Recombinant Scheffersomyces stipitis Assembly factor CBP4 (CBP4)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order remarks to ensure fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on purchasing method and location. Please contact your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to collect the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50%, which may serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its incorporation.
Synonyms
CBP4; PICST_55406; Assembly factor CBP4; Cytochrome b mRNA-processing protein 4
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-147
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Scheffersomyces stipitis (strain ATCC 58785 / CBS 6054 / NBRC 10063 / NRRL Y-11545) (Yeast) (Pichia stipitis)
Target Names
CBP4
Target Protein Sequence
MSAKPLWYRWARVYFAGSCIIGTGVLCFIYTTPTDEQLIASFSPEIREDYEKNKAYRQRE QQELMEIVKKTSQSDEPVWKTGPIGSPLEKEQRNLNQQLIDYNQFEKKRAEEYQREQIDK AQEELLEVEKLAAQAKKGYWWNPFSSK
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
Essential for the assembly of ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase. It directly influences the correct incorporation of the Rieske protein, core 4, core 5, and apocytochrome b.
Database Links
Protein Families
CBP4 family
Subcellular Location
Mitochondrion inner membrane; Single-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is Scheffersomyces stipitis Assembly factor CBP4?

Scheffersomyces stipitis Assembly factor CBP4 (CBP4) is a protein encoded by the CBP4 gene (ORF name: PICST_55406) in the non-conventional yeast Scheffersomyces stipitis (formerly known as Pichia stipitis). It functions as a cytochrome b mRNA-processing protein and is officially designated with UniProt accession number A3LQD9 . The full-length protein consists of 147 amino acids with the sequence: MSAKPLWYRWARVYFAGSCIIGTGVLCFIYTTPTDEQLIASFSPEIREDYEKNKAYRQREQQELMEIVKKTSQSDEPVWKTGPIGSPLEKEQRNLNQQLIDYNQFEKKRAEEYQREQIDKAQEELLEVEKLAAQAKKGYWWNPFSSK . This protein is part of the mitochondrial assembly machinery involved in cytochrome processing, making it an important component for cellular respiration in S. stipitis.

What are the structural characteristics of S. stipitis CBP4?

S. stipitis CBP4 exhibits several important structural features that contribute to its function. Analysis of its amino acid sequence reveals the presence of a hydrophobic N-terminal region (MSAKPLWYRWARVYFAGSCIIGTGVLCFIYT), which likely serves as a mitochondrial targeting sequence or membrane anchor . The protein contains multiple charged residues in its middle section, including glutamic acid (E) and lysine (K) residues, which may facilitate protein-protein or protein-RNA interactions essential for its role in cytochrome b mRNA processing. The C-terminal region includes the distinctive sequence GYWWNPFSSK, which may be involved in specific functional interactions . These structural features align with its role as an assembly factor, where precise positioning and interaction capabilities are essential for facilitating the proper assembly of respiratory chain components.

What are the optimal storage conditions for recombinant S. stipitis CBP4?

For optimal preservation of recombinant S. stipitis CBP4 activity and structural integrity, the protein should be stored at -20°C, with extended storage recommended at either -20°C or -80°C . The commercially available recombinant protein is typically supplied in a Tris-based buffer containing 50% glycerol, which has been optimized to maintain protein stability . Researchers should note that repeated freezing and thawing cycles significantly compromise protein quality and function; therefore, it is strongly recommended to prepare small working aliquots that can be stored at 4°C for up to one week of active use . This storage protocol helps maintain the structural integrity and functional capacity of the protein for experimental applications.

How does S. stipitis differ from other yeast species in terms of metabolic capabilities?

Scheffersomyces stipitis possesses several distinctive metabolic features that differentiate it from conventional yeasts like Saccharomyces cerevisiae. S. stipitis is a Crabtree-negative yeast that inhabits the gut of wood-decaying beetles, giving it specialized adaptations for utilizing diverse carbon sources . Unlike S. cerevisiae, S. stipitis can naturally metabolize a remarkably broad range of biomass-derived sugars, including glucose, xylose, fructose, N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc), mannose, galactose, cellobiose, maltose, and sucrose . This metabolic versatility stems from its extensive genomic encoding of specialized enzymes and transporters necessary for dissimilating various saccharides . Furthermore, S. stipitis exhibits different patterns of carbon catabolite repression compared to S. cerevisiae, with notable effects observed when multiple sugar types co-exist in the growth medium . These unique metabolic capabilities make S. stipitis an attractive platform for bioengineering applications, particularly in producing compounds derived from the shikimate pathway.

