KEGG: sce:YPR170W-B
STRING: 4932.YPR170W-B
YPR170W-B is an uncharacterized protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) with a UniProt accession number P0C5R9. It consists of 85 amino acids with the following sequence: MRPVVSTGKAWCCTVLSAFGVVILSVIAHLFNTNHESFVGSINDPEDGPAVAHTVYLAALLVYLVFFVFCGFQVYLARRKPSIELR . The protein contains hydrophobic regions suggesting potential membrane association, with characteristic features including cysteine residues that may participate in disulfide bond formation and potential transmembrane domains.
The amino acid composition analysis reveals several notable features:
High content of hydrophobic amino acids (A, V, L, I, F)
Multiple aromatic residues (F, Y, W)
Presence of charged amino acids (R, K) predominantly in the C-terminal region
Several cysteines (C) potentially involved in structural stabilization
These characteristics suggest YPR170W-B may function as a membrane-associated protein, though further structural studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
For optimal expression and purification of recombinant YPR170W-B:
Expression System: Use E. coli as the expression host, as demonstrated in available recombinant products . BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains are recommended for small membrane-associated proteins.
Expression Construct: Design a construct with an N-terminal His-tag followed by the full-length protein (amino acids 1-85). Include a TEV protease cleavage site if tag removal is necessary for downstream applications.
Expression Conditions:
Culture in LB medium at 37°C until OD600 reaches 0.6-0.8
Induce with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Lower temperature to 16-18°C post-induction
Express for 16-18 hours
Purification Protocol:
Lyse cells in Tris/PBS-based buffer (pH 8.0) containing 6% trehalose and protease inhibitors
Use immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with Ni-NTA resin
Apply stringent washing with increasing imidazole concentrations (10 mM, 20 mM, 50 mM)
Elute with 250-300 mM imidazole
Optional: Size exclusion chromatography for higher purity
Storage: Lyophilize the purified protein or store in Tris/PBS buffer with 50% glycerol at -80°C to maintain stability .
This methodology yields protein with greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE, suitable for most research applications .
To maintain the stability and activity of purified YPR170W-B:
Short-term Storage (1-2 weeks):
Long-term Storage:
Reconstitution Protocol:
Briefly centrifuge vials before opening
Reconstitute lyophilized protein in deionized sterile water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Allow complete dissolution before use
For functional assays, reconstitute in buffers mimicking physiological conditions
Stability Considerations:
These storage protocols are essential to maintain protein integrity for subsequent functional and structural studies.
YPR170W-B shows predicted interactions with multiple RNA transcripts based on catRAPID prediction scores:
RNA Partner | Ensembl ID | RNA Length | Prediction Score | z-Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
NSR1 | YGR159C | 1245 nt | 13.71 | -0.21 |
MDJ1 | YFL016C | 1536 nt | 13.13 | -0.31 |
YML009W-B | YML009W-B | 477 nt | 12.97 | -0.33 |
SSA3 | YBL075C | 1950 nt | 12.87 | -0.35 |
NOP1 | YDL014W | 984 nt | 12.18 | -0.46 |
The highest prediction score (13.71) is with NSR1 RNA, a transcript encoding a nucleolar protein involved in pre-rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis . These predictions are based on computational algorithms that analyze physicochemical properties and binding propensities.
Regarding reliability:
The negative z-scores (ranging from -0.21 to -0.76) indicate moderate confidence in these predictions
No experimentally detected interactions (via RIP-Chip) are currently reported in the database
The prediction scores are relatively modest compared to well-established RNA-binding proteins
To validate these predictions:
RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) followed by qPCR for specific targets
Cross-linking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) to identify direct binding sites
In vitro binding assays with purified components
These computational predictions provide valuable starting points for experimental validation, particularly focusing on NSR1 and MDJ1 RNAs which show the highest prediction scores .
