Studies on PRLR polymorphisms in sheep breeds reveal associations with prolificacy and milk production:
Polymorphisms: Three genotypes (AA, AB, BB) identified in intron 1 and exon 10 regions .
Litter Size:
| Genotype | Average Litter Size Increase vs. AA |
|---|---|
| BB | +0.64–0.76 lambs |
| AB | +0.44–0.54 lambs |
PRLR Intron Analysis: Monomorphic sequences in introns 1 and 2, suggesting limited genetic diversity in these regions .
Milk Traits: No significant associations between PRLR variants and milk yield/composition were found, indicating breed-specific genetic influences .
High prolactin concentrations (>20 ng/mL) upregulate apoptosis in sheep ovarian GCs by:
KEGG: oas:443020
UniGene: Oar.4812
Sheep express two primary PRLR isoforms: Long PRLR (L-PRLR) and Short PRLR (S-PRLR). These isoforms differ significantly in their molecular weights and isoelectric points. The L-PRLR has a predicted molecular weight of 65,235.36 KD with an isoelectric point of 5.12, while S-PRLR is 33,847.48 KD with an isoelectric point of 8.34 . The substantial difference in isoelectric points (5.12 vs. 8.34) indicates distinct charge properties that impact protein-protein interactions and functional characteristics.
The secondary protein structures of the two isoforms exhibit notable differences:
| Structural Element | L-PRLR (%) | S-PRLR (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Alpha helix | 16.01 | 18.24 |
| Extended strand | 21.00 | 30.07 |
| Random coils | 59.55 | 48.99 |
| β-turns | 3.44 | Not present |
L-PRLR contains all four secondary structure elements (alpha helix, extended strand, random coils, and β-turns), whereas S-PRLR lacks β-turns entirely . These structural differences likely contribute to their distinct functional properties and interaction capacities with ligands and downstream signaling molecules.
PRLR isoforms show differential expression across sheep tissues. mRNA expression of both L-PRLR and S-PRLR is highest in the uterus compared to the ovary, mammary gland, spleen, and lymph tissue . This tissue-specific expression suggests specialized roles in different physiological contexts. Notably, L-PRLR expression in lymph tissue is significantly higher during lactation than in the post-weaning period, while S-PRLR expression in the uterus and mammary gland is lower during lactation compared to post-weaning .
For reliable amplification of sheep PRLR isoforms, the following primer sequences have been validated:
| PRLR Isoform | Forward Primer | Reverse Primer | Amplicon Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| L-PRLR | 5′-CCCCTTGTTCTCTGCTAAACCC-3′ | 5′-CTATCCGTCACCCGAGACACC-3′ | 120 bp |
| S-PRLR | 5′-AAATACCTTGTGCAGATTCGATG-3′ | 5′-AAACACAGACACAAGGCGAGA-3′ | 267 bp |
| GAPDH (reference) | 5′-CTGACCTGCCGCCTGGAGAAA-3′ | 5′-GTAGAAGAGTGAGTGTCGCTGTT-3′ | 149 bp |
These primers were designed from conserved regions identified by aligning sheep L-PRLR, S-PRLR, and GAPDH gene sequences published in GenBank . When designing primers for PRLR expression studies, it's essential to target regions that discriminate between the isoforms while maintaining specificity for sheep sequences.
For isolating granulosa cells (GCs) from sheep ovaries, researchers should:
Collect ovaries from adult ewes following humane euthanasia protocols
Process tissues within 20 minutes of collection under sterile conditions
Cut tissue samples into approximately 0.2 cm³ pieces
Flash-freeze in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction studies or proceed immediately with cell isolation for culture experiments
For PRL treatment experiments, researchers have established that GCs can be effectively cultured and treated with different PRL concentrations to study apoptosis and steroid hormone production. Studies show that cell viability assays and apoptosis detection using flow cytometry can reliably assess the effects of PRL on GCs .
