication:
Verify protein identity using mass spectrometry
Assess protein quality through thermal shift assays
Confirm activity using biochemical assays
Context Dependency Analysis:
Test in different cellular backgrounds (e.g., different yeast strains)
Vary environmental conditions (pH, temperature, ionic strength)
Examine effects of potential binding partners
Integrative Data Analysis:
Use Bayesian approaches to integrate multiple data types
Perform meta-analysis of similar studies
Develop computational models to explain contextual differences
This approach emphasizes the importance of reproducibility while acknowledging that biological systems are complex and context-dependent. The goal is not simply to resolve contradictions but to understand the underlying complexity that explains apparent contradictions.
Time-course experiments are crucial for understanding the dynamic behavior of proteins like YKR075W-A:
Time-Course Design Principles:
Temporal Resolution Selection:
Match sampling frequency to expected kinetics
Logarithmic sampling for processes with decreasing rates
Include both early (seconds/minutes) and late (hours/days) timepoints
Synchronization Methods:
Cell cycle synchronization for cell cycle-dependent processes
Inducible expression systems for controlled initiation
Temperature-sensitive mutants for conditional activation
Multiplexed Data Collection:
Parallel measurement of multiple parameters
Single-cell approaches to capture population heterogeneity
Live-cell imaging for continuous monitoring
Data Analysis Strategies:
Differential equation modeling for kinetic parameters
Principal component analysis for dimensionality reduction
Clustering methods for trajectory classification
Time-Course Type | Sampling Strategy | Key Analysis Methods |
---|---|---|
Rapid Kinetics | Millisecond to minute resolution | Stopped-flow, quench-flow, rapid mixing |
Cellular Response | Minutes to hours | Live-cell imaging, flow cytometry, reporter assays |
Developmental | Hours to days | Stage-specific sampling, morphological analysis |
This framework ensures that time-course experiments are designed with appropriate temporal resolution and analytical approaches to capture the relevant dynamics of YKR075W-A.
The reconstitution of lyophilized YKR075W-A is a critical step that can significantly impact subsequent functional studies. The optimal protocol includes:
Step-by-Step Reconstitution Protocol:
Pre-Reconstitution Preparation:
Briefly centrifuge the vial containing lyophilized protein to bring contents to the bottom
Allow the vial to equilibrate to room temperature (15-20 minutes)
Primary Reconstitution:
Add deionized sterile water to achieve a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Gently rotate or invert the vial until complete dissolution (avoid vortexing)
Allow to stand for 5-10 minutes at room temperature
Stabilization:
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (manufacturer's default is 50%)
Mix gently by pipetting up and down
Aliquoting:
Divide into small single-use aliquots (typically 10-20 μL)
Flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen
Storage:
Quality control testing post-reconstitution should include verification of protein concentration, assessment of aggregation state by dynamic light scattering, and validation of functional activity through appropriate biochemical assays.
Structural prediction tools offer valuable insights into protein function when experimental structures are unavailable. For YKR075W-A, the following approach is recommended:
Structural Prediction Workflow:
Primary Sequence Analysis:
Identification of conserved domains using PFAM, SMART, or InterPro
Secondary structure prediction using PSIPRED or JPred
Disorder prediction using IUPred or PONDR
3D Structure Prediction:
Template-based modeling using SWISS-MODEL or I-TASSER if homologs exist
Ab initio modeling using Rosetta or AlphaFold for novel folds
Refinement of models using molecular dynamics simulations
Functional Site Prediction:
Active site prediction using CASTp or COACH
Ligand binding site prediction using 3DLigandSite
Protein-protein interaction interface prediction using SPPIDER
Validation and Refinement:
Model quality assessment using ProQ, QMEAN, or MolProbity
Experimental validation of key predictions
Iterative refinement based on experimental feedback
This hierarchical approach combines multiple computational methods to build a comprehensive structural model, which can then guide hypothesis generation and experimental design for functional studies.
