Recombinant Shigella flexneri serotype 5b Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase (arnC)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: While we prioritize shipping the format currently in stock, please specify your format preference in order notes for customized fulfillment.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary depending on the purchasing method and location. Please consult your local distributor for precise delivery estimates.
Note: Standard shipping includes blue ice packs. Dry ice shipping requires advance notification and incurs additional charges.
Notes
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Centrifuge the vial briefly before opening to settle the contents. Reconstitute the protein in sterile, deionized water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquoting at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard glycerol concentration is 50% and can serve as a guideline.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on several factors: storage conditions, buffer composition, temperature, and protein stability. Generally, liquid formulations have a 6-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C, while lyophilized formulations have a 12-month shelf life at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing.
Tag type is determined during production. If a specific tag type is required, please inform us, and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
arnC; SFV_2324; Undecaprenyl-phosphate 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose transferase; Undecaprenyl-phosphate Ara4FN transferase; Ara4FN transferase
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-322
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Shigella flexneri serotype 5b (strain 8401)
Target Names
arnC
Target Protein Sequence
MFEIHPVKKVSVVIPVYNEQESLPELIRRTTTACESLGKEYEILLIDDGSSDNSAHMLVE ASQAENSHIVSILLNRNYGQHSAIMAGFSHVTGDLIITLDADLQNPPEEIPRLVAKADEG YDVVGTVRQNRQDSWFRKTASKMINRLIQRTTGKAMGNYGCMLRAYRRHIVDAMLHCHER STFIPILANIFARRAIEIPVHHAEREFGESKYSFMRLINLMYDLVTCLTTTPLRMLSLLG SIIAIGGFSIAVLLVILRLTFGPQWAAEGVFMLFAVLFTFIGAQFIGMGLLGEYIGRIYT DVRARPRYFVQQVIRPSSKENE
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function

This enzyme catalyzes the transfer of 4-deoxy-4-formamido-L-arabinose from UDP to undecaprenyl phosphate. This modified arabinose is incorporated into lipid A and is essential for resistance to polymyxins and cationic antimicrobial peptides.

Database Links

KEGG: sfv:SFV_2324

Protein Families
Glycosyltransferase 2 family
Subcellular Location
Cell inner membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the biological role of arnC in Shigella flexneri?

ArnC is an integral membrane glycosyltransferase that catalyzes a critical step in bacterial lipopolysaccharide modification. Specifically, it attaches a formylated form of aminoarabinose (L-Ara4FN) to the lipid undecaprenyl phosphate (UndP). This modification pathway is essential for outer membrane remodeling, which contributes to bacterial virulence and survival mechanisms in host environments . The enzyme belongs to the polyprenyl phosphate glycosyltransferase family, which is distributed widely among Gram-negative bacteria including Shigella, a genus discovered in 1897 that causes dysenteric diarrhea in primates . The biological significance of this pathway extends to bacterial survival under antibiotic stress, as lipopolysaccharide modifications can alter membrane permeability and affect antibiotic entry.

How is the structural characterization of arnC typically performed?

Structural characterization of arnC has been successfully performed using single-particle cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) with the protein embedded in lipid nanodiscs, which maintains the native membrane environment. The methodological approach involves:

  • Protein expression in appropriate bacterial systems (typically E. coli)

  • Purification while maintaining the protein in detergent micelles

  • Reconstitution into lipid nanodiscs to mimic the native membrane environment

  • Vitrification and imaging using cryo-EM

  • Data processing and 3D reconstruction to determine structural features

Researchers have successfully resolved two conformational states of arnC: the apo (unbound) form and the UDP-bound form . Comparative analysis between datasets collected at 200 kV (Talos Arctica) and 300 kV (Titan Krios) microscopes shows negligible differences in resolution at matched particle counts, suggesting that specimen-dependent factors rather than imaging conditions may be the primary limitation to achieving higher resolution .

What is the relationship between Shigella flexneri arnC and bacterial pathogenesis?

ArnC contributes to Shigella flexneri pathogenesis through its role in modifying bacterial surface structures, which affects host-pathogen interactions and survival within the host. Shigella flexneri is one of the most prevalent species causing shigellosis worldwide, accounting for approximately 60% of isolates . The disease causes around 160,000 deaths annually, particularly affecting children under 5 years of age .

Lipopolysaccharide modifications catalyzed by arnC can:

  • Alter bacterial surface charge, affecting interactions with host immune factors

  • Contribute to antibiotic resistance mechanisms

  • Potentially modify recognition by host immune receptors

This relationship between enzymatic function and pathogenesis makes arnC an attractive target for both antimicrobial development and vaccine strategies. Current vaccine development approaches against Shigella include targeting outer membrane proteins that are conserved across strains, similar to the research on TolC as a vaccine candidate .

