The recombinant protein is produced in two primary systems:
Expression System | Host | Tag | Buffer |
---|---|---|---|
1 | E. coli | Undetermined | Tris-based buffer, 50% glycerol |
2 | Baculovirus | Undetermined | Tris-based buffer, 50% glycerol |
Concentration: 0.1–1.0 mg/mL in deionized sterile water.
Stabilizer: 5–50% glycerol (final concentration) recommended for long-term storage .
SPBC336.16 is primarily used in biochemical assays, including:
Application | Details |
---|---|
ELISA | Quantitative analysis (e.g., antigen detection) |
Functional Studies | Limited due to uncharacterized function; potential use in yeast protein interaction studies . |
No peer-reviewed studies directly linking SPBC336.16 to specific biological pathways (e.g., DNA repair, metabolism) were identified in indexed literature .
Despite its availability as a recombinant protein, SPBC336.16 remains poorly studied. Key areas for investigation include:
Functional Characterization: Linking the protein to cellular processes (e.g., transcriptional regulation, stress response).
Interaction Mapping: Identifying binding partners via co-immunoprecipitation or mass spectrometry.
Phylogenetic Analysis: Comparing conserved domains with orthologs in other species.
KEGG: spo:SPBC336.16
The uncharacterized protein C336.16 (SPBC336.16) from S. pombe (strain 972/ATCC 24843) consists of 71 amino acids in its expression region (1-71). The full amino acid sequence is: MYHSYSHDLTNYLYNYFSSTTSWLVFIILSLDTINATFSNITFVDILMETGFTKNRSLDQTTCGIKFGFVN . This relatively short protein is identified in the UniProt database with the accession number G2TRR0.
For structural studies, researchers should consider using a combination of X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and in silico modeling approaches. When working with recombinant versions, note that the tag type may vary during the production process, which could affect structural analyses.
The recombinant protein is typically stored in a Tris-based buffer with 50% glycerol, which has been optimized specifically for this protein . For short-term storage (up to one week), working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C. For extended storage, the protein should be kept at -20°C or -80°C to preserve stability and function .
Researchers should avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as this can lead to protein denaturation and loss of activity. When designing experiments, prepare single-use aliquots sized appropriately for your experimental needs to minimize freeze-thaw events.
While protein C336.16 (SPBC336.16) is currently uncharacterized, research on the rec16 gene in S. pombe provides context for understanding potential functional relationships. The rec16 gene product regulates multiple meiotic processes, including DNA synthesis, recombination, and transcript induction . Unlike other rec genes that primarily affect meiotic recombination, rec16 has broader impacts on meiotic processes.
When investigating potential functions of protein C336.16, researchers should consider whether it might participate in meiotic pathways. Comparative analyses with known rec proteins could identify structural or functional similarities. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments with rec16 protein or other meiotic factors would be valuable for determining potential interactions.
For expression of S. pombe proteins like C336.16, several systems can be considered:
Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Yield Potential |
---|---|---|---|
E. coli | Quick growth, inexpensive, well-established protocols | Potential misfolding of eukaryotic proteins, lack of post-translational modifications | Medium to high |
S. cerevisiae | Eukaryotic system, some post-translational modifications | Slower growth than E. coli, different codon usage from S. pombe | Medium |
S. pombe | Native environment, correct post-translational modifications | More complex cultivation, lower yields | Low to medium |
Insect cells | Complex eukaryotic post-translational modifications | Expensive, technically demanding | Medium |
Mammalian cells | Most complex post-translational modifications | Most expensive, longest production time | Low to medium |
For an uncharacterized protein like C336.16, initial expression trials in E. coli with subsequent comparison to native protein from S. pombe extracts would establish whether simpler prokaryotic systems produce correctly folded protein.
Given the limited knowledge about protein C336.16, a multifaceted approach combining genetic, biochemical, and computational methods is recommended:
Genetic Approaches: Create knockout/knockdown strains in S. pombe to observe phenotypic changes. Based on findings related to rec16, which affects meiotic processes , examine meiotic phenotypes with particular attention to:
Meiotic DNA synthesis timing and efficiency
Recombination frequency
Transcript levels of meiotic genes
Biochemical Approaches: Perform protein-protein interaction studies using:
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Co-immunoprecipitation with known meiotic proteins
Chromatin immunoprecipitation if nuclear localization is suspected
Computational Approaches: Utilize:
Structural prediction algorithms to identify functional domains
Phylogenetic analysis across yeast species
Comparative analysis with rec protein family members
When faced with contradictory data regarding protein C336.16 function, a systematic approach to reconciliation should include:
Standardization of Experimental Conditions:
Control for strain background variations
Standardize growth media and culture conditions
Use consistent protein purification methods
Multi-method Validation:
Verify findings using orthogonal techniques
Combine in vivo and in vitro approaches
Incorporate both genetic and biochemical methods
Statistical Approaches:
Perform meta-analysis of multiple experimental datasets
Use Bayesian analysis to incorporate prior knowledge
Calculate effect sizes to quantify the magnitude of observed effects
Context-dependent Analysis:
Consider whether contradictions reflect genuine biological context-dependency
Examine whether protein function varies with cell cycle stage or meiotic phase
Investigate potential post-translational modifications affecting function
A decision matrix for resolving contradictory findings might include:
Contradiction Type | Primary Investigation Method | Secondary Validation | Tertiary Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
Functional effects | Repeat with standardized conditions | Alternative functional assays | Dose-response studies |
Localization differences | Live-cell imaging with different tags | Fractionation studies | Time-course analysis |
Interaction partners | Reciprocal co-IP experiments | Proximity labeling methods | In vitro binding assays |
Expression effects | qRT-PCR with multiple reference genes | RNA-seq | Promoter analysis |
Based on research on the rec16 gene in S. pombe, which is essential for normal meiotic replication, recombination, and transcript induction , protein C336.16 could potentially interact with the meiotic recombination machinery through several mechanisms:
Direct DNA Interaction:
The amino acid sequence of C336.16 (MYHSYSHDLTNYLYNYFSSTTSWLVFIILSLDTINATFSNITFVDILMETGFTKNRSLDQTTCGIKFGFVN) contains motifs that might enable DNA binding . Researchers should perform DNA binding assays with various DNA structures (single-stranded, double-stranded, and recombination intermediates).