Identifying and characterizing protein-protein interactions is essential for understanding YKR075W-A function. A comprehensive approach includes:
Protein Interaction Analysis Strategy:
Discovery Phase Methods:
Yeast two-hybrid screening using YKR075W-A as bait
Affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry (AP-MS)
Proximity-dependent biotin labeling (BioID or APEX)
Protein complementation assays (e.g., split-GFP)
Validation Phase Methods:
Co-immunoprecipitation with candidate interactors
FRET or BRET assays to confirm direct interactions
Surface plasmon resonance or isothermal titration calorimetry for binding kinetics
Mammalian two-hybrid assays as orthogonal validation
Characterization Phase Methods:
Deletion/mutation mapping to identify interaction domains
Competition assays to determine interaction exclusivity
Structural studies of complexes (X-ray, NMR, or cryo-EM)
Functional assays to determine biological significance
Network Analysis:
Integration of interaction data into protein networks
GO term enrichment analysis of interactors
Pathway analysis to identify biological processes
This multi-phase approach ensures that identified interactions are specific, reproducible, and biologically relevant, providing a foundation for understanding YKR075W-A function within the cellular context.
Analysis of YKR075W-A knockout or knockdown experiments requires careful consideration of both experimental design and data interpretation:
Data Analysis Framework:
Validation of Knockout/Knockdown Efficiency:
RT-qPCR to confirm mRNA reduction
Western blot to confirm protein reduction
Genomic sequencing to confirm CRISPR-mediated modifications
Phenotypic Analysis:
Growth curve analysis to detect proliferation defects
Microscopy for morphological changes
Metabolic profiling for biochemical alterations
Statistical Approaches:
Power analysis to determine appropriate sample size
Selection of appropriate statistical tests based on data distribution
Multiple hypothesis testing correction (e.g., Benjamini-Hochberg)
Controls and Normalization:
Wild-type controls processed in parallel
Rescue experiments to confirm specificity
Internal normalization controls for qPCR and protein quantification
Integrative Analysis:
Correlation of phenotypic changes with molecular alterations
Pathway analysis to identify affected biological processes
Network analysis to identify compensatory mechanisms
This comprehensive framework ensures robust interpretation of knockout/knockdown experiments, enabling researchers to distinguish direct effects of YKR075W-A loss from secondary or compensatory responses.
Interactome studies generate complex datasets that require sophisticated analytical approaches:
Interactome Analysis Strategy:
Data Preprocessing:
Filtering of non-specific interactions using control datasets
Normalization to account for protein abundance differences
Transformation to meet statistical assumptions
Confidence Scoring:
Implementation of probabilistic scoring (e.g., SAINT algorithm)
Integration of multiple replicate experiments
Incorporation of prior knowledge from databases
Network Construction and Analysis:
Visualization using platforms like Cytoscape
Calculation of network parameters (degree, betweenness, clustering)
Module detection to identify functional complexes
Functional Interpretation:
Gene Ontology enrichment analysis
Pathway mapping using KEGG or Reactome
Domain-based analysis of interaction interfaces
Integration with Other Data Types:
Correlation with expression data
Integration with structural information
Mapping to genetic interaction networks
Analysis Type | Tools/Methods | Key Outputs |
---|---|---|
Quality Control | SAINTexpress, CRAPome | Filtered interaction list with confidence scores |
Network Analysis | Cytoscape, STRING | Network visualization, module identification |
Functional Analysis | DAVID, g:Profiler, EnrichR | Enriched GO terms, pathways |
Structural Mapping | PyMOL, HADDOCK | 3D models of interaction interfaces |
This multi-layered analytical approach transforms raw interaction data into biologically meaningful insights about YKR075W-A function.
Building a comprehensive model of YKR075W-A function requires integration of diverse experimental data:
Integrative Modeling Framework:
Data Collection and Harmonization:
Standardize experimental conditions across studies
Convert different data types to comparable formats
Assess and account for data quality and reliability
Multi-Scale Integration:
Molecular scale: Structural and interaction data
Cellular scale: Localization and expression data
System scale: Phenotypic and network-level data
Computational Modeling Approaches:
Boolean networks for qualitative relationships
Ordinary differential equations for kinetic behavior
Agent-based models for spatial dynamics
Model Validation:
Experimental testing of model predictions
Cross-validation using data partitioning
Sensitivity analysis to identify key parameters
Iterative Refinement:
Update models as new data becomes available
Resolve contradictions through additional experiments
Expand model scope to include new components
This integrative approach synthesizes diverse data types into a coherent model that can explain existing observations and generate testable predictions about YKR075W-A function.
