KEGG: svo:SVI_4076
STRING: 637905.SVI_4076
Shewanella violacea is a gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium isolated from marine sediment in the Ryukyu Trench at a depth of 5,110m. It appears violet when grown on Marine Agar 2216 Plates and is a motile organism with flagella. As a facultative anaerobic extremophile, S. violacea has optimal growing conditions at 8°C and 30 MPa, making it valuable for studying adaptations to extreme environments .
The guanylate kinase from S. violacea is of particular interest because it functions under high pressure and low temperature conditions. This enzyme catalyzes the phosphorylation of GMP to GDP, playing an essential role in recycling GMP and indirectly affecting cGMP pathways . Studying this enzyme can provide insights into:
Molecular adaptations to extreme environments
Structural modifications that enable function under high pressure
Evolutionary adaptations in nucleotide metabolism
Comparative enzymatic mechanisms between extremophiles and mesophiles
Guanylate kinases from extremophiles like S. violacea differ from those in mesophilic bacteria in several ways that reflect adaptations to extreme environments:
Oligomeric state and ionic sensitivity: While specific data for S. violacea gmk is not provided in the search results, related bacterial guanylate kinases like that of E. coli differ significantly from eukaryotic counterparts. E. coli guanylate kinase is multimeric, with its protomeric state dictated by ionic conditions - appearing as a tetramer under low ionic conditions and a dimer under high ionic conditions .
Substrate binding characteristics: E. coli guanylate kinase binds GMP cooperatively, and this cooperativity changes with ionic strength, unlike eukaryotic guanylate kinases . S. violacea gmk likely has similar adaptations to function optimally in high-pressure, low-temperature environments.
Structural adaptations: Deep-sea bacteria like S. violacea typically demonstrate structural modifications in their proteins, including increased flexibility in cold environments and pressure-resistant conformations.
Co-factor requirements: While specific co-factor data for S. violacea gmk is not available in the search results, related Shewanella UshA enzymes involved in nucleotide metabolism require Mg²⁺ and Mn²⁺ as cofactors, suggesting similar metal ion dependencies for gmk .
Based on related research with Shewanella proteins, the following methodological approach is recommended for recombinant expression of S. violacea gmk:
Expression System Selection:
Heterologous expression in E. coli BL21(DE3) is generally effective for Shewanella proteins
For proteins requiring cold adaptation, consider using cold-adapted expression hosts or cold-induction systems (16°C induction)
Vector Design Considerations:
Include a 6×His tag for purification (N-terminal tags are typically less disruptive for kinases)
Consider using pET-series vectors with T7 promoter systems for controlled expression
Codon optimization may be necessary as S. violacea is a GC-rich organism
Expression Conditions:
Initial induction at low temperature (16-20°C) to ensure proper folding
Use low IPTG concentrations (0.1-0.5 mM) to prevent inclusion body formation
Extend expression time (16-24 hours) at lower temperatures
Specialized Considerations for Extremophile Proteins:
Addition of osmolytes (such as glycerol 5-10%) to stabilize protein structure
Inclusion of appropriate divalent cations (Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺) in the growth medium
A multi-step purification strategy is recommended for obtaining high-purity, active recombinant S. violacea gmk:
Initial Capture:
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin for His-tagged protein
Lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol
Wash buffer: Same as lysis with 20-30 mM imidazole
Elution buffer: Same as lysis with 250-300 mM imidazole
Intermediate Purification:
2. Ion Exchange Chromatography
Based on the theoretical pI of the protein (approximately 5.5-6.5 for most gmk proteins)
Use Q-Sepharose (anion exchange) if the protein is negatively charged at pH 8.0
Polishing Step:
3. Size Exclusion Chromatography
Buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol
Critical for separating different oligomeric states and removing aggregates
Storage Recommendations:
Add 20-50% glycerol for long-term storage at -80°C (aliquot to avoid freeze-thaw cycles)
Typical shelf life is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C in liquid form and 12 months in lyophilized form
Multiple complementary approaches should be used to verify both the structural integrity and enzymatic activity of purified recombinant S. violacea gmk:
Structural Integrity Assessment:
SDS-PAGE analysis to confirm molecular weight (expected ~23 kDa)
Western blot using anti-His antibodies for tagged protein
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to evaluate secondary structure
Dynamic light scattering to assess homogeneity and oligomeric state
Enzymatic Activity Assays:
Coupled spectrophotometric assay:
Measure the production of GDP from GMP and ATP
Couple the reaction to pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase
Monitor NADH oxidation at 340 nm
Direct HPLC assay:
Separate and quantify GMP, GDP, and GTP
Use a C18 reverse-phase column with appropriate mobile phase
Radioactive assay:
Use [γ-³²P]ATP as substrate
Measure incorporation of ³²P into GDP
Functional Parameters to Measure:
Km for GMP and ATP substrates
kcat and catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km)
Effects of temperature and pressure on activity
Metal ion dependencies (likely Mg²⁺ or Mn²⁺)
Investigating the pressure adaptation of S. violacea gmk requires specialized approaches and equipment:
Experimental Design for Pressure Studies:
Data Interpretation Framework:
Evaluate volume changes during catalysis (ΔV‡)
Analyze compressibility factors
Assess changes in oligomeric state with pressure
Researchers should note that S. violacea has demonstrated adaptive responses to pressure in its respiratory system, with an inhibitor- and pressure-resistant terminal oxidase expressed in cells grown under high pressure (50 MPa) . Similar adaptations may be present in gmk.
