YIL060W is implicated in respiratory growth and glycogen accumulation . Key observations include:
Null Mutation Effects: Deletion strains show reduced glycogen levels and impaired plasma membrane electron transport .
Mitochondrial Localization: Suggests involvement in energy metabolism, though specific pathways remain uncharacterized .
Recent studies challenge YIL060W’s functional relevance:
Ribosomal Profiling Data: YIL060W shows minimal ribosome occupancy (7 reads) compared to its antisense ORF YIL059C (1,741 reads) .
Mass Spectrometry (MS): YIL060W was undetectable in MS analyses of canonical ORFs, while YIL059C peptides were identified .
Homology Analysis: YIL060W lacks strong homologs outside Saccharomyces species, unlike YIL059C, which shows conservation in S. jurei .
These findings suggest YIL060W may be a nonfunctional ORF or a horizontally transferred sequence .
Recombinant YIL060W is synthesized in heterologous systems:
| Parameter | Details |
|---|---|
| Host Organism | E. coli , Yeast , Mammalian Cells |
| Purification Tag | His-tag , N-terminal tag |
| Purity | ≥85% (SDS-PAGE) |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C (long-term), 4°C (short-term) |
Functional Validation: Further studies are needed to confirm YIL060W’s role in mitochondrial processes.
Expression Analysis: Reconciling ribo-seq/MS discrepancies with genetic deletion phenotypes .
Pathway Mapping: Identifying interaction partners and biochemical pathways (e.g., using BioGRID data ).
KEGG: sce:YIL060W
STRING: 4932.YIL060W
YIL060W is an uncharacterized protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) consisting of 144 amino acids. Its significance in research stems from its uncharacterized nature, making it a target for functional genomics studies aiming to elucidate previously unknown cellular mechanisms. The protein has UniProt ID P40519 and represents an opportunity to discover novel biochemical pathways or regulatory functions in yeast cells . As an uncharacterized protein, research on YIL060W contributes to completing our understanding of the yeast proteome, which serves as a model for eukaryotic cellular processes.
Recombinant YIL060W protein is typically produced using E. coli expression systems. The full-length coding sequence (1-144 amino acids) is cloned into an expression vector that incorporates an N-terminal His-tag for purification purposes . The expression is induced under controlled conditions, followed by cell lysis and protein purification using affinity chromatography (typically Ni-NTA columns that bind the His-tag). The purified protein is then typically supplied as a lyophilized powder with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE . For research applications, the protein can be reconstituted in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, with the addition of 5-50% glycerol for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C to prevent degradation through freeze-thaw cycles.
When studying an uncharacterized protein like YIL060W, a systematic multi-omics approach is recommended. Begin with computational prediction of function based on sequence homology, protein domains, and evolutionary conservation. Follow with experimental validation including:
Localization studies using GFP-fusion proteins to determine subcellular localization
Phenotypic analysis of deletion strains (as available in yeast deletion collections)
Chemical genomic profiling to identify genetic interactions and potential pathways
Proteomics approaches to identify binding partners
Transcriptomics to analyze expression patterns under various conditions
The experimental design should incorporate appropriate controls, including wild-type strains and strains with deletions of genes with known functions . A Latin Square Design can be particularly effective when testing multiple variables (such as different stress conditions) to identify functional contexts of the protein while controlling for experimental noise . This approach removes two sources of variation from the experimental error, making it more sensitive for detecting subtle phenotypes that might be associated with YIL060W function.
For optimal maintenance of YIL060W protein stability and activity, the following protocol should be followed:
Store the lyophilized powder at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt
Prior to opening, briefly centrifuge the vial to bring contents to the bottom
Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (optimally 50%) for cryoprotection
Aliquot into small volumes to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles
For working stocks, maintain aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
The protein is typically provided in a Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% Trehalose at pH 8.0, which helps maintain stability . Repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can lead to protein denaturation and loss of activity. For experimental applications, always verify protein integrity via SDS-PAGE before proceeding with functional assays.
To effectively design experiments for functional characterization of YIL060W, researchers should implement a comprehensive strategy that integrates multiple approaches:
Genetic Approach: Create precise gene deletions or modifications using techniques such as CRISPR-Cas9 or homologous recombination. Study the phenotypic consequences under various conditions (temperature, nutrient availability, stress) .
Chemical Genomic Profiling: Expose heterozygous deletion strains (containing one functional copy of YIL060W) to various compounds and monitor growth over multiple generations (5-20). This can reveal sensitivity or resistance phenotypes that provide functional insights .
Experimental Design Considerations:
Data Collection Timeline: Monitor growth and other phenotypes at multiple time points (e.g., after 5, 10, 15, and 20 generations) to capture both immediate and adaptive responses .
Control Selection: Include both negative controls (wild-type strains) and positive controls (strains with deletions in genes of known function related to hypothesized pathways) .
This multi-faceted approach maximizes the probability of identifying the biological role of YIL060W while minimizing false positives through rigorous experimental design and appropriate controls.
Chemical genomic profiling represents a powerful approach for investigating the function of uncharacterized proteins like YIL060W through systematic analysis of genetic interactions. The methodology involves the following steps:
Strain Preparation: Utilize heterozygous S. cerevisiae diploid strains where one copy of each predicted ORF has been replaced by an antibiotic resistance marker (KANMX4), with unique DNA barcodes identifying each deletion .
Growth Conditions: Expose strain pools to the IC20 concentration of test compounds or control conditions. Culture at 30°C with shaking at 200 rpm in 48-well plates with an initial OD600 of 0.1 .
Generational Analysis: Allow growth for approximately 5 generations (12 hours), then subculture (1/20 dilution) to obtain pools representing ~10, 15, and 20 generations of growth under selective pressure .
DNA Extraction and Barcode Sequencing:
Data Analysis: Rank heterozygous strains based on compound sensitivity after 20 generations, identifying those most depleted in treated populations compared to untreated controls .
This approach can reveal genetic interactions that suggest potential pathways in which YIL060W might function, particularly if deletion of YIL060W alters sensitivity to specific compounds or stress conditions.
Investigating protein-protein interactions involving an uncharacterized protein like YIL060W requires sophisticated methodologies that can detect both stable and transient interactions. The following advanced approaches are recommended:
Affinity Purification coupled with Mass Spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express His-tagged YIL060W protein in yeast cells
Perform in vivo crosslinking to capture transient interactions
Purify using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography
Identify binding partners via mass spectrometry
Validate interactions through reciprocal pull-downs
Proximity-based Labeling:
Create fusion proteins with BioID or APEX2 enzymes
Express in yeast to allow in vivo biotinylation of proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify via mass spectrometry
This approach captures both direct interactions and proteins in close proximity
Yeast Two-Hybrid (Y2H) Screening:
Create bait constructs with YIL060W fused to DNA-binding domain
Screen against a library of yeast proteins fused to activation domain
Validate positive interactions with complementary approaches
Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Generate fluorescent protein fusions with YIL060W and candidate interactors
Measure energy transfer as indication of protein proximity
Particularly useful for studying dynamics of interactions in living cells
For all these approaches, appropriate controls are crucial, including using unrelated proteins as negative controls and known interacting pairs as positive controls. The combination of multiple complementary techniques provides the strongest evidence for genuine biological interactions.
Microarray analysis offers powerful insights into the transcriptional consequences of YIL060W function or deletion. To effectively implement this approach, researchers should follow these methodological steps:
Experimental Design Considerations:
Compare wild-type strains to YIL060W deletion or overexpression strains
Include multiple biological replicates (minimum 3) to ensure statistical robustness
Test under various conditions to identify context-dependent functions
Consider time-course experiments to capture dynamic responses
RNA Isolation Protocol:
Sample Preparation and Hybridization:
Data Analysis Pipeline:
Validation Steps:
Confirm key findings using RT-qPCR
Correlate transcriptional changes with phenotypic observations
Test predictions through targeted genetic or biochemical experiments
This comprehensive approach allows for the identification of genes and pathways affected by YIL060W, providing crucial insights into its biological function and regulatory networks.