Researchers working with YKR075W-A may encounter several challenges:
Troubleshooting Guide:
Protein Solubility Issues:
Challenge: YKR075W-A may form aggregates after reconstitution
Solution: Optimize buffer conditions (pH, salt concentration, additives)
Alternative: Consider fusion tags that enhance solubility (MBP, SUMO)
Low Expression Yield:
Challenge: Poor expression in E. coli systems
Solution: Optimize codon usage for E. coli
Alternative: Try different expression systems (yeast, insect cells)
Functional Assay Development:
Challenge: Lack of known function makes assay design difficult
Solution: Start with binding assays to identified interactors
Alternative: Use phenotypic assays in knockout/complementation systems
Antibody Availability:
Challenge: Limited availability of specific antibodies
Solution: Use the His-tag for detection and purification
Alternative: Develop custom antibodies against unique peptide regions
Structural Analysis Difficulties:
Challenge: Challenges in obtaining crystal structures
Solution: Try NMR for solution structure
Alternative: Use crosslinking mass spectrometry for structural constraints
This troubleshooting guide provides practical solutions to common challenges, facilitating successful experimental work with YKR075W-A.
Distinguishing direct from indirect effects is crucial for accurate functional characterization:
Experimental Design for Causality:
Rapid Induction/Depletion Systems:
Auxin-inducible degron for rapid protein depletion
Tetracycline-inducible expression for controlled induction
Analysis of immediate vs. delayed responses
Structure-Function Analysis:
Targeted mutagenesis of specific domains
Creation of separation-of-function mutants
Correlation of structural features with specific functions
In Vitro Reconstitution:
Purified component systems to test direct biochemical activities
Stepwise addition of components to identify minimal requirements
Comparison of in vitro and in vivo phenotypes
Proximity-Based Methods:
FRET-based sensors to detect direct interactions in real-time
Crosslinking approaches to capture transient interactions
Single-molecule methods to observe direct molecular events
This methodological framework enables researchers to establish causal relationships and distinguish direct molecular functions from downstream consequences.
Genetic background can significantly influence experimental outcomes:
Genetic Background Considerations:
Strain Selection Criteria:
Use isogenic strains differing only in YKR075W-A status
Consider well-characterized laboratory strains vs. wild isolates
Include multiple distinct genetic backgrounds for robustness
Genetic Interaction Analysis:
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) screening to identify genetic interactors
Double-mutant analysis to detect epistatic relationships
Suppressor screening to identify functional relationships
Background Effect Control:
Back-crossing to standardize genetic background
Complementation tests to confirm phenotype specificity
Creation of congenic strains for critical comparisons
Evolutionary Considerations:
Compare YKR075W-A function across Saccharomyces species
Assess conservation of interacting partners
Test for functional complementation across species
These considerations ensure that observed phenotypes are reliably attributed to YKR075W-A rather than background-specific effects, enhancing the generalizability and robustness of findings.
Based on current knowledge, several research directions show particular promise:
Systematic Functional Screening: Comprehensive phenotypic analysis across diverse conditions to identify specific functional contexts.
Evolutionary Analysis: Comparative studies across fungal species to identify conserved functions and species-specific adaptations.
High-Resolution Structural Studies: Determination of crystal or cryo-EM structures to provide atomic-level insights into function.
Systems Biology Integration: Incorporation of YKR075W-A into comprehensive cellular models to understand its role in broader biological networks.
Translational Applications: Exploration of potential biotechnological applications based on the unique properties of YKR075W-A.
These directions represent complementary approaches that together will provide a comprehensive understanding of YKR075W-A function, potentially revealing novel biological principles and applications.
Advancing collective knowledge about YKR075W-A requires coordinated community efforts:
Data Sharing: Deposition of experimental data in public repositories such as UniProt, PDB, and BioGRID.
Method Standardization: Development and sharing of optimized protocols for working with YKR075W-A.
Resource Development: Creation of strain collections, plasmids, and antibodies accessible to the research community.
Collaborative Networks: Establishment of research consortia focused on comprehensive characterization of uncharacterized yeast proteins.
Integration with Systems Biology: Contribution of YKR075W-A data to systems-level models of cellular function.