Recombinant Salmonella dublin Probable 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose-phosphoundecaprenol flippase subunit ArnF (arnF)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The specific tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
arnF; SeD_A2647; Probable 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose-phosphoundecaprenol flippase subunit ArnF; L-Ara4N-phosphoundecaprenol flippase subunit ArnF; Undecaprenyl phosphate-aminoarabinose flippase subunit ArnF
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-125
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Salmonella dublin (strain CT_02021853)
Target Names
arnF
Target Protein Sequence
MGVMWGLISVAIASLAQLSLGFAMMRLPSIAHPLAFISGLGALNAATLALFAGLAGYLVS VFCWHKTLHTLALSKAYALLSLSYVLVWVASMLLPGLQGAFSLKAMLGVLCIMAGVMLIF LPARS
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This protein translocates 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose-phosphoundecaprenol (α-L-Ara4N-phosphoundecaprenol) across the inner membrane from the cytoplasm to the periplasm.

Database Links
Protein Families
ArnF family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the biochemical function of ArnF in Salmonella dublin?

ArnF is hypothesized to function as a subunit of a flippase complex that translocates 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (L-Ara4N)-phosphoundecaprenol from the cytoplasmic to the periplasmic face of the inner membrane. This translocation represents a critical step in the pathway that ultimately leads to the modification of lipid A with L-Ara4N, which contributes significantly to resistance against cationic antimicrobial peptides, including polymyxin antibiotics.

The L-Ara4N modification pathway begins with UDP-glucuronic acid, which undergoes oxidation and decarboxylation catalyzed by ArnA, followed by transamination catalyzed by ArnB to generate the novel sugar nucleotide UDP-L-Ara4N . Subsequent steps involve transfer of L-Ara4N to undecaprenyl phosphate, forming L-Ara4N-phosphoundecaprenol, which must be flipped across the membrane by a complex that includes ArnF before the L-Ara4N moiety can be transferred to lipid A phosphate groups. This addition to lipid A is required for resistance to polymyxin and other cationic antimicrobial peptides in both Escherichia coli and Salmonella species .

To experimentally investigate this function, researchers typically employ membrane reconstitution assays using proteoliposomes containing purified ArnF and fluorescently labeled substrate analogues, measuring translocation through accessibility to membrane-impermeable quenching agents. The biochemical characterization of this process provides foundational understanding for developing strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance.

How is the arnF gene organized within the Arn operon in Salmonella dublin?

The arnF gene is part of the Arn (also known as PmrF) operon, which in Salmonella species typically consists of seven genes organized in a single transcriptional unit: arnB (pmrH), arnC (pmrF), arnA (pmrI), arnD (pmrJ), arnT (pmrK), arnE (pmrL), and arnF (pmrM). This genetic organization reflects the coordinated regulation of all components necessary for the complete L-Ara4N modification pathway.

The operon is primarily regulated by the PmrA-PmrB two-component regulatory system, which responds to environmental signals such as low pH and high Fe³⁺ concentrations - conditions that bacteria might encounter during infection. This regulatory system ensures that the Arn pathway components, including ArnF, are expressed under appropriate conditions when antimicrobial peptide resistance would provide a survival advantage.

For investigating operon structure and regulation, researchers employ techniques such as reverse transcription PCR to confirm co-transcription, 5' RACE to identify transcription start sites, and reporter gene assays to quantify expression under different environmental conditions. Understanding this organization is essential for designing genetic manipulation strategies and interpreting the effects of environmental perturbations on ArnF expression and function.

What evolutionary relationships exist between ArnF in Salmonella dublin and similar proteins in other bacterial species?

ArnF belongs to a specialized family of membrane proteins found primarily in Gram-negative bacteria that possess mechanisms for modifying lipid A with aminoarabinose. Comparative genomic analyses reveal that closely related ArnF orthologs are present only in bacteria capable of synthesizing lipid A species modified with the L-Ara4N moiety , suggesting these proteins evolved specifically to support this antibiotic resistance mechanism.

What are effective methods for expressing and purifying recombinant ArnF?

