KEGG: sce:YGR141W
STRING: 4932.YGR141W
VPS62 (also known as Vps62p) is one of the novel proteins identified in genome-wide screens for components involved in the vacuolar protein sorting pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This protein participates in the carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) trafficking pathway, which is one of the main routes for hydrolase transport to the yeast vacuole. Research indicates that VPS62 plays a specific role in the proper targeting of proteins to the vacuole, with deletion mutants exhibiting missorting of CPY to the extracellular space rather than to the vacuole .
Methodologically, the function has been determined through reverse genetic approaches, particularly using homozygous diploid deletion strains and monitoring the secretion of CPY as a reporter. The CPY colony blot assay, as described by Roberts et al. (1991), is a primary technique used to identify the functional role of VPS genes including VPS62 .
VPS62 belongs to a group of novel vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) genes designated as VPS61p-VPS75p. Within the broader classification of VPS proteins, VPS62 appears to function primarily in the carboxypeptidase Y pathway, unlike some other VPS proteins (such as MON1, MON2, VPS61, and VPS67) that function in both the CPY and alkaline phosphatase pathways .
To investigate these pathway relationships experimentally, researchers typically employ pulse-chase experiments tracking the processing of enzyme precursors to mature forms. The data from such experiments reveals the following relationships among newer VPS proteins:
| VPS Protein | CPY Secretion | CPY Pathway Involvement | ALP Pathway Involvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| VPS61 | ++ | + | + |
| VPS62 | ++ | ++ | - |
| VPS67 | ++ | + | + |
| VPS71 | ++ | + | - |
| VPS72 | ++ | ++ | - |
| VPS73 | ++ | ++ | - |
| VPS74 | ++ | +++ | - |
| VPS75 | ++ | ++ | - |
Note: + indicates degree of involvement; - indicates minimal involvement .
Several fundamental techniques can be employed to study VPS62 expression and localization:
Recombinant protein expression systems: VPS62 can be expressed in various host systems including E. coli, yeast, baculovirus, or mammalian cells, with the choice depending on research requirements for post-translational modifications and protein folding .
Colony blot assays: The CPY colony blot assay is particularly useful for screening VPS gene function. This involves transferring yeast colonies to nitrocellulose membranes and performing immunoblotting with anti-CPY antibodies to detect CPY secretion .
Fluorescence microscopy: GFP-tagging of VPS62 allows for visualization of its subcellular localization. This approach can confirm vacuolar membrane association or reveal other unexpected localizations.
Subcellular fractionation: Differential centrifugation followed by western blotting can be used to determine the subcellular compartments where VPS62 is enriched.
For experimental protocols, the following parameters have proven effective:
Expression conditions: 30°C for yeast hosts
Purification yield: >90% purity achievable with appropriate chromatography steps
Storage stability: Maintain in liquid form containing glycerol at -20°C for short-term or -80°C for long-term storage .
To investigate the specific role of VPS62 in the CPY pathway, several advanced methodological approaches can be employed:
Reciprocal hemizygosity assay: This technique is particularly valuable for determining allele-specific contributions to phenotype in diploid organisms. The method involves creating hybrid strains where only one functional copy of VPS62 remains (either from one strain or another), allowing researchers to evaluate the contribution of different allelic variants to the sorting phenotype .
Pulse-chase analysis: To track the kinetics of CPY transport:
Quantitative assessment of sorting defects: Using densitometry to measure the ratio of intracellular to extracellular CPY forms:
| VPS Mutant | % CPY Secreted | % CPY Processed to Mature Form (10-min chase) |
|---|---|---|
| WT | <5% | 90-100% |
| vps62Δ | 40-60% | 60-90% |
Yeast two-hybrid analysis: To identify protein-protein interactions of VPS62 with other components of the sorting machinery. This can reveal functional complexes and position VPS62 within the hierarchical organization of the pathway .
Several VPS proteins, including VPS62, have been implicated in actin cytoskeleton interactions. To investigate this relationship methodologically:
Actin staining in vps62Δ mutants: Use rhodamine-phalloidin staining to visualize F-actin structures. Compare wild-type and vps62Δ strains at various temperatures (25°C, 30°C, and 37°C) to detect temperature-dependent defects.
Co-immunoprecipitation studies: Use epitope-tagged VPS62 to identify physical interactions with actin or actin-related proteins such as Arp5p and Arp6p, which have been shown to affect vacuolar protein sorting .
Latrunculin treatment: Disrupt the actin cytoskeleton using latrunculin and assess the effect on VPS62 localization and function. This can determine whether an intact actin cytoskeleton is required for VPS62 function.
Research findings suggest that some novel VPS proteins like VPS61p, VPS64p, and VPS67p display defects in the actin cytoskeleton at 30°C, suggesting an interplay between actin organization and vacuolar protein sorting . VPS62 may have similar connections that can be investigated using these approaches.
Differentiating between direct and indirect effects of VPS62 deletion requires carefully designed experimental approaches:
Conditional expression systems: Use temperature-sensitive or galactose-inducible VPS62 alleles to allow for rapid inactivation or depletion of the protein. Monitor immediate versus delayed effects on sorting to distinguish direct from indirect consequences.
Bypass suppression analysis:
Cargo-specific analysis: Compare the trafficking of multiple vacuolar cargoes (CPY, ALP, PrA, CPS) in vps62Δ mutants to determine specificity:
| Cargo Protein | Transport Pathway | Effect of vps62Δ |
|---|---|---|
| CPY | VPS (Golgi → PVC → Vacuole) | Moderate defect |
| ALP | AP-3 (Golgi → Vacuole) | No significant defect |
| PrA | VPS (Golgi → PVC → Vacuole) | Moderate defect |
| CPS | VPS (Golgi → PVC → Vacuole) | Variable defect |
Epistasis analysis: Construct double mutants combining vps62Δ with deletions of genes functioning in defined steps of vacuolar transport (e.g., vps21Δ, pep12Δ, vps4Δ). Compare phenotypes to establish pathway relationships .
Robust statistical approaches are essential for proper interpretation of VPS62 functional studies:
Strain background considerations:
Phenotypic variation quantification:
Measure distribution of phenotypes across single cells rather than population averages
Apply flow cytometry to quantify cell-to-cell variation in protein sorting
Implement single-cell tracking to detect heterogeneity in response
Experimental design strategies:
Statistical approaches for heterogeneity:
When working with recombinant VPS62, several quality control parameters should be monitored to ensure experimental reliability:
Protein purity assessment:
Functional validation:
Binding assays to known interaction partners
Complementation of vps62Δ phenotypes when reintroduced
In vitro assays relevant to hypothesized molecular function
Stability monitoring:
Expression system considerations:
Investigating the protein interaction network (interactome) of VPS62 requires multiple complementary approaches:
Affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express epitope-tagged VPS62 (e.g., TAP-tag, FLAG-tag) in S. cerevisiae
Perform single-step or tandem affinity purifications
Analyze co-purifying proteins by mass spectrometry
Use SILAC or TMT labeling for quantitative comparison
Include appropriate controls (untagged strains, irrelevant tagged proteins)
Proximity-based labeling approaches:
Fuse VPS62 to BioID or APEX2 enzymes
Allow in vivo biotinylation of proximal proteins
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
This detects transient and stable interactions in the native cellular environment
Yeast two-hybrid screening:
Use VPS62 as bait to screen against genomic or cDNA prey libraries
Validate positive interactions through secondary assays
Map interaction domains through deletion constructs
Co-localization studies:
Employ fluorescently tagged VPS62 and candidate interactors
Use high-resolution microscopy to assess spatial overlap
Apply FRET or BiFC techniques to confirm direct interactions
From existing studies, potential VPS62 interactions should be investigated with:
Other VPS pathway components (especially VPS61-VPS75)
Actin-related proteins (Arp5p, Arp6p)
GTP-binding proteins involved in vesicle trafficking (Arl1p, Arl3p)
Contradictions in phenotypic data are common in complex biological systems. To systematically address contradictions in VPS62 research:
| Phenotypic Aspect | Study 1 Finding | Study 2 Finding | Potential Reconciliation |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPY secretion | Strong (++++) | Moderate (++) | Different strain backgrounds |
| Growth defect | None | Slight at 37°C | Temperature-dependent phenotype |
| Vacuole morphology | Fragmented | Normal | Media composition differences |
Integrated analysis approach:
Advanced imaging techniques offer powerful approaches to understand VPS62 dynamics and localization:
Live-cell imaging methodologies:
Express VPS62-GFP/mCherry fusion under native promoter
Use spinning disk confocal microscopy for fast acquisition
Apply TIRF microscopy to visualize events near the plasma membrane
Implement photoactivatable or photoconvertible fluorophores (PA-GFP, mEos) to track protein subpopulations
Super-resolution microscopy approaches:
STED microscopy: Achieve 50-70 nm resolution in yeast cells
PALM/STORM: Single-molecule localization for 20-30 nm resolution
SIM: Structured illumination for 100 nm resolution with less photodamage
These techniques can resolve subdomains within organelles that may be specifically enriched for VPS62
Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM):
Locate VPS62-tagged structures by fluorescence
Examine the same structures at ultrastructural resolution by EM
This is particularly valuable for characterizing novel compartments
Advanced analysis techniques:
Particle tracking for dynamic studies
Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for mobility assessment