Research demonstrates an inverse relationship between serum prolactin levels and follicle counts in sexually mature ewes. Regression analysis shows a strong correlation (R² = 0.709 for linear model, R² = 0.7704 for quadratic model, and R² = 0.7795 for cubic model) between increasing PRL concentration and decreasing follicle counts . This relationship is particularly important for understanding reproductive disorders in sheep that involve abnormal prolactin levels.
The mechanism appears to involve granulosa cell apoptosis, which increases gradually at PRL concentrations above 20 ng/mL. At 500 ng/mL (considered a high concentration), PRL significantly decreases steroid hormone secretion and expression of L-PRLR and S-PRLR .
| PRL Concentration (ng/mL) | Apoptotic Rate (%) |
|---|---|
| 0 (control) | 1.60 ± 0.055^c |
| 4 | 1.93 ± 0.076^bc |
| 20 | 1.56 ± 0.399^c |
| 100 | 2.07 ± 0.055^b |
| 500 | 4.01 ± 0.220^a |
Different superscript letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05)
High prolactin concentrations (500 ng/mL) promote apoptosis and inhibit steroid hormone secretion in granulosa cells by upregulating MAPK12 through reducing L-PRLR and S-PRLR expression . This regulatory mechanism appears to be a key factor in follicle development and ovulation. Experimental evidence shows that:
Knockdown of L-PRLR and S-PRLR increases MAPK12 expression
Overexpression of L-PRLR and S-PRLR decreases MAPK12 expression
Inhibiting MAPK12 reduces cell apoptosis and increases steroid hormone secretion
These findings provide important insights into how prolactin regulates ovarian function through PRLR-mediated signaling pathways.
An intriguing aspect of PRLR biology is its ability to form heterodimers with other receptors, particularly the growth hormone receptor (GHR). Surface plasmon resonance and gel filtration experiments have demonstrated that ovine placental lactogen (PL) can heterodimerize the extracellular domains of ruminant GHR and PRLR . This heterodimerization represents a novel mechanism contributing to the diversity of cytokine signaling.
Functional studies using chimeric receptors consisting of cytosolic and transmembrane parts of ovine GHR or PRLR and extracellular domains of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (GM-CSFR) have shown that when heterodimerized, these chimeric receptors can transduce biological signals . This opens new research avenues for investigating how PRLR heterodimerization influences reproductive functions in sheep.
To investigate PRLR-mediated signaling pathway activation, researchers can employ several complementary approaches:
Gene editing techniques: CRISPR/Cas9 for knockdown of L-PRLR and S-PRLR to assess downstream effects on signaling molecules like MAPK12
Overexpression systems: Constructing vectors for overexpression of PRLR isoforms to evaluate gain-of-function effects
RNA-Seq analysis: Transcriptome sequencing to identify differentially expressed genes following PRL treatment or PRLR manipulation
Reporter gene assays: Transfection with reporter luciferase genes to measure activation of signaling pathways upon receptor stimulation
These methodologies can help elucidate the complex signaling networks downstream of PRLR activation and identify key molecules involved in mediating PRL effects on reproductive tissues.
The L-PRLR and S-PRLR genes of sheep (Ovis aries) show high sequence similarity among ruminants . Comparative analysis of nucleotide sequences provides important insights for researchers working with recombinant PRLR across different species. This conservation suggests evolutionary pressure to maintain PRLR function in reproductive processes across ruminant species.
When designing experiments with recombinant sheep PRLR, researchers should consider the degree of conservation when evaluating cross-species reactivity of antibodies, ligands, or other molecular tools. The similarity also facilitates comparative studies that can illuminate shared mechanisms of PRL action in domestic animals.
When working with recombinant sheep PRLR, researchers should consider:
Protein folding and structure: Ensure that recombinant PRLR mimics the native secondary structure (particularly the differences between L-PRLR and S-PRLR as outlined in section 1.2)
Post-translational modifications: Verify whether important modifications present in native PRLR are maintained in the recombinant form
Functional validation: Test binding affinity to PRL and downstream signaling capacity compared to native receptors
Expression system selection: Choose expression systems that will produce correctly folded and functional receptor proteins
These considerations are crucial for generating reliable experimental data that accurately reflects the biology of sheep PRLR in vivo.