The Recombinant Salmonella schwarzengrund UPF0060 membrane protein ynfA (ynfA) is a recombinant protein derived from the bacterium Salmonella schwarzengrund. This protein is part of the UPF0060 family, which is characterized by its role in bacterial membrane functions. The ynfA protein is specifically expressed in Escherichia coli for research purposes and is often tagged with a His-tag to facilitate purification and detection.
Species: Salmonella schwarzengrund (strain CVM19633)
Uniprot ID: B4TVH1
Tag Type: The tag type is determined during production, but commonly includes His-tags for purification.
Storage Buffer: Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, optimized for protein stability.
Storage Conditions: Store at -20°C for short-term storage and -80°C for long-term storage. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Amino Acid Sequence: The sequence is similar to other ynfA proteins, with slight variations depending on the strain.
| Characteristics | Description |
|---|---|
| Species | Salmonella schwarzengrund (strain CVM19633) |
| Uniprot ID | B4TVH1 |
| Tag Type | Determined during production (commonly His-tag) |
| Storage Buffer | Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol |
| Storage Conditions | -20°C/-80°C, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles |
| Amino Acid Sequence | Similar to other ynfA proteins, e.g., mLKTTLLFFVTALCEIIGCFLPWLWLKRGASMWWLLPAAASLALFVWLLTLHPAASGRVY AAYGGVYVCTALLWLRVVDGVRLTVYDWCGALIALCGmLIIVVGWGRT |
The Recombinant Salmonella schwarzengrund UPF0060 membrane protein ynfA (ynfA) is produced in Escherichia coli, a common host for recombinant protein expression due to its well-understood genetics and ease of manipulation. The protein is expressed as a full-length protein (1-108 amino acids) and is often fused with a His-tag at the N-terminal to facilitate purification using affinity chromatography.
KEGG: sew:SeSA_A1606
Salmonella schwarzengrund (strain CVM19633) UPF0060 membrane protein ynfA is a recombinant protein consisting of 108 amino acids (aa 1-108) . As a membrane protein, it possesses specific structural features that enable its integration into bacterial cell membranes. While detailed three-dimensional structural characterization studies specifically for ynfA remain limited in the literature, researchers typically approach membrane protein characterization through multiple complementary techniques:
X-ray crystallography after stabilization with detergents
Cryo-electron microscopy for visualization of native conformation
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to analyze secondary structure components
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy for dynamic structural information
The amino acid sequence of ynfA protein suggests it contains transmembrane domains typical of UPF0060 family proteins, which are conserved across multiple Salmonella strains and potentially play roles in membrane integrity or transport functions.
Multiple expression systems can be utilized for recombinant Salmonella ynfA protein production, with specific advantages depending on research objectives:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Typical Yield | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | Cost-effective, rapid growth, established protocols | May form inclusion bodies requiring refolding | 10-50 mg/L | Structural studies, antibody production |
| Yeast | Better folding of complex proteins, post-translational modifications | Longer production time, higher cost | 5-20 mg/L | Functional studies |
| Baculovirus | Superior for complex membrane proteins, native-like folding | Technical complexity, specialized equipment | 1-10 mg/L | Structural and functional characterization |
| Mammalian cells | Most authentic post-translational modifications | Most expensive, longest production time | 0.5-5 mg/L | Immunological studies |
The selection of an appropriate expression system depends on the specific research questions . For basic characterization studies, E. coli-based expression is often sufficient, while more complex functional analyses may benefit from eukaryotic expression systems that provide proper folding environments for membrane proteins. When designing expression constructs, inclusion of affinity tags (His6, GST, etc.) facilitates subsequent purification while codon optimization enhances expression efficiency in the chosen host system.
Purification of recombinant Salmonella membrane proteins like ynfA requires specialized protocols that maintain protein structure and function:
Membrane protein extraction: Use gentle detergents (n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside, CHAPS, or Triton X-100) to solubilize the protein from membranes without denaturation
Affinity chromatography: Utilize tag-based purification (His-tag, GST) with optimized binding and elution conditions
Size exclusion chromatography: Remove aggregates and separate oligomeric states
Ion exchange chromatography: Further refine purity based on charge properties
Quality assessment via SDS-PAGE typically reveals ynfA protein as a distinct band at approximately 12-15 kDa (for the 108 amino acid fragment) . Western blotting with anti-His antibodies (for His-tagged constructs) confirms identity, while mass spectrometry provides definitive molecular weight verification. The purified protein should be stored in buffer containing appropriate detergent concentrations to maintain solubility and prevent aggregation.
Verification of immunogenicity involves multiple assays:
Antibody production assessment: Immunize laboratory animals (mice, rabbits, or chickens) with purified ynfA protein and adjuvant, followed by serum collection and antibody titer determination via ELISA
Specificity testing: Confirm antibody specificity through Western blotting against both recombinant protein and native Salmonella lysates
Epitope mapping: Identify specific immunogenic regions using peptide arrays or deletion mutants
Cross-reactivity analysis: Test reactivity against related proteins from other Salmonella strains or species
ELISA-based methods can be optimized using ynfA protein at concentrations of approximately 156 ng per well, based on protocols developed for similar Salmonella outer membrane proteins . Antibody development typically follows a 28-42 day protocol with primary immunization and 1-2 booster doses to achieve high-titer antisera. The resulting antibodies can serve both as research reagents and as indicators of potential vaccine efficacy.
The incorporation of ynfA protein into attenuated Salmonella vaccine vectors requires careful genetic engineering approaches:
Vector selection: Choose an appropriate attenuated Salmonella strain (such as S. Choleraesuis rSC0016) with demonstrated safety and immunogenicity profiles
Plasmid construction: Design expression plasmids with optimized promoters (e.g., nirB, pagC) for in vivo induction and balanced expression
Transformation: Introduce the plasmid into the attenuated Salmonella strain using electroporation or chemical transformation
Stability testing: Verify plasmid stability through multiple passages without antibiotic selection
Expression verification: Confirm in vivo expression through Western blotting of bacterial lysates recovered from animal models
The regulated delayed attenuation and balanced lethal systems represent advanced approaches that enhance vector efficacy. For example, construction of vectors similar to those used for other Salmonella antigens can be applied, where the gene encoding ynfA is cloned into an Asd+ complemented plasmid (such as pYA3493) using appropriate restriction enzymes like EcoRI and SalI . The resulting construct can be verified by PCR amplification and restriction enzyme digestion before transformation into the attenuated Salmonella strain.
Recombinant Salmonella vector vaccines expressing membrane proteins like ynfA typically elicit multi-faceted immune responses:
| Immune Component | Response Type | Assessment Method | Typical Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mucosal immunity | sIgA production | ELISA of mucosal secretions | 2-5 fold increase over controls |
| Humoral immunity | Serum IgG (IgG1/IgG2a) | ELISA, immunoblotting | 5-10 fold increase over controls |
| Cell-mediated immunity | T-cell proliferation | Lymphocyte proliferation assay | SI values 1.5-3.0 above controls |
| Cytokine profile | Th1/Th2 balance | ELISPOT, qPCR | IFN-γ, IL-4 elevation; typically Th1-biased |
The oral administration of recombinant Salmonella vectors induces strong mucosal immunity by effectively delivering antigens to gut-associated lymphoid tissues, which is crucial for protection against pathogens that infect via mucosal surfaces . Measurements of specific cytokines (IFN-γ for Th1 responses, IL-4 for Th2 responses) typically reveal a mixed Th1/Th2 response with Th1 predominance, as evidenced by higher numbers of IFN-γ secreting cells compared to IL-4 secreting cells in ELISPOT assays . This balanced immune response is beneficial for comprehensive protection.
Assessment of protective efficacy requires comprehensive evaluation across multiple parameters:
Challenge model design:
Selection of appropriate challenge strain and dose
Determination of challenge route (oral, respiratory, etc.)
Establishment of challenge timeline (typically 2-4 weeks post-vaccination)
Protection parameters:
Survival rates and time-to-death analysis
Bacterial colonization levels in target tissues
Weight loss/gain monitoring
Clinical symptom scoring
Immunological correlates:
Antibody titers (mucosal and systemic)
Lymphocyte proliferation indices (SI values)
Cytokine profiles (IFN-γ/IL-4 ratios)
T-cell subpopulation analysis
Histopathological evaluation:
Tissue damage scoring
Inflammatory cell infiltration quantification
Immunohistochemistry for pathogen detection
Protective efficacy is typically measured through challenge studies where immunized animals show reduced clinical symptoms, improved weight maintenance, decreased pathogen loads, and minimized tissue damage compared to control groups . For example, in similar Salmonella vector studies, vaccinated mice demonstrated significantly reduced weight loss, diminished lung pathological damage, and decreased inflammatory cell infiltration following challenge with the target pathogen .
Optimization of antigen presentation involves multiple engineering strategies:
Subcellular localization targeting:
Periplasmic expression: Use appropriate signal sequences (e.g., OmpA, PhoA)
Surface display: Fusion with outer membrane proteins or autotransporter domains
Cytoplasmic expression: Direct expression without signal sequences
Secretion: Incorporation of type III secretion signals
Promoter selection and regulation:
In vivo-inducible promoters (e.g., nirB, pagC, ssaG)
Delayed antigen expression systems using arabinose-regulated promoters
Balanced expression to avoid metabolic burden
Codon optimization:
Adjust codon usage to match the Salmonella host
Remove rare codons that might limit translation efficiency
Optimize mRNA secondary structure to enhance translation initiation
Fusion strategies:
Adjuvant fusion: Link ynfA to immunostimulatory molecules (flagellin, IL-2)
Carrier fusion: Couple with highly immunogenic carrier proteins
Multimer construction: Create concatemers of multiple epitopes
The regulated delayed antigen expression systems represent particularly advanced approaches that balance bacterial fitness with robust antigen production. Expression levels can be verified using quantitative Western blotting, with optimal expression typically showing antigen bands representing 1-5% of total cellular protein. These optimization strategies significantly impact vaccine efficacy, with appropriately engineered constructs demonstrating superior immune responses compared to basic expression systems .
Evaluation of cross-protection requires systematic analysis:
Sequence analysis and epitope prediction:
Alignment of ynfA sequences across Salmonella strains
Identification of conserved and variable regions
B-cell and T-cell epitope prediction using algorithms (IEDB, BepiPred)
Construction of consensus sequences covering multiple strains
In vitro cross-reactivity assessment:
ELISA and Western blot with ynfA proteins from multiple strains
Epitope mapping using peptide arrays
Competitive binding assays with sera from immunized animals
Heterologous challenge studies:
Sequential challenge with different Salmonella serotypes
Measurement of protection parameters across strains
Correlation of protection with immune response breadth
Passive transfer experiments:
Transfer of immune sera between animal models
Assessment of protection conferred against heterologous strains
Identification of protective antibody subclasses and epitopes
The potential for cross-protection depends largely on the conservation of immunodominant epitopes across Salmonella strains. Sequence analysis typically reveals higher conservation in functional domains, which can be targeted specifically for broader protection. Challenge studies with heterologous strains provide the most definitive evidence of cross-protection, with successful vaccines demonstrating at least 50-70% protection against related strains compared to the homologous strain.
Optimized ELISA protocols for ynfA-specific antibody detection require careful parameter adjustment:
Antigen coating optimization:
Blocking and washing conditions:
Blocking buffer: 3-5% BSA or 5% skim milk in PBS
Blocking duration: 1-2 hours at room temperature
Wash buffer: PBS-T (0.05% Tween-20)
Wash cycles: 3-5 washes between steps
Sample processing:
Serum dilutions: Two-fold serial dilutions starting at 1:100
Incubation conditions: 1-2 hours at 37°C or room temperature
Secondary antibody selection: Species-appropriate conjugates (typically HRP or AP)
Signal development and analysis:
Substrate selection: TMB, ABTS, or pNPP depending on conjugate
Development time: 10-30 minutes (monitored for optimal signal-to-noise ratio)
Cutoff determination: Mean of negative controls plus 3 standard deviations
For field applications, standardized ELISA conditions can achieve sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90% when properly optimized . Comparison of different antigen preparations (whole cell, Omp extract, and recombinant protein) shows that recombinant proteins provide superior specificity while maintaining comparable sensitivity to crude preparations .
Differential analysis of immune responses requires selective approaches:
Competitive inhibition assays:
Pre-incubation of sera with purified ynfA or other Salmonella proteins
Measurement of differential inhibition patterns
Calculation of percent inhibition to quantify specificity
Epitope-specific assays:
Synthesis of unique ynfA peptide fragments
ELISA or ELISPOT using peptide-specific antigens
B-cell and T-cell epitope mapping
Absorption studies:
Sequential absorption of sera with various Salmonella antigen preparations
Analysis of reactivity before and after absorption
Identification of ynfA-specific antibody populations
Recombinant antigen panels:
Parallel testing with multiple defined Salmonella antigens
Development of antibody profile signatures
Statistical analysis to identify ynfA-specific responses
Cross-reactivity analysis with antisera against other bacteria (E. coli, Klebsiella, etc.) confirms specificity of the assay, with properly designed tests showing no significant reactivity with heterologous antisera . The differential diagnosis can be further refined by calculating the ratio of reactivity to ynfA versus other Salmonella antigens, with ynfA-specific responses typically showing >3:1 ratios compared to non-specific antigens.
Design of effective vaccine vectors involves multiple engineering considerations:
Attenuation strategy selection:
Metabolic drift mutations (aroA, aroC, purA)
Virulence gene deletion (phoP, phoQ, sopB)
Regulated delayed attenuation systems
Combination approaches for balanced attenuation
Plasmid stability engineering:
Balanced-lethal systems (e.g., Asd+ plasmids in Δasd strains)
Antibiotic resistance-free selection systems
Origin of replication optimization
Partition systems to prevent plasmid loss
Expression control optimization:
In vivo-inducible promoters
Codon optimization for Salmonella host
Translation efficiency enhancement
Secretion signal selection
Safety enhancement features:
Programmed cell lysis systems
Biocontainment mechanisms
Reduced inflammatory potential (e.g., modified LPS)
Tissue tropism modification
Recent advances incorporate sophisticated regulated delayed attenuation and regulated delayed antigen synthesis systems that balance safety with immunogenicity . For example, the recombinant S. Choleraesuis attenuated vector rSC0016 incorporates a regulated delayed attenuation system and a delayed antigen expression system while also having the sopB gene knocked out to reduce intestinal inflammatory responses . These engineered vector systems have demonstrated superior immunogenicity compared to traditional attenuation approaches.
Monitoring in vivo expression requires specialized techniques:
Reporter gene fusions:
Transcriptional fusions with luciferase, GFP, or β-galactosidase
Measurement of reporter activity in recovered bacteria
Real-time imaging for luciferase reporters in animal models
Tissue sampling and bacterial recovery:
Collection of tissues at different timepoints post-immunization
Selective plating to recover vaccine strains
Preservation of samples for protein and RNA analysis
Direct antigen detection:
Immunohistochemistry of tissue sections
Flow cytometry of recovered bacteria
Western blotting of tissue lysates
Mass spectrometry-based proteomics
Transcriptional analysis:
RT-PCR of bacterial RNA from recovered tissues
RNA-seq for comprehensive expression profiling
Single-cell transcriptomics for heterogeneity assessment
For quantitative assessment, recovery of bacteria from tissues followed by Western blotting with densitometric analysis provides reliable data on in vivo expression levels. Typically, successful vectors show detectable antigen expression for at least 7-10 days post-immunization, with peak expression occurring 3-5 days after administration . This expression kinetics ensures sufficient antigen presentation to the immune system while allowing for eventual clearance of the vaccine vector.
Comparative analysis reveals important distinctions:
| Protein | Size (kDa) | Immunogenicity | Conservation Across Strains | Protective Efficacy | Technical Challenges |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ynfA | 12-15 | Moderate | High | Under investigation | Expression as membrane protein |
| OmpC | 38-43 | High | Moderate to high | Demonstrated | Well-established protocols |
| OmpF | 35-40 | High | Moderate | Variable | Porin functionality may affect expression |
| OmpA | 35-37 | High | High | Demonstrated | Stable expression in multiple systems |
| P42 | 42 | High | Moderate | Demonstrated | High solubility, easier handling |
| P97 | 97 | High | Variable | Strain-specific | Size may affect expression efficiency |
Several promising research avenues emerge:
Multi-epitope vaccine development:
Identification of immunodominant epitopes within ynfA
Combination with epitopes from other conserved antigens
Design of chimeric proteins with enhanced immunogenicity
Development of particle-based delivery systems
Advanced delivery platforms:
mRNA-based delivery of ynfA antigen
Virus-like particles displaying ynfA epitopes
Nanoparticle formulations for enhanced stability
Plant-based expression systems for oral delivery
Diagnostic applications:
Multiplex assay development incorporating ynfA with other markers
Point-of-care rapid tests using recombinant ynfA
Machine learning algorithms for pattern recognition in antibody profiles
Development of ynfA-based biosensors
Structural biology approaches:
Detailed structural characterization of ynfA
Structure-based epitope design
Protein engineering for enhanced stability
Rational antigen design based on structural insights
The integration of computational approaches with experimental validation represents a particularly promising direction. For example, epitope prediction algorithms combined with experimental verification can identify highly conserved, immunogenic regions of ynfA that could serve as the basis for next-generation subunit vaccines or diagnostic targets.