Researchers working with the uncharacterized protein YIL060W encounter several technical challenges. Here are common issues and their methodological solutions:
Low Protein Solubility:
Challenge: His-tagged YIL060W may form inclusion bodies during expression
Solution: Optimize expression conditions by lowering induction temperature (16-20°C), reducing IPTG concentration, or using specialty E. coli strains designed for membrane protein expression
Alternative: Consider using different fusion tags (MBP, GST) that can enhance solubility
Protein Stability Issues:
Challenge: Rapid degradation after reconstitution
Solution: Add protease inhibitors to all buffers, maintain strict temperature control, and consider adding stabilizing agents like trehalose (already present in storage buffer at 6%)
Recommended: Always perform fresh reconstitution before critical experiments
Inconclusive Phenotypes in Deletion Strains:
Challenge: Subtle or context-dependent phenotypes that are difficult to detect
Solution: Implement stress conditions to reveal conditional phenotypes, and use sensitive growth monitoring instruments capable of detecting minor growth differences
Advanced approach: Employ genetic interaction screens to identify synthetic phenotypes
Contradictory Data Interpretation:
Challenge: Different experimental approaches yielding inconsistent results
Solution: Implement rigorous statistical analysis, increase biological replicates, and verify findings with complementary methods
Critical practice: Document all experimental conditions meticulously to identify potential sources of variability
These methodological solutions should be implemented systematically, with careful documentation of outcomes to build a consistent understanding of YIL060W's properties and function.
Analyzing and interpreting genetic stability data for YIL060W mutants requires a systematic methodological approach:
Experimental Setup for Stability Testing:
Analytical Framework:
Quantify phenotypic stability by measuring variance in growth rates, stress resistance, or other relevant phenotypes across generations
Apply statistical tests to determine if observed changes exceed experimental noise:
Interpretation Guidelines:
Stable phenotype: Consistent phenotypic measurements across generations with variations within statistical bounds
Unstable phenotype: Significant drift in measurements that exceeds experimental error
Adaptive changes: Directional shifts in phenotype that may indicate compensatory mechanisms
Decision Matrix for Data Interpretation:
| Observation Pattern | Statistical Significance | Interpretation | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consistent phenotype | p > 0.05 across time points | Genetically stable mutation | Proceed with functional characterization |
| Gradual phenotype loss | p < 0.05 with time-dependent trend | Genetic instability or suppressor mutations | Sequence for secondary mutations; restart with fresh isolates |
| Sudden phenotype change | p < 0.05 with step change | Contamination or major genetic event | Verify strain identity; reestablish from frozen stocks |
| Oscillating phenotype | Variable significance | Epigenetic regulation or measurement error | Increase sampling frequency; control environmental variables |
Advanced Analysis:
Whole genome sequencing to identify any secondary mutations that may arise
Transcriptome analysis to detect compensatory changes in gene expression
Epigenetic profiling if phenotypic changes occur without genetic alterations
This methodological framework ensures reliable interpretation of genetic stability data, which is crucial for understanding the true functions of YIL060W without confounding effects from genetic drift or compensatory adaptations.