Several mutagenesis strategies can be employed to investigate structure-function relationships in S. violacea gmk:
Site-Directed Mutagenesis Approaches:
Alanine scanning mutagenesis:
Systematically replace conserved residues with alanine
Target the P-loop motif (GXXGXGKS/T) essential for ATP binding
Analyze effects on catalytic activity and substrate binding
Domain swapping:
Create chimeric proteins with domains from mesophilic Shewanella gmk
Identify regions responsible for pressure and cold adaptation
Conservative vs. non-conservative substitutions:
Replace residues with similar amino acids (conservative)
Compare with effects of dramatically different residues (non-conservative)
Random Mutagenesis Methods:
Error-prone PCR:
Generate libraries with random mutations throughout the gene
Screen for variants with altered pressure or temperature optima
Directed evolution:
Apply selection pressure (temperature, pressure) to identify adaptive mutations
Use multiple rounds of mutagenesis and selection
Functional Characterization of Mutants:
| Mutation Type | Expected Effect | Analysis Method |
|---|---|---|
| P-loop motif mutations | Altered ATP binding | Kinetic analysis, isothermal titration calorimetry |
| Surface hydrophobic residues | Changed pressure sensitivity | Activity under varied pressure |
| Metal-binding site mutations | Modified cofactor requirements | Activity with different metal ions |
| Interface residues | Altered oligomerization | Size exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation |
While not directly related to gmk, understanding adaptive mutations in Shewanella provides valuable context for studying extremophile enzymes. The G547W mutation in sensor histidine kinase (pdsS) in Shewanella algae offers insights into bacterial adaptation mechanisms:
Key Findings on G547W Mutation:
The G547W mutation in the sensor histidine kinase (pdsS) of S. algae was associated with:
Overexpression of an OmpA-like protein (pdsO) within a proteobacteria-specific sortase system
β-lactam resistance through maintenance of membrane integrity
Mechanistic Insights:
Transcriptome analysis revealed the G547W mutation led to overexpression of multiple genes involved in:
The study observed a recurrent switch between wild-type and G547W alleles, revealing expansion and contraction of cell subpopulations in response to environmental pressures
Relevance to S. violacea gmk Research:
This adaptive mechanism demonstrates how Shewanella species can respond to environmental stressors through genetic adaptations. Similar mechanisms may be involved in pressure adaptation of S. violacea enzymes including gmk. Researchers studying gmk should consider:
The possibility of naturally occurring variants with enhanced function under extreme conditions
Potential regulatory mechanisms controlling gmk expression under different pressure conditions
The role of gmk in broader adaptive responses to environmental stressors
Investigating the role of gmk in nucleotide metabolism under high pressure requires integrating molecular, biochemical, and systems biology approaches:
Experimental Approaches:
Metabolomics under pressure:
Cultivate S. violacea under different pressures (0.1, 30, 50 MPa)
Extract and quantify nucleotides (GMP, GDP, GTP) using LC-MS/MS
Compare nucleotide pools and ratios at different pressures
Gene expression analysis:
qRT-PCR to measure gmk expression under different pressure conditions
RNA-seq to identify co-regulated genes in the nucleotide metabolism pathway
Promoter analysis to identify pressure-responsive elements
Genetic approaches:
Create gmk knockout or knockdown strains if possible (consider using CRISPR-Cas9)
Develop conditional expression systems for gmk
Perform complementation studies with gmk variants
Integrative Analysis:
Correlate gmk expression/activity with global nucleotide metabolism
Investigate interaction partners of gmk using pull-down assays
Develop mathematical models of nucleotide flux under different pressure conditions
Technical Considerations:
Working with S. violacea under high pressure requires specialized equipment:
High-pressure cultivation vessels
Pressure-resistant sampling systems
Methods for rapid decompression without disrupting cellular metabolism
Studies on S. violacea respiratory systems have shown that cells grown under high pressure (50 MPa) express specialized proteins adapting to these conditions . Similar adaptations likely exist in nucleotide metabolism pathways.
