Recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe Uncharacterized protein C1093.03 (SPAC1093.03), partial

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference during order placement for customized preparation.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: All proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires prior arrangement and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to consolidate the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer components, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized forms have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses to prevent repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
The tag type is determined during production. If you require a specific tag, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
SPAC1093.03Polyphosphoinositide phosphatase; EC 3.1.3.-; Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate 5-phosphatase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Protein Length
Partial
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) (Fission yeast)
Target Names
SPAC1093.03
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The PI(3,5)P2 regulatory complex controls both the synthesis and degradation of phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(3,5)P2).
Database Links
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm. Vacuole membrane; Peripheral membrane protein.

Q&A

What is SPAC1093.03 and what do we currently know about its genomic context in S. pombe?

SPAC1093.03 is an uncharacterized protein in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The "SPAC" prefix indicates its location on chromosome 1 of S. pombe. While specific information about this particular protein is limited, S. pombe genome studies have revealed that many uncharacterized proteins reside in subtelomeric homologous (SH) regions, which exhibit high sequence polymorphism and are hotspots for genome variation . These regions consist of two distinct parts: a highly variable telomere-proximal part with multiple common segments and a more conserved telomere-distal part . Understanding this genomic context is crucial when studying the evolutionary conservation and potential functional significance of SPAC1093.03.

What expression systems are most appropriate for producing recombinant SPAC1093.03?

Multiple expression systems can be utilized for SPAC1093.03 recombinant protein production, including:

Expression SystemAdvantagesPotential Limitations
E. coliHigh yield, rapid growth, cost-effectiveMay lack proper eukaryotic post-translational modifications
Yeast (e.g., S. cerevisiae, P. pastoris)Better protein folding, some post-translational modificationsLower yield than E. coli, longer production time
Insect cells (Sf9, Sf21, High Five)Complex eukaryotic modifications, better foldingTechnical complexity, higher cost
Mammalian cells (293, 293T, CHO)Native-like modifications, complex foldingHighest cost, lowest yield, most complex

For initial characterization, E. coli expression with solubility-enhancing fusion tags is often most practical, while more native conditions may require expression in yeast systems such as SMD1168, GS115, or X-33 .

How do fusion tags affect purification and characterization of SPAC1093.03?

Different fusion tags offer distinct advantages for purification and functional studies:

  • His Tag: Enables efficient purification via nickel affinity chromatography; minimal impact on protein structure

  • FLAG Tag: Allows highly specific antibody-based purification; useful for co-immunoprecipitation studies

  • MBP/GST: Enhance solubility and facilitate purification; larger tags that may affect protein function

  • GFP: Enables direct visualization of cellular localization and trafficking in live cells

When designing experiments, consider whether the tag should be N-terminal or C-terminal based on protein domain structure and whether cleavage of the tag post-purification is necessary for functional studies.

What are the key components of a robust experimental design for characterizing SPAC1093.03 function?

When designing experiments to investigate SPAC1093.03, address the five areas of experimental design as identified in comprehensive experimental design analyses :

A comprehensive experimental approach should incorporate multiple methodologies, including phenotypic analysis, localization studies, protein-protein interaction mapping, and transcriptomic profiling to triangulate the function of this uncharacterized protein.

How should researchers approach protein interaction studies for SPAC1093.03?

Recent advances in S. pombe protein interaction analysis offer a methodological framework:

  • Endogenous tagging: Generate strains with epitope-tagged SPAC1093.03 at its chromosomal locus to maintain native expression levels

  • Immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS): Perform IP-MS under various conditions to identify stable and transient interaction partners

  • Validation: Confirm key interactions through reciprocal tagging and co-immunoprecipitation

  • Network analysis: Place identified interactions in context of known S. pombe protein networks

Recent studies identified protein interactors for approximately half of S. pombe transcription factors, with over a quarter potentially forming stable complexes . This methodological approach can be directly applied to SPAC1093.03 to determine if it participates in similar regulatory networks.

How can mixed methods research approaches enhance the study of SPAC1093.03?

