Recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae UPF0479 membrane protein YPL283W-B (YPL283W-B)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on various factors including storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its implementation.
Synonyms
YPL283W-B; UPF0479 membrane protein YPL283W-B
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-160
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain ATCC 204508 / S288c) (Baker's yeast)
Target Names
YPL283W-B
Target Protein Sequence
MMPAKLQLDVLRTLQSSARHGTQTLKNSNFLERFHKDRIVFCLPFFPALFFVPVQKVLQH LCLRFTQVAPYFIIQLFDLPSRHAENLAPLLASCRIQYTNCFSSSSNGQVPSIISLYLRV DLSPFYAKIFQISYRVPMIWLDVFQVFFVFLVISQHSLHS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Database Links
Protein Families
UPF0479 family
Subcellular Location
Membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is UPF0479 membrane protein YPL283W-B and what is its significance in research?

UPF0479 membrane protein YPL283W-B is a full-length (160 amino acid) membrane protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast). The protein belongs to the UPF0479 family of uncharacterized membrane proteins. Its significance in research stems from being a model membrane protein for studying fundamental aspects of membrane protein biology, including protein folding, membrane insertion, and function . As a yeast membrane protein, it also serves as an important research tool for evolutionary studies of membrane proteins across eukaryotic systems.

What are the optimal storage conditions for recombinant YPL283W-B protein?

For optimal stability and activity, recombinant YPL283W-B should be stored according to the following guidelines:

Storage ParameterRecommended ConditionNotes
Short-term storage4°CUp to one week for working aliquots
Long-term storage-20°C to -80°CFor extended preservation
Storage bufferTris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, pH optimizedSpecifically formulated for this membrane protein
Handling protocolAvoid repeated freeze-thaw cyclesAliquot before freezing

The high glycerol concentration (50%) in the storage buffer is crucial for maintaining protein stability by preventing denaturation during freeze-thaw cycles . For research requiring prolonged use, it is recommended to make small working aliquots to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles that can compromise protein integrity.

How should I design experiments to study YPL283W-B function in vitro?

When designing experiments to study YPL283W-B function in vitro, follow these methodological principles:

  • Define your variables clearly:

    • Independent variable: Typically the experimental condition you're manipulating (e.g., temperature, pH, ligand concentration)

    • Dependent variable: The measurable outcome (e.g., protein activity, binding affinity, structural changes)

    • Control for extraneous variables that might influence results

  • Establish appropriate controls:

    • Negative controls: Buffer-only or inactive protein variants

    • Positive controls: Known functional membrane proteins with similar properties

    • Vehicle controls: When using solvents to deliver compounds

  • Optimize protein reconstitution:

    • For functional studies, reconstitution into artificial membrane systems (liposomes, nanodiscs) may be necessary

    • Consider using solubilization approaches like those developed for other membrane proteins, such as the WRAP (Water-soluble RFdiffused Amphipathic Proteins) technology

  • Measurement methodologies:

    • Spectroscopic methods for structural studies (CD, fluorescence)

    • Activity assays specific to hypothesized function

    • Binding studies if receptor/transporter function is suspected

Remember that a good experimental design requires a strong understanding of the membrane protein system being studied . For YPL283W-B, whose function is not fully characterized, initial experiments should focus on comparative analyses with better-understood membrane proteins.

What are the challenges in expressing and purifying YPL283W-B, and how can they be overcome?

Expressing and purifying membrane proteins like YPL283W-B presents several challenges, with corresponding solutions:

ChallengeSolution ApproachMethodological Details
Low expression yieldsOptimize expression systemsUse specialized yeast or bacterial strains engineered for membrane protein expression; consider codon optimization
Protein insolubilityAppropriate detergent selectionScreen multiple detergents (DDM, LDAO, etc.); consider novel solubilization technologies like protein WRAPs
Protein instabilityBuffer optimizationInclude stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids); maintain appropriate pH and ionic strength
Purification difficultiesAffinity tag selectionHis-tagged versions facilitate purification via IMAC; position the tag to avoid functional interference
Structural integrity confirmationBiophysical characterizationUse circular dichroism, thermal shift assays, and size exclusion chromatography to confirm proper folding

Recent advances in membrane protein solubilization using designed proteins (WRAPs) offer promising alternatives to traditional detergent-based methods. These approaches preserve the native sequence, fold, and function of membrane proteins while rendering them water-soluble . For YPL283W-B, a similar approach could potentially circumvent the need for detergents and facilitate structural and functional studies.