Comparative analysis of gmk across Shewanella species reveals insights into evolutionary adaptations to different environments:
Sequence and Structural Comparison:
While complete comparative data specific to gmk is not provided in the search results, we can infer information based on related Shewanella proteins:
Sequence conservation:
Gmk is highly conserved across Shewanella species with approximately 80-95% sequence identity expected
The core catalytic domain and P-loop motif are likely invariant
Most variation would occur in surface-exposed regions
Species-specific adaptations:
Functional Comparison Based on Environment:
Different Shewanella species inhabit diverse environments, likely leading to functional adaptations:
| Species | Environment | Expected gmk Adaptations |
|---|---|---|
| S. violacea | Deep-sea (5,110m), 8°C, 30 MPa | Pressure resistance, cold activity |
| S. denitrificans | Marine, denitrifying conditions | Standard activity profile |
| S. oneidensis | Freshwater/sediments | Mesophilic characteristics |
Evolutionary Implications:
The observation that S. violacea belongs to Group 1 Shewanella (extremophiles) while many other species belong to Group 2 (mesophiles) suggests distinct evolutionary trajectories. Gmk likely shows adaptations reflecting these environmental specializations.
Comparative genomics provides valuable insights into how guanylate kinase has evolved in extremophiles like S. violacea:
Genomic Context and Organization:
Gene neighborhood conservation:
Regulatory elements:
Promoter regions may contain extremophile-specific regulatory elements
Pressure and temperature-responsive elements could be identified through comparative analysis
Evolutionary Patterns in Extremophiles:
Molecular signatures of adaptation:
Higher frequency of specific amino acids (e.g., glycine for flexibility in cold environments)
Modified surface charge distribution for function under extreme conditions
Altered oligomerization interfaces for stability
Horizontal gene transfer vs. vertical evolution:
Examine whether gmk shows evidence of horizontal acquisition
Compare evolutionary rates in extremophile vs. mesophile lineages
Specific Adaptations in S. violacea:
The complete genome sequence analysis of S. violacea revealed adaptations for life in deep-sea environments . Though specific details about gmk are not provided in the search results, the bacterium's general adaptations include:
Modified respiratory systems with inhibitor- and pressure-resistant terminal oxidases
Higher percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids in membranes compared to mesophilic Shewanella
Likely modifications to enzyme systems for function under high pressure
S. violacea gmk can serve as a valuable auxiliary enzyme in coupled assay systems to study pressure effects on other enzymes:
Methodological Approach:
Development of pressure-resistant coupled assay systems:
Use S. violacea gmk as an auxiliary enzyme in assays requiring GMP phosphorylation
Create a fully pressure-adapted enzyme cascade with other extremophile enzymes
Design spectrophotometric assays functional at high pressures (30-50 MPa)
Application to study non-adapted enzymes:
Compare activity of mesophilic enzymes using either pressure-adapted or standard auxiliary enzymes
Isolate pressure effects on the target enzyme from effects on the detection system
Experimental Design Considerations:
Ensure S. violacea gmk is not rate-limiting in the coupled assay
Validate that gmk activity is stable at the experimental pressure range
Include appropriate controls to account for pressure effects on substrates and products
Potential Applications:
Nucleotide metabolism enzymes:
Nucleoside kinases
Nucleotide phosphatases
DNA/RNA polymerases
Signal transduction components:
cGMP-dependent pathways
Protein kinases
Phosphodiesterases
Creating auxotrophic strains using gmk as a selective marker is a valuable approach for genetic manipulation of Shewanella species:
Strategy for Creating gmk Auxotrophs:
Gene deletion approaches:
CRISPR-Cas9-based deletion of the native gmk gene
Traditional homologous recombination-based gene replacement
Transposon mutagenesis screening for gmk disruption
Complementation system:
Plasmid-based expression of functional gmk
Integration of gmk under control of inducible promoters
Use of gmk orthologs from related species for complementation studies
Considerations for S. violacea:
The creation of auxotrophic mutants in extremophiles presents unique challenges:
Growth media must be supplemented with appropriate metabolites
Growth conditions must account for pressure and temperature requirements
Transformation efficiencies may be lower than in model organisms
Examples from Related Research:
While specific gmk auxotrophy data for Shewanella is not provided in the search results, related examples include:
Creation of a quadruple auxotrophic mutant (ura3, trp1, leu2, and his3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas9, which achieved knockouts in up to 60% of colonies despite the need to disrupt multiple alleles simultaneously
Development of NAD⁺-auxotrophic E. coli strains by disrupting essential genes in the NAD⁺ biosynthesis pathway, allowing precise control of intracellular NAD⁺ levels
Generation of a uracil auxotroph of Saccharomyces boulardii using classical UV mutagenesis and selection with 5-FOA (5-Fluoroorotic acid)
These approaches could be adapted for creating gmk auxotrophs in S. violacea or related Shewanella species.
