Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Uncharacterized Membrane Protein YDL133W (YDL133W) is a transmembrane protein encoded by the YDL133W gene in baker’s yeast. Despite its historical classification as "uncharacterized," recent studies have begun elucidating its structural properties, interactions, and potential roles in cellular processes such as phospholipase D (PLD) activity regulation, sporulation, and pH-dependent stress responses .
Recombinant YDL133W is produced in E. coli with the following specifications :
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Expression Region | 1–437 (full-length) |
| Tag Type | Determined during production |
| Storage Conditions | Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol; store at -20°C or -80°C |
| Purity | Optimized for ELISA applications |
YDL133W, renamed Srf1 (Spo14 Regulatory Factor 1), directly interacts with Spo14 (yeast PLD) and is essential for its catalytic activity. Key findings include:
C16:0 PAF Sensitivity: YDL133W deletion mutants exhibit heightened sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of C16:0 platelet-activating factor (PAF), a pathogenic lipid implicated in neurodegenerative diseases .
Localization: Spo14 and phosphatidic acid (PA) delocalize from the cell periphery under C16:0 PAF exposure, suggesting YDL133W stabilizes PLD activity at membranes .
Interaction with Rmd1p (YDL001W): Three independent databases (DIP, Benno, PathCalling) confirm YDL133W interacts with Rmd1p, a protein required for sporulation .
Hypothesis: YDL133W may regulate cell cycle arrest during sporulation, supported by its co-localization with ER/Golgi transport proteins like Sec17p .
Deletion mutants show sensitivity at pH 8 after 15 generations, implicating YDL133W in pH homeostasis or stress response .
| Peak | Window Position | Hydrophobicity Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50–70 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 120–140 | 1.9 |
| 3 | 250–270 | 2.3 |
| 4 | 380–400 | 2.0 |
| Data derived from Kyte-Doolittle analysis (window size = 19) . |
Proposed experiments to resolve remaining questions:
KEGG: sce:YDL133W
STRING: 4932.YDL133W
A: YDL133W is a 437-amino acid uncharacterized membrane protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae with UniProt accession number Q12516 . The full amino acid sequence begins with MGDSNSSQEAYSDTTSTNASRIADQNQLNLNVDLEKNQTVRKSGSLEALQNAKIHVPKHS and contains multiple hydrophobic regions consistent with transmembrane domains . Sequence analysis predicts it contains several transmembrane segments with alternating hydrophilic regions. The protein has a molecular weight of approximately 49 kDa and an isoelectric point in the neutral to slightly acidic range. While its precise function remains unknown, its sequence features suggest it may be involved in membrane transport, signaling, or structural organization of the yeast membrane system.
A: For recombinant expression of YDL133W, several expression systems should be considered based on experimental goals:
Homologous expression in S. cerevisiae:
Advantages: Native folding environment, appropriate post-translational modifications
Vectors: pYES2, pRS series with either constitutive (TEF1) or inducible (GAL1) promoters
Expression conditions: 30°C growth temperature, careful optimization of induction time
Bacterial expression (E. coli):
Advantages: High yield, rapid growth, ease of purification
Challenges: Membrane protein folding issues, potential toxicity
Strains: C41(DE3), C43(DE3) specifically designed for membrane proteins
Tags: His-tag, fusion proteins (MBP, SUMO) to enhance solubility
Insect cell expression:
Advantages: Eukaryotic folding machinery, higher yields than yeast
Systems: Baculovirus expression system (BEVS)
Cell lines: Sf9, High Five
Conditions: Optimize infection MOI, harvest time, and temperature
For structural studies requiring high purity, the insect cell system often provides the best balance of proper folding and expression yield for yeast membrane proteins, while functional studies might benefit from homologous expression in S. cerevisiae.
