KEGG: sce:YER190C-B
UPF0479 membrane protein YPL283W-B is a full-length (160 amino acid) membrane protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast). The protein belongs to the UPF0479 family of uncharacterized membrane proteins. Its significance in research stems from being a model membrane protein for studying fundamental aspects of membrane protein biology, including protein folding, membrane insertion, and function . As a yeast membrane protein, it also serves as an important research tool for evolutionary studies of membrane proteins across eukaryotic systems.
For optimal stability and activity, recombinant YPL283W-B should be stored according to the following guidelines:
| Storage Parameter | Recommended Condition | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term storage | 4°C | Up to one week for working aliquots |
| Long-term storage | -20°C to -80°C | For extended preservation |
| Storage buffer | Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, pH optimized | Specifically formulated for this membrane protein |
| Handling protocol | Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles | Aliquot before freezing |
The high glycerol concentration (50%) in the storage buffer is crucial for maintaining protein stability by preventing denaturation during freeze-thaw cycles . For research requiring prolonged use, it is recommended to make small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can compromise protein integrity.
When designing experiments to study YPL283W-B function in vitro, follow these methodological principles:
Define your variables clearly:
Establish appropriate controls:
Negative controls: Buffer-only or inactive protein variants
Positive controls: Known functional membrane proteins with similar properties
Vehicle controls: When using solvents to deliver compounds
Optimize protein reconstitution:
Measurement methodologies:
Spectroscopic methods for structural studies (CD, fluorescence)
Activity assays specific to hypothesized function
Binding studies if receptor/transporter function is suspected
Remember that a good experimental design requires a strong understanding of the membrane protein system being studied . For YPL283W-B, whose function is not fully characterized, initial experiments should focus on comparative analyses with better-understood membrane proteins.
Expressing and purifying membrane proteins like YPL283W-B presents several challenges, with corresponding solutions:
Recent advances in membrane protein solubilization using designed proteins (WRAPs) offer promising alternatives to traditional detergent-based methods. These approaches preserve the native sequence, fold, and function of membrane proteins while rendering them water-soluble . For YPL283W-B, a similar approach could potentially circumvent the need for detergents and facilitate structural and functional studies.
Verifying the structural integrity of YPL283W-B after purification is critical for ensuring reliable experimental results. A comprehensive approach includes:
SDS-PAGE analysis:
Secondary structure analysis:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure elements
Expected profile should be consistent with a membrane protein (high alpha-helical content)
Thermal stability assessment:
Differential scanning calorimetry or fluorimetry to determine melting temperature
Provides insight into protein stability under different buffer conditions
Size exclusion chromatography:
Assesses aggregation state and homogeneity
Can indicate proper folding (misfolded proteins often aggregate)
Functional assays:
Activity or binding assays to confirm that the protein retains its native function
May require reconstitution into membrane mimetics
For membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, maintaining structural integrity often requires the presence of detergents or lipids throughout the purification process. The choice of these components should be experimentally determined for optimal results.
Investigating YPL283W-B through protein-protein interaction studies requires sophisticated methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):
Utilize the His-tag on recombinant YPL283W-B for pull-down assays
Analyze interacting partners through mass spectrometry
Maintain appropriate detergent concentrations to preserve membrane protein interactions
Yeast two-hybrid adaptations:
Consider modified Y2H systems designed for membrane proteins (MYTH - Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid)
Split-ubiquitin systems may be particularly useful for YPL283W-B
Proximity labeling approaches:
BioID or APEX2 fusion constructs can identify proximal proteins in vivo
Especially valuable for transient interactions in the native membrane environment
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified YPL283W-B on sensor chips
Measure direct binding kinetics with putative interaction partners
Requires careful optimization of immobilization conditions for membrane proteins
Cross-linking studies:
Chemical crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (XL-MS)
Can capture both stable and transient interactions
The identical sequence shared between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A suggests potential functional redundancy . Comparative interaction studies between these two proteins might reveal important insights into their biological roles and any potential functional specialization.