What expression systems are suitable for producing recombinant S. stipitis CBP4?

For laboratory-scale production of recombinant S. stipitis CBP4, researchers typically employ either E. coli or yeast expression systems, each with specific advantages depending on research objectives. When using E. coli systems, codon optimization for the CBP4 gene is recommended to enhance expression efficiency, with BL21(DE3) or Rosetta strains being preferred hosts due to their enhanced ability to express eukaryotic proteins . Vector selection should incorporate appropriate affinity tags (commonly His6 or GST) to facilitate subsequent purification. Alternatively, yeast expression systems (particularly Pichia pastoris or S. cerevisiae) may provide better post-translational modifications and protein folding. Culture conditions require careful optimization, with induction parameters (temperature, inducer concentration, and duration) critical for maximizing yield while maintaining protein functionality. Purification typically involves affinity chromatography followed by size exclusion steps to achieve high purity suitable for experimental applications.

What experimental approaches are most effective for studying CBP4 function in mitochondrial respiration?

Investigating CBP4 function in mitochondrial respiration requires a multi-faceted experimental approach combining genetic, biochemical, and analytical techniques. Gene knockout/knockdown studies using CRISPR-Cas9 system (as demonstrated in S. stipitis genomic studies) provide a foundation for understanding CBP4's essentiality and phenotypic effects on cellular respiration . Respiratory chain complex activity assays using spectrophotometric methods to measure cytochrome c oxidase and NADH dehydrogenase activities help quantify the impact of CBP4 manipulation on respiratory efficiency. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) analysis with specialized microplate respirometry systems allows real-time monitoring of mitochondrial function in CBP4-modified strains versus wild-type controls. For deeper molecular insights, RNA immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (RIP-seq) can identify specific cytochrome b mRNA interactions with CBP4, while blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) visualizes respiratory complex assembly. Complementation studies using site-directed mutagenesis of key CBP4 residues further elucidate structure-function relationships. This comprehensive approach provides mechanistic insights into CBP4's role in mitochondrial respiratory chain assembly and function.

How can researchers optimize CBP4 purification to maintain structural integrity?

Purifying CBP4 while preserving its structural integrity presents several challenges that require strategic optimization of the isolation protocol. Given CBP4's hydrophobic N-terminal region and potential membrane association, researchers should begin with a specialized lysis buffer containing mild detergents (0.5-1% n-dodecyl β-D-maltoside or CHAPS) to efficiently solubilize the protein without denaturing it . The purification workflow should employ affinity chromatography (typically using His-tag or GST-tag systems) under native conditions with reduced flow rates to minimize mechanical stress. Critical buffer components include 10-20% glycerol to stabilize hydrophobic regions, 1-5 mM reducing agents (DTT or β-mercaptoethanol) to maintain disulfide bonds, and protease inhibitor cocktails to prevent degradation . Size exclusion chromatography as a polishing step helps remove aggregates. Throughout purification, temperature control (4°C) and minimizing exposure to air/oxidation are essential. Functional validation of the purified protein using circular dichroism spectroscopy to assess secondary structure integrity and activity assays specific to cytochrome processing capability confirm successful preservation of CBP4's structural properties.

How does the amino acid sequence of S. stipitis CBP4 influence its interaction with cytochrome b mRNA?

The specialized amino acid composition of S. stipitis CBP4 contains multiple functional domains that facilitate specific interactions with cytochrome b mRNA. The N-terminal region (residues 1-30) contains a high proportion of aromatic and hydrophobic residues (MSAKPLWYRWARVYFAGSCIIGTGVLCFIYT), which likely forms an alpha-helical structure that anchors the protein to the mitochondrial membrane, positioning it optimally for mRNA interactions . The central domain (residues 31-110) is enriched with positively charged amino acids (lysine and arginine) that create an electropositive surface suitable for binding the negatively charged phosphate backbone of mRNA . Particularly, the sequence motif EIREDYEKNKAYRQRE (residues 42-57) contains a pattern of basic residues interspersed with aromatic amino acids typical of RNA-binding domains . The C-terminal region features the sequence GYWWNPFSSK with aromatic residues that may provide π-stacking interactions with RNA bases, enhancing binding specificity . These structural features collectively enable CBP4 to recognize specific sequences or secondary structures within cytochrome b mRNA, facilitating precise processing events necessary for respiratory chain assembly.

