KEGG: stm:STM4173
STRING: 99287.STM4173
ZraS functions as a sensor histidine kinase in Salmonella typhimurium, forming part of the ZraSR two-component signal transduction system. This system plays a critical role in detecting and responding to envelope stress, particularly in zinc-dependent stress responses. ZraS serves as the sensory component that detects environmental stimuli, while ZraR acts as the response regulator that modulates gene expression .
Methodologically, researchers investigate ZraS by generating knockout mutants (ΔzraS) and comparing their phenotypes to wild-type strains under various stress conditions. Complementation studies using plasmid-expressed ZraS can verify phenotypic changes are specifically due to the absence of the sensor protein.
The interaction between ZraS and ZraR follows the classical two-component system paradigm. Upon detecting appropriate stimuli (primarily zinc and envelope stress), ZraS undergoes autophosphorylation at a conserved histidine residue. The phosphoryl group is subsequently transferred to an aspartate residue in the receiver domain of ZraR, activating it as a transcription factor .
For experimental investigation of this interaction, researchers typically employ:
Phosphotransfer assays using purified recombinant proteins
Bacterial two-hybrid systems to verify protein-protein interactions
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved phosphorylation sites
The ZraSR system operates in a regulatory network with ZraP, where:
ZraS activates ZraR in response to zinc and envelope stress
Activated ZraR controls expression from divergent σ54-dependent promoters for both zraSR and zraP
ZraP functions as a zinc-binding periplasmic protein with chaperone activity
ZraP negatively regulates ZraR, creating a feedback inhibition mechanism
This regulatory relationship can be visualized in Table 1:
| Component | Primary Function | Regulates | Regulated By | Signal Response |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZraS | Sensor kinase | ZraR (positive) | Unknown | Zinc, envelope stress |
| ZraR | Response regulator | zraSR and zraP expression | ZraS (positive), ZraP (negative) | Phosphorylation by ZraS |
| ZraP | Periplasmic chaperone | ZraR (negative) | ZraR (positive) | Zinc binding |
Expression patterns of these three components show correlation with the feedback inhibition mechanism across different growth phases in Salmonella .
Measuring ZraS activation requires indirect approaches since the protein's phosphorylation state is transient. Recommended methodological approaches include:
Reporter Gene Assays: Construct transcriptional fusions between ZraR-regulated promoters (e.g., zraP promoter) and reporter genes (lacZ, gfp)
Phosphorylation Assays: Use radiolabeled ATP (γ-32P-ATP) to track phosphotransfer from ZraS to ZraR in vitro
Quantitative RT-PCR: Monitor expression levels of ZraR-regulated genes under varying zinc concentrations
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation: Determine in vivo binding of activated ZraR to target promoters
| Condition | Zinc Concentration | Envelope Stress | Expected ZraS Activity | Readout Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basal | <1 μM | None | Low | qRT-PCR of zraP |
| Zinc induction | 0.5-1 mM | None | High | Reporter assay |
| Envelope stress | <1 μM | Antimicrobial peptides | Moderate | Phosphotransfer |
| Combined | 0.5-1 mM | Antimicrobial peptides | Very high | Transcriptomics |
To investigate ZraS function in vivo, researchers should employ these methodological strategies:
Precise Gene Deletion: Use λ-Red recombineering to create clean deletions of zraS without polar effects on zraR
Complementation Analysis: Express wild-type zraS in trans from its native promoter on a low-copy plasmid
Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Target conserved functional residues (e.g., phosphorylation site, metal-binding residues)
Domain Swapping: Create chimeric proteins to identify domain-specific functions
Conditional Expression: Use inducible promoters to control ZraS levels during different infection stages
For in vivo infection models, compare survival and colonization of wild-type and ΔzraS mutants in mouse models of salmonellosis, examining both systemic infection and intestinal colonization patterns.
The ZraSR system contributes to Salmonella virulence through multiple mechanisms:
Stress Response Regulation: ZraR mediates positive regulation of virulence factors MntH (manganese transporter) and heat shock chaperones (GroEL, GroSL, DnaK, ClpB)
Survival in Macrophages: The ZraR regulon includes functional groups required for survival within the Salmonella-containing vacuole
Anaerobic Adaptation: ZraR regulates genes contributing to anaerobic metabolism, important for intestinal colonization
Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance: ZraP responds to misfolding of periplasmic and outer membrane proteins due to antimicrobial cationic peptides
Research methodologies to investigate these functions include macrophage survival assays, competitive index studies in animal models, and transcriptomic analysis of ΔzraS mutants during infection.
While direct information on ZraS regulation throughout infection stages is limited in the search results, we can make methodological recommendations:
Infection Stage Analysis: Use reporter strains with fluorescent or luminescent proteins under the control of the zraS promoter
Tissue-Specific Expression: Perform laser capture microdissection of infected tissues followed by RT-PCR
Single-Cell Approaches: Employ flow cytometry sorting of bacteria recovered from different host tissues
In vivo Expression Technology (IVET): Identify conditions where zraS is specifically induced during infection
Researchers should compare expression patterns between intestinal lumen, epithelial invasion, and systemic infection in macrophages.