Structural characterization of membrane proteins like YPL283W-B requires specialized approaches:
X-ray crystallography challenges and solutions:
Difficulty: Membrane proteins are notoriously difficult to crystallize
Solution: Utilize lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization methods
Consideration: Fusion proteins (e.g., T4 lysozyme) may facilitate crystallization
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
NMR spectroscopy approaches:
Solution NMR with detergent-solubilized protein
Solid-state NMR in lipid bilayers for more native-like conditions
Selective isotopic labeling to focus on specific regions
Computational prediction and modeling:
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Provides information on protein dynamics and solvent accessibility
Can identify regions involved in interactions or conformational changes
The choice of method depends on research questions and available resources. For initial characterization, combining computational prediction with lower-resolution experimental techniques may be most practical.
Site-directed mutagenesis provides powerful insights into structure-function relationships in membrane proteins like YPL283W-B:
Strategic mutation selection:
Conserved residues across UPF0479 family members
Hydrophobic residues at predicted lipid-protein interfaces
Charged residues in potential functional domains
Regions with predicted structural importance
Experimental design considerations:
Include multiple mutation types (alanine scanning, conservative, non-conservative)
Design mutations that test specific hypotheses about protein function
Create mutation series along predicted structural elements
Functional impact assessment:
Compare expression levels and membrane localization of mutants
Evaluate protein stability through thermal denaturation
Measure changes in binding or catalytic activities
Assess oligomerization state changes
Structural impact evaluation:
Circular dichroism to detect secondary structure changes
Intrinsic fluorescence to monitor tertiary structure
Limited proteolysis to identify conformational changes
Analysis framework:
Establish clear protocols for comparing mutant phenotypes
Use statistical methods appropriate for the data type
Consider creating comprehensive mutation maps
The identical sequence of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A presents an interesting opportunity to explore functional redundancy through mutagenesis. Creating mutations that affect shared properties versus potential specialized functions could provide valuable evolutionary insights.
Researchers working with YPL283W-B may encounter several technical challenges:
| Issue | Possible Causes | Resolution Strategies |
|---|---|---|
| Low protein yield | Suboptimal expression conditions | Optimize temperature, induction time, and media composition; try different expression systems |
| Protein aggregation | Improper handling or buffer conditions | Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids); optimize detergent type and concentration |
| Loss of activity | Denaturation during purification | Perform purification at 4°C; minimize time between steps; add protease inhibitors |
| Poor reconstitution | Incompatible lipids or detergents | Screen different lipid compositions; optimize detergent removal method |
| Inconsistent results | Batch-to-batch variability | Standardize expression and purification protocols; implement quality control checks |
| Degradation | Protease contamination | Include appropriate protease inhibitors; maintain sterile conditions; minimize freeze-thaw cycles |
For membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can cause significant protein degradation. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week to maintain integrity .
Buffer optimization is crucial for maintaining YPL283W-B stability and function:
Systematic buffer screening approach:
Screen pH range (typically 6.5-8.5 for membrane proteins)
Test different buffer systems (Tris, HEPES, phosphate)
Vary ionic strength (100-500 mM)
Evaluate different stabilizing agents (glycerol, sucrose, specific lipids)
Stability assessment methods:
Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions
Size exclusion chromatography to monitor aggregation state
Activity assays to confirm functional preservation
Detergent considerations:
Determine critical micelle concentration (CMC) of selected detergents
Maintain detergent concentration above CMC but minimize excess
Consider detergent exchange if initial selection is suboptimal
Specific recommendations for YPL283W-B:
Documentation and standardization:
Maintain detailed records of buffer optimization experiments
Implement standardized quality control for each new buffer preparation
Remember that optimal buffer conditions may differ depending on the specific application (storage, purification, or functional studies). For reconstitution purposes, the buffer composition will need to be compatible with the chosen reconstitution method.
