KEGG: spo:SPBC83.05
STRING: 4896.SPBC83.05.1
S. pombe Yme2 possesses two distinct functional domains that contribute to its role in mitochondrial processes. Recent structural analyses have revealed that Yme2 contains an RNA recognition motif (RRM) that faces the mitochondrial matrix and a AAA+ domain that is located in the intermembrane space . This topology suggests a dual function in RNA processing and protein interactions across mitochondrial compartments.
The full-length mature protein spans amino acids 30-773 and contains Walker motifs characteristic of ATP-binding proteins . The protein's architecture can be visualized as follows:
| Domain | Position | Orientation | Function |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNA Recognition Motif (RRM) | N-terminal region | Matrix-facing | RNA binding/processing |
| Transmembrane segment | Central region | Spans inner membrane | Membrane anchoring |
| AAA+ domain | C-terminal region | Intermembrane space | Protein complex assembly |
Yme2 forms a high molecular weight complex and genetically interacts with multiple components of the mitochondrial protein biogenesis machinery. Studies have demonstrated that YME2 genetically interacts with MDM38, MBA1, and OXA1, linking its function directly to mitochondrial protein biogenesis pathways . This interaction network positions Yme2 as a crucial component in coordinating mitochondrial gene expression with protein integration into the inner membrane.
The interaction pattern suggests that Yme2 may function as a bridge between mitochondrial translation and membrane protein insertion, potentially recognizing specific mitochondrial RNAs through its RRM domain while facilitating protein integration via its AAA+ domain.
While multiple expression systems have been evaluated, E. coli has emerged as the preferred host for recombinant S. pombe Yme2 production. Current protocols utilize N-terminal His-tagged constructs expressing the mature protein (amino acids 30-773) . This approach allows for efficient purification while maintaining protein functionality.
When designing expression constructs, researchers should consider:
Codon optimization for E. coli expression
Inclusion of appropriate protease cleavage sites for tag removal
Selection of a vector system with tunable expression levels
Growth at lower temperatures (16-18°C) to enhance proper folding
Purification of recombinant Yme2 requires careful consideration of its structural properties. The following protocol has demonstrated success in obtaining high-purity protein:
Initial capture using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography with a Tris/PBS-based buffer (pH 8.0)
Purification to >90% homogeneity as determined by SDS-PAGE
Storage in Tris/PBS buffer with 6% trehalose to maintain stability
Lyophilization for long-term storage
To prevent protein aggregation during purification:
Maintain reduced temperature throughout the process
Include low concentrations of non-ionic detergents when handling full-length protein
Consider adding ATP or ATP analogs to stabilize the AAA+ domain
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles which significantly reduce activity
To investigate Yme2's RNA-binding capacity and potential role in mitochondrial RNA processing, researchers should consider the following approaches:
RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP): Using tagged Yme2 to identify associated RNAs in vivo
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assays (EMSA): To characterize direct RNA-protein interactions in vitro
Northern blot analysis: To detect changes in mitochondrial RNA processing patterns in Yme2 mutants, similar to methods used to study S. pombe mitochondrial transcription
Comparative analysis with known mitochondrial RNA processing pathways: S. pombe mitochondrial genome is transcribed in two major units, each producing a large precursor RNA that requires processing
When designing experiments, it's crucial to consider that S. pombe mitochondrial gene expression differs from that of S. cerevisiae, with distinct transcription and RNA processing mechanisms .
To characterize Yme2's protein interactome, multiple complementary approaches should be employed:
Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS): Similar to approaches used for S. pombe transcription factors
Yeast two-hybrid screening: To identify direct protein interactions
Co-immunoprecipitation of candidate partners: Based on genetic interaction data (MDM38, MBA1, OXA1)
Blue native PAGE: To analyze the composition of Yme2's high molecular weight complex
When interpreting interaction data, researchers should be aware that transient or weak interactions might be missed using standard approaches. Consider employing crosslinking strategies to capture more dynamic interactions.