Expressing active S. violacea gmk in heterologous systems presents several challenges due to its extremophilic origin:
Major Challenges and Solutions:
Protein folding at non-native temperatures and pressures:
Challenge: S. violacea proteins evolved to fold at low temperatures (8°C) and high pressures (30 MPa)
Solutions:
Express at reduced temperatures (16-20°C)
Use chaperone co-expression systems (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE)
Add osmolytes to mimic pressure effects (glycerol, TMAO)
Codon usage bias:
Challenge: Differences in codon preferences between S. violacea and expression hosts
Solutions:
Codon optimization for the expression host
Use of specialized strains with rare tRNA genes
Expression in related Shewanella species rather than E. coli
Post-translational modifications:
Challenge: Potential differences in post-translational processing
Solutions:
Characterize native modifications in S. violacea gmk
Select expression hosts with similar modification machinery
Engineer constructs to minimize modification requirements
Protein solubility and stability:
Challenge: Aggregation or misfolding in non-native conditions
Solutions:
Fusion with solubility-enhancing tags (MBP, SUMO)
Addition of stabilizing agents in purification buffers
Directed evolution for improved expression
Documented Approaches from Related Research:
Researchers working with deep-sea bacteria have developed specialized approaches:
S. violacea has been cultured under various pressures (0.1, 30, 50, 65 MPa) to study pressure adaptation of its respiratory system
High-pressure cultivation equipment can be used to maintain native conditions during expression
Designing assays for measuring enzyme activity under high pressure requires specialized equipment and methodological adaptations:
High-Pressure Enzyme Assay Methodologies:
Spectrophotometric assays under pressure:
Equipment: High-pressure optical cells with sapphire windows
Method:
Coupled enzyme assays using pressure-resistant auxiliary enzymes
Direct monitoring of substrate disappearance or product formation
Stopped-flow systems modified for high-pressure work
Discontinuous assays with sampling:
Equipment: High-pressure reactors with sampling capability
Method:
Withdraw samples at defined time points
Rapidly decompress and analyze by HPLC or other methods
Calculate activity based on reaction progression
NMR spectroscopy under pressure:
Equipment: High-pressure NMR tubes and probes
Method:
Real-time monitoring of reaction progress
Identification of potential intermediates
Analysis of reaction kinetics
Data Analysis Considerations:
Account for pressure effects on substrate and product concentrations
Consider pressure-induced pH shifts in buffer systems
Apply appropriate models for extracting kinetic parameters under pressure
Adaptation Strategy Based on S. violacea Research:
Research on S. violacea terminal oxidases demonstrated significant differences in activity profiles under various pressures . Similar approaches could be applied to gmk:
Prepare membrane fractions or purified enzyme from cells grown under different pressures
Measure activity across a pressure range (0.1-65 MPa)
Compare relative activities to identify pressure optima and ranges
A comprehensive approach to studying substrate specificity of S. violacea gmk should include:
Methodological Approaches:
Substrate screening:
Traditional nucleotide substrates: GMP, dGMP, IMP, XMP
Nucleotide analogs: Modified bases, sugar modifications, fluorescent analogs
High-throughput screening: Microplate-based activity assays with substrate libraries
Kinetic parameter determination:
Measure Km, Vmax, kcat for each viable substrate
Determine inhibition constants for competitive inhibitors
Calculate specificity constants (kcat/Km) to quantify preference
Structural analysis of enzyme-substrate complexes:
X-ray crystallography with substrate or substrate analogs
Molecular docking studies
Molecular dynamics simulations under varying pressure conditions
Comparative Experimental Design:
| Parameter | S. violacea gmk | Mesophilic gmk | Analysis Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Substrate range | Primary data | Comparison data | Activity assays with multiple substrates |
| Temperature profile | 4-30°C | 25-40°C | Activity at temperature range |
| Pressure effects | 0.1-50 MPa | 0.1 MPa | High-pressure assay systems |
| Metal ion requirements | Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, others | Mg²⁺ | Activity with different metal ions |
Integration with Evolutionary Analysis:
Compare substrate preferences across evolutionary diverse gmk enzymes
Correlate specificity changes with habitat adaptation
Identify key residues controlling specificity through sequence analysis
This approach would build on understanding of other Shewanella enzymes, such as UshA from S. violacea, which has been shown to utilize AMP, ATP, and GTP as substrates with Mg²⁺ and Mn²⁺ as cofactors .