The expression and purification of membrane proteins like ArnF present significant technical challenges due to their hydrophobic nature and tendency to aggregate. Based on successful approaches with related membrane proteins in the Arn pathway, the following methodological strategy can be implemented:

Expression Systems:

  • E. coli C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) strains, which are engineered specifically for membrane protein expression

  • T7 promoter-based expression systems with tight regulation, similar to the approach used successfully for ArnB

  • Fusion tags such as His6, MBP, or SUMO to improve solubility and facilitate purification

  • Codon optimization of the arnF gene for the expression host to enhance translation efficiency

Expression Conditions:

  • Induction at lower temperatures (16-20°C) to slow protein synthesis and improve folding

  • Use of mild inducers such as lactose instead of IPTG to reduce toxicity

  • Addition of specific lipids or detergents to the growth medium to stabilize membrane proteins

Purification Strategy:

  • Membrane isolation through differential centrifugation

  • Solubilization using mild detergents such as DDM, LDAO, or Triton X-100

  • Affinity chromatography using the fusion tag

  • Size exclusion chromatography to separate monomeric protein from aggregates

  • Optional reconstitution into nanodiscs or liposomes for functional studies

For ArnB, a related protein in the L-Ara4N pathway, researchers successfully used a T7lac promoter-driven construct for overexpression . Similar approaches could be adapted for ArnF, with modifications to account for its membrane-embedded nature. Typical yields for membrane proteins range from 0.1-1 mg per liter of culture, with purity assessed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

How can gene knockout studies be designed to investigate ArnF function in vivo?

Gene knockout studies provide crucial insights into the physiological role of ArnF in Salmonella dublin. A comprehensive experimental design would include:

Construction of Deletion Mutants:

  • Lambda Red recombineering system for precise deletion of arnF without polar effects on other operon genes

  • Construction of complementation plasmids expressing wild-type arnF under native or inducible promoters

  • Generation of point mutants targeting conserved residues to identify functional domains

Phenotypic Characterization:

  • Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays for polymyxin and other cationic antimicrobial peptides

  • Mass spectrometry analysis of lipid A to quantify L-Ara4N modification levels

  • Membrane permeability assays using fluorescent dyes

  • In vivo competition assays in animal models to assess fitness costs of arnF deletion

Table 1 presents a hypothetical dataset showing the relationship between arnF genotype and polymyxin resistance in Salmonella dublin:

GenotypePolymyxin B MIC (μg/ml)L-Ara4N-modified Lipid A (%)Growth Rate (doublings/hour)
Wild-type8.078.50.65
ΔarnF0.512.30.63
ΔarnF + pArnF7.575.20.61
ΔarnF + pArnF(D87A)0.515.70.62
ΔarnB0.253.20.64

In this experimental framework, proper controls are essential, including both positive controls (known susceptible strains) and negative controls (resistant strains). Testing multiple independent knockout clones helps rule out secondary mutations, while complementation confirms that phenotypes are specifically due to arnF deletion rather than polar effects or unintended mutations.

What assays can be used to measure ArnF flippase activity in vitro?

Measuring flippase activity presents unique technical challenges due to the membrane-embedded nature of the process. Several complementary approaches can be employed to assess ArnF function:

Liposome-Based Flippase Assays:

  • Preparation of proteoliposomes containing purified ArnF

  • Loading of liposomes with fluorescently labeled L-Ara4N-phosphoundecaprenol analogues

  • Addition of membrane-impermeable fluorescence quenchers

  • Time-course measurement of fluorescence quenching as an indicator of substrate translocation

Biochemical Approaches:

  • Development of a coupled enzymatic assay where subsequent enzymes in the pathway (such as ArnT) are used to detect flipped substrates

  • Use of LC-MS/MS to directly quantify substrate and product concentrations on both sides of the membrane

  • Application of NMR techniques to track the orientation of isotopically labeled substrates

Biophysical Methods:

  • Surface plasmon resonance to measure binding of undecaprenyl substrates to ArnF

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to identify substrate interaction sites

  • Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy with spin-labeled substrates to monitor movement across the membrane

A successful assay should demonstrate ATP dependence (if ArnF is an active transporter), substrate specificity, and inhibition by known flippase inhibitors. Control experiments should include protein-free liposomes and heat-inactivated ArnF preparations to establish baseline measurements and confirm that observed activities are protein-dependent.

How do post-translational modifications affect ArnF functionality?

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact membrane protein function, including potential regulation of flippases like ArnF. To investigate this complex question, researchers would employ a multi-faceted approach:

  • Identification of potential PTMs:

    • Mass spectrometry analysis of purified ArnF to detect phosphorylation, glycosylation, or other modifications

    • Comparative proteomics between different growth conditions to identify condition-specific PTMs

    • Bioinformatic prediction of modification sites based on consensus sequences for kinases and other modifying enzymes

  • Determination of functional consequences:

    • Site-directed mutagenesis of identified modification sites (e.g., substituting phosphorylatable serine residues with alanine)

    • In vitro flippase assays comparing wild-type and mutant proteins

    • In vivo antibiotic susceptibility testing of strains expressing non-modifiable ArnF variants

Table 2 presents hypothetical data showing the relationship between growth conditions, ArnF phosphorylation, and antimicrobial resistance:

Growth ConditionPhosphorylation SitesRelative Flippase ActivityPolymyxin MIC (μg/ml)
pH 7.4None detected1.0 (reference)2.0
pH 5.5Ser42, Thr1563.88.0
High Mg²⁺None detected0.91.5
High Fe³⁺Ser42, Thr156, Tyr2034.28.5

Such data would suggest that phosphorylation at specific sites enhances ArnF activity, correlating with increased polymyxin resistance under conditions that trigger the PmrA-PmrB system. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms could reveal new strategies for modulating antibiotic resistance by targeting the PTM machinery rather than the protein itself, potentially circumventing the development of resistance to direct inhibitors.

What structural features of ArnF are essential for substrate recognition?

Determining the structural basis of substrate recognition by ArnF is fundamental to understanding its mechanism and potentially designing inhibitors. A comprehensive investigation would include:

  • Structural determination approaches:

    • X-ray crystallography of purified ArnF (challenging for membrane proteins)

    • Cryo-electron microscopy to resolve the three-dimensional structure

    • Homology modeling based on related flippases with known structures

    • Molecular dynamics simulations to identify binding pockets and conformational changes

  • Functional mapping:

    • Alanine scanning mutagenesis of conserved residues

    • Domain swapping with related flippases that have different substrate specificities

    • Photocrosslinking experiments with substrate analogues to identify binding sites

    • Accessibility scanning using cysteine mutagenesis and sulfhydryl reagents

Table 3 presents hypothetical data from mutational analysis identifying critical residues for ArnF function:

ResidueConservationEffect of Mutation on ActivityProposed Role
R78Highly conservedComplete loss of activityDirect substrate binding
D134Conserved in Salmonella80% reductionCoordination of aminoarabinose moiety
W215Variable50% reductionMembrane interface positioning
G247Highly conservedInactive, protein misfoldingStructural integrity
F302Conserved in flippasesAltered substrate specificityUndecaprenyl recognition

Such structural insights would not only advance our understanding of ArnF's molecular mechanism but could also guide rational design of inhibitors targeting specific substrate-binding residues or protein conformational states. These inhibitors could potentially sensitize resistant bacteria to existing antimicrobial peptides, providing a valuable adjunct therapy approach.

How does the interaction between ArnF and other Arn proteins influence the efficiency of L-Ara4N transfer to lipid A?

  • Interaction identification methods:

    • Bacterial two-hybrid or yeast two-hybrid screening

    • Co-immunoprecipitation followed by mass spectrometry

    • Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) between fluorescently labeled Arn proteins

    • Crosslinking mass spectrometry to identify interaction interfaces

  • Functional analysis of complexes:

    • Reconstitution of the complete pathway in proteoliposomes

    • Activity assays comparing individual proteins versus reconstituted complexes

    • Effect of overexpressing or depleting individual components on the activity of others

    • Single-molecule tracking to observe co-localization and dynamics in living cells

  • Structural studies of protein complexes:

    • Blue native PAGE to isolate native complexes

    • Cryo-electron tomography of membrane preparations

    • Integrative structural modeling combining multiple experimental data sources

This research approach might reveal that ArnF functions optimally within a transmembrane assembly that couples synthesis, flipping, and transfer of L-Ara4N to lipid A. The efficiency of this process likely depends on proper spatial organization of all components, potentially creating opportunities to disrupt resistance by targeting protein-protein interactions rather than individual enzymatic activities.

How does environmental pH regulate arnF expression?

Environmental pH is a key regulator of genes involved in antimicrobial peptide resistance in Salmonella. To investigate pH-dependent regulation of arnF, researchers would implement:

  • Transcriptional analysis approaches:

    • Quantitative RT-PCR to measure arnF mRNA levels at different pH values

    • RNA-seq to examine global transcriptional responses

    • Promoter-reporter fusions (e.g., arnF promoter-lacZ) to quantify expression under various conditions

    • DNase I footprinting to identify transcription factor binding sites

  • Regulatory network mapping:

    • Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify direct regulators

    • Genetic screens for mutants with altered pH responsiveness

    • Two-component system phosphorylation assays (particularly PmrA-PmrB)

    • Construction of regulatory mutants and measurement of their effects on arnF expression

Table 4 presents hypothetical data showing the relationship between pH, regulatory systems, and antimicrobial peptide resistance:

pHRelative arnF ExpressionPmrA PhosphorylationL-Ara4N-modified Lipid A (%)Polymyxin MIC (μg/ml)
7.51.0 (baseline)+28.42.0
6.53.7++45.64.0
5.58.2+++72.38.0
5.5 (ΔpmrA)1.2N/A31.22.0
5.5 (ΔpmrB)1.1+30.52.0

Such data would suggest that acid-induced expression of arnF is primarily mediated through the PmrA-PmrB two-component system, with the degree of activation correlating with the level of L-Ara4N modification and polymyxin resistance. This regulatory mechanism likely represents an adaptation to conditions encountered during infection, such as the acidic environment of the macrophage phagosome, where antimicrobial peptide resistance would provide a survival advantage to the pathogen.

What is the relationship between ArnF activity and polymyxin resistance?

Understanding the quantitative relationship between ArnF activity and antibiotic resistance is essential for evaluating its potential as a drug target. A comprehensive investigation would include:

  • Dose-response relationship analysis:

    • Construction of strains with titratable arnF expression using inducible promoters

    • Measurement of polymyxin MICs across an expression gradient

    • Quantification of L-Ara4N-modified lipid A corresponding to each expression level

    • Determination of the minimal ArnF activity required for clinically relevant resistance

  • Structure-activity relationships:

    • Comparison of different polymyxin derivatives and their effectiveness against strains with varying ArnF activity

    • Investigation of cross-resistance to other cationic antimicrobial peptides

    • Testing of synergistic drug combinations that might overcome ArnF-mediated resistance

  • Clinical correlations:

    • Analysis of arnF expression in clinical isolates with different resistance profiles

    • Sequencing of arnF in resistant isolates to identify potential activating mutations

    • Epidemiological studies correlating treatment outcomes with arnF expression or sequence variants

The results might demonstrate a non-linear relationship between ArnF activity and resistance, with a threshold effect where a certain level of expression is required before significant resistance is observed. This information would be valuable for developing dosing strategies for polymyxin antibiotics and for designing inhibitors targeting the ArnF-mediated resistance pathway.

How does the ArnF-mediated pathway interact with other antibiotic resistance mechanisms?

Bacteria typically employ multiple resistance mechanisms simultaneously. To understand how the ArnF pathway integrates with other resistance systems:

  • Genetic interaction studies:

    • Construction of double and triple mutants combining arnF deletion with other resistance genes

    • Synthetic genetic array analysis to identify genetic interactions systematically

    • Transcriptomic analysis to identify compensatory responses when arnF is deleted

  • Biochemical pathway interactions:

    • Characterization of lipid A modifications in strains with multiple resistance pathways

    • Metabolic flux analysis to examine resource allocation between different resistance mechanisms

    • Investigation of physical interactions between components of different resistance systems

  • Integrated resistance phenotypes:

    • Antibiotic susceptibility testing using various classes of antibiotics

    • Time-kill kinetics in the presence of multiple antibiotics

    • In vivo virulence and resistance studies in animal models

Salmonella dublin is known for its natural antibiotic-resistant tendencies , and most Salmonella Dublin strains are multi-drug resistant . Understanding how the ArnF pathway contributes to this broader resistance profile could reveal vulnerabilities that might be exploited therapeutically. For instance, inhibition of ArnF might not only restore susceptibility to polymyxins but could also enhance the efficacy of other antimicrobial agents through synergistic effects on membrane permeability.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.