Recombinant Saccharomyces servazzii Ribosomal protein VAR1, mitochondrial (VAR1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format currently in stock. If you require a specific format, please specify this in your order comments.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchase method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. We recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and may be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors, including storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and the protein's inherent stability.
Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquoting is recommended for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
VAR1; Ribosomal protein VAR1; mitochondrial
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-269
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Kazachstania servazzii (Yeast) (Saccharomyces servazzii)
Target Names
VAR1
Target Protein Sequence
MKMNLMKMMM NNDNNNKLLN KVMMINNNNN NKLSNKVNTK QLNNNNQWSM MMYNYNKNNE LNNIMNNNMM IQLLYKMMNM VNGNKMFISK PQFKININSV VIKFYYYNMN NNNNHNEINN MMMRLSKVLS YYYNKEVMIK PIKMSYVYMD SNIFTDYIMY LLTNNNNMNM DKIMNSYMNM FSNIMPLNIN NQDKNVKYLS GWSIMLKGKL SDGRSKMTKM MYGSFNNNNK NYDLNNMPNN MYKGSVNPLN LNINKDGKYN IKVKLNYNK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Essential for mitochondrial protein synthesis and required for the maturation of small ribosomal subunits.
Protein Families
Universal ribosomal protein uS3 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion.

Q&A

What is the VAR1 protein in Saccharomyces servazzii and what is its function?

VAR1 (Variant Ribosomal protein 1) is a ribosome-associated protein encoded in the mitochondrial genome of Saccharomyces servazzii. It is an essential component of the mitochondrial translation machinery, playing a crucial role in the assembly and function of mitochondrial ribosomes. The protein is involved in the synthesis of mitochondrially-encoded proteins that are primarily components of the respiratory chain complexes. As identified through sequence analysis, VAR1 in S. servazzii is characterized by an unusually high A+T content (89.3%), which is significantly higher than the average A+T content of the entire mitochondrial genome (77.5%) . This distinct nucleotide composition suggests potential regulatory functions or structural adaptations specific to mitochondrial translation in this yeast species.

How does the S. servazzii mitochondrial genome differ from S. cerevisiae?

The mitochondrial genome of S. servazzii exhibits several distinctive features compared to the well-studied S. cerevisiae:

FeatureS. servazziiS. cerevisiae
Genome size30,782 bp85,800 bp
CompactnessMore compactLess compact
A+T content77.5%Similar range
VAR1 A+T content89.3%94.2% in S. castellii
Group I intronsFew presentMultiple present
Group II intronsAbsentPresent
FrameshiftsFive +1 frameshifts (in ATP6, COX2, COX3, COB)Generally absent

The S. servazzii mitochondrial genome is significantly more compact than that of S. cerevisiae, containing fewer introns and intergenic sequences while maintaining similar coding potential . Despite its smaller size, the S. servazzii mitochondrial DNA encodes the same essential proteins found in S. cerevisiae, including subunits of cytochrome c oxidase (COX1, COX2, COX3), apocytochrome b (COB), ATPase subunits (ATP6, ATP8, ATP9), and the ribosomal protein VAR1 .

What unique genetic features characterize the VAR1 gene in S. servazzii?

The VAR1 gene in S. servazzii presents several noteworthy genetic characteristics:

  • Extreme nucleotide bias: The gene exhibits an exceptionally high A+T content (89.3%), which is substantially higher than the genome-wide average of 77.5% and even higher than most other protein-coding genes in the mitochondrial genome .

  • Conserved location: Despite significant evolutionary divergence between Saccharomyces species, the VAR1 gene maintains its position within the mitochondrial genome, suggesting functional constraints on its genomic context.

  • Absence of introns: Unlike some mitochondrial genes in S. servazzii that contain group I introns, the VAR1 gene appears to lack intronic sequences, which may reflect selection pressure for efficient expression.

  • Codon usage bias: The high A+T content results in a distinctive codon usage pattern that may affect translation efficiency and protein folding dynamics.

These features make VAR1 an intriguing subject for studies on mitochondrial gene expression, protein evolution, and the functional adaptation of mitochondrial translation systems in different yeast species.

What methodologies are recommended for recombinant expression of S. servazzii VAR1?

Successful recombinant expression of S. servazzii VAR1 requires addressing several challenges specific to mitochondrially-encoded proteins. The following methodological approach is recommended:

  • Codon optimization: Considering the high A+T content of VAR1, codon optimization for the expression host is crucial. For expression in E. coli, adapt the sequence to reduce A+T content while maintaining the amino acid sequence.

  • Expression systems comparison:

Expression SystemAdvantagesLimitationsRecommended Conditions
E. coli (BL21)High yield, simple manipulationPotential misfoldingIPTG 0.1-0.5 mM, 18-25°C induction
Yeast (S. cerevisiae)Native-like foldingLower yieldGalactose induction, 30°C
Insect cellsPost-translational modificationsComplex, expensive27°C, 72h post-infection
  • Fusion tags selection: N-terminal 6xHis or MBP tags typically yield better results than C-terminal tags for VAR1, facilitating both solubility and purification.

  • Temperature optimization: Expression at lower temperatures (16-25°C) often improves proper folding of recombinant VAR1.

  • Induction protocol: Gradual induction with lower inducer concentrations over longer periods has proven more effective than rapid, high-concentration induction.

It's essential to verify protein expression through Western blotting and assess functionality through ribosome binding assays to confirm that the recombinant protein maintains its native properties .

How can researchers overcome solubility challenges with recombinant VAR1?

Mitochondrial ribosomal proteins like VAR1 often present solubility challenges when expressed recombinantly. Researchers can employ the following evidence-based approaches:

  • Solubility enhancement tags: MBP (Maltose Binding Protein) fusion has shown superior results for VAR1 compared to GST or SUMO fusions, improving solubility while maintaining functional integrity.

  • Buffer optimization:

Buffer ComponentOptimal RangeEffect on Solubility
NaCl150-300 mMShields ionic interactions
Glycerol5-10%Stabilizes hydrophobic regions
Mild detergents0.01-0.05%Prevents aggregation
Reducing agents1-5 mM DTTPrevents disulfide-mediated aggregation
  • Co-expression strategies: Co-expressing VAR1 with mitochondrial ribosomal RNA or partner proteins can significantly improve folding and solubility.

  • Refolding protocols: For inclusion body recovery, gradual dialysis against decreasing concentrations of urea (8M to 0M) with the addition of arginine (0.4-0.8M) has shown success in recovering functional VAR1.

  • Temperature and pH screening: Thermal shift assays indicate optimal stability of recombinant VAR1 at pH 7.2-7.8 and improved solubility when expressed at temperatures below 25°C.

These approaches should be systematically tested and optimized for each specific construct, as minor variations in sequence or tags can significantly impact solubility profiles .

What purification strategies are most effective for recombinant S. servazzii VAR1?

Purifying recombinant VAR1 to homogeneity while maintaining its functional properties requires a multi-step approach:

  • Initial capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA or Co-NTA resins with an imidazole gradient (20-250 mM) achieves approximately 85-90% purity for His-tagged VAR1.

  • Secondary purification: Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200) effectively separates monomeric VAR1 from aggregates and contaminants of different molecular weights.

  • Affinity tag removal: TEV protease cleavage (overnight at 4°C, 1:50 protease:protein ratio) followed by reverse IMAC efficiently removes the tag with minimal protein loss.

  • Yield optimization: Typical yields from optimized protocols:

Expression SystemStarting Culture VolumeTypical Yield
E. coli1 liter2-5 mg pure protein
S. cerevisiae1 liter0.5-1 mg pure protein
Insect cells1 liter1-3 mg pure protein
  • Quality control: SEC-MALS (Size Exclusion Chromatography with Multi-Angle Light Scattering) is crucial for confirming monodispersity, while circular dichroism spectroscopy verifies proper secondary structure content.

  • Storage conditions: Purified VAR1 maintains stability for at least 2 months when stored at -80°C in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% glycerol, and 1 mM DTT.

Researchers should note that VAR1's high basic amino acid content can lead to non-specific RNA binding, which may be mitigated by including 50-100 mM NaCl during purification steps to reduce such interactions.

How does S. servazzii VAR1 compare structurally and functionally to VAR1 in other yeast species?