Experimental Design Considerations:
Primary Statistical Analyses:
Post-hoc Testing and Multiple Comparisons:
Tukey's HSD test: For pairwise comparisons between multiple strains or conditions
Dunnett's test: When comparing multiple treatment groups against a single control
Bonferroni or Benjamini-Hochberg corrections: To control for family-wise error rate or false discovery rate
Cross-Resistance Correlation Analysis:
Calculate Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients between resistance profiles
Apply hierarchical clustering to identify patterns of cross-resistance
Perform principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce dimensionality and identify key variables driving resistance patterns
Data Visualization Approaches:
Heat maps: To display resistance patterns across multiple stressors
Dose-response curves: To compare sensitivity thresholds
Network diagrams: To illustrate relationships between different resistance phenotypes
Table: Example Framework for Statistical Analysis of Cross-Resistance Data
| Analysis Stage | Method | Purpose | Implementation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preliminary Analysis | Normalization to control | Account for batch effects | (Treated value / Control value) × 100% |
| Primary Analysis | Two-way ANOVA | Test main effects and interactions | R: aov(resistance ~ strain * stressor + block) |
| Multiple Testing Correction | Benjamini-Hochberg procedure | Control false discovery rate | R: p.adjust(p_values, method="BH") |
| Pattern Recognition | Hierarchical clustering | Identify groups of similar responses | R: hclust(dist(resistance_matrix)) |
| Validation | Cross-validation | Ensure robustness of findings | K-fold cross-validation of predictive models |
This comprehensive statistical approach ensures rigorous analysis of cross-resistance data, enabling researchers to identify genuine biological patterns related to YIL060W function rather than statistical artifacts.
Based on current knowledge and technological capabilities, several promising research directions could significantly advance our understanding of YIL060W function:
Systematic Genetic Interaction Mapping:
Implement CRISPR-based genetic interaction screens to identify synthetic lethal or synthetic rescue interactions
Create comprehensive genetic interaction profiles to position YIL060W within cellular pathways
Compare interaction profiles with those of characterized proteins to infer function through similarity
Structural Biology Approaches:
Determine the three-dimensional structure using X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM, or NMR spectroscopy
Identify potential binding pockets or catalytic sites
Perform structure-guided mutagenesis to test functional hypotheses
Systems Biology Integration:
Combine transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data to create a holistic view of YIL060W's impact
Apply machine learning approaches to identify patterns across multiple data types
Develop predictive models of cellular responses to YIL060W perturbation
Evolutionary Conservation Analysis:
Conduct comparative genomics across fungal species to identify conserved domains or motifs
Perform complementation studies with orthologs from other species
Trace the evolutionary history to identify potential functional constraints
Single-Cell Analysis:
Implement single-cell transcriptomics to identify cell-to-cell variability in responses to YIL060W deletion
Use microfluidic approaches to monitor individual cell behaviors over time
Identify potential phenotypic heterogeneity masked in population-level studies
These research directions, particularly when pursued in parallel, offer the greatest potential for elucidating the biological role of this uncharacterized protein and integrating it into our understanding of cellular function.
Advanced computational approaches offer powerful methods to accelerate understanding of uncharacterized proteins like YIL060W. Researchers should consider implementing these methodological strategies:
Deep Learning for Function Prediction:
Apply neural network architectures trained on characterized proteins to predict YIL060W function
Utilize models that integrate sequence, structure prediction, and evolutionary conservation
Validate computational predictions with targeted experimental approaches
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Generate structural models based on homology or ab initio predictions
Simulate protein dynamics in different environments
Identify potential ligand binding sites or conformational changes
Test hypotheses about protein-protein interactions through in silico docking
Network-Based Function Inference:
Construct protein-protein interaction networks incorporating YIL060W
Apply network analysis algorithms to predict function based on connection patterns
Identify network motifs that suggest specific cellular roles
Use graph neural networks to predict functional associations
Integrative Multi-omics Analysis:
Develop computational pipelines that integrate data across platforms:
Transcriptomics (RNA-seq, microarray)
Proteomics (mass spectrometry)
Metabolomics (NMR, mass spectrometry)
Genetic interaction screens
Apply dimensionality reduction techniques to identify key patterns
Implement Bayesian networks to model causal relationships
Text Mining and Literature-Based Discovery:
Apply natural language processing to extract indirect connections from scientific literature
Identify proteins with similar profiles in published research
Generate testable hypotheses based on literature-derived associations
When implementing these computational approaches, researchers should maintain rigorous validation protocols, including experimental verification of key predictions and critical assessment of model limitations. The integration of multiple computational methods provides the most robust framework for function prediction.