How can I verify the structural integrity of purified YPL283W-B?

Verifying the structural integrity of YPL283W-B after purification is critical for ensuring reliable experimental results. A comprehensive approach includes:

  • SDS-PAGE analysis:

    • Confirms protein purity (>90% is typically desired)

    • Verifies expected molecular weight (~18 kDa plus tag size)

    • Can be used to assess protein degradation

  • Secondary structure analysis:

    • Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure elements

    • Expected profile should be consistent with a membrane protein (high alpha-helical content)

  • Thermal stability assessment:

    • Differential scanning calorimetry or fluorimetry to determine melting temperature

    • Provides insight into protein stability under different buffer conditions

  • Size exclusion chromatography:

    • Assesses aggregation state and homogeneity

    • Can indicate proper folding (misfolded proteins often aggregate)

  • Functional assays:

    • Activity or binding assays to confirm that the protein retains its native function

    • May require reconstitution into membrane mimetics

For membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, maintaining structural integrity often requires the presence of detergents or lipids throughout the purification process. The choice of these components should be experimentally determined for optimal results.

How might the function of YPL283W-B be investigated through protein-protein interaction studies?

Investigating YPL283W-B through protein-protein interaction studies requires sophisticated methodological approaches:

  • Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP):

    • Utilize the His-tag on recombinant YPL283W-B for pull-down assays

    • Analyze interacting partners through mass spectrometry

    • Maintain appropriate detergent concentrations to preserve membrane protein interactions

  • Yeast two-hybrid adaptations:

    • Consider modified Y2H systems designed for membrane proteins (MYTH - Membrane Yeast Two-Hybrid)

    • Split-ubiquitin systems may be particularly useful for YPL283W-B

  • Proximity labeling approaches:

    • BioID or APEX2 fusion constructs can identify proximal proteins in vivo

    • Especially valuable for transient interactions in the native membrane environment

  • Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):

    • Immobilize purified YPL283W-B on sensor chips

    • Measure direct binding kinetics with putative interaction partners

    • Requires careful optimization of immobilization conditions for membrane proteins

  • Cross-linking studies:

    • Chemical crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry (XL-MS)

    • Can capture both stable and transient interactions

The identical sequence shared between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A suggests potential functional redundancy . Comparative interaction studies between these two proteins might reveal important insights into their biological roles and any potential functional specialization.

What structural characterization methods are most suitable for YPL283W-B?

Structural characterization of membrane proteins like YPL283W-B requires specialized approaches:

  • X-ray crystallography challenges and solutions:

    • Difficulty: Membrane proteins are notoriously difficult to crystallize

    • Solution: Utilize lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization methods

    • Consideration: Fusion proteins (e.g., T4 lysozyme) may facilitate crystallization

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):

    • Recent advances make this viable for smaller membrane proteins

    • Novel solubilization approaches like WRAPs have enabled successful cryo-EM studies of challenging membrane proteins

    • A resolution of around 4.0 Å can be achieved with optimized samples

  • NMR spectroscopy approaches:

    • Solution NMR with detergent-solubilized protein

    • Solid-state NMR in lipid bilayers for more native-like conditions

    • Selective isotopic labeling to focus on specific regions

  • Computational prediction and modeling:

    • Leverage recent advances in AI-based protein structure prediction

    • Deep learning approaches like those used for WRAP design could predict structure

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to study dynamics within membranes

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS):

    • Provides information on protein dynamics and solvent accessibility

    • Can identify regions involved in interactions or conformational changes

The choice of method depends on research questions and available resources. For initial characterization, combining computational prediction with lower-resolution experimental techniques may be most practical.

How can site-directed mutagenesis be applied to study structure-function relationships in YPL283W-B?

Site-directed mutagenesis provides powerful insights into structure-function relationships in membrane proteins like YPL283W-B:

  • Strategic mutation selection:

    • Conserved residues across UPF0479 family members

    • Hydrophobic residues at predicted lipid-protein interfaces

    • Charged residues in potential functional domains

    • Regions with predicted structural importance

  • Experimental design considerations:

    • Include multiple mutation types (alanine scanning, conservative, non-conservative)

    • Design mutations that test specific hypotheses about protein function

    • Create mutation series along predicted structural elements

  • Functional impact assessment:

    • Compare expression levels and membrane localization of mutants

    • Evaluate protein stability through thermal denaturation

    • Measure changes in binding or catalytic activities

    • Assess oligomerization state changes

  • Structural impact evaluation:

    • Circular dichroism to detect secondary structure changes

    • Intrinsic fluorescence to monitor tertiary structure

    • Limited proteolysis to identify conformational changes

  • Analysis framework:

    • Establish clear protocols for comparing mutant phenotypes

    • Use statistical methods appropriate for the data type

    • Consider creating comprehensive mutation maps

The identical sequence of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A presents an interesting opportunity to explore functional redundancy through mutagenesis. Creating mutations that affect shared properties versus potential specialized functions could provide valuable evolutionary insights.

What are common issues encountered when working with YPL283W-B and how can they be resolved?

Researchers working with YPL283W-B may encounter several technical challenges:

IssuePossible CausesResolution Strategies
Low protein yieldSuboptimal expression conditionsOptimize temperature, induction time, and media composition; try different expression systems
Protein aggregationImproper handling or buffer conditionsAdd stabilizing agents (glycerol, specific lipids); optimize detergent type and concentration
Loss of activityDenaturation during purificationPerform purification at 4°C; minimize time between steps; add protease inhibitors
Poor reconstitutionIncompatible lipids or detergentsScreen different lipid compositions; optimize detergent removal method
Inconsistent resultsBatch-to-batch variabilityStandardize expression and purification protocols; implement quality control checks
DegradationProtease contaminationInclude appropriate protease inhibitors; maintain sterile conditions; minimize freeze-thaw cycles

For membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, repeated freeze-thaw cycles should be strictly avoided as they can cause significant protein degradation. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week to maintain integrity .

How can I optimize buffer conditions for functional studies of YPL283W-B?

Buffer optimization is crucial for maintaining YPL283W-B stability and function:

  • Systematic buffer screening approach:

    • Screen pH range (typically 6.5-8.5 for membrane proteins)

    • Test different buffer systems (Tris, HEPES, phosphate)

    • Vary ionic strength (100-500 mM)

    • Evaluate different stabilizing agents (glycerol, sucrose, specific lipids)

  • Stability assessment methods:

    • Thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing conditions

    • Size exclusion chromatography to monitor aggregation state

    • Activity assays to confirm functional preservation

  • Detergent considerations:

    • Determine critical micelle concentration (CMC) of selected detergents

    • Maintain detergent concentration above CMC but minimize excess

    • Consider detergent exchange if initial selection is suboptimal

  • Specific recommendations for YPL283W-B:

    • Start with Tris-based buffer containing 6% trehalose at pH 8.0

    • Include 50% glycerol for storage conditions

    • Consider including specific yeast lipids that might stabilize the native structure

  • Documentation and standardization:

    • Maintain detailed records of buffer optimization experiments

    • Implement standardized quality control for each new buffer preparation

Remember that optimal buffer conditions may differ depending on the specific application (storage, purification, or functional studies). For reconstitution purposes, the buffer composition will need to be compatible with the chosen reconstitution method.

What quality control measures should be implemented when working with recombinant YPL283W-B?

Implementing rigorous quality control is essential for reliable research with recombinant YPL283W-B:

  • Protein identity confirmation:

    • Mass spectrometry to verify molecular weight and sequence

    • Western blot with anti-His antibodies (for His-tagged versions)

    • N-terminal sequencing to confirm correct processing

  • Purity assessment:

    • SDS-PAGE with Coomassie or silver staining (>90% purity recommended)

    • Size exclusion chromatography to detect aggregates or contaminants

    • Endotoxin testing for applications in cellular studies

  • Functional verification:

    • Develop and standardize activity assays

    • Compare activity across batches to establish consistency

    • Include positive controls with known activity

  • Stability monitoring:

    • Regular testing of stored aliquots

    • Monitoring for degradation products via SDS-PAGE

    • Thermal stability assays to detect changes in protein folding

  • Batch tracking system:

    • Detailed documentation of expression and purification conditions

    • Assignment of unique identifiers to each production batch

    • Record of all quality control results with acceptance criteria

For His-tagged YPL283W-B, purity assessment via SDS-PAGE should consistently demonstrate >90% purity . Establishing clear acceptance criteria for each quality control parameter will ensure experimental reproducibility and reliability.

How does YPL283W-B compare to other UPF0479 family members in terms of structure and function?

Comparative analysis of YPL283W-B with other UPF0479 family members reveals important insights:

  • Sequence similarity:

    • YPL283W-B shares 100% sequence identity with YEL077W-A (UniProt ID: P0CX95)

    • This perfect identity suggests recent gene duplication

    • Other UPF0479 family members across species show varying degrees of conservation, particularly in transmembrane domains

  • Predicted structural features:

    • All UPF0479 family members are predicted to contain multiple transmembrane helices

    • Conservation patterns suggest functional importance of specific regions

    • Structural modeling indicates similar topology across family members

  • Evolutionary considerations:

    • Perfect sequence conservation between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A suggests strong selective pressure

    • Analysis of synonymous vs. non-synonymous substitution rates across species can provide insights into functional constraints

    • Genomic context of different UPF0479 genes may suggest functional specialization

  • Expression patterns:

    • Differential expression of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A under various conditions may indicate functional divergence despite identical sequences

    • Comparison of expression patterns across family members can reveal physiological roles

The identical sequences of YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A raise interesting questions about functional redundancy versus specialization, and comparative studies examining their expression, localization, and interaction partners would be valuable for understanding their biological roles.

What novel approaches could be applied to study membrane protein YPL283W-B?

Emerging technologies offer exciting opportunities for studying YPL283W-B:

  • Advanced solubilization strategies:

    • WRAP technology (Water-soluble RFdiffused Amphipathic Proteins) offers a detergent-free approach to membrane protein solubilization

    • Deep learning-based design can create custom solubilizing domains that preserve native structure and function

    • This approach has been successful with other membrane proteins, achieving 4.0 Å resolution in cryo-EM studies

  • Single-molecule techniques:

    • Single-molecule FRET to study conformational dynamics

    • Atomic force microscopy to examine protein-membrane interactions

    • Single-particle tracking in native environments

  • Advanced imaging approaches:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to study localization and dynamics in yeast cells

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) for structural context

    • Cryo-electron tomography for in situ structural studies

  • Functional genomics integration:

    • CRISPR-based approaches for studying function in native contexts

    • High-throughput mutagenesis combined with deep sequencing

    • Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions

  • Computational approaches:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations in realistic membrane environments

    • AI-based functional prediction

    • Integrative structural modeling combining sparse experimental data

The development of WRAP technology is particularly promising for membrane proteins like YPL283W-B, as it can enable structural and functional studies without the complications associated with detergents . This approach could accelerate research on this understudied protein family.

What are the implications of studying YPL283W-B for broader membrane protein research?

Studying YPL283W-B has several important implications for membrane protein research:

  • Methodological advances:

    • Optimization protocols developed for YPL283W-B may be applicable to other challenging membrane proteins

    • Novel solubilization strategies tested with this protein could expand the toolbox for membrane protein research

    • Quality control standards established may serve as benchmarks for the field

  • Evolutionary insights:

    • The perfect sequence identity between YPL283W-B and YEL077W-A provides a unique opportunity to study gene duplication and functional divergence

    • Comparing these proteins' roles could shed light on how membrane proteins evolve specialized functions

    • Conservation patterns across species may reveal fundamental principles of membrane protein evolution

  • Functional characterization:

    • UPF0479 family members represent uncharacterized proteins, making their study valuable for expanding the functional annotation of the proteome

    • Discoveries about YPL283W-B function may provide insights into general membrane biology

    • Potential roles in cellular processes could connect to human membrane protein biology

  • Technical challenges representation:

    • As a challenging membrane protein, YPL283W-B serves as an excellent model system for developing and refining membrane protein methodologies

    • Successful application of approaches like WRAP technology to this protein would demonstrate their broader utility

The study of previously uncharacterized membrane proteins like YPL283W-B is essential for expanding our understanding of cellular processes and potentially identifying new therapeutic targets. The methodological advances developed through such research contribute to our ability to study the challenging but crucially important membrane proteome.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.