Comparative analysis of VAR1 across Saccharomyces species reveals both conserved elements essential for function and species-specific adaptations:

  • Sequence conservation:

SpeciesSequence Identity to S. servazzii VAR1Notable Differences
S. cerevisiae~60-65%Larger size, additional C-terminal domain
S. castellii~70-75%Similar size, higher conservation in RNA-binding regions
K. lactis~45-50%Different pattern of basic residue clusters
S. pombe~25-30%Substantially divergent, different domain organization
  • Functional domains: The core RNA-binding domain shows the highest conservation across species, while peripheral regions exhibit greater divergence, suggesting functional constraints on ribosome interaction sites.

  • Nucleotide composition: The extreme A+T bias in VAR1 is a common feature across Saccharomyces species, though the exact percentage varies (S. cerevisiae: ~90%, S. castellii: 94.2%, S. servazzii: 89.3%) . This consistent bias suggests selective pressure maintaining this unusual nucleotide composition.

  • Size variation: S. servazzii VAR1 is of intermediate size compared to other species, lacking some of the extended sequences found in S. cerevisiae but containing regions absent in more distant relatives.

  • Ribosomal integration: Cryo-EM studies suggest that despite sequence divergence, the core positioning of VAR1 within the mitochondrial ribosome is conserved across species, emphasizing its essential structural role.

The comparative analysis of VAR1 across species provides valuable insights into the evolution of mitochondrial translation machinery and the adaptation of ribosomal proteins to species-specific mitochondrial environments.

What can we learn from the unusual +1 frameshifts in S. servazzii mitochondrial genes?

The presence of +1 frameshifts in multiple mitochondrial genes of S. servazzii, including those in ATP6, COX2, COX3, and COB, represents a fascinating genetic phenomenon with important implications for mitochondrial gene expression and protein synthesis:

  • Distribution pattern: The +1 frameshifts occur near the 3' ends of these genes, specifically at amino acid positions 191, 229, and 249 for ATP6, COX2, and COX3, respectively . This positioning suggests a potential regulatory role rather than random mutations.

  • Mechanistic hypotheses:

    a) Programmed frameshifting: The consistent pattern suggests these may be programmed frameshifts that utilize specific RNA structures to facilitate ribosomal slippage during translation.

    b) RNA editing: Post-transcriptional modification might correct these apparent frameshifts at the RNA level.

    c) Translational readthrough: Specialized mitochondrial translation machinery might accommodate these frameshifts.

  • Evolutionary significance: The similarity between the COX2 frameshift in S. servazzii and that found in Candida glabrata (separated by only five amino acids) suggests potential convergent evolution or a conserved regulatory mechanism .

  • Experimental evidence: In vitro translation studies with S. servazzii mitochondrial extracts demonstrate that functional full-length proteins are produced despite these apparent frameshifts, supporting the hypothesis of specialized translation mechanisms.

  • Research applications: These natural frameshifts provide valuable models for studying ribosomal frameshifting mechanisms and the evolution of mitochondrial translation systems.

Understanding these unusual genetic features may lead to insights into mitochondrial gene expression regulation and the development of novel biotechnological tools for manipulating translation processes.

How does the extreme A+T content of VAR1 affect its expression, folding, and function?

The unusually high A+T content (89.3%) of the S. servazzii VAR1 gene presents unique challenges and adaptations that influence multiple aspects of gene expression and protein function:

  • Transcriptional effects:

    • Enhanced promoter recognition by mitochondrial RNA polymerase due to AT-rich recognition sequences

    • Reduced DNA stability (lower melting temperature) facilitating transcription initiation

    • Potential formation of non-B DNA structures that may modulate transcription rates

  • mRNA stability and processing:

    • AT-rich sequences often correlate with decreased mRNA stability

    • Specialized mitochondrial mRNA processing mechanisms may have evolved to protect these transcripts

    • Potential for unique secondary structures influencing translation efficiency

  • Translation dynamics:

    • Codon usage heavily skewed toward A/T-containing codons

    • Specialized mitochondrial tRNA populations adapted to this skewed codon usage

    • Potentially slower translation rates at specific regions, which may facilitate co-translational folding

  • Protein characteristics:

    • Amino acid composition biased toward residues encoded by AT-rich codons (Lys, Asn, Ile, Tyr, Phe)

    • Distinctive physicochemical properties including higher positive charge density

    • Specialized folding pathways adapted to this unusual amino acid distribution

  • Experimental implications:

    • Recombinant expression often requires extensive codon optimization

    • Heterologous expression systems may lack the specialized machinery for efficient translation

    • Potential for misfolding when expressed outside the native mitochondrial environment

Research using circular dichroism and thermal stability assays has demonstrated that the high A+T content correlates with increased structural flexibility in VAR1, potentially facilitating its integration into the mitochondrial ribosome and interactions with ribosomal RNA .

What bioinformatic approaches are most effective for analyzing the unique features of S. servazzii VAR1?

Advanced bioinformatic analysis of S. servazzii VAR1 requires specialized approaches to address its unusual sequence characteristics:

  • Sequence analysis tools:

Analysis TypeRecommended ToolsSpecific Parameters for VAR1
Codon usage analysisCodonW, GCUACustom Saccharomyces mitochondrial scoring matrices
RNA structure predictionMFOLD, RNAfoldTemperature adjustment to 30°C, mitochondrial-specific energy parameters
Protein disorder predictionPONDR, IUPred2ACalibration with known mitochondrial ribosomal proteins
Evolutionary rate analysisPAML, HyPhyCodon-based models accounting for A+T bias
  • Comparative genomics approach:

    • Multi-species alignment using MAFFT with parameters optimized for high A+T content sequences

    • Identification of conserved domains through profile-based methods rather than simple sequence alignment

    • Selective pressure analysis using codon-based models that account for nucleotide composition bias

  • Structure prediction strategies:

    • Integration of evolutionary coupling data to enhance accuracy for this divergent protein

    • Fragment-based modeling with fragments derived from diverse ribosomal proteins

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to assess stability of predicted structures in mitochondrial-like environments

  • Functional site prediction:

    • RNA-binding site prediction incorporating electrostatic potential analysis

    • Protein-protein interaction prediction using co-evolutionary signals

    • Identification of potential post-translational modification sites using mitochondrial-specific training datasets

  • Recommended workflow:

    • Initial compositional bias correction using sequence composition-aware alignment methods

    • Progressive filtering of sequences based on both identity and shared functional signatures

    • Integration of predicted contacts from multiple methods to improve structure prediction

    • Validation of predictions against available cryo-EM data from related species

These specialized bioinformatic approaches account for the unique challenges posed by VAR1's extreme composition bias and evolutionary divergence, enabling more accurate functional and structural predictions .

What is known about the interaction of S. servazzii VAR1 with the mitochondrial ribosome?

Understanding the integration of VAR1 into the S. servazzii mitochondrial ribosome requires insights from comparative structural biology and biochemical studies:

These structural insights, while primarily derived from related species and extrapolated to S. servazzii, provide a framework for understanding VAR1's essential role in mitochondrial translation and the structural adaptations accommodating its unusual sequence composition .

How can recombinant S. servazzii VAR1 be utilized in structural biology studies?

Recombinant S. servazzii VAR1 offers unique opportunities for structural biology investigations with several methodological approaches:

  • Cryo-EM studies of ribosome assembly:

    • Reconstitution of partial ribosomal complexes with labeled recombinant VAR1

    • Time-resolved cryo-EM to capture assembly intermediates

    • Comparison with ribosomes lacking VAR1 to define its structural contribution

  • Crystallization strategies:

    • Co-crystallization with binding partners or specific rRNA fragments

    • Surface entropy reduction through targeted mutations of surface residues

    • Use of nanobodies or crystallization chaperones to facilitate crystal packing

  • NMR applications:

    • Solution NMR of isolated domains using isotopic labeling

    • Solid-state NMR to investigate dynamics within reconstituted ribosomal complexes

    • Identification of residues involved in RNA binding through chemical shift perturbation experiments

  • Integrative structural biology approaches:

    • Combination of low-resolution data from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS)

    • Cross-linking mass spectrometry to define spatial relationships

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to explore conformational dynamics

  • Methodological optimizations:

    • Expression of isolated domains to improve sample quality

    • Selective deuteration to enhance NMR spectral quality

    • Nanodiscs or amphipols to mimic the native membrane environment for peripheral membrane association studies

The structural characterization of S. servazzii VAR1 would provide valuable insights into mitochondrial ribosome assembly and function, potentially revealing adaptations related to its unusual sequence characteristics and the frameshifting phenomena observed in S. servazzii mitochondrial genes .

What can the study of S. servazzii VAR1 teach us about mitochondrial evolution?

S. servazzii VAR1 represents a fascinating case study in mitochondrial genome evolution, offering insights into several evolutionary processes:

  • Genomic streamlining:

    • The compact mitochondrial genome of S. servazzii (30,782 bp compared to S. cerevisiae's 85.8 kb) exemplifies genomic streamlining

    • VAR1 retention despite genome reduction highlights its essential function

    • Comparison across species reveals the minimal functional requirements for mitochondrial translation

  • Nucleotide composition bias:

    • The extreme A+T content (89.3%) of VAR1 represents a case of compositional convergence across yeast species

    • This consistent bias suggests selective forces maintaining this unusual composition

    • Analysis of substitution patterns reveals the evolutionary dynamics driving this bias

  • Frameshift evolution:

    • The +1 frameshifts in S. servazzii mitochondrial genes, including the context of VAR1, provide a model for the evolution of translational recoding mechanisms

    • The similar position of frameshifts in related species suggests potential functional significance

    • Experimental manipulation of these sites allows testing of hypotheses about their evolutionary origins

  • Ribosomal adaptation:

    • VAR1's integration into the mitochondrial ribosome demonstrates co-evolution of protein and RNA components

    • Comparison with bacterial and cytoplasmic homologs illustrates mitochondria-specific adaptations

    • Reconstruction of ancestral sequences provides insights into the evolutionary trajectory from bacterial to mitochondrial ribosomes

  • Methodological implications:

    • Development of specialized evolutionary models accounting for extreme composition bias

    • Testing of hypotheses about selection versus neutral evolution in mitochondrial genomes

    • Insights into the co-evolution of nuclear and mitochondrial genomes

The study of S. servazzii VAR1 in this evolutionary context contributes to our understanding of mitochondrial genome evolution, the origins of genetic code variations, and the adaptive flexibility of translation systems across diverse lineages .

What experimental approaches can address the apparent frameshifts in S. servazzii mitochondrial genes?

The intriguing presence of +1 frameshifts in S. servazzii mitochondrial genes presents a compelling research opportunity that can be addressed through several complementary experimental approaches:

  • In vitro translation systems:

    • Development of S. servazzii mitochondrial translation extracts

    • Comparison of translation products from wild-type and frameshift-corrected templates

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of the resulting peptides to identify the actual protein sequences

  • RNA analysis techniques:

    • Direct RNA sequencing to identify potential RNA editing events

    • Structure probing of mRNA regions containing frameshifts

    • Ribosome profiling to monitor translation dynamics at frameshift sites

  • Genetic manipulation strategies:

    • CRISPR-based mitochondrial genome editing to correct frameshifts

    • Assessment of the effects on protein expression and mitochondrial function

    • Introduction of S. servazzii frameshifts into S. cerevisiae to test for functional compatibility

  • Ribosome structure and function studies:

    • Cryo-EM of S. servazzii mitochondrial ribosomes stalled at frameshift sites

    • Identification of unique ribosomal features or associated factors

    • Comparative analysis with non-frameshift containing species

  • Computational analysis:

    • Prediction of RNA secondary structures that might facilitate programmed frameshifting

    • Evolutionary analysis of frameshift sites across related species

    • Molecular dynamics simulations of ribosome-mRNA interactions at frameshift sites

  • Proposed experimental design:

ApproachKey MethodsExpected Outcomes
RNA editing investigationDirect RNA sequencing, RT-PCR, cDNA analysisIdentification of any post-transcriptional modifications
Ribosome pausing analysisRibosome profiling, toeprintingCharacterization of translation dynamics at frameshift sites
Protein product analysisMass spectrometry, N-terminal sequencingDetermination of actual protein sequences
Functional assessmentComplementation assays, respiratory chain activityEvaluation of biological significance

These experimental approaches would not only clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying these unusual genetic features but could also reveal novel aspects of mitochondrial translation regulation with potential applications in synthetic biology and biotechnology .

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.