Recombinant AaeX is produced via heterologous expression in E. coli, followed by affinity chromatography using its His tag. Specifications vary slightly across vendors:
AaeX is studied as a potential antigen for Salmonella vaccine candidates due to its surface-exposed localization in the bacterium . Its immunogenicity and role in bacterial pathogenicity make it a target for antibody production and protective immunity studies.
The protein is used in ELISA and Western blot (WB) to detect Salmonella infections. For example, Creative BioMart’s His-tagged AaeX enables high-throughput screening of patient sera .
AaeX’s sequence and structure are analyzed to understand its function in Salmonella virulence mechanisms, such as adhesion or toxin secretion .
While Salmonella arizonae AaeX is the primary focus, homologs exist in other species:
Species | Gene Name | Host System | Purity |
---|---|---|---|
Salmonella heidelberg | aaeX | E. coli/Yeast | ≥85% |
Edwardsiella tarda | ETAE_3128 | Mammalian cells | ≥85% |
Pathogenicity: AaeX contributes to Salmonella survival in host environments, potentially aiding in immune evasion .
Thermostability: The protein retains activity after lyophilization, making it suitable for diagnostic kits .
Cross-Reactivity: Antibodies against AaeX show specificity for Salmonella serovars but not other Enterobacteriaceae .
Current studies lack in vivo efficacy data for AaeX-based vaccines. Further research is needed to evaluate its protective capacity in animal models and optimize large-scale production .
KEGG: ses:SARI_04267
STRING: 882884.SARI_04267
Salmonella arizonae Protein AaeX is a 67-amino acid protein with the following sequence: MSLFPVIVVFGLSFPPIFFELLLSLAIFWLVRRVLVPTGIYDFVWHPALFNTALYCCLFYLISRLFV . The protein is encoded by the aaeX gene (locus SARI_04267) in Salmonella arizonae strain ATCC BAA-731/CDC346-86/RSK2980 . Its relatively small size and specific sequence characteristics suggest it may function as a membrane-associated protein, consistent with its hydrophobic regions that could facilitate membrane insertion or interaction. When analyzing this protein's structure, researchers should consider employing bioinformatic approaches to predict secondary structure elements before proceeding to more resource-intensive structural determination methods.
The evolutionary position of Salmonella arizonae between subgroup I (human pathogens) and subgroup V (S. bongori, usually non-pathogenic to humans) makes AaeX an interesting subject for comparative genomics . Phylogenetic analysis using concatenated gene sequences of 945 genes common across Salmonella strains positions S. arizonae RKS2983 between Salmonella subgroup I and S. bongori . For meaningful homology comparisons, researchers should:
Perform multiple sequence alignments using MAFFT or similar tools
Calculate sequence identity and similarity percentages
Construct phylogenetic trees using Neighbor-Joining methods
Analyze patterns of conservation in functional regions
This comparison provides insights into protein evolution during the transition from environmental to host-adapted pathogen lifestyles.
Based on available research data, Recombinant Salmonella arizonae Protein AaeX has been successfully expressed in E. coli with various tags, most commonly His-tags . The optimal expression system depends on your experimental requirements:
E. coli expression: Most commonly used and documented approach, suitable for basic structural and biochemical studies
Yeast or Baculovirus systems: Alternative systems that may provide better protein folding for functional studies
Mammalian cell expression: Could be considered if post-translational modifications are suspected to be important
For highest purity recombinant protein, implement a two-step purification protocol:
Initial capture using affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA for His-tagged constructs)
Polishing step using size exclusion chromatography to achieve >90% purity
Proper storage and handling are essential for maintaining protein integrity and activity. Research data indicates that Recombinant Salmonella arizonae Protein AaeX requires:
For optimal stability, the protein is typically maintained in Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol or Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 . Researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this significantly reduces protein activity . For reconstitution of lyophilized protein, use deionized sterile water to achieve concentrations of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, followed by addition of glycerol (5-50% final concentration) for aliquoting and storage .
Determining the function of poorly characterized proteins like AaeX requires a multi-faceted approach:
Bioinformatic analysis:
Predict subcellular localization using tools like PSORT
Identify functional domains through comparison with characterized proteins
Search for conserved motifs using PROSITE or similar databases
Gene knockout/complementation studies:
Generate aaeX deletion mutants in S. arizonae
Perform phenotypic analysis under various conditions
Complement with wild-type gene to confirm phenotype specificity
Protein interaction studies:
Perform pull-down assays using tagged recombinant AaeX
Employ bacterial two-hybrid systems to identify potential binding partners
Use crosslinking approaches to capture transient interactions in vivo
Transcriptomic analysis:
Compare gene expression patterns between wild-type and aaeX mutants
Identify conditions that induce aaeX expression
While no direct functional data for AaeX is provided in the search results, its small size and sequence characteristics suggest potential roles in membrane processes or stress responses that could be investigated through these approaches.
Although the specific role of AaeX in pathogenesis is not directly described in the search results, we can formulate research approaches based on what is known about Salmonella pathogenicity. As Salmonella arizonae occupies an evolutionary position between human pathogens and non-pathogens , AaeX might play a role in:
Host adaptation: Investigate AaeX expression during infection of different hosts (cold-blooded vs. warm-blooded)
Stress response: Test aaeX mutant sensitivity to various environmental stresses (pH, temperature, antimicrobials)
Membrane functionality: Examine membrane integrity and composition in mutants lacking aaeX
Pathogenicity island function: Analyze potential interactions with products of Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPIs)
The search results indicate that S. arizonae shares some SPIs with S. bongori and others with S. typhimurium or S. typhi , suggesting evolutionary acquisition of virulence factors. Researchers should design experiments comparing AaeX function in different Salmonella subgroups to understand its evolutionary significance in pathogenesis.