Several promising research directions could advance our understanding of S. violacea gmk's role in high-pressure adaptation:
Fundamental Mechanistic Studies:
Pressure-induced conformational changes:
High-pressure X-ray crystallography or NMR studies
Molecular dynamics simulations under varying pressure
FRET-based studies of protein dynamics under pressure
Volume change analysis:
Determine activation volumes (ΔV‡) for the gmk reaction
Compare with mesophilic homologs
Identify structural elements contributing to pressure adaptation
Hydration shell dynamics:
Examine water-protein interactions under pressure
Study the role of hydration in pressure adaptation
Use neutron scattering to probe hydration changes
Systems-Level Investigations:
Metabolic network analysis under pressure:
Map nucleotide metabolism fluxes at varying pressures
Identify rate-limiting steps under pressure
Develop computational models of pressure effects on metabolism
Transcriptional and translational regulation:
Investigate pressure-responsive elements controlling gmk expression
Study post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms
Examine protein-protein interactions affected by pressure
Applied Research Directions:
Engineering pressure-adapted enzymes:
Use insights from S. violacea gmk to create pressure-resistant biocatalysts
Apply directed evolution to enhance pressure resistance
Develop chimeric proteins with pressure-adapted domains
Biotechnological applications:
Develop high-pressure enzymatic processes using gmk and related enzymes
Create biosensors for pressure detection
Apply insights to enhance biocatalysis under non-conventional conditions
Systems biology approaches offer powerful tools for understanding S. violacea gmk in its broader cellular context:
Multi-Omics Integration Strategies:
Computational Modeling Approaches:
Constraint-based metabolic modeling:
Develop genome-scale metabolic models for S. violacea
Perform flux balance analysis under different conditions
Predict metabolic adaptations to pressure changes
Kinetic modeling of nucleotide metabolism:
Incorporate pressure effects on enzyme kinetics
Simulate nucleotide fluctuations under varying conditions
Identify control points in the network
Integration with Experimental Data:
This systems approach would build on existing knowledge about S. violacea adaptations, such as:
Expression of inhibitor- and pressure-resistant terminal oxidases under high pressure
Modifications to respiratory pathways with parallel electron transport chains
Membrane adaptations with increased polyunsaturated fatty acids
Understanding gmk within this context would provide a more comprehensive view of nucleotide metabolism adaptation in deep-sea bacteria.
Evolutionary studies of S. violacea gmk can provide significant insights into adaptation mechanisms:
Evolutionary Analysis Approaches:
Ancestral sequence reconstruction:
Infer ancestral gmk sequences across the Shewanella phylogeny
Resurrect ancestral enzymes through recombinant expression
Compare ancestral vs. modern enzyme properties
Positive selection analysis:
Identify sites under positive selection using dN/dS ratios
Map selected sites onto protein structure
Correlate with functional/structural features
Experimental evolution:
Culture S. violacea under altered pressure regimes
Monitor gmk sequence changes over generations
Characterize evolved variants
Specific Research Questions:
Convergent evolution across extremophiles:
Compare gmk adaptations in distantly related piezophiles
Identify common strategies for pressure adaptation
Distinguish between convergent and divergent solutions
Trade-offs in enzyme adaptation:
Characterize activity-stability trade-offs in gmk variants
Examine specialization vs. generalization in substrate use
Determine costs of pressure adaptation on other enzyme properties
Epistatic interactions:
Study how gmk mutations interact with other genetic changes
Identify compensatory mutations in the nucleotide metabolism network
Map the adaptive landscape for gmk evolution
Parallel with Known Adaptive Mechanisms:
The study of adaptive mutations in Shewanella algae providing β-lactam resistance offers a model for understanding adaptive evolution: