Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Putative uncharacterized protein YLR302C (YLR302C)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Supplied as a lyophilized powder.
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your preferred format in order notes for fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on shipping method and destination. Please contact your local distributor for estimated delivery timelines.
Note: Our standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Before opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which may serve as a useful reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The specific tag will be determined during production. If a particular tag type is required, please inform us; we will prioritize its incorporation.
Synonyms
YLR302C; Uncharacterized protein YLR302C
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-120
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) (Baker's yeast)
Target Names
YLR302C
Target Protein Sequence
MRWHCMDGGNRIVSMYLTTLYYTKEIVDEKTREQEKGKTSFLTDALLNLIYILFFSSSVF NWTRCHLFDTSVIMLHSFHEDGALTNLISHLPTTTVPQYRQLHVPFAILRSCDLKRKSKK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links

STRING: 4932.YLR302C

Subcellular Location
Membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is YLR302C and what are its basic properties?

YLR302C is a putative uncharacterized protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) consisting of 120 amino acids. The protein has been identified through genomic sequencing but its exact biological function remains to be fully elucidated. The full-length recombinant protein can be expressed with an N-terminal His-tag in E. coli expression systems for research purposes . When working with this protein, researchers should note that it is part of the broader investigation into yeast proteomics and functional genomics.

The protein's basic properties include:

PropertyDescription
UniProt IDO13544
Length120 amino acids
Molecular WeightApproximately 13.5 kDa
Expression SystemE. coli
Common TagN-terminal His-tag
Storage Recommendation-20°C/-80°C in aliquots

How should YLR302C recombinant protein be stored and reconstituted for experimental use?

For optimal stability and activity, YLR302C recombinant protein should be stored as follows:

  • Upon receipt, briefly centrifuge the vial to bring contents to the bottom

  • Reconstitute the lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL

  • Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended 50%)

  • Aliquot to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

  • Store at -20°C/-80°C for long-term storage

  • For working solutions, store aliquots at 4°C for up to one week

The protein comes in a Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain stability during the lyophilization process . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of activity. Working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for short periods, but should not be kept beyond one week to ensure experimental reproducibility.

How should I design experiments to characterize the unknown function of YLR302C?

When investigating an uncharacterized protein like YLR302C, a systematic experimental approach is essential. Based on research methodology principles, consider implementing the following design strategy:

  • Begin with comparative sequence analysis to identify potential homologs in other organisms

  • Conduct gene knockout or knockdown studies to observe phenotypic changes

  • Perform protein-protein interaction studies (yeast two-hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation)

  • Analyze subcellular localization using tagged versions of the protein

  • Conduct expression profiling under various conditions to identify regulation patterns

When designing these experiments, it's crucial to establish a robust baseline with at least 5 data points per experimental phase to meet research standards . For conditions with high variability, more baseline measurements may be necessary. Ensure each experiment includes appropriate controls and allows for replication of effects at least three times to establish internal validity .

Consider using inspiration from studies of other uncharacterized yeast proteins, such as YOL002c, which was found to play key roles in metabolic pathways regulating lipid and phosphate metabolism . Similar approaches could reveal functional insights for YLR302C.

What single-subject experimental designs are most appropriate for investigating YLR302C function?

When investigating the function of YLR302C, several single-subject experimental designs (SSEDs) can be employed, depending on your specific research questions:

  • A-B Design: Establish a baseline measurement of cellular function (A), then introduce recombinant YLR302C and observe changes (B). This design is useful for initial explorations but requires careful interpretation.

  • Multiple Baseline Design: Measure several dependent variables (e.g., growth rate, gene expression, metabolite production) and introduce YLR302C to determine if effects are specific or general.

  • Changing Criterion Design: Gradually increase YLR302C concentration to determine dose-dependent effects on cellular function.

For any SSED to meet research standards, ensure:

  • The independent variable (YLR302C) is actively manipulated

  • Dependent variables are measured systematically over time

  • Multiple assessors verify measurements with interassessor agreement on at least 20% of data points

  • Each phase includes at least 5 data points (3-4 points meets standards with reservations)

  • Effects are replicated at least three times

When analyzing results, be particularly attentive to changes in level, trend, and variability between phases, as illustrated in research methodology literature . For instance, if introducing YLR302C causes an immediate change in cellular behavior, the causal relationship is stronger than if the change occurs after a delay.

How can I address experimental limitations when studying an uncharacterized protein like YLR302C?

When investigating YLR302C, researchers should proactively address several common limitations:

  • Protein Stability Issues: YLR302C's function may be sensitive to experimental conditions. Establish optimal buffer conditions and consider adding stabilizing agents like trehalose (as used in commercial preparations) .

  • Functional Redundancy: S. cerevisiae often contains redundant genes that can mask phenotypes in single-gene deletion studies. Consider using synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions.

  • Limited Prior Knowledge: With uncharacterized proteins, research direction can be challenging. Use comparative analysis with better-characterized systems as a starting point.

  • Data Interpretation Challenges: When analyzing experimental results, be cautious of:

    • Latency effects that may suggest external variables rather than direct protein function

    • Pre-existing trends in baseline data that continue into intervention phases

    • High data variability that obscures true effects

Document these limitations transparently in your research methodology section, explaining how you attempted to mitigate them and how they might affect interpretation of results. This approach strengthens the credibility of your findings and provides valuable context for future researchers working with YLR302C.

What methodological approaches should be used to collect reliable data about YLR302C function?

To generate reliable data regarding YLR302C function, researchers should employ multiple complementary methodological approaches:

  • Genetic Approaches:

    • Gene deletion/knockout studies using CRISPR-Cas9 or traditional homologous recombination

    • Conditional expression systems (e.g., tetracycline-regulated promoters)

    • Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions

  • Biochemical Approaches:

    • In vitro activity assays using purified recombinant protein

    • Substrate screening to identify potential binding partners

    • Structural analysis through crystallography or cryo-EM

  • Cell Biology Approaches:

    • Fluorescent tagging for subcellular localization

    • Time-lapse microscopy to observe dynamic behaviors

    • Stress response studies to identify conditions affecting function

For all approaches, ensure systematic data collection with consistent intervals between measurements. Collect at least 5 data points for each experimental condition to meet standard research methodology requirements . Document interassessor agreement when subjective measurements are involved, aiming for agreement on at least 20% of data points .

When using recombinant YLR302C protein, verify protein quality through SDS-PAGE (>90% purity recommended) and consider functional validation through activity assays appropriate to hypothesized function .

How should I analyze contradictory results in YLR302C research?

When faced with contradictory results in YLR302C research, apply a systematic analytical approach:

  • Examine Methodological Differences:

    • Compare experimental designs across studies (A-B, multiple baseline, withdrawal designs)

    • Assess whether each study meets methodological standards with sufficient data points and controls

    • Evaluate protein preparation methods, as differences in tags or expression systems may affect function

  • Consider Contextual Factors:

    • Strain background variations in S. cerevisiae

    • Growth conditions and media composition

    • Presence of stress factors or environmental variables

  • Apply Formal Analysis Techniques:

    • Visual analysis of graphed data to identify trends, levels, and variability

    • Statistical approaches appropriate to data type (parametric vs. non-parametric)

    • Meta-analytical approaches for combining multiple studies

  • Resolve Through Additional Experimentation:

    • Design experiments specifically targeting the contradiction

    • Include additional controls addressing potential confounding variables

    • Consider collaborative replication with laboratories reporting different results

Remember that contradictions often lead to deeper insights into complex biological systems. Document all analyses transparently, including limitations and potential explanations for discrepancies, as this advances the collective understanding of YLR302C function.

What statistical approaches are most appropriate for analyzing YLR302C functional studies?

The appropriate statistical approaches for YLR302C functional studies depend on your experimental design and data characteristics:

Study TypeRecommended Statistical ApproachConsiderations
Gene ExpressionANOVA with post-hoc testsCheck normality assumptions
Growth PhenotypesRepeated measures ANOVAAccount for time-dependent effects
Protein InteractionsChi-square or Fisher's exact testFor categorical binding outcomes
Dose-ResponseNon-linear regressionSelect appropriate curve model
Multiple VariablesPrincipal Component AnalysisFor dimension reduction
Single-Subject DesignVisual analysis, effect size calculationFocus on changes in level, trend, and variability

For single-subject experimental designs, which are common in preliminary YLR302C characterization, statistical significance testing may be less informative than visual analysis and effect size calculations . Pay particular attention to:

  • Changes in level (immediate shifts in the dependent variable)

  • Changes in trend (alterations in the direction or slope of data)

  • Changes in variability (differences in data stability between phases)

When baseline data shows high variability or trends, consider extended baseline measurement periods or alternative experimental designs. Document all statistical methods thoroughly, including software packages, version numbers, and specific tests applied.

How might YLR302C relate to other characterized proteins in S. cerevisiae metabolism?

Though YLR302C remains largely uncharacterized, researchers can draw insights from studies of similar proteins like YOL002c, which plays key roles in lipid and phosphate metabolism regulation . Based on comparative analysis, potential metabolic roles for YLR302C might include:

  • Membrane-Associated Functions: The amino acid sequence of YLR302C (MRWHCMDGGNRIVSMYLTTLYYTKEIVDEKTREQEKGKTSFLTDALLNLIYILFFSSSVFNWTRCHLFDTSVIMLHSFHEDGALTNLISHLPTTTVPQYRQLHVPFAILRSCDLKRKSKK) suggests potential membrane association through hydrophobic regions .

  • Regulatory Pathways: Like YOL002c, YLR302C might function in signaling pathways connecting different metabolic processes. YOL002c connects lipid metabolism with phosphate signaling , suggesting that uncharacterized proteins can serve as important regulatory nodes.

  • Stress Responses: Many uncharacterized yeast proteins show altered expression under specific stress conditions. Investigating YLR302C expression under conditions that affect YOL002c (such as growth with saturated fatty acids) might reveal functional parallels .

To explore these relationships, consider:

  • Transcriptomic analysis comparing expression patterns of YLR302C with known metabolic proteins

  • Protein-protein interaction studies to identify binding partners

  • Metabolomic profiling of wild-type versus YLR302C mutant strains under various conditions

These approaches could position YLR302C within the broader metabolic network of S. cerevisiae and provide direction for targeted functional studies.

What evolutionary insights can be gained from studying YLR302C across species?

Evolutionary analysis of YLR302C can provide valuable insights into its functional significance:

  • Conservation Analysis: The fact that YOL002c has homologs across species including humans suggests that other uncharacterized proteins like YLR302C might also have evolutionarily conserved functions. Identify homologs through sequence alignment tools and phylogenetic analysis.

  • Functional Prediction Through Homology: If homologs of YLR302C have been characterized in other organisms, their functions might suggest potential roles in S. cerevisiae. Even partial homology to domains of known function can provide valuable clues.

  • Evolutionary Rate Analysis: The rate at which a protein sequence evolves can indicate functional constraints. Slowly evolving regions often represent functionally critical domains.

  • Synteny Analysis: Examining the genomic context of YLR302C across related yeast species can reveal conserved gene neighborhoods that suggest functional relationships.

When conducting evolutionary studies, it's methodologically sound to:

  • Use multiple sequence alignment algorithms to ensure robust results

  • Apply appropriate models of sequence evolution

  • Consider both sequence and structural conservation

  • Validate computational predictions with experimental approaches

This evolutionary perspective can provide a broader context for understanding YLR302C function and highlight its potential significance in fundamental cellular processes conserved across species.

How can advanced imaging techniques contribute to understanding YLR302C function?

Advanced imaging techniques offer powerful approaches for investigating the function of uncharacterized proteins like YLR302C:

  • Subcellular Localization Studies:

    • Fluorescent protein tagging (GFP, mCherry) to visualize native localization

    • Super-resolution microscopy (STED, PALM, STORM) to resolve precise spatial distribution

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to combine contextual and ultrastructural information

  • Dynamic Behavior Analysis:

    • Live-cell imaging to track protein movement in real-time

    • FRAP (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching) to measure protein mobility

    • FRET (Förster Resonance Energy Transfer) to detect protein-protein interactions in situ

  • Functional Imaging:

    • Biosensor development to detect YLR302C activity or associated metabolic changes

    • Optogenetic approaches to control YLR302C function with light

    • Multi-modal imaging combining functional readouts with localization data

When designing imaging experiments, follow methodological best practices:

  • Include appropriate controls for autofluorescence and non-specific binding

  • Verify that fluorescent tags don't disrupt protein function

  • Collect sufficient biological and technical replicates

  • Quantify observations using objective image analysis algorithms

These imaging approaches can provide unique insights into YLR302C function that complement biochemical and genetic methods, particularly regarding spatial and temporal aspects of protein behavior within the cellular context.

What are the most common technical challenges when working with recombinant YLR302C protein?

Researchers working with recombinant YLR302C protein commonly encounter several technical challenges:

  • Solubility Issues: As a putative membrane-associated protein, YLR302C may exhibit solubility problems during expression and purification. Consider:

    • Testing different detergents for extraction

    • Using solubility-enhancing fusion partners (MBP, SUMO)

    • Optimizing buffer conditions with stabilizing agents like trehalose

  • Expression Optimization:

    • E. coli is the standard expression system , but expression levels may be low

    • Try different E. coli strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta, C41/C43)

    • Optimize induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, induction time)

  • Purification Challenges:

    • The His-tag enables IMAC purification , but additional purification steps may be needed

    • Consider size exclusion chromatography as a polishing step

    • Verify purity by SDS-PAGE (aim for >90%)

  • Stability Concerns:

    • Aliquot and store at -80°C to prevent degradation

    • Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles

    • For working solutions, store at 4°C for no more than one week

  • Activity Assessment:

    • Without known function, activity assays are challenging

    • Consider thermal shift assays to assess protein folding

    • Test binding to potential partners identified through bioinformatic analysis

Document all optimization steps thoroughly to ensure reproducibility and prepare troubleshooting guides for future researchers working with YLR302C.

How can I design a comprehensive experimental workflow to characterize YLR302C function?

A comprehensive experimental workflow for characterizing YLR302C should progress from initial prediction to detailed functional validation:

Phase 1: Predictive Analysis (1-2 months)

  • Bioinformatic analysis of sequence and structure

  • Literature review of related proteins (e.g., YOL002c )

  • Generate hypotheses about potential functions

Phase 2: Preliminary Characterization (2-3 months)

  • Express and purify recombinant YLR302C

  • Determine subcellular localization

  • Create knockout/knockdown strains

  • Perform initial phenotypic screening

Phase 3: Targeted Functional Studies (3-6 months)

  • Design experiments based on Phase 1-2 findings

  • Implement appropriate single-subject experimental designs

  • Ensure each experimental phase includes at least 5 data points

  • Include replication of effects at least three times

Phase 4: Interaction and Network Studies (3-4 months)

  • Identify binding partners through pull-down assays

  • Map genetic interactions through synthetic genetic arrays

  • Place YLR302C in context of known pathways

Phase 5: Validation and Integration (2-3 months)

  • Validate findings with orthogonal methods

  • Address contradictory results

  • Integrate findings into a coherent model of YLR302C function

Throughout all phases, maintain methodological rigor by:

  • Designing experiments with appropriate controls

  • Ensuring reproducibility through biological and technical replicates

  • Conducting visual analysis of data for changes in level, trend, and variability

  • Documenting all methods in sufficient detail for replication

This systematic approach maximizes the likelihood of meaningful characterization while efficiently using research resources.

What reporting standards should be followed when publishing research on YLR302C?

When publishing research on uncharacterized proteins like YLR302C, adhere to the following reporting standards to ensure reproducibility and research integrity:

  • Methodology Documentation:

    • Detail experimental design meeting established standards

    • Describe all independent and dependent variables

    • Report length of experimental phases (minimum 5 data points per phase)

    • Document replication of effects (minimum 3 replications)

  • Materials Reporting:

    • Provide complete information on YLR302C protein (source, tag, purification)

    • Report storage and reconstitution conditions

    • Include buffer compositions and additives

    • Specify S. cerevisiae strain background and growth conditions

  • Results Presentation:

    • Include both visual analysis and statistical analysis of data

    • Present changes in level, trend, and variability between phases

    • Acknowledge limitations and potential confounding variables

    • Address any contradictory findings transparently

  • Data Sharing:

    • Deposit raw data in appropriate repositories

    • Share protocols on platforms like protocols.io

    • Make materials available to other researchers

    • Consider pre-registration of study design for confirmatory research

  • Contextual Integration:

    • Relate findings to existing knowledge about S. cerevisiae proteins

    • Discuss similarities and differences to characterized proteins like YOL002c

    • Suggest future research directions based on limitations and unanswered questions

Following these reporting standards ensures that your research contributes meaningfully to the scientific understanding of YLR302C and facilitates building upon your findings in future studies.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.