This bifunctional protein plays a crucial role in lysophospholipid acylation. It catalyzes the transfer of fatty acids to the 1-position of lysophospholipids via an enzyme-bound acyl-ACP intermediate, requiring ATP and magnesium. Its primary physiological function is the regeneration of phosphatidylethanolamine from 2-acyl-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (2-acyl-GPE), which is produced through transacylation reactions or phospholipase A1 degradation.
KEGG: seh:SeHA_C3223
The Bifunctional protein aas (aas) from Salmonella heidelberg is a 719 amino acid protein (UniProt accession: B4TGR5) that functions as a bifunctional enzyme. It includes domains for 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamine acyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.40) and is involved in membrane phospholipid metabolism . The protein has a molecular mass of approximately 59-61 kDa and is typically produced recombinantly with an N-terminal His-tag for research purposes.
Key characteristics of the protein include:
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of amino acids | 719 |
| Molecular mass | ~59-61 kDa |
| Gene name | aas |
| Ordered Locus Name | SeHA_C3223 |
| UniProt accession | B4TGR5 |
| Main function | 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamine acyltransferase |
| Expression system for recombinant protein | E. coli |
| Common tag | N-terminal His-tag |
Comparative analysis shows high conservation of the aas protein across Salmonella serovars. The Bifunctional protein aas from Salmonella heidelberg and Salmonella dublin share remarkably similar amino acid sequences, with only minor variations . This high level of conservation suggests functional importance across Salmonella species.
When comparing the sequences between S. heidelberg and S. dublin, there are only a few amino acid differences, with key functional domains being highly preserved . For example, position 151 shows a glutamine (Q) in S. heidelberg versus a valine (V) in S. dublin, and at position 367, S. heidelberg has a proline (P) where S. dublin has a leucine (L) .
For optimal expression of Recombinant Salmonella heidelberg Bifunctional protein aas in E. coli, researchers should consider the following methodological approach:
Expression system: E. coli is the recommended expression host, with BL21(DE3) or similar strains commonly used for protein expression .
Vector selection: pET-based vectors with T7 promoter systems provide high-level expression for His-tagged proteins.
Induction conditions:
IPTG concentration: 0.5-1.0 mM
Induction temperature: 16-25°C (lower temperatures may improve protein solubility)
Induction time: 4-16 hours (overnight induction at lower temperatures often yields better results)
Media composition: Enriched media like LB or 2YT with appropriate antibiotics based on the plasmid's resistance marker.
Cell lysis: Sonication or high-pressure homogenization in a buffer containing:
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
300 mM NaCl
10 mM imidazole
Protease inhibitors
A multi-step purification strategy is recommended to obtain high-purity, active Recombinant Salmonella heidelberg Bifunctional protein aas:
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC):
Using Ni-NTA or similar resin for His-tagged protein
Binding buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole
Wash buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 20-40 mM imidazole
Elution buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, 250-500 mM imidazole
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC):
Further purification using Superdex 200 or similar column
Running buffer: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl
Buffer exchange and concentration:
Quality control:
Based on product specifications and scientific literature, the following storage conditions are recommended for maintaining stability:
Short-term storage (up to one week):
Long-term storage:
Lyophilization:
Stability considerations:
To measure the 2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamine acyltransferase activity of Bifunctional protein aas, researchers can employ several methodological approaches:
Radiolabeled substrate assay:
Use 14C-labeled acyl donors (e.g., acyl-CoA or acyl-ACP)
Monitor transfer to glycerophosphoethanolamine acceptors
Quantify product formation by thin-layer chromatography and scintillation counting
HPLC-based assay:
Utilize fluorescently labeled or UV-absorbing acyl-CoA substrates
Separate and quantify reaction products by reverse-phase HPLC
Monitor decrease in substrate or increase in product peaks
Coupled enzymatic assay:
Link acyltransferase activity to a secondary reaction that produces a measurable signal
Measure release of CoA using DTNB (Ellman's reagent) at 412 nm
Monitor change in absorbance spectrophotometrically
Mass spectrometry-based assay:
Detect and quantify reaction products directly using LC-MS/MS
Allows for simultaneous analysis of multiple substrate-product combinations
Optimal reaction conditions generally include:
pH range: 7.0-8.0
Temperature: 30-37°C
Buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl or phosphate buffer
Divalent cations: Mg2+ or Mn2+ (1-5 mM)
Reducing agent: DTT or β-mercaptoethanol (1-5 mM)
Several methodological approaches can be employed to investigate structure-function relationships:
A systematic approach combining these methods would provide insights into which regions and residues are critical for enzymatic function, substrate binding, and protein-protein interactions.
Research on the direct role of Bifunctional protein aas in Salmonella virulence is still emerging, but several connections can be made based on available evidence:
Membrane homeostasis and integrity:
Regulation by virulence-associated factors:
Potential role in antimicrobial resistance:
While not directly implicated, phospholipid metabolism enzymes can influence membrane permeability and potentially impact susceptibility to antimicrobials
Salmonella Heidelberg strains show varied antimicrobial resistance profiles, though resistance is primarily associated with plasmid-borne genes like blaCMY-2
Environmental persistence:
To directly investigate the role of aas in virulence, researchers could:
Generate targeted aas deletion mutants in Salmonella Heidelberg
Compare virulence in appropriate infection models
Assess survival under various stress conditions relevant to host environments
Examine membrane lipid composition changes during infection
While direct comparative studies of the Bifunctional protein aas between antimicrobial-resistant and susceptible Salmonella Heidelberg strains are not explicitly described in the search results, several research directions can be proposed:
Sequence comparison:
Expression level analysis:
Transcriptomic comparison of aas expression between resistant and susceptible strains
Evaluation of whether antibiotic selection pressure alters aas expression
Membrane composition studies:
Lipidomic analysis to determine if resistant strains show alterations in membrane phospholipid composition
Assessment of whether such changes correlate with altered aas activity
Functional studies:
Comparison of enzyme kinetics and substrate specificity between aas proteins from resistant and susceptible strains
Investigation of potential interactions between aas and components of resistance mechanisms
Research has shown that Salmonella Heidelberg strains with different antimicrobial resistance profiles show varied survival capabilities in environments like pine wood shavings used as broiler litter. Specifically, strains harboring antimicrobial resistance genes like blaCMY-2 (SH-AAFC) survived longer than pan-susceptible strains (SH-ARS) .
While Bifunctional protein aas itself has not been specifically studied as a vaccine candidate based on the search results, researchers could explore its potential in vaccine development through several methodological approaches:
Epitope mapping and antigenicity assessment:
Apply similar approaches to those used for FlgK protein in Salmonella Heidelberg
Use immunoinformatic tools to predict potential B-lymphocyte epitopes
Compare in silico predictions with experimental results from animal immunizations
Assess antigenicity using tools like VaxiJen and allergenicity with AllerTOP
Recombinant subunit vaccine approach:
Express recombinant aas protein or specific epitope-containing fragments
Formulate with appropriate adjuvants
Evaluate immunogenicity in animal models
Assess protective efficacy against challenge
Reverse vaccinology strategy:
mRNA vaccine technology:
Design mRNA constructs encoding aas or selected epitopes
Evaluate expression and immune response in appropriate models
Immunological evaluation:
Research on the FlgK protein from Salmonella Heidelberg identified three common shared consensus peptide epitope sequences that could be valuable for vaccine development . Similar methodologies could be applied to investigate the vaccine potential of Bifunctional protein aas.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer powerful approaches to understanding the structural dynamics and substrate binding mechanisms of Bifunctional protein aas:
System preparation:
Generate a high-quality structural model through homology modeling if crystal structure is unavailable
Embed the protein in a phospholipid bilayer membrane to mimic its native environment
Solvate the system with explicit water molecules and appropriate ion concentrations
Simulation approaches:
Perform equilibrium MD simulations (100 ns to μs timescale) to observe conformational dynamics
Use advanced sampling techniques like metadynamics or umbrella sampling to characterize free energy landscapes of substrate binding
Employ steered MD to investigate substrate entry/exit pathways
Specific investigations:
Characterize binding pocket flexibility and conformational changes upon substrate binding
Identify key residues involved in substrate recognition and catalysis
Simulate the effects of mutations on substrate binding and enzyme dynamics
Model the bifunctional nature by simulating both enzymatic activities
Analysis methods:
Calculate binding free energies using MM/PBSA or MM/GBSA approaches
Analyze hydrogen bonding networks and salt bridge formations
Perform principal component analysis to identify major modes of protein motion
Create Markov state models to identify relevant metastable states
These computational approaches would complement experimental studies and provide atomic-level insights into the mechanism of this important bifunctional enzyme.
Investigating the relationship between aas gene variations and bacterial fitness across different host environments represents an important research frontier:
Comparative genomic analysis:
Sequence the aas gene across Salmonella Heidelberg isolates from diverse sources (human clinical, poultry, environmental)
Identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and structural variations
Compare with other Salmonella serovars to identify serovar-specific patterns
Experimental evolution studies:
Subject Salmonella Heidelberg to serial passage in different host-mimicking conditions
Sequence the aas gene before and after adaptation
Identify mutations that arise under specific selection pressures
Functional genomics approaches:
Generate a library of aas variants using site-directed mutagenesis or random mutagenesis
Assess fitness effects in competition assays under various conditions
Perform complementation studies in aas knockout strains
Host-specific adaptation analysis:
Compare aas sequences from isolates adapted to different hosts (human vs. poultry)
Assess membrane lipid composition changes in host-adapted strains
Investigate whether aas variations correlate with host range or tissue tropism
Research has shown that Salmonella Heidelberg strains with different genetic characteristics exhibit varied survival capabilities in environments like pine wood shavings used as broiler litter . Understanding how aas gene variations might contribute to these differences would provide valuable insights into bacterial adaptation strategies.
Understanding the protein interaction network of Bifunctional protein aas could reveal its broader biological roles. Several cutting-edge interactomics approaches can be applied:
Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS):
Express tagged Bifunctional protein aas in Salmonella Heidelberg
Perform pull-down experiments under various conditions
Identify co-precipitating proteins by mass spectrometry
Validate interactions through reciprocal pull-downs
Proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID or TurboID):
Fuse aas to a biotin ligase (BioID2 or TurboID)
Express in Salmonella and allow proximity labeling to occur
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Map the spatial interactome of aas in living cells
Bacterial two-hybrid screening:
Create an aas bait construct
Screen against a genomic library of Salmonella proteins
Validate positive interactions through secondary assays
Map interaction domains through truncation analysis
Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS):
Use chemical cross-linkers to capture transient protein-protein interactions
Digest cross-linked complexes and analyze by specialized MS workflows
Identify interaction interfaces at amino acid resolution
Incorporate findings into structural models
Protein co-evolution analysis:
Apply computational methods to identify co-evolving protein pairs
Predict functional associations based on evolutionary constraints
Validate predictions experimentally
These approaches would help place Bifunctional protein aas within the broader context of cellular pathways and potentially reveal unexpected functions beyond its known enzymatic activities.