The recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] cytochrome b small subunit, mitochondrial (SDH4) is a membrane-anchoring component of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), which functions as Complex II in the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) . SDH4 (UniProt ID: Q9P7X0) is a multi-pass transmembrane protein critical for anchoring the catalytic subunits of SDH to the inner mitochondrial membrane, enabling electron transfer from succinate to ubiquinone .
Source | Host | Tag | Sequence | Purity | Applications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Creative Biomart | E. coli | His | Full-length (1–85aa) | >90% | SDS-PAGE, biochemical assays |
MyBioSource | Cell-free | N/A | Partial | >85% | Structural studies |
Note: Full-length SDH4 (159aa) is not commercially available; recombinant variants focus on functional domains (e.g., N-terminal regions critical for membrane anchoring) .
SDH4 partners with SDH3 (a heme-containing subunit) to form the membrane anchor domain of SDH, enabling quinone binding and electron transfer . Key conserved residues include:
Cys172: Critical for heme binding and oxidative stress responses .
Phe100, Ser102, Lys163: Involved in distal quinone-binding site .
SDH4 expression is tightly regulated by iron availability in S. pombe :
Php4 (iron-deficient conditions): Represses sdh4 transcription to limit iron-sulfur cluster assembly .
Fep1 (iron-rich conditions): Activates sdh4 to support iron-dependent metabolic pathways .
Interactions: SDH4 interacts with Grx4 (glutaredoxin), Php4, and Fep1, forming a regulatory axis for iron metabolism .
Partial Constructs: Truncated recombinant SDH4 (1–85aa) may lack full functional activity .
Mitochondrial Import: Proper folding in heterologous systems remains challenging, impacting in vitro studies .
SDH4 shares structural and functional similarities with orthologs in other organisms:
Organism | Homolog | Sequence Identity | Key Shared Features |
---|---|---|---|
Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Shh4p | 52% | Conserved quinone-binding residues |
Homo sapiens | SDHD | 35% | Multi-pass membrane topology |
Note: S. pombe SDH4 diverges in regulatory mechanisms compared to S. cerevisiae, where Hap4 modulates carbon-source responses .
KEGG: spo:SPBP23A10.16
STRING: 4896.SPBP23A10.16.1
Schizosaccharomyces pombe, commonly known as fission yeast, is a unicellular eukaryotic organism that has emerged as a powerful model system for studying various cellular processes. S. pombe belongs to the division Ascomycota, the largest and most diverse group of fungi. It was first isolated from various fermented beverages and is naturally found in tree exudates, plant roots, soil, and fermented fruits .
S. pombe has become a preferred model organism for several reasons. First, its genome was fully sequenced in 2002, becoming the sixth eukaryotic organism to achieve this milestone. Approximately 70% of its genes have orthologs in humans, including many genes involved in human diseases, making it valuable for biomedical research . Additionally, S. pombe has contributed significantly to our understanding of DNA damage repair mechanisms, with numerous assays developed to study outcomes of mitotic recombination, a major repair mechanism for DNA double-strand breaks and stalled or collapsed replication forks . The subcellular localization of almost all proteins in S. pombe has been mapped using green fluorescent protein tagging, further enhancing its utility in research .
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) is a critical enzyme that functions in both the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and the electron transport chain. In the TCA cycle, SDH catalyzes the oxidation of succinate to fumarate. Simultaneously, in the electron transport chain (complex II), it transfers electrons to ubiquinone (coenzyme Q).
The complete SDH complex typically consists of four subunits: SDHA (flavoprotein), SDHB (iron-sulfur protein), and SDHC and SDHD (membrane anchor proteins). The sdh4 gene specifically encodes the smallest subunit (equivalent to SDHD in mammals), which is a hydrophobic protein embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane. This subunit is essential for anchoring the catalytic components to the membrane and for proper electron transfer to ubiquinone.
In S. pombe mitochondria, the respiratory chain components work together to generate ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. Studies have shown that S. pombe mitochondria exhibit antimycin A-sensitive oxygen uptake activity when utilizing various substrates including succinate, which involves the SDH complex . Understanding sdh4's role helps elucidate the mechanisms of cellular respiration and energy production in this model organism.
S. pombe offers several sophisticated techniques for genetic manipulation, making it an excellent model for studying genes like sdh4. A simple modification of the transformation procedure for directing integration of genomic sequences has been shown to increase transformation efficiency by 5-fold when using antibiotic-based dominant selection markers .
Additionally, the removal of the pku70+ and pku80+ genes, which encode DNA end-binding proteins required for the non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway, can increase gene targeting efficiency by approximately 16-fold (to around 75-80%) . This is particularly useful for genes that are typically difficult to target.
Several vector systems have been developed to facilitate genetic studies in S. pombe:
pINTL and pINTK vectors use ura4+ selection to direct disruptive integration of leu1+ and lys1+ respectively
pINTH vectors exploit nourseothricin resistance to detect targeted disruption of a hygromycin B resistance-conferring hphMX6 cassette
Multi-copy expression vectors that use resistance to nourseothricin or kanamycin/G418 for selection in prototrophic hosts
These tools collectively enhance the versatility of S. pombe as a model system for studying genes like sdh4.
Expression and purification of recombinant S. pombe sdh4 protein requires specialized techniques due to its hydrophobic nature and mitochondrial localization. The following methodology outlines a general approach:
Vector Selection and Construction:
Expression System Selection:
For membrane proteins like sdh4, yeast expression systems (particularly S. cerevisiae) often yield better results than bacterial systems
Alternative systems include insect cells or mammalian cells for proteins requiring eukaryotic post-translational modifications
Optimization of Expression Conditions:
Membrane Protein Purification:
Cell lysis using mechanical disruption methods
Membrane fraction isolation through differential centrifugation
Solubilization using appropriate detergents (typically DDM, LDAO, or Triton X-100)
Affinity chromatography based on the fusion tag
Size exclusion chromatography for final purification
Quality Assessment:
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to confirm identity
Mass spectrometry to verify protein integrity
Functional assays to confirm activity
When working specifically with S. pombe sdh4, researchers should note that the protein must maintain its native conformation to retain functionality, and detergent selection is critical for preserving membrane protein structure during purification.
Several methods can be employed to study the subcellular localization of sdh4 in S. pombe:
Fluorescent Protein Tagging:
Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) tagging is particularly effective, as demonstrated by the comprehensive protein localization study in S. pombe
For mitochondrial proteins like sdh4, construct a C-terminal GFP fusion (N-terminal tags may interfere with mitochondrial targeting)
Express the fusion protein using either the native promoter (for physiological expression levels) or an inducible promoter system like urg1
Immunofluorescence Microscopy:
Generate antibodies against the sdh4 protein or use antibodies against epitope tags
Fix cells with formaldehyde or methanol and perform immunostaining
Counterstain with DAPI to visualize nuclei and use mitochondrial markers (like MitoTracker) for colocalization studies
Subcellular Fractionation and Western Blotting:
Isolate mitochondria from S. pombe cells using differential centrifugation
Perform protease protection assays to determine membrane topology
Conduct Western blotting with sdh4-specific antibodies
As shown in research on mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase in S. pombe, enzyme assays with Triton X-100 treatment can confirm matrix localization of proteins
Electron Microscopy with Immunogold Labeling:
Prepare thin sections of S. pombe cells for transmission electron microscopy
Use antibodies conjugated to gold particles for precise localization
This technique provides high-resolution images of protein localization within mitochondrial subcompartments
Proximity Labeling Techniques:
Fuse sdh4 to enzymes like BioID or APEX2 that biotinylate nearby proteins
Identify proximal proteins through streptavidin pulldown and mass spectrometry
This approach reveals the protein interaction network of sdh4 in its native context
By combining these techniques, researchers can comprehensively characterize the localization, topology, and interactions of the sdh4 protein in S. pombe mitochondria.
Sdh4 plays a crucial role in the respiratory function of S. pombe by serving as an essential component of Complex II (succinate dehydrogenase) in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. Its contributions can be understood through several key aspects:
Understanding sdh4's contribution to respiratory function provides valuable insights into mitochondrial energy metabolism and the adaptation of S. pombe to various growth conditions.
The sdh4 protein exhibits notable differences between S. pombe and other model organisms, reflecting evolutionary adaptation and specialized functions:
Key differences include:
These differences make comparative studies of sdh4 across species valuable for understanding mitochondrial evolution, gene transfer, and adaptation of respiratory functions.
Some organisms demonstrate the phenomenon of having functional copies of sdh4 in both the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes. Studying this dual genomic presence and the resulting expression patterns requires sophisticated approaches:
Genome Analysis and Comparison:
Conduct whole-genome sequencing to confirm the presence of sdh4 copies in both genomes
Perform sequence comparison to identify differences between nuclear and mitochondrial versions
Analyze surrounding genomic regions to understand the evolutionary context
Similar analyses in Populus revealed that nuclear copies of sdh4 had acquired N-terminal mitochondrial targeting presequences from pre-existing genes
Transcriptional Analysis:
Employ RNA-Seq to quantify expression levels from both genomic copies
Use variant-specific primers in RT-PCR to distinguish transcripts from each copy
Apply nascent RNA capture techniques to measure transcription rates
Studies in Populus demonstrated that both nuclear and mitochondrial copies of sdh4 were expressed in multiple organs
RNA Editing Analysis:
Protein Isoform Characterization:
Use mass spectrometry to distinguish protein products from different genomic copies
Develop isoform-specific antibodies for Western blotting and immunoprecipitation
Apply ribosome profiling to measure translation rates of each transcript
Regulatory Element Analysis:
Characterize promoters and regulatory elements controlling each copy
Perform ChIP-seq to identify transcription factors binding to nuclear copy promoters
Analyze mitochondrial transcription and processing mechanisms
Tissue-Specific and Condition-Responsive Expression:
Measure expression of both copies across different tissues/cell types
Analyze expression changes under various stresses and metabolic conditions
Create reporter constructs with copy-specific promoters to visualize expression patterns
Functional Complementation Experiments:
This multi-faceted approach provides comprehensive insights into the evolutionary significance, regulation, and functional implications of maintaining dual genomic copies of sdh4.
The molecular mechanisms of electron transfer involving sdh4 in S. pombe succinate dehydrogenase (Complex II) involve sophisticated protein-protein and protein-cofactor interactions:
Understanding these molecular mechanisms provides insights into mitochondrial energy conversion efficiency and may reveal targets for metabolic engineering or therapeutic interventions in related human diseases.
Designing experiments to study the evolution of mitochondrial to nuclear gene transfer of sdh4 requires innovative approaches spanning comparative genomics, molecular biology, and evolutionary analysis:
Comparative Genomic Analysis:
Sample diverse species across phylogenetic lineages to identify patterns of sdh4 gene location
Sequence both nuclear and mitochondrial genomes to detect potential duplicate copies
Construct phylogenetic trees to establish evolutionary relationships of sdh4 genes
Previous research in Populus identified both nuclear and mitochondrial copies of sdh4, with evidence of coexpression
Experimental Evolution Approaches:
Design long-term evolution experiments with S. pombe under conditions that might favor gene transfer
Apply selective pressures that could benefit from nuclear encoding (e.g., mitochondrial stress)
Periodically sequence genomic DNA to detect spontaneous transfer events
Create reporter systems to detect functional nuclear integration of mitochondrial genes
Functional Analysis of Transferred Genes:
Identify naturally transferred sdh4 genes in related species
Analyze acquisition of targeting sequences and regulatory elements
Studies have shown that transferred genes can gain N-terminal mitochondrial targeting presequences from pre-existing genes
Test functionality through complementation experiments in S. pombe sdh4 mutants
Synthetic Biology Approaches:
Artificially transfer the mitochondrial sdh4 gene to the nucleus with various targeting sequences
Assess expression, protein import, and functional integration
Systematically modify the synthetic nuclear gene to determine minimum requirements for functional transfer
Apply the advanced S. pombe genetic manipulation techniques to integrate and express the transferred gene
RNA Editing and Processing Analysis:
Computational Modeling:
Develop models of selection pressure for gene transfer
Simulate evolutionary trajectories under various conditions
Predict intermediate states in the transfer process
Analysis of Transfer Mechanisms:
Test hypotheses about RNA-mediated vs. DNA-mediated transfer
Investigate the role of nuclear insertions of mitochondrial DNA (NUMTs)
Study the involvement of DNA repair machinery in integration events
These experimental approaches would provide comprehensive insights into the evolutionary process of mitochondrial gene transfer to the nucleus, a fundamental aspect of eukaryotic evolution with implications for understanding organellar genome reduction and nuclear-mitochondrial communication.
Investigating the interactions between sdh4 and other components of the respiratory chain requires sophisticated biochemical, biophysical, and genetic approaches:
Protein Crosslinking and Mass Spectrometry:
Apply chemical crosslinkers to stabilize transient protein-protein interactions
Perform in vivo crosslinking in intact S. pombe mitochondria
Digest crosslinked complexes and analyze by mass spectrometry
Map interaction sites at amino acid resolution
Co-immunoprecipitation and Pull-down Assays:
Generate antibodies against sdh4 or use epitope-tagged versions
Perform co-immunoprecipitation from solubilized mitochondrial membranes
Identify interacting partners by Western blotting or mass spectrometry
Verify direct interactions using recombinant proteins in pull-down assays
Blue Native PAGE Analysis:
Isolate intact respiratory complexes and supercomplexes using mild detergents
Separate complexes by Blue Native PAGE
Identify complex composition using 2D electrophoresis or mass spectrometry
Compare complex assembly in wild-type and sdh4 mutant strains
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
Purify intact Complex II or respiratory supercomplexes
Determine high-resolution structures by cryo-EM
Map the position of sdh4 and its interactions with neighboring subunits
Identify conformational changes associated with different functional states
Genetic Interaction Mapping:
Proximity Labeling Techniques:
Fuse sdh4 to promiscuous biotin ligases (BioID) or peroxidases (APEX)
Allow in vivo labeling of proteins in close proximity to sdh4
Purify biotinylated proteins and identify by mass spectrometry
Map the spatial environment of sdh4 in the mitochondrial membrane
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET):
Create fluorescent protein fusions with sdh4 and potential interaction partners
Measure FRET efficiency in live S. pombe cells
Quantify interaction strength and dynamics
Assess the effects of metabolic conditions on interaction patterns
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry:
Expose purified complexes to deuterated water
Monitor the rate of hydrogen-deuterium exchange by mass spectrometry
Identify protected regions indicating protein-protein interaction sites
Compare exchange patterns under different functional conditions
Modular-Kinetic Analysis:
These methodologies would provide comprehensive insights into how sdh4 interacts with other respiratory chain components, advancing our understanding of mitochondrial energy metabolism and potentially revealing new therapeutic targets for mitochondrial disorders.