Recombinant Salmonella agona GTPase Era (era)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format. If you have specific format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult local distributors for specific delivery times. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. For dry ice shipping, contact us in advance; extra fees apply.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
era; SeAg_B2742GTPase Era
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-301
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Salmonella agona (strain SL483)
Target Names
era
Target Protein Sequence
MSTDKTYCGF IAIVGRPNVG KSTLLNKLLG QKISITSRKA QTTRHRIVGI HTEGPYQAIY VDTPGLHMEE KRAINRLMNK AASSSIGDVE LVIFVVEGTR WTPDDEMVLN KLRDGKAPVI LAVNKVDNVQ EKADLLPHLQ FLASQMNFLD IVPISAETGM NVDTIAGIVR KHLPEAIHHF PEDYITDRSQ RFMASEIIRE KLMRFLGAEL PYSVTVEIER FVTNERGGYD INGLILVERE GQKKMVIGNK GAKIKTIGIE ARKDMQEMFE APVHLELWVK VKSGWADDER ALRSLGYVDD L
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
An essential GTPase that binds GDP and GTP, with rapid nucleotide exchange. Involved in 16S rRNA processing, 30S ribosomal subunit biogenesis, and potentially cell cycle regulation and energy metabolism.
Database Links
Protein Families
TRAFAC class TrmE-Era-EngA-EngB-Septin-like GTPase superfamily, Era GTPase family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Cell inner membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the Era GTPase and what is its primary function in bacterial systems?

Era GTPase is a highly conserved bacterial protein that plays a crucial role in ribosome biogenesis and assembly. In Escherichia coli, overexpression of Era has been shown to improve 16S rRNA processing and 70S ribosome assembly, partially suppressing growth defects in strains lacking the YbeY endoribonuclease . The protein is essential for bacterial viability across multiple species, making it a subject of interest for both basic microbiology and antimicrobial development research. Era belongs to the GTPase superfamily, which functions as molecular switches cycling between GTP-bound (active) and GDP-bound (inactive) states.

To study Era function in bacterial systems including Salmonella, researchers should employ multiple complementary approaches: genetic manipulation (gene deletion, point mutations, expression modulation), biochemical characterization (GTPase activity assays, nucleotide binding studies), and functional assessments (ribosome profiling, growth phenotyping). These approaches can reveal how Era orchestrates ribosome maturation and influences bacterial growth and stress responses.

How does genetic diversity in Salmonella Agona relate to protein function studies?

Salmonella Agona exhibits significant genetic diversity that can impact protein function studies, including those focused on conserved proteins like GTPases. Analysis of 2233 S. Agona isolates from UK infections (2004-2020) revealed both conserved arrangements and genomic rearrangements . Notably, a subset analysis of 207 isolates using long-read sequencing identified a conserved genome structure (GS1.0) in 195 isolates, with 8 additional genomic arrangements in 12 isolates .

When studying protein function in S. Agona, researchers must account for this genetic diversity by:

  • Characterizing the specific genome arrangement of the strain(s) under investigation

  • Comparing results across multiple clinical or environmental isolates

  • Correlating genomic variations with phenotypic differences in protein function

  • Employing appropriate controls when introducing recombinant proteins

Interestingly, genome-rearranged isolates were typically associated with early convalescent carriage (3 weeks-3 months), suggesting these arrangements might play a role in bacterial persistence . This observation highlights the importance of considering the infection stage when selecting strains for protein function studies.

What methods are available for expressing and purifying recombinant bacterial GTPases?

For successful expression and purification of recombinant bacterial GTPases, researchers should consider a methodical approach tailored to these specific proteins:

  • Expression system selection: For Salmonella-derived proteins, an E. coli-based expression system often provides good yields while maintaining proper folding. For more challenging GTPases, consider specialized expression strains like BL21(DE3) derivatives that contain additional chaperones or rare tRNAs.

  • Vector design: When designing expression vectors, consider tags that facilitate both purification and detection (His6, GST, or MBP tags). For secreted expression, a signal sequence can be incorporated, as demonstrated in recombinant Salmonella systems where the β-lactamase signal sequence directed secretion of recombinant proteins .

  • Expression optimization: GTPases often require careful optimization of induction conditions (temperature, inducer concentration, duration). Lower temperatures (16-25°C) may improve folding and solubility of these complex proteins.

  • Purification strategy:

    • Initial capture using affinity chromatography based on the chosen tag

    • Intermediate purification using ion exchange chromatography

    • Final polishing using size exclusion chromatography to ensure monomeric, properly folded protein

  • Quality control: Verify GTPase functionality through:

    • GTP binding assays (fluorescent nucleotide analogs or radiolabeled GTP)

    • GTP hydrolysis assays (phosphate release detection)

    • Proper folding assessment (circular dichroism, thermal shift assays)

When adapting these methods to less-studied GTPases like Era from Salmonella Agona, researchers should first validate their approaches using well-characterized homologs before proceeding to novel targets.

How should experiments be designed to study the role of GTPases in bacterial pathogenesis?

Designing rigorous experiments to study GTPases in bacterial pathogenesis requires careful consideration of controls, variables, and analytical approaches. Based on experimental design principles , researchers should implement the following methodological framework:

  • Hypothesis formulation and control selection:

    • Clearly define the specific GTPase function being investigated

    • Include positive controls (known functional GTPases)

    • Incorporate negative controls (GTPase-deficient strains, catalytically inactive mutants)

    • Use isogenic strains differing only in the GTPase of interest to minimize confounding variables

  • Variable manipulation and randomization:

    • Manipulate one or more independent variables (e.g., GTPase expression levels, host cell types)

    • Apply changes to dependent variables (e.g., bacterial survival, host cell responses)

    • Randomly assign experimental subjects to treatment groups to prevent bias

    • Implement proper blinding procedures during data collection and analysis

  • Specialized assays for GTPase function:

    • Subcellular localization studies (immunofluorescence, fractionation)

    • Activity measurements (GTP hydrolysis rates, nucleotide binding affinities)

    • Interaction studies (pull-downs, bacterial two-hybrid assays)

    • Structural changes (FRET-based conformational sensors)

  • Infection model selection:

    • In vitro cellular models (epithelial cells, macrophages)

    • Ex vivo tissue models (intestinal organoids)

    • In vivo animal models (similar to those used for recombinant Salmonella vaccine testing )

  • Data analysis planning:

    • Predetermine statistical approaches before experimentation

    • Ensure sufficient replication for statistical power

    • Implement appropriate controls for multiple comparisons

    • Plan for both population-level and single-cell analyses

This experimental framework enables researchers to establish causal relationships between GTPase function and pathogenesis, providing more definitive answers to research questions as emphasized in experimental design guidelines .

What next-generation sequencing approaches can reveal GTPase variations across Salmonella strains?

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers powerful approaches to characterize GTPase variations across Salmonella strains, providing insights into evolutionary conservation and potential functional differences. Drawing from methodologies employed in Salmonella Agona studies , researchers should consider:

  • Sequencing strategy selection:

    • Short-read sequencing (e.g., Illumina) for high-accuracy SNP detection within GTPase genes

    • Long-read sequencing (e.g., PacBio, Oxford Nanopore) for identifying structural variations affecting GTPase expression

    • Targeted amplicon sequencing for focused analysis of specific GTPase genes across large strain collections

  • Comparative genomic analysis methods:

    • Species-specific core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) for strain comparison

    • Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) phylogeny to track evolutionary relationships

    • Serovar-specific cgMLST for higher resolution within specific Salmonella serovars

  • Analytical pipeline development:

    • Quality filtering and preprocessing of raw sequence data

    • Reference-based mapping or de novo assembly approaches

    • Variant calling optimized for the specific sequencing technology

    • Annotation and functional prediction of identified variants

  • Sampling strategy design:

    • Include diverse strain sources (clinical, environmental, food)

    • Consider temporal distribution to capture evolutionary changes

    • Select strains from different disease states (acute infection, chronic carriage)

This approach has revealed important insights about Salmonella Agona, including increased SNP variation during early convalescent carriage (3 weeks-3 months) , which might reflect population expansion as part of an immune evasion mechanism. Similar approaches could identify variations in GTPase genes that might affect function and contribute to pathogenesis or persistence.

How can structural biology methods illuminate GTPase mechanisms in bacterial systems?

Structural biology provides crucial insights into the molecular mechanisms of bacterial GTPases by revealing conformational changes, interaction interfaces, and regulatory features. Based on approaches used to study GTPase-bacterial effector interactions , researchers should implement:

  • X-ray crystallography for atomic-resolution structures:

    • Crystallize GTPases in different nucleotide states (GTP/GDP/nucleotide-free)

    • Determine co-crystal structures with interaction partners

    • Analyze conformational changes in switch regions upon nucleotide binding/hydrolysis

  • Solution-state techniques for dynamic analysis:

    • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to map protein dynamics and interactions, as employed in studying Rab32 modifications

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify regions with altered conformational flexibility

    • Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for solution-state structural information

  • Single-molecule methods for real-time dynamics:

    • Single-pair Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) as used to study Rab32 conformational changes after proteolytic modification

    • Optical tweezers or atomic force microscopy for measuring forces in GTPase-effector interactions

    • Single-molecule tracking in live bacterial cells

  • Computational approaches to extend experimental findings:

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to investigate conformational transitions, as applied in the Rab32-GtgE study

    • Homology modeling for less-characterized GTPases based on known structures

    • Molecular docking to predict interaction interfaces with binding partners

  • Integrated structural biology workflow:

    • Combine multiple techniques for comprehensive structural characterization

    • Validate structural findings with functional assays

    • Connect structural features to physiological roles

This multi-technique approach revealed how proteolytic modification of Rab32 by Salmonella GtgE disrupts the interswitch region, blunts binding to effector proteins like VARP, and enables GDI binding in both nucleotide states . Similar approaches could elucidate how Era GTPase mediates ribosome assembly and how structural features contribute to its essential functions in bacterial physiology.

How can recombinant Salmonella systems be developed for studying GTPase function?

Developing recombinant Salmonella systems for GTPase studies requires specialized approaches that balance expression efficiency, functional activity, and strain stability. Based on methodologies from successful recombinant Salmonella research , investigators should implement:

  • Vector system optimization:

    • Select appropriate plasmid backbones such as Asd+ vectors with reduced Asd expression to minimize selective disadvantage

    • Consider copy number effects - multicopy systems (like pYA3493) enable higher expression but may increase metabolic burden

    • Incorporate regulated promoters that allow titrated expression levels

  • Strain engineering strategy:

    • Select appropriate attenuated Salmonella strains as experimental chassis

    • Introduce specific chromosomal modifications using techniques such as lambda Red recombineering

    • Consider deletion mutations (like Δcrp-28 and ΔasdA16 used in vaccine strain development ) that stabilize the recombinant system

  • Protein expression customization:

    • For secreted GTPases, incorporate appropriate signal sequences (such as the β-lactamase signal sequence )

    • For cytoplasmic expression, optimize ribosome binding sites and codon usage

    • Include epitope tags for detection and purification while verifying they don't interfere with function

  • Expression verification protocol:

    • Perform cellular fractionation to confirm proper localization (as in result , where approximately 50% of recombinant protein was detected in combined supernatant and periplasmic fractions)

    • Conduct immunoblotting with appropriate antibodies

    • Verify enzymatic activity through GTPase assays

  • Stability assessment:

    • Monitor plasmid retention during growth without selection

    • Assess protein expression levels over multiple generations

    • Evaluate growth kinetics compared to non-recombinant controls

These methodological approaches enable the creation of stable recombinant Salmonella systems that can be used for diverse applications, from basic research on GTPase function to potential vaccine development strategies .

What are the challenges in studying GTPase-mediated ribosome assembly in Salmonella?

Investigating GTPase-mediated ribosome assembly in Salmonella presents several technical challenges that require specialized methodological solutions. Based on approaches used in Era GTPase studies , researchers should address:

  • Ribosome heterogeneity management:

    • Develop gradient protocols optimized for Salmonella ribosomal particles

    • Implement quality control measures to assess ribosome integrity

    • Consider the impact of growth conditions on ribosome populations

  • Assembly intermediate characterization:

    • Utilize sucrose density gradient centrifugation with sensitive detection methods

    • Apply quantitative mass spectrometry to identify proteins associated with assembly intermediates

    • Employ RNA-protein crosslinking to map interactions between GTPases and rRNA

  • Growth condition standardization:

    • Establish consistent protocols for culturing Salmonella for ribosome studies

    • Define physiologically relevant conditions that might affect ribosome assembly

    • Monitor growth parameters carefully to ensure comparable physiological states

  • Genetic manipulation considerations:

    • Develop conditional depletion systems for essential GTPases like Era

    • Create point mutations that affect specific aspects of GTPase function

    • Implement complementation systems to verify phenotype specificity

  • Analytical technique integration:

    • Combine ribosome profiling with RNA-seq to assess global translation impacts

    • Correlate biochemical findings with electron microscopy structural data

    • Link ribosome assembly defects to downstream physiological effects

The findings from E. coli showing that Era overexpression improves 16S rRNA processing and 70S ribosome assembly in strains lacking YbeY provide a conceptual framework, but researchers must adapt these approaches to address Salmonella-specific challenges, including potential impacts of genomic rearrangements observed in persistent infections .

How can recombinant Salmonella systems be used to study immune responses to bacterial GTPases?

Recombinant Salmonella systems offer powerful platforms for investigating immune responses to bacterial GTPases, providing insights into host-pathogen interactions. Building on methodologies from recombinant Salmonella vaccine research , investigators should implement:

  • Immunization model development:

    • Establish appropriate animal models (such as BALB/c mice used in recombinant Salmonella studies )

    • Define optimal administration routes (oral immunization with 10^9 CFU as used in previous studies )

    • Design appropriate sampling timepoints to capture immune response kinetics

  • Immune response characterization:

    • Measure antibody responses to the GTPase of interest using ELISA

    • Determine antibody isotype distribution (IgG1, IgG2a) to assess Th1/Th2 balance

    • Analyze T-cell responses through techniques like ELISpot, flow cytometry, and cytokine profiling

  • Challenge model implementation:

    • Develop appropriate bacterial challenge protocols to assess protective immunity

    • Monitor immune response boosting after challenge (as observed with PspA antibody levels after S. pneumoniae challenge )

    • Correlate protection with specific immune parameters

  • Antigen presentation investigation:

    • Study the impact of GTPase cellular localization on immune response development

    • Analyze dendritic cell activation and antigen processing

    • Investigate the role of specific immune cell populations using depletion or adoptive transfer approaches

  • Comparative immunology approach:

    • Compare immune responses to various GTPases to identify immunodominant epitopes

    • Contrast responses to wild-type versus mutant GTPases

    • Evaluate cross-reactivity between homologous GTPases from different bacterial species

Prior research has shown that after a single oral immunization with recombinant Salmonella, both IgG1 (indicating a Th2-type response) and IgG2a (indicating a Th1-type response) antibodies are produced, with the balance depending on the specific antigen and its localization . This framework can be adapted to study immune responses to bacterial GTPases, providing insights into their potential as vaccine targets or diagnostic markers.

How do bacterial pathogens like Salmonella target host GTPases during infection?

Bacterial pathogens employ sophisticated mechanisms to target host GTPases, modulating host cellular processes to facilitate infection and survival. Based on findings about Salmonella's targeting of Rab32 GTPase , researchers investigating these mechanisms should:

  • Characterize the molecular targeting mechanism:

    • Identify bacterial effectors that interact with or modify host GTPases using proteomics approaches

    • Determine the specificity of targeting (as seen with GtgE specifically cleaving the Rab32 subfamily )

    • Map the exact site of modification (GtgE cleaves Rab32 between G59 and V60 in the switch I region )

  • Investigate the biochemical consequences:

    • Analyze how modifications affect GTPase activity and nucleotide binding

    • Determine impact on interactions with regulatory proteins and effectors (as shown for Rab32-VARP binding disruption )

    • Assess conformational changes using structural biology approaches (NMR, FRET, molecular dynamics )

  • Explore physiological outcomes:

    • Track changes in cellular processes regulated by the target GTPase

    • Monitor alterations in vesicular trafficking or signaling pathways

    • Connect molecular modifications to broader infection dynamics

  • Study regulatory context:

    • Determine nucleotide-state specificity (GtgE exclusively cleaves GDP-bound Rab substrates )

    • Investigate timing of modification during infection cycle

    • Assess tissue or cell-type specificity of targeting

  • Develop countermeasure strategies:

    • Design inhibitors of bacterial effectors that target host GTPases

    • Create GTPase mutants resistant to bacterial modification

    • Identify host factors that might protect GTPases from bacterial targeting

The findings that Salmonella typhimurium's GtgE protease cleaves Rab32, disrupting its interswitch region and blunting its binding to VARP , exemplify how bacterial pathogens can precisely modify host GTPases to subvert host defense mechanisms, delivering antimicrobial factors and thereby supporting infection.

What role might bacterial GTPases play in Salmonella persistence during chronic infections?