Creating targeted Yme2 mutations in S. pombe requires careful experimental design. The following methodologies have proven successful:
PCR-based gene targeting: Similar to methods used for creating comprehensive strain libraries in S. pombe
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing: For precise modifications without introducing selection markers
Domain-specific mutations: Particularly targeting the RRM and Walker motifs in the AAA+ domain
When designing mutations, consider:
The conservation of specific residues across species
The potential impact on protein folding versus function
The need for proper controls to verify expression levels
Phenotypic analysis of Yme2 mutants should encompass multiple aspects of mitochondrial function:
Respiratory growth: Compare growth on fermentable versus non-fermentable carbon sources
Mitochondrial morphology: Using fluorescent markers to visualize changes in mitochondrial structure
Protein import and assembly: Measuring the efficiency of nuclear-encoded protein import into mitochondria
Mitochondrial translation: Analyzing the synthesis of mitochondrially-encoded proteins
Mitochondrial RNA processing: Examining the pattern of mitochondrial transcripts using Northern blot analysis
Statistical design considerations should include appropriate controls, biological replicates, and power analysis to detect meaningful differences between wild-type and mutant strains.
While Yme2 is primarily characterized as a mitochondrial protein, its potential role in nuclear processes such as meiotic recombination deserves investigation. S. pombe has been extensively used to study meiotic recombination, with multiple rec genes identified as essential for this process .
Researchers investigating potential connections should consider:
Examining expression patterns of Yme2 during meiosis
Screening for genetic interactions between Yme2 and known recombination factors
Analyzing recombination frequencies in Yme2 mutants using established assays
This research direction could potentially reveal unexpected nuclear roles for this mitochondrial protein or identify separate functions for splice variants or differentially localized pools of the protein.
Despite being distant relatives, S. pombe and S. cerevisiae share some conserved mitochondrial proteins, though their functions may differ. Comparative analysis reveals:
| Feature | S. pombe Yme2 | S. cerevisiae Yme2 | Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain structure | RRM and AAA+ domains | RRM and AAA+ domains | Structural conservation despite evolutionary distance |
| Genetic interactions | MDM38, MBA1, OXA1 | Similar interactions | Conserved role in mitochondrial protein biogenesis |
| Mitochondrial context | Transcription in two major units | Different transcription pattern | Species-specific adaptation to mitochondrial gene expression |
| Complex formation | High molecular weight complex | Similar complex formation | Conserved assembly properties |
When interpreting functional data across species, researchers should consider that "although some aspects of recombination are similar to those in the distantly related budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, other aspects are distinctly different" , a principle that likely extends to mitochondrial functions as well.
Statistical approaches for Yme2 research should be tailored to the specific experimental design:
For interaction studies: Consider appropriate statistical tests for detecting significant interactions, such as:
Fisher's exact test for binary interaction data
Permutation tests for complex datasets
Multiple hypothesis correction when screening numerous potential interactions
For phenotypic analyses:
For localization studies:
Quantify colocalization using established statistical measures
Employ randomization tests to establish significance thresholds
When faced with conflicting data about Yme2 function, researchers should:
Carefully examine experimental conditions, including:
Strain background differences
Expression levels of tagged constructs
Growth conditions and media composition
Assay sensitivities and limitations
Design critical experiments to directly test competing hypotheses
Consider the possibility that Yme2 may have multiple, context-dependent functions
Integrate diverse experimental approaches (genetic, biochemical, structural) to build a comprehensive model of Yme2 function
Remember that "the roles of identified orthologs in regulating recombination often differ" between yeast species , suggesting that protein functions can evolve despite sequence conservation.
Several high-impact research directions emerge from current Yme2 knowledge:
Structural biology approaches: Determining high-resolution structures of Yme2's RRM and AAA+ domains to understand mechanism
Identification of RNA targets: Comprehensive analysis of RNAs bound by Yme2's RRM domain
Integration with broader mitochondrial biology: Investigating how Yme2 coordinates with other mitochondrial systems
Evolutionary analysis: Comparing Yme2 function across diverse fungal species to understand functional conservation and divergence
Human relevance: Investigating potential human orthologs and their involvement in mitochondrial diseases