What are the implications of CBP4 activity for metabolic engineering of S. stipitis?

CBP4's role in cytochrome assembly has significant implications for metabolic engineering strategies targeting S. stipitis as a production platform. As a respiratory chain assembly factor, CBP4 directly influences mitochondrial function and consequently impacts the cell's energy metabolism balance between respiration and fermentation . For bioproduction applications, modulating CBP4 expression can strategically shift metabolic flux: upregulation may enhance respiratory capacity, increasing ATP yield through oxidative phosphorylation, which is particularly advantageous for growth on non-fermentable carbon sources or for products requiring high energy input . Conversely, controlled downregulation could redirect carbon flux from respiration toward target metabolite production pathways, as demonstrated in engineered S. stipitis strains producing resveratrol from various sugar sources . Integration with existing metabolic engineering approaches, such as the feedback-insensitive alleles of chorismate mutase (SsARO7G139S) used in resveratrol production strains, offers synergistic benefits when combined with optimized CBP4 expression . Furthermore, CBP4 manipulation could enhance S. stipitis' unusual ability to metabolize diverse carbon sources simultaneously, potentially overcoming carbon catabolite repression observed when multiple sugars co-exist in industrial feedstocks like molasses .

How do the metabolic profiles of S. stipitis change when utilizing different carbon sources, and what implications does this have for CBP4 research?

Metabolomic analyses reveal that S. stipitis exhibits significantly different metabolic profiles depending on the carbon source utilized, which has important implications for studies involving mitochondrial assembly factors like CBP4. When grown on different sugars, S. stipitis shows distinct patterns in glycolytic intermediates, energy metabolism cofactors, and shikimate pathway metabolites . For instance, cells grown on sucrose demonstrate significantly higher ATP accumulation in early fermentation phases compared to those grown on glucose/fructose mixtures, while AMP accumulation follows the opposite pattern . These energy metabolism differences directly impact mitochondrial function, where CBP4 plays a crucial role. Disaccharides like sucrose and cellobiose lead to increased intracellular accumulation of aromatic amino acid precursors compared to monosaccharides . The shifts in cellular redox status and energy charge (ATP/ADP/AMP ratios) between different carbon sources would affect mitochondrial respiratory chain assembly and function, where CBP4 is actively involved . Researchers studying CBP4 must carefully consider these carbon source-dependent metabolic variations when designing experiments and interpreting results, as they may significantly influence CBP4 expression, localization, and activity in context-specific ways.

What analytical methods are most appropriate for characterizing CBP4 interactions?

Characterizing CBP4 protein interactions requires a strategic combination of complementary analytical techniques to elucidate both binding partners and functional consequences. Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) provides quantitative binding kinetics data for CBP4 interactions with cytochrome b mRNA or other proteins, yielding association (ka) and dissociation (kd) constants that define interaction strength . Microscale Thermophoresis (MST) offers an alternative approach requiring minimal sample quantity while providing affinity constants across various buffer conditions. For structural details of these interactions, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) maps the specific regions of CBP4 involved in binding by identifying protected areas during complex formation. Crosslinking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) using reagents like BS3 or EDC captures transient interaction sites by covalently linking proteins in proximity. Fluorescence-based techniques such as Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) measure real-time interaction dynamics in vitro or in vivo when CBP4 and potential partners are tagged with appropriate fluorophore pairs. For functional validation, in vitro reconstitution assays combining purified CBP4 with cytochrome b mRNA and other assembly factors enable monitoring of specific processing events through gel electrophoresis and RNA protection assays.

How can researchers differentiate between the direct and indirect effects of CBP4 in complex cellular systems?

Distinguishing direct from indirect effects of CBP4 in complex cellular systems presents a significant challenge that requires carefully designed experimental approaches. Time-resolved analyses using inducible expression systems (such as tetracycline-regulated promoters) allow researchers to monitor the immediate consequences of CBP4 expression versus delayed secondary effects that emerge over longer timeframes . Complementary in vitro reconstitution experiments with purified components provide evidence for direct biochemical activities, which can then be validated in cellular contexts. Proximity-based labeling techniques, including BioID or APEX2 fused to CBP4, identify proteins in close physical association, distinguishing direct interaction partners from downstream effectors . Comparative multi-omics approaches combining transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data from CBP4 mutant strains help construct causality networks that separate primary from secondary effects. Conditional CBP4 depletion systems using auxin-inducible degron tags enable rapid protein removal to capture immediate consequences before compensatory mechanisms engage. Additionally, domain-specific mutations in CBP4 that selectively disrupt particular functions while preserving others help delineate specific activity pathways. These complementary approaches collectively build a comprehensive understanding of CBP4's direct functions versus its broader cellular impacts.

How might CBP4 be leveraged for enhancing bioproduction capabilities in S. stipitis?

CBP4's function in mitochondrial assembly positions it as a potential metabolic engineering target for enhancing S. stipitis' capabilities as a bioproduction platform. Strategic manipulation of CBP4 expression levels could optimize the balance between respiratory and fermentative metabolism, potentially increasing yield of target metabolites . For products derived from aromatic amino acid pathways (like resveratrol), coordinated engineering approaches combining CBP4 modulation with existing strategies (such as feedback-resistant ARO7G139S alleles) may synergistically enhance precursor availability . Development of inducible or carbon source-responsive CBP4 expression systems could enable dynamic regulation of mitochondrial function in response to changing fermentation conditions, addressing the challenge of carbon catabolite repression observed in mixed-sugar substrates like molasses . Creation of CBP4 variants with enhanced stability or activity through protein engineering might improve cellular energy efficiency when utilizing challenging substrates. Integration of CBP4 manipulation into multi-target metabolic engineering strategies that simultaneously optimize sugar transport, central carbon metabolism, and product synthesis pathways represents a promising comprehensive approach. Future research should particularly explore how CBP4 modification affects S. stipitis' unusual capacity to utilize diverse carbon sources, potentially expanding the range of economical feedstocks suitable for bioproduction.

What comparative genomics approaches would advance our understanding of CBP4 evolution across yeast species?

Advancing our understanding of CBP4 evolution across yeast species requires sophisticated comparative genomics approaches that integrate sequence, structural, and functional analyses. Phylogenetic analysis of CBP4 homologs from diverse yeast lineages (including conventional and non-conventional yeasts) would reveal evolutionary patterns and selection pressures on this assembly factor . Synteny mapping across species can identify conserved genomic contexts and potentially co-evolving gene clusters related to mitochondrial function. Molecular clock analyses calibrated with fossil record data would establish the timeline of CBP4 functional diversification relative to major evolutionary transitions in yeast metabolism (e.g., whole genome duplication events, transitions between aerobic/fermentative lifestyles). Positive selection analysis using tools like PAML to calculate dN/dS ratios would identify specific amino acid residues under evolutionary pressure, potentially highlighting functionally critical regions . Ancestral sequence reconstruction combined with heterologous expression of reconstructed ancestral CBP4 variants could experimentally test hypotheses about functional evolution. Correlation of CBP4 sequence features with species-specific metabolic capabilities (particularly regarding sugar utilization ranges) might reveal co-evolutionary patterns between respiratory chain assembly and carbon metabolism . This multi-faceted approach would provide insights into how CBP4 function has diversified across yeast phylogeny in relation to ecological niches and metabolic strategies.

How can systems biology approaches integrate CBP4 function into comprehensive metabolic models of S. stipitis?

Incorporating CBP4 function into comprehensive metabolic models of S. stipitis requires sophisticated systems biology approaches that capture both the direct role of this assembly factor and its broader metabolic implications. Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) should be expanded to include mitochondrial assembly processes, with CBP4-dependent reactions explicitly parameterized based on experimental data from various carbon sources . Integration of transcriptomic data from CBP4 perturbation experiments enables more accurate flux predictions through techniques like TIGER or E-Flux that constrain flux boundaries based on gene expression levels. Multi-scale modeling approaches connecting protein-level interactions (CBP4 with cytochrome b mRNA) to organelle-level functions (mitochondrial respiration) and finally to whole-cell metabolism would provide a more complete picture of CBP4's systemic effects. Sensitivity analysis identifying how changes in CBP4 activity parameters propagate through the metabolic network helps prioritize experimental validation targets. Agent-based modeling simulating individual mitochondria with stochastic CBP4 activity could capture cell-to-cell variability in respiratory function. Dynamic flux balance analysis (dFBA) incorporating time-dependent changes in CBP4 activity would better represent metabolic shifts during growth phase transitions. These integrative approaches would transform our understanding of how CBP4, despite being a specialized assembly factor, influences global metabolic capabilities of S. stipitis across diverse growth conditions and genetic backgrounds.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.