YER039C-A is a 72-amino acid protein encoded by the non-essential gene YER039C-A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is classified as a "putative protein of unknown function" with no direct links to essential cellular pathways . Key features include:
YER039C-A exhibits a synthetic positive genetic interaction with BIR1, a component of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC) involved in chromosome segregation. This interaction was identified through high-throughput fitness analysis :
| Interaction | Score | Throughput | Biological Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| YER039C-A ↔ BIR1 | 6.8 | High Throughput | Mitotic regulation, kinetochore function |
This suggests a potential auxiliary role in mitotic processes, though no direct mechanistic evidence exists.
Expression: No baseline or differential expression data is available for YER039C-A in S. cerevisiae .
Localization: Predicted to localize to the cytoplasm and Golgi apparatus based on orthology with human SLC35D1, a nucleotide-sugar transporter .
Orthologs of YER039C-A exist in eukaryotes, including humans (SLC35D1), Drosophila (CG3874), and Arabidopsis (At4g31600) . These orthologs are associated with:
| Organism | Ortholog | Function |
|---|---|---|
| Homo sapiens | SLC35D1 | UDP-galactose transmembrane transport |
| Drosophila melanogaster | CG3874 | Imaginal disc development |
| Schizosaccharomyces pombe | SPAC144.18 | Nucleotide-sugar transport |
This conservation implies a possible role in glycosylation or metabolite transport, though experimental validation in yeast is lacking.
Function: Despite genetic interactions and orthology clues, YER039C-A’s molecular role remains unconfirmed.
Expression: Absence of expression data in SGD suggests low abundance or condition-specific activity .
Applications: Potential utility in studying conserved transport mechanisms or mitotic regulation remains unexplored.
KEGG: sce:YER039C-A
STRING: 4932.YER039C-A
YER039C-A has been identified as a multi-pass membrane protein according to the UniProt database . This classification indicates that the protein contains multiple membrane-spanning domains that integrate into cellular membranes. The specific membrane system (such as plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum, or mitochondrial membrane) has not been definitively established in the available data.
To determine the precise subcellular localization, researchers typically employ techniques such as:
Fluorescent protein tagging and microscopy
Subcellular fractionation followed by western blotting
Immunolocalization using specific antibodies
The membrane localization suggests potential roles in membrane transport, signaling, or structural functions, but further experimental validation is required to confirm its exact location and function within the cell.
Based on the available data, recombinant YER039C-A has been successfully expressed in E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag . The following methodological approach is recommended:
Expression System:
Host: E. coli (BL21 or Rosetta strains are commonly used for membrane proteins)
Vector: pET series vectors with N-terminal His-tag
Induction: IPTG concentration should be optimized (typically 0.1-1.0 mM)
Temperature: Lower temperatures (16-25°C) often improve membrane protein folding
Duration: Extended induction periods (16-24 hours) at lower temperatures
Purification Strategy:
Cell lysis using detergent-containing buffers (e.g., n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside or CHAPS)
Initial purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography
Secondary purification using size exclusion chromatography
For maximum purity, the protocol should achieve >90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE, consistent with the specifications mentioned in the product data .
For optimal stability and activity maintenance of YER039C-A, the following handling and storage protocols are recommended:
Storage Conditions:
Store at -20°C or preferably -80°C upon receipt
Aliquoting is necessary to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
Buffer Composition:
Tris/PBS-based buffer with pH 8.0
Consider adding protease inhibitors for extended storage
Reconstitution Protocol:
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended 50%) for long-term storage
Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of function, particularly for membrane proteins like YER039C-A.
The available data reveals that YER039C-A participates in numerous genetic interactions with various yeast proteins, suggesting potential functional roles. These interactions were documented in a study referenced by PubMed ID 27708008 .
Key Genetic Interaction Partners:
| Interacting Protein | Gene Name | Potential Functional Area |
|---|---|---|
| MAK16_YEAST | MAK16 | Ribosome biogenesis |
| MET30_YEAST | MET30 | Cell cycle regulation |
| ATC3_YEAST | DRS2 | Membrane trafficking |
| VAM7_YEAST | VAM7 | Vesicle fusion |
| CDC48_YEAST | CDC48 | Protein quality control |
| MOB2_YEAST | MOB2 | Cell polarity/morphogenesis |
| SLN1_YEAST | SLN1 | Osmosensing |
| BET3_YEAST | BET3 | ER-Golgi transport |
| RNA1_YEAST | RNA1 | RNA processing |
These genetic interactions span diverse cellular processes, with notable representation in membrane trafficking (ATC3, VAM7, BET3), suggesting YER039C-A may function in vesicular transport or membrane organization pathways. The interactions with cell cycle regulators (MET30) and protein quality control machinery (CDC48) further suggest roles in growth regulation or stress response mechanisms.
To systematically characterize the function of YER039C-A, a multi-faceted experimental approach is recommended:
1. Phenotypic Profiling:
Assess growth under various stress conditions (temperature, osmotic, pH, nutrient limitation)
Screen for sensitivity to membrane-disrupting agents
Analyze morphological changes in deletion or overexpression strains
2. Localization and Dynamics:
Fluorescent protein tagging (C-terminal GFP fusion)
Live-cell imaging to monitor subcellular distribution
Colocalization studies with known compartment markers
3. Interaction Proteomics:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)
Proximity-dependent labeling (BioID or APEX)
Validation of key interactions using co-immunoprecipitation
4. Functional Genomics:
CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing to create functional mutants
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis to expand interaction network
RNA-seq to identify transcriptional changes upon deletion/overexpression
5. Structural Analysis:
Membrane topology mapping using cysteine accessibility methods
Cryo-electron microscopy for structural determination
Computational modeling and simulation of membrane integration
These approaches should be implemented in an iterative manner, with each experiment informing the design of subsequent investigations to gradually build a comprehensive functional profile of YER039C-A.