Implementing rigorous quality control is essential for reliable research with recombinant YPL283W-B:
Protein identity confirmation:
Mass spectrometry to verify molecular weight and sequence
Western blot with anti-His antibodies (for His-tagged versions)
N-terminal sequencing to confirm correct processing
Purity assessment:
Functional verification:
Develop and standardize activity assays
Compare activity across batches to establish consistency
Include positive controls with known activity
Stability monitoring:
Regular testing of stored aliquots
Monitoring for degradation products via SDS-PAGE
Thermal stability assays to detect changes in protein folding
Batch tracking system:
Detailed documentation of expression and purification conditions
Assignment of unique identifiers to each production batch
Record of all quality control results with acceptance criteria
For His-tagged YPL283W-B, purity assessment via SDS-PAGE should consistently demonstrate >90% purity . Establishing clear acceptance criteria for each quality control parameter will ensure experimental reproducibility and reliability.
Comparative analysis of YPL283W-B with other UPF0479 family members reveals important insights:
Sequence similarity:
Predicted structural features:
All UPF0479 family members are predicted to contain multiple transmembrane helices
Conservation patterns suggest functional importance of specific regions
Structural modeling indicates similar topology across family members
Evolutionary considerations:
Perfect sequence conservation between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A suggests strong selective pressure
Analysis of synonymous vs. non-synonymous substitution rates across species can provide insights into functional constraints
Genomic context of different UPF0479 genes may suggest functional specialization
Expression patterns:
Differential expression of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A under various conditions may indicate functional divergence despite identical sequences
Comparison of expression patterns across family members can reveal physiological roles
The identical sequences of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A raise interesting questions about functional redundancy versus specialization, and comparative studies examining their expression, localization, and interaction partners would be valuable for understanding their biological roles.
Emerging technologies offer exciting opportunities for studying YPL283W-B:
Advanced solubilization strategies:
WRAP technology (Water-soluble RFdiffused Amphipathic Proteins) offers a detergent-free approach to membrane protein solubilization
Deep learning-based design can create custom solubilizing domains that preserve native structure and function
This approach has been successful with other membrane proteins, achieving 4.0 Å resolution in cryo-EM studies
Single-molecule techniques:
Single-molecule FRET to study conformational dynamics
Atomic force microscopy to examine protein-membrane interactions
Single-particle tracking in native environments
Advanced imaging approaches:
Super-resolution microscopy to study localization and dynamics in yeast cells
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) for structural context
Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural studies
Functional genomics integration:
CRISPR-based approaches for studying function in native contexts
High-throughput mutagenesis combined with deep sequencing
Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions
Computational approaches:
Molecular dynamics simulations in realistic membrane environments
AI-based functional prediction
Integrative structural modeling combining sparse experimental data
The development of WRAP technology is particularly promising for membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, as it can enable structural and functional studies without the complications associated with detergents . This approach could accelerate research on this understudied protein family.
Studying YPL283W-B has several important implications for membrane protein research:
Methodological advances:
Optimization protocols developed for YPL283W-B may be applicable to other challenging membrane proteins
Novel solubilization strategies tested with this protein could expand the toolbox for membrane protein research
Quality control standards established may serve as benchmarks for the field
Evolutionary insights:
The perfect sequence identity between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A provides a unique opportunity to study gene duplication and functional divergence
Comparing these proteins' roles could shed light on how membrane proteins evolve specialized functions
Conservation patterns across species may reveal fundamental principles of membrane protein evolution
Functional characterization:
UPF0479 family members represent uncharacterized proteins, making their study valuable for expanding the functional annotation of the proteome
Discoveries about YPL283W-B function may provide insights into general membrane biology
Potential roles in cellular processes could connect to human membrane protein biology
Technical challenges representation:
As a challenging membrane protein, YPL283W-B serves as an excellent model system for developing and refining membrane protein methodologies
Successful application of approaches like WRAP technology to this protein would demonstrate their broader utility
The study of previously uncharacterized membrane proteins like YPL283W-B is essential for expanding our understanding of cellular processes and potentially identifying new therapeutic targets. The methodological advances developed through such research contribute to our ability to study the challenging but crucially important membrane proteome.