Recombinant Salmonella paratyphi B Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Overview of prfA in Bacterial Systems

The prfA gene is primarily characterized in Bacillus species (e.g., B. subtilis, B. stearothermophilus) and encodes a multifunctional protein involved in:

  • DNA repair and recombination .

  • Chromosome segregation .

  • Endonuclease activity, creating single-strand DNA breaks with 5'-phosphate and 3'-hydroxyl termini .

Recombinant Protein Production in Salmonella Paratyphi B

While prfA is not documented in Salmonella Paratyphi B, other recombinant proteins from this pathogen have been studied. For example:

Table 1: Example of Recombinant Protein in Salmonella Paratyphi B

Protein NameGeneFunctionExpression SystemTagReference
Electron Transport RnfArnfAElectron transport complexE. coliN-terminal His

This recombinant RnfA (A9N023, 1-193aa) is expressed in E. coli and used for structural or functional studies .

Genomic Context of Salmonella Paratyphi B

Key genomic features of S. Paratyphi B strains include:

  • Pathogenicity: Systemic (paratyphoid fever) vs. enteric (gastroenteritis) strains, distinguished by virulence gene profiles (e.g., sopB, sopD, sopE1) .

  • SPI-1 and SPI-2: Type III secretion systems critical for invasion and intracellular survival .

  • Antibiotic Resistance: Multi-drug resistance in dTa+ strains .

Table 2: Virulence Gene Profiles in S. Paratyphi B Pathovars10

PathovarsopE1avrAsopBsopDClinical Outcome
Systemic+-+-Paratyphoid fever
Enteric±+±+Gastroenteritis

Hypothetical Role of prfA in Salmonella Paratyphi B

If prfA exists in S. Paratyphi B, its recombinant form might:

  • Function analogously to Bacillus PrfA: DNA repair or recombination.

  • Interact with virulence systems: SPI-1/SPI-2 effectors (e.g., SopB, SptP) .

  • Require codon optimization: For heterologous expression in E. coli or yeast .

Research Gaps and Recommendations

  • Gene Annotation: No prfA homolog is annotated in S. Paratyphi B genomes .

  • Functional Studies: Priority should be given to knockout/overexpression experiments to validate hypothetical roles.

  • Structural Analysis: Homology modeling using Bacillus PrfA as a template .

Key References

  1. Whole-genome sequencing of S. Paratyphi B .

  2. PrfA endonuclease activity in Bacillus .

  3. Recombinant protein expression systems in Salmonella .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the format we have in stock. If you have special format requirements, please note them when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for specifics. All proteins ship with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance for an extra fee.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute protein in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, storage temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
prfA; SPAB_01453; Peptide chain release factor 1; RF-1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-360
Protein Length
full length protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Salmonella paratyphi B (strain ATCC BAA-1250 / SPB7)
Target Names
prfA
Target Protein Sequence
MKPSIVAKLE ALHERHEEVQ ALLGDAGIIA DQDRFRALSR EYAQLSDVSR CFTDWQQVQD DIETAQMMLD DPEMREMAQE ELREAKEKSE QLEQQLQVLL LPKDPDDERN AFLEVRAGTG GDEAALFAGD LFRMYSRYAE ARRWRVEIMS MSEGEHGGYK EIIAKISGDG VYGRLKFESG GHRVQRVPAT ESQGRIHTSA CTVAVMPELP EAELPDINPA DLRIDTFRSS GAGGQHVNTT DSAIRITHLP TGIVVECQDE RSQHKNKAKA LSVLGARIHA AETAKRQQAE ASTRRNLLGS GDRSDRNRTY NFPQGRVTDH RINLTLYRLD ETMEGKLDML IEPIVQEHQA DLLAALSEQE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Peptide chain release factor 1 terminates translation in response to the stop codons UAG and UAA.
Database Links
Protein Families
Prokaryotic/mitochondrial release factor family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What is Salmonella paratyphi B and what clinical significance does it have?

Salmonella Paratyphi B is a bacterial pathogen that causes paratyphoid fever, a systemic infection similar to typhoid fever but typically less severe. This organism is a notifiable disease in many countries, including England, where most cases are imported from endemic regions. The disease is generally mild but can lead to invasive infections requiring hospitalization, particularly in younger children. Research has confirmed that chronic carriage of Paratyphoid B can occur, potentially leading to person-to-person transmission even in non-endemic areas .

Recent epidemiological studies have documented clusters of Paratyphoid B cases where whole genome sequencing has confirmed close genetic relationships (0-5 single-nucleotide polymorphisms) between isolates from different patients, establishing clear transmission chains . This pathogen represents an important model for studying bacterial pathogenesis, host-pathogen interactions, and virulence mechanisms.