Mixed methods research combining qualitative and quantitative approaches offers significant advantages for studying uncharacterized proteins like SPAC1093.03 . This approach provides:

  • Participant enrichment: Increasing sample sizes for greater statistical power

  • Instrument fidelity: Validating findings through multiple experimental approaches

  • Treatment integrity: Ensuring experimental manipulations perform as intended

  • Significance enhancement: Obtaining more comprehensive understanding through methodological triangulation

An effective mixed methods design would integrate quantitative approaches (e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics, growth measurements) with qualitative assessments (e.g., microscopy, phenotypic characterization) to develop a coherent functional model for SPAC1093.03.

What chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) strategies should be considered if SPAC1093.03 exhibits DNA-binding properties?

If preliminary evidence suggests SPAC1093.03 may function as a transcription factor or chromatin-associated protein, implement ChIP strategies modeled after recent comprehensive S. pombe studies :

  • Generate endogenously tagged SPAC1093.03 strains

  • Perform ChIP-sequencing under multiple growth conditions

  • Identify binding motifs using computational approaches

  • Map binding sites relative to gene features (promoters, gene bodies, etc.)

  • Compare binding profiles with known transcription factors to identify potential cooperative or competitive relationships

This approach recently identified DNA-binding sites across 2,027 unique genomic regions for S. pombe transcription factors, revealing motifs for 38 previously uncharacterized factors . Similar approaches could determine if SPAC1093.03 contributes to transcriptional regulation.

What strategies can overcome expression and purification challenges with recombinant SPAC1093.03?

When facing difficulties with SPAC1093.03 expression or purification:

ChallengeSolution Strategy
Low expression levelTest multiple host strains (BL21(DE3), Rosetta-GAMI for E. coli; SMD1168, GS115 for yeast)
Poor solubilityExpress with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, GST, NusA); optimize induction temperature and duration
Degradation during purificationInclude appropriate protease inhibitors; purify at 4°C; add stabilizing agents
Low purityImplement multi-step purification strategy; consider on-column refolding techniques
Loss of activityCarefully optimize buffer conditions; preserve native structure through gentle purification methods

Additionally, consider sequence optimization for the expression host and evaluate protein toxicity by monitoring growth curves of expression strains.

How can researchers address experimental design difficulties when working with subtelomeric proteins?

If SPAC1093.03 is indeed a subtelomeric protein, researchers should address several experimental challenges:

  • Sequence variation: Compare SPAC1093.03 across different S. pombe strains, as subtelomeric regions show high polymorphism

  • Chromatin environment: Account for heterochromatin effects in the telomere-distal SH regions versus shelterin complex interactions in telomere-proximal regions

  • Recombination potential: Be aware that subtelomeric regions are prone to homologous recombination that may cause genetic instability during experiments

  • Replication challenges: Consider that subtelomeric regions are intrinsically difficult to replicate, potentially affecting protein expression

These difficulties should be addressed through careful strain selection, genetic stability monitoring, and chromatin state characterization.

What statistical approaches are appropriate for analyzing functional data for uncharacterized proteins?

Statistical analysis for SPAC1093.03 functional studies should incorporate:

  • Proper experimental controls: Include positive and negative controls tailored to each experimental approach

  • Appropriate sample sizes: Determine sample sizes through power analysis to detect biologically meaningful effects

  • Multiple testing correction: Apply corrections (e.g., Bonferroni, Benjamini-Hochberg) when conducting multiple comparisons

  • Validation through independent methods: Triangulate findings using diverse experimental approaches

For complex datasets, consider integrating qualitative and quantitative analysis methods as described in mixed methods research, which can provide complementary insights and enhance result validity through methodological triangulation .

How should potential roles of SPAC1093.03 in gene regulation be evaluated?

To investigate potential regulatory functions of SPAC1093.03:

  • Transcriptomic analysis: Compare gene expression profiles between wild-type and SPAC1093.03 deletion/overexpression strains

  • Binding site identification: If ChIP-seq reveals DNA binding, analyze binding patterns for associations with specific gene features or chromatin states

  • Motif discovery: Identify potential DNA sequence preferences that might indicate direct DNA binding

  • Regulatory network mapping: Place SPAC1093.03 in context of known regulatory networks in S. pombe

  • Evolutionary conservation: Examine conservation of function across related species

Recent studies of S. pombe transcription factors revealed extensive cross-regulation and autoregulation networks . If SPAC1093.03 shows evidence of DNA binding, similar network analyses could reveal its place in the regulatory hierarchy.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.