A: Initial characterization of YDL133W should follow a systematic approach:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Sequence homology search using BLAST/HHpred
Domain prediction using Pfam, SMART, InterPro
Transmembrane region prediction using TMHMM, Phobius, MEMSAT
Secondary structure prediction using PSIPRED
Evolutionary conservation mapping with ConSurf
Localization studies:
GFP/mCherry-tagging of YDL133W in S. cerevisiae
Fluorescence microscopy to determine subcellular localization
Co-localization with known membrane compartment markers
Immunogold electron microscopy for higher resolution localization
Expression analysis:
RT-qPCR to determine expression patterns under different conditions
Western blotting to confirm protein expression and size
Proteomics to analyze expression in different cellular fractions
Phenotypic analysis:
Generation of YDL133W deletion strain
Growth assays under various stress conditions
Metabolic profiling of deletion strain versus wild-type
High-throughput phenotypic screening across diverse conditions
These approaches provide foundational data about protein characteristics without requiring prior knowledge of function, creating a framework for more targeted functional studies.
A: Confirming membrane localization and topology of YDL133W requires multiple complementary approaches:
Subcellular fractionation:
Differential centrifugation to separate cellular compartments
Western blot analysis of fractions using anti-YDL133W antibodies
Comparison with known membrane protein markers
Quantification of enrichment in membrane fractions
Fluorescence microscopy:
C-terminal or N-terminal fluorescent protein fusions
Live-cell imaging to visualize localization
Co-localization with organelle-specific markers
Protease protection assays:
Treatment of intact cells or spheroplasts with proteases
Analysis of protection patterns to determine topology
Western blot detection of preserved domains
Cysteine accessibility methods:
Introduction of cysteine residues at predicted loops
Labeling with membrane-impermeable sulfhydryl reagents
Determination of cytosolic versus extracellular exposure
A comprehensive topology map typically requires data from multiple approaches, as each method has inherent limitations. The most reliable results come from integrating biochemical, genetic, and imaging techniques to build a consistent topological model.
A: For functional prediction of uncharacterized proteins like YDL133W, several bioinformatic tools and approaches are particularly valuable:
Sequence-based tools:
BLAST/PSI-BLAST: Identifies distant homologs
HMMER: Sensitive profile-based sequence searches
InterProScan: Integrated platform for protein signature recognition
MOTIF: Identifies short conserved sequence motifs
Structure prediction tools:
AlphaFold2: State-of-the-art protein structure prediction
SWISS-MODEL: Homology modeling if templates exist
I-TASSER: Hierarchical approach to structure prediction
Robetta: Fragment-based protein structure prediction
Function prediction platforms:
SIFTER: Statistical inference of function through evolutionary relationships
ProFunc: Combines structure and sequence-based methods
COFACTOR: Structure-based function annotations
Membrane-specific tools:
MEMSAT: Membrane protein topology prediction
TOPCONS: Consensus prediction of membrane protein topology
TMHMM: Transmembrane helix prediction
Integrated analysis approaches:
STRING: Protein-protein interaction networks
EggNOG: Orthology prediction and functional annotation
Gene Ontology enrichment tools
MetaCyc/KEGG pathway association analysis
For uncharacterized membrane proteins, combining predictions from multiple tools provides more reliable results than relying on any single method. Cross-validation of predictions is essential before experimental validation.
A: Genetic approaches for functional characterization of YDL133W should be systematic and multi-layered:
Gene deletion and phenotyping:
CRISPR-Cas9 or homologous recombination for gene knockout
Phenotypic screening under various conditions:
Different carbon sources (glucose, glycerol, ethanol)
Temperature sensitivity (16°C, 30°C, 37°C)
Osmotic/ionic stress (NaCl, KCl, sorbitol)
pH variations (pH 4-8)
Cell wall/membrane stressors (SDS, calcofluor white)
High-throughput phenotypic arrays (e.g., Biolog system)
Synthetic genetic interaction analysis:
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) screening against deletion collection
Synthetic lethal screens with chemical or genetic perturbations
Dosage suppressor screens to identify genetic rescuers
Chemical-genetic profiling with diverse compound libraries
Complementation and rescue experiments:
Expression of homologs from other species
Domain swapping with characterized membrane proteins
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
Conditional expression systems:
Tetracycline-regulated promoters for titrated expression
Auxin-inducible degron tagging for controlled degradation
Temperature-sensitive alleles for rapid inactivation
The integration of genetic data with other experimental approaches is crucial for developing a comprehensive functional model for YDL133W.
A: Proteomics offers powerful approaches for elucidating YDL133W function:
Differential proteomics:
Quantitative comparison between wild-type and YDL133W deletion strains
SILAC or TMT labeling for precise quantification
Analysis under normal and stress conditions
Focused analysis of membrane proteome changes
Protein-protein interaction mapping:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID/TurboID)
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) for interaction interfaces
Co-immunoprecipitation validation of key interactions
Post-translational modification analysis:
Phosphoproteomics to identify regulatory modifications
Ubiquitination profiling for protein turnover assessment
Glycosylation analysis for membrane protein processing
Protein dynamics and turnover:
Pulse-chase SILAC for protein half-life determination
Thermal proteome profiling for conformational stability
Limited proteolysis-coupled mass spectrometry for structural insights
The combination of these proteomic approaches provides a systems-level understanding of YDL133W's role in cellular processes.
A: Structural determination of YDL133W presents several specific challenges with corresponding solution strategies:
Challenges:
Low natural expression levels
Difficulty in extracting from membranes
Limited stability outside the membrane environment
Tendency to aggregate during purification
Difficulty in forming well-diffracting crystals
Solution strategies by technique:
X-ray crystallography approach:
Extensive detergent screening (DDM, LMNG, GDN, OG)
Lipidic cubic phase crystallization
Fusion protein approaches (T4 lysozyme, BRIL insertion)
Nanobody/antibody co-crystallization to stabilize structure
Cryo-EM approach:
Amphipol stabilization (A8-35, PMAL-C8)
Nanodisc reconstitution with optimized lipid composition
Phase plate technology for improved contrast
Direct electron detectors with high sensitivity
NMR approach:
Selective isotope labeling of specific amino acids
TROSY techniques for large proteins
Solid-state NMR for membrane-embedded proteins
Specific methyl labeling for large proteins
Hybrid approaches:
Integrative structural biology combining low-resolution data
Cross-linking mass spectrometry constraints
EPR distance measurements
AlphaFold2 prediction validated by experimental constraints
Recent advances in membrane protein structural biology, particularly in cryo-EM and computational prediction, have dramatically improved success rates. For YDL133W specifically, a cryo-EM approach combined with computational modeling may offer the most practical path to structural insights.
A: Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide valuable insights into YDL133W structure and function:
Membrane embedding simulations:
Proper positioning of YDL133W in lipid bilayers
Assessment of protein-lipid interactions
Identification of specific lipid binding sites
Monitoring membrane deformation effects
Structural dynamics analysis:
Conformational flexibility of transmembrane domains
Identification of potential gating mechanisms
Water/ion permeation pathways
Dynamic coupling between protein domains
Binding site identification:
Potential ligand binding pockets
Cryptic sites that appear transiently
Electrostatic surface mapping
Druggability assessment
Advanced simulation techniques:
Coarse-grained simulations for longer time scales
Free energy calculations for binding/transport processes
Markov state modeling for conformational transitions
Enhanced sampling methods (metadynamics, umbrella sampling)
Simulation protocols for YDL133W should include:
Proper membrane composition modeling (ergosterol, PI, PE, PS lipids)
Sufficient equilibration (50-100 ns)
Production runs of 500+ ns
Replicates with different starting configurations
Validation with experimental data when available
MD simulations complement experimental approaches by providing atomistic insights into dynamics that are difficult to capture experimentally, generating testable hypotheses about functional mechanisms.
A: Comparative genomics provides valuable insights for generating functional hypotheses about YDL133W through several analytical approaches:
Ortholog identification and analysis:
Identify YDL133W orthologs across fungal species
Compare presence/absence patterns with known phenotypic traits
Analyze co-evolution with functionally characterized genes
Assess conservation in specific yeast clades
Synteny analysis:
Examine conservation of gene order around YDL133W
Identify frequently co-located genes (potential functional partners)
Detect genomic rearrangements affecting YDL133W context
Compare with other membrane protein genetic contexts
Evolutionary rate analysis:
Calculate selection pressure (dN/dS ratios)
Identify conserved domains under purifying selection
Detect rapidly evolving regions (potential species-specific functions)
Compare evolutionary rates with proteins of known function
Phylogenetic profiling:
Correlate presence/absence patterns with biochemical pathways
Identify co-evolving gene sets
Compare with phenotypic trait distribution
Detect potential horizontal gene transfer events
Integration with functional data:
Correlate evolutionary patterns with expression data
Compare with protein-protein interaction networks
Analyze in context of metabolic reconstructions
Map known phenotypes onto phylogenetic tree
The strength of comparative genomics lies in its ability to generate functional hypotheses based on evolutionary patterns, which can then be tested experimentally. This approach is particularly valuable for uncharacterized proteins like YDL133W, where direct functional data is limited.
A: Optimizing expression and solubility of recombinant YDL133W requires methodical troubleshooting:
Expression system optimization:
Test multiple expression systems:
E. coli (BL21(DE3), C41/C43, Lemo21)
S. cerevisiae (BY4741, W303)
P. pastoris (GS115, SMD1168)
Insect cells (Sf9, High Five)
Compare codon-optimized vs. native sequences
Evaluate different promoter strengths
Test induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, time)
Construct design strategies:
Generate truncation constructs to remove flexible regions
Create fusion proteins (MBP, SUMO, Trx) to enhance solubility
Optimize tag position (N- vs C-terminal)
Consider synthetic stabilizing mutations in exposed loops
Extraction and solubilization approaches:
Screen detergent panel for extraction efficiency:
| Detergent Class | Examples | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maltoside | DDM, UDM | Gentle, maintain function | Large micelles |
| Glucoside | OG, NG | Easily removable | Harsh, potential denaturation |
| Neopentyl glycol | LMNG, GDN | High stability, small micelles | Expensive |
| Facial amphiphiles | MNA-C12, FA-3 | Novel properties | Limited availability |
Expression condition optimization:
Test temperature range (16-30°C)
Vary induction timing (early vs. late log phase)
Adjust media composition (rich vs. minimal)
Add specific membrane protein folding enhancers (glycerol, specific ions)
Stabilization strategies:
Include lipids during purification
Add specific ligands if suspected
Use nanodiscs or amphipols for detergent-free environments
For YDL133W specifically, a homologous expression system in S. cerevisiae with controlled expression rates often provides the best balance of native folding and sufficient yield.
A: Optimal isolation and purification of YDL133W requires careful consideration of membrane protein biochemistry:
Cell lysis and membrane preparation:
Gentle mechanical disruption (glass beads for yeast cells)
Differential centrifugation (1,000g → 10,000g → 100,000g)
Membrane washing to remove peripheral proteins (high salt, high pH)
Storage in buffer with glycerol and protease inhibitors
Solubilization optimization:
Systematic detergent screening protocol:
Start with 1% detergent concentration
Incubate at 4°C for 1-2 hours with gentle rotation
Centrifuge at 100,000g to separate solubilized fraction
Analyze by Western blot to determine extraction efficiency
Consider mixed micelle approaches (primary/secondary detergents)
Test lipid addition during solubilization
Purification strategy:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography (IMAC for His-tagged YDL133W)
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography
Consider on-column detergent exchange to more stable options
Quality control assessment:
Size-exclusion chromatography profiles (monodispersity)
Dynamic light scattering (aggregation state)
Circular dichroism (secondary structure integrity)
Thermal stability assays (CPM fluorescence, DSF)
Negative stain EM for homogeneity
Recommended buffers for YDL133W:
Extraction buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor cocktail
Solubilization buffer: Extraction buffer + selected detergent (0.5-1%)
Purification buffer: 20 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, detergent at CMC + 0.05%
Throughout purification, maintaining protein stability requires careful temperature control (4°C), minimizing exposure to air/foam, and rapid processing to prevent degradation.
A: Developing functional assays for uncharacterized membrane proteins like YDL133W requires a systematic approach:
Transport function assessment:
Liposome reconstitution and substrate transport assays
Preparation of protein-reconstituted liposomes
Fluorescent substrate uptake measurements
Counterflow assays for exchange activities
Whole-cell transport measurements
Radioligand uptake in cells overexpressing YDL133W
Fluorescent substrate accumulation
Electrophysiological measurements
Patch-clamp if ion channel activity is suspected
Solid-supported membrane electrophysiology
Binding and interaction assays:
Thermal shift assays with potential ligands
Microscale thermophoresis for interaction studies
Surface plasmon resonance for binding kinetics
Isothermal titration calorimetry for thermodynamic parameters
Functional complementation:
Expression in deletion strains of related proteins
Cross-species functional rescue
Chimeric protein construction with characterized domains
Heterologous expression in specialized reporter systems
Activity-based assays:
ATPase activity measurements if P-type ATPase features exist
Lipid flippase activity assays if transporter features exist
Enzyme-coupled assays if metabolic function is suspected
Membrane integrity assays if structural role is hypothesized
Assay development workflow:
Generate initial functional hypotheses based on:
Bioinformatic predictions
Phenotypic data from gene deletion
Localization patterns
Interaction partners
Design targeted assays based on specific hypotheses
Include proper controls:
Empty vector controls
Inactive mutant controls
Known related protein controls
Optimize assay conditions for sensitivity and specificity
For membrane proteins without clear homologs like YDL133W, a parallel testing approach with multiple assay types often provides the first functional insights.
A: Multi-omics integration provides powerful insights into YDL133W function through systematic data collection and analysis:
Core omics datasets to generate:
Transcriptomics: RNA-seq comparing wild-type vs. YDL133W deletion
Proteomics: Quantitative proteomics of deletion strain
Metabolomics: Targeted and untargeted metabolic profiling
Interactomics: Protein-protein interaction maps
Specialized membrane-focused approaches:
Lipidomics to detect membrane composition changes
Membrane proteome enrichment analysis
Protein co-expression networks focusing on membrane components
Organelle proteomics to pinpoint subcellular effects
Integration analysis methods:
Network-based integration (weighted correlation networks)
Bayesian integration of heterogeneous data types
Multi-block statistical methods (DIABLO, MOFA)
Knowledge-based pathway mapping
Machine learning approaches for pattern recognition
Functional interpretation strategies:
Gene Ontology and pathway enrichment analysis
Network centrality and module detection
Causal reasoning algorithms for mechanism proposals
Literature-based discovery methods
The power of multi-omics approaches lies in their ability to detect subtle effects that might be missed in single-technique approaches, particularly important for membrane proteins that often have regulatory or sensing functions rather than enzymatic activities with clear biochemical readouts.
A: Computational methods for predicting structure-function relationships of YDL133W include:
Structural prediction and analysis:
AlphaFold2/RoseTTAFold for 3D structure prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations in membrane environments
Electrostatic surface mapping
Cavity and pocket detection for binding site prediction
Conservation mapping onto structural models
Sequence-based functional prediction:
Conserved domain analysis
Motif recognition
Sequence profile comparison with characterized proteins
Co-evolution analysis for interacting residues
Transmembrane topology optimization
Integrated structural bioinformatics:
Structure-based function prediction (ProFunc, COFACTOR)
Ligand binding site prediction (FTSite, SiteMap)
Protein-protein interaction surface prediction
Transmembrane channel/pore analysis
Advanced computational approaches:
Template-based function transfer
Binding site similarity searches against protein structure databases
Molecular docking with metabolite libraries
Graph-based representation learning
The computational analysis workflow should include:
Generate high-quality structural models
Validate models through quality assessment metrics
Identify potential functional sites
Simulate protein dynamics in membrane environment
Generate testable hypotheses for experimental validation
These computational predictions provide a foundation for targeted experimental approaches, significantly narrowing the search space for YDL133W function.
A: The most promising future research directions for elucidating YDL133W function include:
Integrative functional genomics:
Chemical genomics combined with traditional genetic approaches
High-resolution phenomics under diverse conditions
Synthetic genetic interaction mapping with other membrane proteins
Condition-specific essentiality screening
Advanced structural biology:
Cryo-EM analysis in different membrane mimetics
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for dynamics
Single-molecule studies of conformational changes
In-cell structural approaches (crosslinking-MS, in-cell NMR)
Systems biology integration:
Multi-omics data integration
Regulatory network mapping
Quantitative models of cellular processes affected by YDL133W
Network perturbation analysis
Comparative and evolutionary studies:
Functional analysis in diverse yeast species
Adaptation experiments under selective pressures
Ancestral sequence reconstruction and functional testing
Pan-Saccharomycetaceae comparative genomics
Emerging technologies:
CRISPR interference for precise temporal control
Single-cell analysis of YDL133W effects
Proximity labeling in native contexts
Advanced imaging (super-resolution, correlative light-electron microscopy)