Although current databases indicate no documented post-translational modifications (PTMs) for YER039C-A , this likely reflects a lack of targeted studies rather than an absence of modifications. To investigate potential PTMs, researchers should employ the following methodological approach:
Mass Spectrometry-Based PTM Identification:
Enrich the protein using immunoprecipitation or His-tag purification
Perform proteolytic digestion with multiple enzymes (trypsin, chymotrypsin)
Analyze peptides using high-resolution LC-MS/MS with fragmentation techniques optimized for PTM detection
Search against PTM databases with variable modification parameters
Specific PTM Enrichment Strategies:
Phosphorylation: TiO₂ or IMAC enrichment
Glycosylation: Lectin affinity chromatography
Ubiquitination: K-ε-GG antibody enrichment
In vivo PTM Detection:
Metabolic labeling with PTM precursors
Pharmacological inhibition of PTM-regulating enzymes
Site-directed mutagenesis of predicted modification sites
Given YER039C-A's membrane localization, particular attention should be paid to modifications that regulate membrane protein trafficking and stability, such as phosphorylation, palmitoylation, and ubiquitination.
The Saccharomyces Genome Database indicates no expression data available for YER039C-A , presenting a significant research challenge. To address this gap, researchers should implement a comprehensive expression profiling strategy:
RNA-Level Expression Analysis:
Design specific qRT-PCR primers spanning exon junctions
Perform Northern blot analysis with strand-specific probes
Implement RNA-seq with sufficient depth to capture low-abundance transcripts
Analyze expression across diverse environmental conditions and stress responses
Protein-Level Expression Detection:
Generate specific antibodies against unique peptide regions of YER039C-A
Develop a targeted proteomics assay using selected reaction monitoring (SRM)
Employ epitope tagging approaches (HA, FLAG, or GFP tags) for detection
Utilize proximity labeling methods to capture transient expression
Regulatory Element Analysis:
Characterize the promoter region using reporter constructs
Identify transcription factor binding sites through ChIP-seq
Investigate potential regulatory ncRNAs that might influence expression
Analyze chromatin accessibility and histone modifications at the locus
The expression pattern of YER039C-A should be examined under various physiological and stress conditions, with particular attention to conditions that affect the phenotypes of interacting genes identified in genetic screens.
Given YER039C-A's classification as a multi-pass membrane protein and its genetic interactions with membrane trafficking components, the following experimental design is recommended to investigate its role in membrane dynamics:
Independent variables: YER039C-A expression levels (wild-type, deletion, overexpression)
Dependent variables: Membrane fluidity, lipid composition, vesicle trafficking rates
Control variables: Temperature, growth phase, media composition
H₁: YER039C-A influences membrane lipid organization
H₂: YER039C-A regulates vesicular trafficking between specific compartments
H₃: YER039C-A functions in membrane stress response pathways
Generate strains with varying YER039C-A expression:
Wild-type control
YER039C-A deletion strain
Conditional expression strain (tetracycline-regulated promoter)
Point mutants affecting key domains
Apply membrane-specific stressors:
Temperature shifts (heat shock/cold shock)
Membrane-disrupting agents (SDS, ethanol)
Osmotic stress conditions
Membrane fluidity assessment:
Fluorescence anisotropy measurements
Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy
Laurdan generalized polarization
Trafficking dynamics:
FM4-64 endocytic trafficking assays
Secretory pathway cargo transport rates
Localization of compartment-specific markers
Lipidomic analysis:
Quantitative mass spectrometry of membrane lipids
Domain-specific lipid probes
Detergent resistance membrane fractionation
This systematic approach will provide insights into YER039C-A's specific role in membrane biology while controlling for confounding variables that might affect membrane dynamics .
When confronted with contradictory results regarding YER039C-A function, researchers should implement a systematic approach to reconciliation that incorporates the following methodological steps:
Establish consistent strain backgrounds
Define precise growth conditions (media, temperature, growth phase)
Standardize protein expression and purification protocols
Develop validated detection and quantification methods
Validate findings using multiple independent techniques
Combine in vivo, in vitro, and in silico approaches
Verify results across different model systems where applicable
Develop quantitative assays with appropriate statistical power
Systematically test combinations of variables that might explain discrepancies
Include appropriate controls for each experimental condition
Document and report all experimental parameters comprehensively
Establish multi-laboratory validation studies
Implement blind experimental designs when possible
Develop shared reagents and standardized protocols
Pre-register experimental designs to minimize bias
Develop a database of experimental conditions and outcomes
Perform statistical meta-analysis of available data
Identify patterns in contradictory results that might reveal condition-dependent functions
Generate new testable hypotheses that might explain the observed discrepancies
This structured approach acknowledges that contradictory results may reflect context-dependent functions of YER039C-A rather than experimental errors, potentially revealing important insights about condition-specific roles of this uncharacterized protein.
Based on the current knowledge and gaps identified in the available data, the following research directions hold significant promise for elucidating YER039C-A function:
Integrative multi-omics approach: Combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses of YER039C-A mutants to identify affected pathways and processes.
High-resolution structural studies: Determining the membrane topology and structural features using cryo-electron microscopy or NMR spectroscopy specialized for membrane proteins.
Synthetic genetic interaction mapping: Expanding the genetic interaction network through systematic double mutant analysis to place YER039C-A in specific cellular pathways.
Condition-specific functional characterization: Investigating YER039C-A function under diverse environmental conditions, particularly those that stress membrane systems.
Comparative genomics approach: Analyzing potential homologs in other fungal species to identify evolutionarily conserved functions and structural features.