Bacterial GTPases may play critical roles in Salmonella persistence during chronic infections, potentially contributing to adaptation and survival under host pressure. Drawing from observations about Salmonella Agona persistence , researchers should investigate:

  • Genetic variation analysis during persistent infection:

    • Compare GTPase gene sequences across isolates from different infection stages

    • Look for SNPs or structural variations in GTPase genes during persistence, similar to the increased SNP variation observed during early convalescent carriage of S. Agona

    • Assess selective pressures on GTPase-encoding genes

  • Gene expression profiling during persistence:

    • Measure GTPase expression levels under conditions mimicking chronic infection

    • Analyze transcriptional regulation of GTPases during stress adaptation

    • Identify persistence-specific expression patterns

  • Functional role characterization:

    • Investigate GTPase contributions to viable but non-culturable (VBNC) states

    • Assess impact on biofilm formation, which is strongly associated with S. Agona persistence

    • Determine involvement in stress responses relevant to host environments

  • Genomic context examination:

    • Analyze if GTPase genes are affected by the genome rearrangements observed in persistent S. Agona isolates

    • Investigate potential horizontal gene transfer affecting GTPase functions

    • Assess the genomic neighborhood of GTPase genes for persistence-related elements

  • Host interaction profiling:

    • Study GTPase-mediated evasion of host immune responses

    • Investigate roles in modulating host cell death or inflammatory responses

    • Explore contributions to intracellular survival within host niches

The finding that genome rearrangements in S. Agona are typically associated with early convalescent carriage (3 weeks-3 months) suggests active adaptation during the transition from acute to chronic infection. GTPases, as key regulatory proteins, may be integral to this adaptation process, potentially contributing to the population expansion observed during persistent infection establishment.

What experimental approaches can distinguish between the roles of different bacterial GTPases in pathogenesis?

Distinguishing between the functions of different bacterial GTPases in pathogenesis requires systematic experimental approaches that account for potential redundancy and context-dependent activities. Researchers should implement:

  • Genetic manipulation with precise controls:

    • Generate single and combinatorial GTPase mutants using clean deletion or point mutation strategies

    • Create conditional depletion systems for essential GTPases

    • Develop complementation systems with ectopic expression of wild-type or mutant variants

    • Implement inducible expression systems to titrate GTPase levels

  • Biochemical profiling with activity discrimination:

    • Perform comparative enzymatic assays under standardized conditions

    • Characterize substrate specificity and kinetic parameters

    • Identify specific interaction partners through proteomics approaches

    • Map GTPase-specific post-translational modifications

  • Infection model selection with discriminatory power:

    • Utilize cell type-specific infection models that reveal GTPase-specific phenotypes

    • Implement organ-specific animal models that highlight tissue-dependent functions

    • Develop ex vivo systems that preserve physiological complexity while allowing manipulation

  • Multi-omics integration for system-level insights:

    • Compare transcriptional responses to different GTPase perturbations

    • Analyze metabolic changes associated with specific GTPase activities

    • Employ proteomics to identify downstream effectors of different GTPases

  • Temporal analysis with stage-specific resolution:

    • Track GTPase activities across the infection timeline

    • Identify infection stage-specific requirements for different GTPases

    • Implement time-resolved perturbation studies

These approaches can help distinguish between GTPases with seemingly similar biochemical properties but distinct pathogenic roles, such as differentiating the function of Era in ribosome assembly from other GTPases involved in different cellular processes, or understanding how various GTPases might contribute differently to the genomic adaptations observed during Salmonella Agona persistence .

What emerging technologies might advance our understanding of bacterial GTPases in the next decade?

Several cutting-edge technologies are poised to transform bacterial GTPase research in the coming decade, enabling unprecedented insights into their functions and applications. Researchers should consider preparing for:

  • Advanced structural biology approaches:

    • Cryo-electron tomography for visualizing GTPases in their native cellular context

    • Integrative structural biology combining multiple data types for complete structural models

    • Time-resolved structural methods to capture transient states during GTPase cycling

    • Computational approaches for predicting dynamics across longer timescales

  • Single-cell and spatial technologies:

    • Single-cell RNA-seq to capture heterogeneity in GTPase expression during infection

    • Spatial transcriptomics to map GTPase activity within tissues during infection

    • Advanced imaging approaches like super-resolution microscopy for tracking GTPase dynamics

    • Microfluidic systems for real-time monitoring of single bacterial cells

  • Genome engineering and synthetic biology:

    • CRISPR-based screens to systematically map GTPase genetic interactions

    • Synthetic GTPase circuits for programmed bacterial behaviors

    • Minimal genome approaches to define essential GTPase functions

    • Engineered bacteria expressing modified GTPases as live therapeutics

  • Host-pathogen interaction technologies:

    • Organoid infection models that better recapitulate host tissue complexity

    • Multi-species microbiome models to study GTPase functions in community contexts

    • Advanced animal models with humanized components for improved translation

    • High-content screening platforms for identification of GTPase modulators

  • Computational and AI-driven approaches:

    • Machine learning for predicting GTPase functional networks from sequence data

    • Molecular simulation at extended timescales to capture complete GTPase cycles

    • Systems biology models integrating GTPase activities with cellular physiology

    • Bioinformatic approaches for mining microbiome and metagenomic datasets

These emerging technologies will help address key questions about GTPases like Era, potentially revealing how their functions in processes like ribosome assembly contribute to bacterial adaptation during persistent infections, such as those observed with Salmonella Agona .

How might bacterial GTPase research contribute to new antimicrobial strategies?

Bacterial GTPase research offers promising avenues for novel antimicrobial development, leveraging their essential functions and structural differences from eukaryotic counterparts. Researchers pursuing this direction should consider:

  • Target validation approaches:

    • Conditional depletion studies to confirm essentiality across diverse conditions

    • In vivo validation using animal infection models

    • Resistance development assessment through extended passage experiments

    • Specificity analysis comparing bacterial and host GTPase homologs

  • High-throughput screening strategies:

    • Biochemical assays monitoring GTPase activity (GTP hydrolysis, nucleotide binding)

    • Cell-based assays with reporter systems linked to GTPase function

    • Fragment-based screening to identify initial binding molecules

    • Virtual screening using solved or modeled GTPase structures

  • Rational drug design methodologies:

    • Structure-based design targeting GTPase active sites or allosteric regions

    • Peptide inhibitors that disrupt specific protein-protein interactions

    • RNA-based strategies to modulate GTPase expression

    • Covalent inhibitors targeting unique residues in bacterial GTPases

  • Combination therapy development:

    • GTPase inhibitors as potentiators of existing antibiotics

    • Dual-targeting approaches addressing redundant pathways

    • Host-directed therapies that enhance immune targeting of GTPase-compromised bacteria

  • Alternative delivery strategies:

    • Phage-based delivery of GTPase-targeting compounds

    • Nanoparticle formulations for improved bioavailability

    • Recombinant Salmonella as delivery vehicles for anti-GTPase compounds

This research direction is particularly relevant given observations about bacterial persistence mechanisms, such as those documented in Salmonella Agona . Novel antimicrobials targeting conserved GTPases like Era might address persistent infections that evade conventional treatments, potentially disrupting critical functions like ribosome assembly that bacteria require for long-term survival.

What are the implications of bacterial GTPase research for understanding evolutionary adaptation in pathogens?

Bacterial GTPase research provides valuable insights into evolutionary adaptation processes in pathogens, revealing how these molecular switches contribute to fitness and survival. Based on observations about genetic diversity in Salmonella Agona , researchers should explore:

  • Comparative genomic approaches:

    • Analyze GTPase conservation and variation across bacterial species and strains

    • Identify signatures of selection in GTPase genes using evolutionary models

    • Compare GTPase sequences from acute versus persistent infection isolates

    • Examine horizontal gene transfer patterns affecting GTPase genes

  • Experimental evolution methodologies:

    • Conduct long-term evolution experiments under selective pressures

    • Track GTPase mutations that emerge during adaptation to host environments

    • Perform functional characterization of naturally occurring GTPase variants

    • Reconstruct ancestral GTPase sequences to trace evolutionary trajectories

  • Host-adaptation correlation studies:

    • Link GTPase variations to host range or tissue tropism

    • Investigate host-specific selection pressures on GTPase function

    • Analyze co-evolution patterns between bacterial GTPases and host factors

  • Structural consequence mapping:

    • Determine how sequence variations affect GTPase structure and function

    • Model the impact of mutations on protein dynamics and interactions

    • Assess how structural changes influence fitness in different environments

  • Population genetics integration:

    • Study GTPase allele frequencies in natural bacterial populations

    • Analyze the spread of adaptive GTPase variants during outbreaks

    • Investigate the role of genetic drift versus selection in GTPase evolution

The observation that Salmonella Agona undergoes increased SNP variation and genome rearrangements during persistent infection suggests that evolutionary processes are actively shaping bacterial adaptation during host interaction. GTPases, as central regulators of fundamental cellular processes, likely play key roles in these adaptive responses, potentially contributing to the population expansion mechanisms that enable persistent infection establishment.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.