The ZraSR system likely functions alongside other envelope stress responses, though the search results don't detail these interactions. Research approaches should include:
Multiple Deletion Analysis: Generate strains lacking combinations of stress response systems (e.g., ΔzraSR, ΔcpxAR, ΔbaeRS)
Temporal Expression Studies: Monitor activation timing of different systems upon stress induction
Regulon Overlap Analysis: Compare transcriptomes of various stress response mutants
Epistasis Testing: Determine whether one system can compensate for another's absence
| System | Primary Stimulus | Overlap with ZraSR | Investigation Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| CpxAR | Protein misfolding | Possible cross-regulation with ZraP | Comparative transcriptomics |
| BaeSR | Metal stress, efflux | May share zinc-responsive mechanisms | Metal chelation assays |
| PhoPQ | Antimicrobial peptides | Both respond to membrane disruption | Membrane integrity analysis |
| RpoE (σE) | Outer membrane stress | May have overlapping chaperone regulation | Chaperone expression studies |
While the specific zinc-sensing domains of ZraS are not detailed in the search results, methodological approaches to identify these include:
Structural Prediction: Use computational modeling and homology comparison with related sensors
Mutagenesis Screening: Systematically mutate potential metal-coordinating residues (His, Cys, Asp, Glu)
Domain Truncation: Create progressive truncations to identify minimal sensing regions
Metal Binding Assays: Measure direct zinc binding using isothermal titration calorimetry or fluorescence spectroscopy
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: Determine coordination geometry of bound zinc
Researchers should focus on the periplasmic domain where sensing likely occurs, and consider whether ZraS detects zinc directly or senses zinc-induced envelope damage.
The ZraSR system is critically required for maximal carbon-starvation induced cross-resistance to heat and polymyxin B . To investigate this phenomenon, researchers should employ:
Carbon Starvation Models: Culture bacteria in minimal media with limiting carbon sources
Stress Challenge Assays: Subject carbon-starved wild-type and ΔzraS bacteria to thermal or antimicrobial challenges
Transcriptomic Profiling: Compare gene expression patterns during carbon starvation between strains
Metabolomic Analysis: Identify metabolic shifts that might trigger ZraS activation
| Strain | Heat Resistance (55°C) | Polymyxin B Resistance | Recommended Assay |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wild-type | High after C-starvation | High after C-starvation | Survival curves |
| ΔzraS | Reduced | Reduced | MIC determination |
| ΔzraR | Reduced | Reduced | CFU counting |
| ΔzraP | Intermediate | Intermediate | Flow cytometry viability |
To understand how ZraP negatively regulates ZraR activity , researchers should consider these methodological approaches:
Protein-Protein Interaction Studies: Use bacterial two-hybrid, pull-down assays, or surface plasmon resonance
Phosphorylation Kinetics: Measure how ZraP affects the rate of ZraR phosphorylation/dephosphorylation
Zinc Sequestration Analysis: Determine if ZraP modulates local zinc concentrations that affect ZraS activity
Structural Studies: Investigate conformational changes in ZraR upon ZraP binding
In vitro Transcription Assays: Assess ZraR-dependent transcription with purified components with/without ZraP
Researchers should monitor feedback inhibition across growth phases, as mentioned in the search results .
The ZraSR system represents a potential target for novel antimicrobials through these research approaches:
High-Throughput Screening: Screen for small molecules that inhibit ZraS autophosphorylation
Structure-Based Drug Design: Target the ATP-binding domain of ZraS or the receiver domain of ZraR
Peptide Inhibitors: Design peptides that mimic interaction interfaces between ZraS and ZraR
Zinc Homeostasis Disruption: Develop compounds that specifically disrupt zinc sensing by ZraS
Potentiation Strategy: Identify molecules that block ZraSR-mediated envelope stress responses, enhancing efficacy of existing antimicrobials
Efficacy testing should examine both direct antibacterial effects and ability to reduce virulence or enhance host immune clearance.
While direct evidence linking ZraSR to RNA repair is not present in the search results, researchers might investigate potential connections using:
RNA Damage Induction: Treat bacteria with agents causing RNA damage (e.g., oxidative stress)
Comparative Transcriptomics: Compare expression of RNA repair genes (rtcBA, rsr-yrlBA) in wild-type versus ΔzraS strains
Double Mutant Analysis: Construct strains lacking both zraS and rtcR (RNA repair regulator)
RNA Quality Assessment: Measure RNA integrity under stress conditions in relevant mutants
This research direction could reveal novel connections between envelope stress sensing and RNA quality control mechanisms.
Future methodological developments to advance ZraS research should include:
Real-Time Sensing Systems: Develop FRET-based reporters to monitor ZraS-ZraR interactions in live cells
Single-Molecule Techniques: Apply super-resolution microscopy to track ZraS localization during signaling
Cryo-EM Studies: Determine full-length ZraS structure in different activation states
Systems Biology Approaches: Integrate transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data to model ZraSR signaling networks
In vivo Sensors: Create zinc-responsive biosensors to correlate local zinc concentrations with ZraS activation
These methodological advances would provide unprecedented insight into the molecular mechanisms of ZraSR signaling and its integration with broader bacterial stress responses.