Single-particle tracking for diffusion coefficient calculation
Object-based colocalization for interaction studies with other proteins
When implementing these techniques, consider:
Minimizing phototoxicity through reduced laser power or oxygen scavengers
Appropriate controls for fusion protein functionality
Statistical analysis of dynamic data (MSD plots, diffusion coefficients)
Integration with complementary biochemical approaches
Understanding VPS62 function has several implications for broader research on vesicular trafficking:
Comparative analysis across species:
Identify VPS62 homologs in other organisms to establish evolutionarily conserved functions
Compare phenotypes of VPS62 disruption across model systems
Investigate whether higher organisms employ similar mechanisms for specialized trafficking
Integration with systems biology approaches:
Position VPS62 within the larger network of trafficking pathways
Apply computational modeling to predict system-level consequences of VPS62 dysfunction
Use network analysis to identify critical nodes in vesicular trafficking systems
Extension to disease-relevant models:
Several human diseases are linked to defects in vacuolar/lysosomal sorting
Determining whether VPS62 homologs are implicated in human disease
Development of yeast-based models for trafficking-related disorders
Application to biotechnology:
Resolving contradictory findings requires systematic approaches:
Standardization of experimental conditions:
Develop consensus protocols for VPS62 functional assays
Create reference strain collections available to the research community
Establish minimal reporting requirements for experimental details
Multi-laboratory validation studies:
Implement collaborative projects to test key findings across different laboratories
Use identical reagents and protocols to eliminate technical variability
Apply statistical meta-analysis techniques to integrate results
Integration of diverse experimental approaches:
Combine genetic, biochemical, and imaging approaches
Develop computational frameworks for integrating heterogeneous datasets
Apply Bayesian techniques to weight evidence based on methodological strength
Formal contradiction detection frameworks:
Advanced statistical methods:
Building on the successful genomic screening approaches that originally identified VPS62 , several advanced methodologies can be employed:
Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis:
Cross vps62Δ with the entire yeast deletion collection
Identify synthetic lethal/sick interactions
Discover genetic suppressors
Map the genetic interaction network surrounding VPS62
CRISPR-based screening approaches:
Apply CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for partial loss-of-function phenotypes
Use CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) to identify genes that, when overexpressed, modify vps62Δ phenotypes
Implement multiplexed CRISPR screening for combinatorial genetic perturbations
Chemical-genetic profiling:
Screen vps62Δ against libraries of small molecules
Identify compounds that specifically enhance or suppress vps62Δ phenotypes
Use these compounds as chemical probes to dissect VPS62 function
Quantitative phenotyping platforms:
Integration with genome-wide datasets:
Correlate genetic interactions with protein-protein interaction data
Analyze transcriptome responses to VPS62 deletion
Examine proteome-wide changes in protein localization or abundance
For optimal results, these approaches should be combined with appropriate statistical methods and experimental designs as outlined in source .
Structural studies of VPS62 would provide valuable insights into its molecular function. Methodological approaches include:
Optimized protein expression and purification:
Test multiple expression systems (E. coli, yeast, insect cells)
Implement multi-step purification protocols including affinity, ion exchange, and size exclusion chromatography
Achieve >95% purity and monodispersity for structural studies
Consider expression of domains separately if full-length protein proves challenging
Protein crystallization approaches:
Screen extensive crystallization conditions
Apply surface entropy reduction through targeted mutations
Consider co-crystallization with binding partners or ligands
Use crystallization chaperones such as antibody fragments
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Particularly valuable if VPS62 forms part of a larger complex
Optimize sample preparation to achieve uniform particle distribution
Consider GraFix method for stabilizing complexes
Implement computational approaches for heterogeneity analysis
Hybrid structural approaches:
Combine X-ray crystallography of domains with cryo-EM of full complexes
Integrate small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for solution structure
Use NMR for dynamic regions and interaction interfaces
Computational structure prediction:
Apply AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold for initial structural models
Validate predictions through targeted experimental approaches
Use molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational states
Understanding the structural features of VPS62 would provide mechanistic insights into its role in vacuolar protein sorting and potentially reveal unexpected functions or interaction capabilities.