Protein Complex Formation:
Investigate whether C336.16 forms complexes with known recombination proteins in S. pombe. Key experimental approaches include:
Affinity purification followed by mass spectrometry
Yeast two-hybrid screening against known recombination proteins
Co-localization studies during meiotic prophase
Transcriptional Regulation:
As rec16 mutations affect transcript levels of some meiotic genes , C336.16 might function in transcriptional regulation. Researchers should perform:
RNA-seq in wild-type versus C336.16 mutant strains during meiosis
ChIP-seq to identify potential binding sites
Reporter assays to test transcriptional activation/repression activity
Evolutionary conservation analysis can provide valuable insights into protein function. For C336.16, researchers should:
Perform BLAST searches against protein databases of related yeast species and other fungi
Conduct multiple sequence alignments to identify conserved domains
Generate phylogenetic trees to visualize evolutionary relationships
A hypothetical conservation analysis might yield results like:
Species | Sequence Identity (%) | Conserved Domains | Functional Annotation |
---|---|---|---|
S. japonicus | 78 | N-terminal helix | Uncharacterized |
S. octosporus | 72 | N-terminal helix | Uncharacterized |
S. cryophilus | 68 | N-terminal helix | Uncharacterized |
S. cerevisiae | 36 | Partial N-terminal conservation | Meiosis-related |
C. albicans | 29 | Minimal conservation | Unknown |
N. crassa | 24 | Minimal conservation | Unknown |
Higher conservation in the Schizosaccharomyces genus would suggest a specialized function in these species, while broader conservation would indicate a more fundamental role. Conserved domains might point to functional regions worth targeting in mutational studies.
For structural studies of recombinant C336.16 protein, a comprehensive purification strategy should include:
Expression Optimization:
Test multiple affinity tags (His, GST, MBP) to determine optimal solubility
Evaluate expression temperatures (16°C, 25°C, 30°C) and induction conditions
Consider co-expression with chaperones if folding issues arise
Purification Protocol:
Initial capture: Affinity chromatography based on selected tag
Intermediate purification: Ion exchange chromatography
Polishing step: Size exclusion chromatography
Buffer optimization: Screen buffers with varying pH, salt concentration, and additives
Quality Control Checkpoints:
SDS-PAGE and western blotting to confirm protein identity and purity
Dynamic light scattering to assess homogeneity
Mass spectrometry to verify molecular weight and post-translational modifications
Circular dichroism to evaluate secondary structure formation
Designing effective genetic manipulation experiments for C336.16 requires careful consideration of several factors:
Complete Knockout Strategy:
CRISPR-Cas9 targeting with homology-directed repair
Homologous recombination with selection markers
Verification by PCR, sequencing, and western blotting
Conditional Knockdown Approaches:
Tetracycline-regulatable promoters
Auxin-inducible degron system
Temperature-sensitive mutants
Experimental Design Considerations:
Based on quasi-experimental design principles , implement:
One-group pretest-posttest design using a double pretest (Design A3)
Untreated control group with dependent pretest and posttest samples (Design C1)
Multiple time-point observations (Design D1)
Phenotypic Analysis Pipeline:
Growth rate measurements in various media conditions
Cell cycle analysis by flow cytometry
Meiotic efficiency and spore viability assessment
Transcriptomic analysis before and after meiotic induction
When phenotyping, particular attention should be paid to meiotic processes, given the potential relationship to rec16 function , with measurements taken at multiple timepoints to capture dynamic changes during meiosis.
Based on current knowledge and gaps identified in this FAQ collection, several key research directions emerge for understanding protein C336.16 function:
Comprehensive Characterization:
Determine the three-dimensional structure through X-ray crystallography or NMR
Identify binding partners through proteome-wide interaction studies
Establish subcellular localization throughout the cell cycle and meiosis
Functional Analysis:
Systems Biology Approaches:
Integrate transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic data
Develop network models of protein interactions during meiosis
Apply machine learning to predict function from sequence and structural data
Translational Applications:
Explore potential as a model for understanding eukaryotic protein evolution
Investigate relevance to fungal biology and potential antifungal targets
Develop tools for controlling meiotic processes in research applications
Researchers should prioritize establishing the basic functional characteristics of C336.16 while designing experiments with sufficient controls and replication to generate robust, reproducible results using appropriate quasi-experimental designs .