What is the peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA) and why is it important in bacterial protein synthesis?

Peptide chain release factor 1 (prfA) is a critical protein involved in translation termination during bacterial protein synthesis. It functions by recognizing the stop codons UAA and UAG in messenger RNA and catalyzing the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the completed polypeptide chain and the transfer RNA in the ribosome's P-site. This process releases the newly synthesized protein from the ribosome.

How does prfA from Salmonella paratyphi B differ from other bacterial species?

While the core functional domains of prfA are highly conserved across bacterial species, sequence variations exist that may reflect adaptation to specific translational environments. In Salmonella paratyphi B, prfA maintains the canonical domains necessary for stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, but contains specific amino acid substitutions that may influence its interaction with ribosomes or other translation factors.

Comparative analysis of prfA sequences from different Salmonella serovars, including Paratyphi B, reveals evolutionary patterns that can provide insights into bacterial adaptation. These variations, though subtle, may contribute to differences in translation efficiency, which could potentially impact pathogenesis and host adaptation strategies.

What are the optimal expression systems for producing recombinant Salmonella paratyphi B prfA?

The expression of recombinant Salmonella paratyphi B prfA requires careful consideration of several factors to ensure proper protein folding and function. While multiple expression systems can be utilized, E. coli-based systems typically provide the highest yields for bacterial proteins. The following methodological approaches have proven effective:

Expression System Comparison:

Expression SystemAdvantagesDisadvantagesTypical Yield (mg/L culture)
E. coli BL21(DE3)High expression, cost-effective, rapid growthInclusion body formation possible15-25
E. coli Rosetta strainsSupplies rare codons, improves foldingHigher cost, slower growth10-20
Cell-free systemsAvoids toxicity issues, rapidExpensive, lower yield1-5

For optimal expression, the prfA gene should be codon-optimized for the expression host and cloned into vectors containing T7 or tac promoters. Induction conditions require careful optimization, with lower temperatures (16-25°C) and reduced IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) often yielding more soluble protein by slowing the expression rate and improving folding.

What purification strategy yields the highest purity and activity for recombinant Salmonella paratyphi B prfA?

A multi-step purification approach is recommended to obtain high-purity, functionally active recombinant prfA:

  • Initial Capture: Affinity chromatography using N-terminal His6-tag with Ni-NTA resin provides efficient initial capture. Buffer conditions should include 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 300 mM NaCl, and 10-20 mM imidazole for binding, with elution using an imidazole gradient (50-250 mM).

  • Intermediate Purification: Ion exchange chromatography (IEX) using a Q-Sepharose column can remove contaminants with different charge properties. prfA typically elutes at approximately 250-300 mM NaCl in a pH 7.5 buffer.

  • Polishing Step: Size exclusion chromatography (Superdex 75 or 200) as a final step ensures removal of aggregates and provides buffer exchange into the storage buffer (typically 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5% glycerol).

This protocol consistently yields >95% pure protein with specific activity comparable to native protein, as confirmed by SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and functional assays.

How can researchers troubleshoot low yields or poor activity of recombinant prfA?

When encountering challenges with recombinant prfA expression or activity, systematic troubleshooting approaches should be implemented:

For Low Expression Yields:

  • Verify codon optimization for the expression host

  • Test multiple expression vectors with different promoter strengths

  • Screen various E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express)

  • Optimize induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, duration)

  • Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK)

For Poor Solubility:

  • Reduce expression temperature to 16-18°C

  • Include solubility enhancers in lysis buffer (0.1% Triton X-100, 5-10% glycerol)

  • Test fusion partners (MBP, SUMO, or GST) that enhance solubility

  • Perform refolding from inclusion bodies if necessary

For Low Activity:

  • Ensure buffers contain essential co-factors (Mg2+)

  • Verify protein is not aggregating using dynamic light scattering

  • Include reducing agents to maintain cysteine residues in reduced form

  • Test for inhibitory contaminants using activity assays

Systematic application of these approaches can significantly improve yields and functionality of recombinant prfA preparations.

What methods are most effective for determining the structure-function relationship of Salmonella paratyphi B prfA?

Understanding the structure-function relationship of prfA requires an integrated approach combining structural biology techniques with functional assays:

Structural Analysis Methods:

  • X-ray crystallography remains the gold standard for high-resolution structural determination, typically requiring 10-15 mg/ml of highly purified protein for crystallization trials

  • Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is particularly valuable for visualizing prfA in complex with ribosomes

  • NMR spectroscopy can provide insights into dynamic regions and conformational changes upon substrate binding

  • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) identifies regions with differential solvent accessibility upon binding

Functional Mapping Approaches:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues followed by in vitro translation termination assays

  • Truncation analysis to identify essential domains

  • Chemical cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry to identify interaction surfaces

  • FRET-based assays to monitor conformational changes during the catalytic cycle

Recent studies have revealed that prfA undergoes significant conformational changes during stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis. The integration of structural data with functional assays has identified key residues in the GGQ motif essential for catalysis and in domain 2 for stop codon recognition.

How can researchers accurately measure the in vitro activity of recombinant Salmonella paratyphi B prfA?

Several complementary approaches can be employed to assess prfA activity:

1. Ribosome-Based Termination Assays:
The most physiologically relevant method utilizes reconstituted translation termination systems with purified components:

  • Pre-termination ribosomal complexes assembled with mRNA containing a stop codon

  • [35S]-labeled peptidyl-tRNA in the P-site

  • Purified recombinant prfA

The release of labeled peptide is quantified by scintillation counting after filtration or TCA precipitation. This assay directly measures the peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis activity of prfA.

2. Fluorescence-Based Assays:
More rapid screening can be performed using fluorescent substrates:

  • Ribosomal complexes with fluorogenic peptidyl-tRNA analogs

  • FRET-based reporters that detect conformational changes

  • Quenched fluorescent peptide substrates that fluoresce upon hydrolysis

3. Competition Assays:
These assess the binding affinity of prfA for ribosomes:

  • Filter binding assays with labeled prfA

  • Surface plasmon resonance measuring prfA-ribosome interactions

  • Microscale thermophoresis for quantifying binding constants

Activity measurements should include appropriate controls, including catalytically inactive prfA mutants and non-cognate stop codons, to ensure specificity.

What are the critical differences in assessing in vitro versus in vivo activity of prfA in Salmonella paratyphi B?

Bridging in vitro biochemical data with in vivo biological relevance presents significant challenges when studying prfA function:

In Vitro Systems:

  • Provide precise control over reaction components

  • Allow quantitative measurement of kinetic parameters

  • Enable manipulation of individual variables

  • Lack cellular complexity and regulation

In Vivo Assessment Approaches:

  • Complementation of conditional prfA mutants

  • Reporter systems with programmed stop codons

  • Ribosome profiling to assess global translation termination efficiency

  • Mass spectrometry to detect read-through products

Key considerations when extrapolating from in vitro to in vivo include:

  • Cellular concentrations of RF1 and competing factors differ from optimized in vitro conditions

  • Intracellular ion concentrations and molecular crowding affect activity

  • Post-translational modifications present in vivo may be absent in recombinant preparations

  • Context effects from neighboring mRNA sequences influence termination efficiency in vivo

Researchers should implement parallel in vitro and in vivo assays, using conditional depletion strategies for prfA coupled with phenotypic and molecular analyses to establish physiological relevance of biochemical findings.

How does prfA expression affect virulence mechanisms in Salmonella paratyphi B?

The relationship between prfA expression and Salmonella pathogenesis represents an emerging area of research. Translation termination efficiency can significantly impact the expression of virulence factors through several mechanisms:

  • Differential Termination Efficiency: Many virulence genes contain rare stop codons or termination contexts that may be more sensitive to changes in prfA levels or activity, creating a regulatory layer for virulence gene expression.

  • Programmed Readthrough: Some virulence factors require programmed translational readthrough of stop codons to produce extended protein variants with altered functions. Modulation of prfA activity affects the ratio of these protein variants.

  • Integration with Stress Responses: During infection, Salmonella encounters various stresses that alter translation termination efficiency. This creates a feedback loop where environmental conditions in host tissues influence virulence factor production through prfA-mediated effects.

Research has demonstrated that Salmonella paratyphi B utilizes sophisticated type III secretion systems encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) that inject effector proteins into host cells . These systems are crucial for invasion of intestinal epithelial cells and survival within macrophages . The precise translation of these virulence factors depends on accurate termination by prfA.

What experimental models are most appropriate for studying the role of prfA in Salmonella paratyphi B infections?

Several complementary models can be employed to investigate prfA's role in Salmonella pathogenesis:

In Vitro Cellular Models:

  • Intestinal epithelial cell lines (Caco-2, HT-29) for studying invasion mechanisms

  • Macrophage models (RAW264.7, THP-1) for intracellular survival studies

  • 3D intestinal organoids providing more physiologically relevant tissue architecture

Animal Models:

  • Mouse models for systemic infection (though S. paratyphi B is primarily human-adapted)

  • Humanized mouse models with human immune components

  • Recently developed ferret models that better recapitulate human enteric fever

Ex Vivo Systems:

  • Human intestinal tissue explants

  • Precision-cut liver slices for studying hepatic stages of infection

When designing studies, researchers should consider:

  • Construction of conditional prfA mutants, as complete deletion is likely lethal

  • Development of strains with modified prfA with altered termination efficiency

  • Implementation of ribosome profiling to identify virulence factors most affected by prfA modulation

  • Correlation of in vitro termination efficiency with in vivo virulence phenotypes

The mouse model has demonstrated utility for studying dose-dependent relationships in Salmonella infection, with clear correlations between inoculum dose and white blood cell responses, as well as bacterial counts in intestinal segments and the spleen .

How can recombinant prfA be utilized to develop novel antimicrobial strategies against Salmonella paratyphi B?

The essential nature of prfA for bacterial viability and its structural divergence from eukaryotic termination factors make it an attractive antimicrobial target. Several research approaches leverage recombinant prfA for therapeutic development:

  • High-Throughput Screening Platforms:

    • Development of fluorescence-based termination assays suitable for screening compound libraries

    • Structure-based virtual screening using solved crystal structures of prfA

    • Fragment-based drug discovery approaches targeting prfA active sites

  • Rational Drug Design:

    • Structure-activity relationship studies of compounds that bind prfA

    • Development of peptide mimetics that interfere with ribosome binding

    • Allosteric inhibitors that lock prfA in inactive conformations

  • Alternative Approaches:

    • Identification of compounds that alter the balance between prfA and other translation factors

    • Development of modified antisense oligonucleotides targeting prfA mRNA

    • Exploitation of species-specific features for selective targeting

Recent studies have demonstrated that compounds targeting bacterial translation termination can show selective toxicity against pathogenic bacteria while sparing beneficial microbiota. The structure-function studies of recombinant prfA provide essential information for designing such selective inhibitors.

What are the challenges in studying post-translational modifications of prfA in Salmonella paratyphi B?

Although bacterial proteins generally undergo fewer post-translational modifications (PTMs) than their eukaryotic counterparts, emerging evidence suggests that PTMs play important regulatory roles in bacterial physiology, including in translation termination:

Common PTMs Affecting Bacterial Release Factors:

  • Methylation of the universally conserved GGQ motif

  • Phosphorylation of serine/threonine residues

  • Acetylation affecting protein stability or interactions

Methodological Challenges:

  • Detection Limitations: Most PTMs occur substoichiometrically, making detection challenging

  • Sample Preparation: Modifications can be lost during standard recombinant protein production

  • Functional Assessment: Determining the physiological significance of identified PTMs

  • Environmental Dependency: PTM patterns change with growth conditions and stress

Recommended Approaches:

  • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics with enrichment strategies for specific PTMs

  • Comparison of recombinant versus native prfA isolated from Salmonella

  • Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues to mimic or prevent modification

  • Development of modification-specific antibodies for tracking PTM dynamics

Understanding the PTM landscape of prfA may reveal novel regulatory mechanisms that influence Salmonella pathogenesis and adaptation to host environments.

How does ribosome heterogeneity affect prfA function in different growth conditions?

Recent research has revealed that bacterial ribosomes exhibit substantial heterogeneity depending on growth conditions, potentially affecting prfA function:

Sources of Ribosomal Heterogeneity:

  • Differential expression of ribosomal proteins

  • Variations in rRNA modifications

  • Incorporation of alternative ribosomal proteins

  • Association with different ribosome-binding factors

Implications for prfA Function:
Ribosome heterogeneity creates "specialized ribosomes" with altered termination properties that may preferentially translate specific mRNA subsets. This creates a complex layer of regulation where prfA activity depends not only on its intrinsic properties but also on the specific ribosome population with which it interacts.

Experimental Approaches:

  • Purification of ribosomes from Salmonella grown under different conditions (e.g., nutrient limitation, acid stress, within macrophages)

  • Comparative termination assays using recombinant prfA with different ribosome populations

  • Ribosome profiling to identify mRNAs differentially affected by ribosomal heterogeneity

  • Structural studies of prfA-ribosome complexes under varying conditions

This research direction may explain how Salmonella adapts its translation termination efficiency during different stages of infection, potentially influencing virulence gene expression. The bacterial envelope structure, including the peptidoglycan layer, differs significantly between Gram-positive (up to 100Å thick) and Gram-negative bacteria (approximately 20Å thick), which may impact how translation products are processed and transported .

What computational approaches can predict structure-function relationships in Salmonella paratyphi B prfA variants?

Computational biology offers powerful tools for predicting how sequence variations in prfA affect function, guiding experimental design:

Structural Bioinformatics Approaches:

  • Homology modeling based on existing release factor structures

  • Molecular dynamics simulations to predict conformational changes

  • Protein-protein docking to model ribosome interactions

  • Energy minimization to assess stability of variants

Sequence-Based Predictive Methods:

  • Conservation analysis across bacterial species

  • Coevolution analysis to identify functionally coupled residues

  • Machine learning models trained on existing release factor functional data

  • Natural language processing approaches using protein language models

Integration with Experimental Data:

  • In silico mutagenesis to prioritize variants for experimental testing

  • Prediction of temperature-sensitive mutations for conditional phenotypes

  • Virtual screening for compounds targeting specific prfA variants

  • Network analysis integrating translation termination with broader cellular processes

A combined computational-experimental approach can efficiently characterize the functional landscape of prfA variants, identifying those with altered termination properties that may influence Salmonella pathogenesis.

How can CRISPR-Cas9 technologies be applied to study prfA function in Salmonella paratyphi B?

CRISPR-Cas9 technologies provide unprecedented opportunities for precise genetic manipulation of Salmonella to study prfA function:

Genome Editing Applications:

  • Creation of conditional prfA mutants using inducible promoters

  • Introduction of point mutations to study specific functional domains

  • Generation of fluorescently tagged prfA for localization studies

  • Implementation of CRISPRi for partial knockdown to study dosage effects

High-Throughput Functional Genomics:

  • CRISPR screening to identify genetic interactions with prfA

  • Base editing to create libraries of prfA variants

  • Multiplexed editing to study combinatorial effects

  • CRISPR-based transcriptional modulators to alter prfA expression

Methodological Considerations:

  • Delivery methods optimized for Salmonella (electroporation or conjugation)

  • Selection of appropriate sgRNA design for high efficiency

  • Implementation of counter-selection strategies for scarless editing

  • Development of inducible CRISPR systems for temporal control

CRISPR technologies enable previously intractable experiments, such as systematically mapping the fitness effects of hundreds of prfA variants during infection or identifying compensatory mutations that restore fitness in prfA-compromised strains.

What is the relationship between prfA function and antibiotic resistance in Salmonella paratyphi B?

Emerging research suggests complex interactions between translation termination and antibiotic resistance:

Mechanistic Connections:

  • Translational Readthrough: Some resistance mechanisms involve programmed readthrough of stop codons, creating extended proteins with altered functions

  • Stress Responses: Antibiotics induce stress responses that may alter prfA activity or abundance

  • Mistranslation: Suboptimal termination can generate protein variants that contribute to phenotypic heterogeneity and survival under antibiotic pressure

  • Ribosome Protection: Alterations in termination complex dynamics can affect binding of ribosome-targeting antibiotics

Research Approaches:

  • Comparative analysis of termination efficiency in resistant versus sensitive strains

  • Assessment of prfA mutations in clinical isolates with unexplained resistance

  • Investigation of translation termination accuracy under antibiotic stress

  • Development of combination therapies targeting both conventional mechanisms and translation termination

The potential role of prfA in antibiotic resistance adds urgency to fundamental research on translation termination mechanisms, particularly in clinically relevant pathogens like Salmonella paratyphi B.

How does the interaction between prfA and the bacterial microbiome affect host colonization by Salmonella paratyphi B?

Recent advances in microbiome research have revealed complex ecological interactions that influence pathogen colonization and virulence:

Microbiome-Dependent Effects:

  • Competition with commensal bacteria for nutrients affects translation rates and termination efficiency

  • Metabolites produced by the microbiota can modulate prfA activity

  • Horizontal gene transfer can introduce variant prfA genes with altered properties

  • Phage predation selects for specific translational phenotypes

Experimental Approaches:

  • Gnotobiotic animal models with defined microbial communities

  • Ex vivo competition assays between Salmonella variants and microbiota members

  • Metabolomic analysis to identify microbiome-derived molecules affecting translation

  • Single-cell analysis of translation termination in mixed bacterial populations

This research direction connects molecular mechanisms of translation termination to ecological interactions, potentially revealing new strategies for preventing Salmonella colonization through microbiome manipulation.

The understanding of Salmonella pathogenesis continues to evolve, with insights into how type III secretion systems encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity islands enable invasion of intestinal epithelial cells and trigger immune responses characterized by the release of cytokines and chemokines . These processes are critical for establishing infection and contribute to the symptomatic manifestations of Salmonella-induced diarrhea.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.