To validate the predicted RNA interactions of YPR170W-B, a multi-tiered experimental approach is recommended:
In Vitro Binding Assays:
RNA Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
Synthesize RNA transcripts for top predicted partners (NSR1, MDJ1)
Incubate with recombinant YPR170W-B at increasing concentrations
Analyze via native PAGE to detect mobility shifts
Filter Binding Assays
Use radiolabeled or fluorescently labeled RNA
Determine binding affinity (Kd) for quantitative comparison
Cellular Validation:
RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP)
Express tagged YPR170W-B in yeast
Crosslink protein-RNA complexes
Immunoprecipitate using anti-tag antibodies
Identify bound RNAs via RT-PCR or RNA-seq
CLIP-seq (Cross-linking and Immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing)
Provides single-nucleotide resolution of binding sites
Can identify sequence or structural motifs recognized by YPR170W-B
Experimental Design for 96-well Format Binding Assays:
Layout considerations for testing multiple RNA candidates:
Include technical replicates (minimum triplicate)
Incorporate concentration gradients
Include positive controls (known RNA-binding proteins)
Include negative controls (non-binding proteins of similar size)
Fluorescence Polarization in 96-well format:
Use fluorescently labeled RNA oligonucleotides
Monitor binding through changes in polarization signal
Can be scaled for multiple candidates
Data Validation:
Perform competition assays with unlabeled RNA
Test binding specificity using mutated RNA sequences
Validate findings in vivo using genetic approaches (e.g., yeast mutants)
Each experimental approach has advantages and limitations, so combining multiple methods provides the most robust validation of predicted RNA interactions.
The predicted interaction between YPR170W-B and NSR1 RNA (prediction score: 13.71) is particularly noteworthy and warrants detailed investigation . NSR1 encodes a nucleolar protein that plays crucial roles in ribosome biogenesis and pre-rRNA processing in yeast.
Potential Significance:
Regulatory Implications:
YPR170W-B may participate in post-transcriptional regulation of NSR1 expression
This interaction could represent a feedback loop in ribosome biogenesis pathways
The regulatory mechanism might involve:
Altered NSR1 mRNA stability
Changed translational efficiency
Subcellular localization control
Functional Context:
NSR1 protein functions in nucleolar processes and ribosome assembly
YPR170W-B's interaction suggests potential roles in:
Stress response pathways affecting ribosome biogenesis
Cell growth regulation mechanisms
RNA quality control pathways
Evolutionary Perspective:
Conservation analysis of this interaction across related yeast species could reveal evolutionary importance
The specificity of this interaction among the predicted RNA partners suggests functional specialization
Experimental Follow-up Approaches:
Genetic interaction studies between YPR170W-B and NSR1
Effects of YPR170W-B overexpression/deletion on NSR1 RNA levels and localization
Co-localization studies using fluorescence microscopy
Analysis of NSR1 expression in YPR170W-B mutant strains
The relatively high prediction score compared to other RNA interactions suggests this might be a biologically relevant interaction, potentially linking YPR170W-B to nucleolar functions and the fundamental process of ribosome biogenesis in yeast.
To elucidate YPR170W-B function, a multi-faceted approach combining genetic, biochemical, and cell biological techniques is recommended:
Genetic Approaches:
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate:
Complete knockout strains
Point mutations in key residues (based on conservation analysis)
Tagged versions for localization studies
Phenotypic Characterization:
Growth curves under various conditions (temperature, pH, osmotic stress)
Sensitivity to RNA metabolism inhibitors
Ribosome profile analysis
Protein Interaction Network:
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS)
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID or APEX)
Co-immunoprecipitation with predicted RNA-binding partners
RNA-focused Experiments:
Cellular Localization:
Fluorescence microscopy with GFP-tagged YPR170W-B
Co-localization with RNA granule markers
Subcellular fractionation followed by western blotting
Response to cellular stress conditions
Evolutionary Analysis:
Comparative genomics across yeast species
Analysis of selection pressure on coding sequence
Identification of conserved functional domains
96-Well Plate Experimental Design:
This comprehensive approach integrates multiple lines of evidence to develop a cohesive model of YPR170W-B function, with special attention to its potential role in RNA processing pathways suggested by predicted interactions.