Salmonella arizonae occupies a critical evolutionary position between Salmonella subgroups I (human pathogens) and V (S. bongori; usually non-pathogenic to humans) . To leverage AaeX in evolutionary studies:
Comparative genomic analysis:
Align aaeX sequences from multiple Salmonella strains representing different subgroups
Calculate selection pressures (dN/dS ratios) to identify adaptive evolution signatures
Map mutations onto predicted protein structures to identify functionally significant changes
Heterologous expression studies:
Express AaeX variants from different Salmonella subgroups in a common genetic background
Compare phenotypic effects to identify functional divergence
Test complementation ability across species barriers
Host-interaction models:
Compare AaeX function in infection models for both cold-blooded and warm-blooded hosts
Analyze temperature-dependent expression and activity of AaeX
The genomic comparison between S. arizonae RKS2983, S. bongori NCTC 12419, and S. typhimurium LT2 reveals that S. arizonae shares 2,823 genes with both genomes but has 926 genes specific to itself . Understanding AaeX in this context may provide insights into the evolutionary acquisition of host-specific virulence factors.
Advanced structural characterization of AaeX would provide significant insights into its function and evolutionary history. Researchers should consider:
X-ray crystallography:
Design constructs with flexible termini removed for improved crystallization
Screen multiple conditions for crystal formation
Analyze crystal structures to identify potential functional sites
NMR spectroscopy:
Particularly suitable for small proteins like AaeX (67 amino acids)
Can provide dynamic information about protein movements
Allows study of protein-ligand interactions in solution
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Most beneficial if AaeX forms part of a larger complex
May reveal membrane-associated conformations if applicable
Molecular dynamics simulations:
Model AaeX behavior in different environments (aqueous, membrane)
Compare dynamics of AaeX variants from different Salmonella subgroups
For membrane-associated proteins like AaeX appears to be based on its sequence characteristics, consider using detergent micelles or nanodiscs to mimic the native environment during structural studies.
While the search results don't directly connect AaeX to adhesion functions, they do mention another Salmonella protein (T2544) involved in adhesion . This raises the possibility that AaeX might have similar functions or interact with adhesion systems. To investigate:
Adhesion assays:
Compare wild-type and aaeX mutant strains for adherence to various cell types
Test binding to extracellular matrix components (laminin, collagen)
Employ flow cytometry to quantify bacterial attachment
Localization studies:
Use immunogold electron microscopy to determine if AaeX is surface-exposed
Create fluorescent protein fusions to visualize AaeX localization during infection
Protein-protein interaction studies:
Screen for interactions with known adhesins or membrane proteins
Use bacterial two-hybrid or co-immunoprecipitation approaches
Antibody inhibition experiments:
Generate antibodies against recombinant AaeX
Test their ability to block bacterial adhesion to host cells
If AaeX functions similarly to the T2544 protein mentioned in the search results, it might contribute to bacterial adhesion through specific interactions with host components .
Development of specific immunological reagents is crucial for AaeX research. Based on strategies used for similar bacterial proteins:
Antibody development:
Generate polyclonal antibodies against purified recombinant AaeX
Design peptide antigens from unique regions of AaeX for monoclonal antibody production
Validate antibody specificity using western blotting against wild-type and aaeX mutant strains
Expression monitoring tools:
Create promoter-reporter fusions (e.g., aaeX promoter driving luciferase or GFP expression)
Develop quantitative PCR assays for aaeX transcript measurement
Establish ELISA protocols for AaeX quantification
Localization approaches:
Use cell fractionation combined with western blotting to determine subcellular localization
Employ fluorescent protein fusions for in vivo localization studies
Apply immunofluorescence microscopy with anti-AaeX antibodies
The approach used to study the T2544 adhesion protein, which involved generating specific antisera and testing their effects on bacterial uptake and clearance , provides a methodological framework that could be adapted for AaeX research.
Genome-wide approaches provide a systems-level understanding of AaeX function within the broader context of Salmonella biology:
Transcriptomic analysis:
Compare RNA-seq profiles between wild-type and aaeX mutant strains under various conditions
Identify genes co-regulated with aaeX using correlation networks
Map the aaeX regulon through overexpression studies
Proteomic approaches:
Use quantitative proteomics to identify proteins affected by aaeX deletion
Perform protein-protein interaction screens (AP-MS, BioID) to map AaeX interaction networks
Analyze post-translational modifications in response to aaeX manipulation
Genomic comparisons:
Analyze the genomic context of aaeX across different Salmonella strains
Identify conserved gene neighborhoods that might suggest functional relationships
Study horizontal gene transfer patterns in regions containing aaeX
Metabolomic studies:
Compare metabolite profiles between wild-type and aaeX mutant strains
Identify metabolic pathways potentially affected by AaeX function
The genomic comparison approach described for S. arizonae RKS2983, which identified 2,823 genes common with S. bongori and S. typhimurium , provides a useful framework for positioning AaeX within the broader context of Salmonella evolution and pathogenesis.