When conducting in vitro studies with recombinant YPR170W-B, rigorous controls and validation methods are essential to ensure reliable and reproducible results:
Protein Quality Controls:
Purity Assessment:
Functional Validation:
Circular dichroism (CD) to confirm proper folding
Size exclusion chromatography to assess oligomeric state
Dynamic light scattering to detect aggregation
RNA Interaction Controls:
Positive Controls:
Known RNA-binding proteins with similar size/properties
Synthetic positive control constructs with verified binding domains
Negative Controls:
Non-relevant proteins of similar size (e.g., GFP)
Heat-denatured YPR170W-B
RNase-treated samples
Scrambled RNA sequences
Buffer Optimization:
Systematic testing of:
pH range (6.5-8.5)
Salt concentrations (50-300 mM)
Reducing agent requirements
Divalent cation effects (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺)
Binding Assay Validation:
Technical Validation:
Triplicate measurements (minimum)
Z-factor determination for high-throughput assays
Signal-to-noise ratio optimization
Determining limits of detection and quantification
Orthogonal Confirmation:
Validate interactions using multiple techniques (EMSA, filter binding, ITC)
Competition assays with unlabeled RNA
Dose-response curves for quantitative assessment
Experimental Design for 96-Well Format:
These controls and validation methods ensure that observations related to YPR170W-B are genuine, reproducible, and free from experimental artifacts or bias.
Based on its amino acid sequence and hydrophobic regions, YPR170W-B likely possesses membrane-associated properties . The following specialized protocols are recommended for studying these characteristics:
Membrane Extraction and Fractionation:
Sequential Extraction Protocol:
Prepare spheroplasts from yeast cells expressing tagged YPR170W-B
Extract with increasing detergent concentrations (0.1% to 1%)
Test multiple detergent classes (nonionic, zwitterionic, ionic)
Analyze fractions by western blotting
Optimal Detergents for YPR170W-B:
Primary recommendations: DDM, CHAPS, or digitonin
Secondary options: Triton X-100, NP-40
Concentration optimization needed for each detergent
Membrane Reconstitution:
Liposome Preparation:
Utilize yeast lipid extracts or defined lipid mixtures
Prepare liposomes via extrusion through 100 nm filters
Incorporate purified YPR170W-B using dialysis or detergent removal
Proteoliposome Characterization:
Confirm orientation using protease protection assays
Assess protein:lipid ratio via quantitative western blotting
Verify homogeneity using dynamic light scattering
Transmembrane Topology Analysis:
Cysteine Scanning Mutagenesis:
Create single-cysteine mutants throughout YPR170W-B sequence
Test accessibility to membrane-impermeable sulfhydryl reagents
Analyze results to generate topology model
Fluorescence Quenching Approaches:
Introduce tryptophan residues at strategic positions
Measure fluorescence quenching by water-soluble quenchers
Determine membrane-embedded regions
Lipid Interaction Studies:
Lipid Blot Assays:
Test binding to PIP strips containing various phospholipids
Identify specific lipid binding preferences
Surface Plasmon Resonance:
Immobilize lipid bilayers on sensor chips
Measure YPR170W-B association/dissociation kinetics
Determine lipid composition effects on binding
Microscopy Validation:
Super-resolution Microscopy:
Utilize PALM or STORM for nanoscale localization
Co-visualize with known membrane markers
Quantify spatial distribution relative to cellular compartments
Experimental Considerations:
Temperature sensitivity (conduct experiments at 25-30°C)
Stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids)
Gentle handling to prevent aggregation
These specialized protocols address the challenges of working with membrane-associated proteins and will provide crucial insights into the structural and functional properties of YPR170W-B.
When analyzing RNA-binding data for YPR170W-B, a systematic analytical framework should be employed:
Quantitative Binding Analysis:
Binding Curve Fitting:
Statistical Validation:
Calculate 95% confidence intervals for Kd values
Perform goodness-of-fit tests (R² and residual analysis)
Conduct ANOVA for comparing multiple RNA targets
Apply multiple testing correction for high-throughput data
Sequence Motif Analysis:
For identified binding sites:
Apply MEME, HOMER, or similar algorithms for motif discovery
Compare identified motifs to known RNA-binding protein recognition sites
Assess motif conservation across related yeast species
Create position weight matrices for binding site prediction
Structure-Function Correlation:
Secondary Structure Analysis:
Determine if YPR170W-B preferentially binds structured or unstructured regions
Use RNA structure prediction tools (RNAfold, Mfold) to analyze binding regions
Test binding to mutated structures to confirm structural requirements
Mapping Interaction Domains:
Identify critical amino acids for RNA binding through mutagenesis
Correlate binding properties with structural features of the protein
Generate structure-function relationship models
Comparative Analysis with Prediction Data:
Create correlation plots between:
Visualization Techniques:
Heatmaps of binding affinities across RNA targets
Principal component analysis of binding properties
Network graphs of protein-RNA interactions
Integration with Biological Context:
Pathway Analysis:
Map interacting RNAs to biological processes and pathways
Identify potential regulatory networks
Connect to yeast stress response or growth regulation pathways
This analytical framework enables robust interpretation of RNA-binding data and facilitates the development of testable hypotheses about YPR170W-B's functional role in yeast biology.
Given YPR170W-B's uncharacterized status, comprehensive bioinformatic analyses can provide crucial insights into its potential functions:
Sequence-Based Analysis:
Homology Detection:
PSI-BLAST searches against diverse databases
HHpred for remote homology detection
HMMER searches against domain databases
Motif Identification:
PROSITE, PRINTS, or InterPro scans for functional motifs
Analysis of the amino acid sequence for RNA-binding domains
Disorder prediction (PONDR, IUPred) to identify flexible binding regions
Structural Prediction and Analysis:
3D Structure Prediction:
AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold for ab initio structure prediction
Structure-based function annotation via ProFunc or COFACTOR
Identification of potential binding pockets or interfaces
Transmembrane Topology:
TMHMM, TopPred, or MEMSAT for transmembrane helix prediction
SignalP for signal peptide detection
Hydrophobicity analysis (Kyte-Doolittle plots)
RNA Interaction Prediction:
Binding Site Prediction:
Correlation Analysis:
Compare prediction scores across the transcriptome
Identify RNA features that correlate with high binding scores
Genomic Context Analysis:
Conservation Analysis:
Phylogenetic profiling across fungal species
Synteny analysis of genomic neighborhood
Selection pressure analysis (dN/dS ratios)
Co-expression Networks:
Identify genes co-expressed with YPR170W-B under various conditions
Construct co-expression networks to predict functional associations
Integrate with protein-protein interaction data
Functional Association Prediction:
Gene Ontology Enrichment:
Analyze GO terms of predicted interacting partners
Predict cellular component, biological process, and molecular function
Integrative Approaches:
STRING database for functional protein association networks
FunCoup for functional coupling analysis
Bayesian integration of multiple data types
By applying these complementary bioinformatic approaches, researchers can generate testable hypotheses about YPR170W-B's function, particularly focusing on its potential role in RNA metabolism suggested by its predicted interactions with transcripts like NSR1 .
When faced with contradictory experimental results in YPR170W-B research, a systematic troubleshooting and reconciliation approach is essential:
By systematically addressing contradictions through this framework, researchers can resolve discrepancies and develop a more nuanced understanding of YPR170W-B's function, particularly in relation to its predicted RNA interactions with transcripts like NSR1 .
Based on current knowledge and preliminary data, several high-priority research directions emerge for YPR170W-B characterization:
RNA Interactome Mapping:
Comprehensive Binding Profile:
Regulatory Impact Assessment:
Analyze effects of YPR170W-B depletion/overexpression on transcript levels
Determine if binding affects RNA stability, localization, or translation
Investigate condition-dependent regulation of RNA targets
Structural Biology Approaches:
High-Resolution Structure Determination:
Structure-Function Studies:
Map RNA-binding interface through mutagenesis and binding assays
Identify residues critical for membrane association
Determine structural changes upon RNA binding
Cellular Function Elucidation:
Genetic Interaction Mapping:
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis with YPR170W-B deletion
CRISPR interference screens to identify genetic dependencies
Suppressor screens to identify functional pathways
Stress Response Roles:
Test response to various cellular stresses (oxidative, heat, nutrient)
Examine localization changes under stress conditions
Investigate potential roles in RNA granule formation
Evolutionary Studies:
Comparative Genomics:
Identify orthologs across fungal species
Analyze sequence conservation patterns
Study functional divergence in different yeast lineages
Horizontal Gene Transfer Investigation:
Examine potential viral or transposon origins
Analyze integration patterns in the genome
Study potential domestication of mobile genetic elements
Systems Biology Integration:
Multi-omics Integration:
Correlate transcriptome, proteome, and RNA interactome data
Build predictive models of YPR170W-B function
Place YPR170W-B in the context of yeast regulatory networks
Translational Relevance:
Investigate conservation of function in pathogenic fungi
Explore potential as an antifungal target
Examine biotechnological applications in yeast engineering
These research directions leverage the predicted RNA interactions, particularly with NSR1 , and the recombinant protein's availability to systematically unveil YPR170W-B's biological functions and significance.
High-throughput techniques offer powerful approaches to elucidate YPR170W-B functions efficiently:
Next-Generation Sequencing Applications:
Enhanced CLIP-seq Approaches:
iCLIP or eCLIP for single-nucleotide resolution of binding sites
PAR-CLIP to identify direct contacts using photoreactive nucleosides
CRAC (crosslinking and analysis of cDNAs) optimized for yeast
Transcriptome-wide Analyses:
RNA-seq of deletion/overexpression strains under multiple conditions
Ribosome profiling to assess translational impacts
SHAPE-MaP to examine RNA structural changes upon binding
Proteomics-Based Methods:
Interaction Proteomics:
BioID proximity labeling to identify neighboring proteins
APEX2 proximity labeling for temporal interaction dynamics
Quantitative AP-MS with TMT labeling for condition-dependent interactions
Post-translational Modification Mapping:
Phosphoproteomics to identify regulatory modifications
Ubiquitylome analysis to assess protein stability regulation
Crosslink mass spectrometry to map interaction interfaces
High-Content Screening:
Phenotypic Profiling:
Chemical-genetic interaction screening (chemogenomics)
Yeast knockout collection screening for synthetic interactions
Morphological profiling using automated microscopy
96-Well Format Optimization:
Pooled Genetic Screens:
CRISPR-Based Approaches:
CRISPRi screens to identify genetic dependencies
CRISPRa screens to identify suppressor pathways
Base editing screens for structure-function analysis
Mutagenesis Approaches:
Deep mutational scanning of YPR170W-B
Saturation mutagenesis of predicted RNA-binding regions
Barcoded library screening for functional variants
Computational Integration:
Machine Learning Applications:
Develop predictive models of binding specificity
Pattern recognition in high-dimensional phenotypic data
Network inference from multi-omics datasets
Data Visualization and Analysis:
Interactive visualization of protein-RNA interaction networks
Multi-parameter analysis of screening results
Clustering approaches to identify functional groups
These high-throughput approaches can be implemented in well-designed 96-well format experiments , enabling systematic investigation of YPR170W-B's functions, particularly its interactions with predicted RNA partners like NSR1 , while maintaining experimental rigor through appropriate controls and replication.