What are the optimal conditions for heterologous expression and purification of recombinant arnC?

The optimal conditions for recombinant arnC expression and purification involve careful consideration of expression systems, detergents, and buffer conditions:

Expression Systems:

  • E. coli is typically the preferred expression host, particularly strains optimized for membrane protein expression (e.g., C41(DE3), C43(DE3))

  • Induction conditions: 0.5-1.0 mM IPTG at lower temperatures (16-20°C) for extended periods (16-20 hours) to promote proper folding

  • Co-expression with chaperones may enhance yields of functional protein

Purification Strategy:

  • Membrane isolation by differential centrifugation

  • Solubilization using mild detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM) or lauryl maltose neopentyl glycol (LMNG))

  • Initial purification by affinity chromatography (typically Ni-NTA for His-tagged constructs)

  • Secondary purification using size exclusion chromatography

  • Optional reconstitution into lipid nanodiscs for structural studies

Buffer Optimization:

  • pH range: 7.5-8.0

  • Salt concentration: 150-300 mM NaCl

  • Addition of glycerol (5-10%) to enhance stability

  • Inclusion of divalent cations, particularly Mn²⁺, which has been shown to enable higher affinity binding of UDP substrates

This methodological approach should yield protein suitable for both biochemical assays and structural studies.

How can molecular dynamics simulations enhance our understanding of arnC substrate binding?

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations provide valuable insights into arnC substrate binding that are difficult to obtain through experimental methods alone. Based on current research approaches, the following methodology is recommended:

Simulation Preparation:

  • Start with high-resolution structural data (from cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography)

  • Embed the protein in a realistic membrane environment (e.g., POPC bilayer)

  • Add explicit solvent and ions to mimic physiological conditions

  • Include substrates (UndP and UDP-L-Ara4FN) in relevant binding positions

Simulation Types and Analysis:

  • Coarse-grained simulations: Useful for studying large-scale movements such as UndP threading through juxtamembrane helices. These simulations have revealed that UndP threads between the juxtamembrane helices of each ArnC protomer to reach the catalytic GT-A domain .

  • Atomistic simulations: Required for detailed binding interactions and conformational changes. These have helped identify two different coordination positions for UndP within the GT-A domain:

    • Position 1 (P1): "standby" position

    • Position 2 (P2): "catalysis" position enabling nucleophilic attack

  • Enhanced sampling techniques: Methods such as metadynamics or umbrella sampling can help calculate binding free energies and identify energetic barriers in the catalytic cycle.

Data Analysis:

  • Root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and fluctuation (RMSF) analyses

  • Hydrogen bond and salt bridge monitoring

  • Principal component analysis to identify major modes of motion

  • Free energy calculations to quantify binding affinity

Through these approaches, simulations have revealed the mechanistic details of UndP binding, showing that in the presence of the nucleotide, both UndP and UDP-L-Ara4FN are less labile when UndP is located in position P2, which is optimal for catalysis .

What are the challenges in developing activity assays for arnC?

Developing reliable activity assays for arnC presents several technical challenges due to its nature as a membrane enzyme and the complexity of its substrates:

Substrate Accessibility Challenges:

  • UndP is highly hydrophobic and has limited solubility in aqueous buffers

  • UDP-L-Ara4FN must be synthesized, as it is not commercially available

  • Ensuring proper orientation and accessibility of substrates to the enzyme active site

Methodological Approaches to Address These Challenges:

Assay TypeMethodologyAdvantagesLimitations
Radiometric AssaysUsing ¹⁴C or ³H-labeled substrates to track product formationHigh sensitivity; QuantitativeSafety concerns; Specialized equipment required
HPLC-based AssaysMonitoring substrate consumption/product formation via HPLCDirect quantification of reaction componentsLower throughput; Requires substrate/product separation
Coupled Enzyme AssaysLinking arnC activity to secondary reactions with colorimetric/fluorescent outputsReal-time monitoring; Potential for high-throughputInterference from coupling enzymes; Complex assay development
Mass SpectrometryDirect detection of reaction productsHigh specificity; Can detect multiple productsSpecialized equipment; Sample preparation complexity
Fluorescence-based AssaysModified substrates with fluorescent labelsReal-time monitoring; Potential for high-throughputSubstrate modifications may alter activity

Assay Optimization Considerations:

  • Detergent type and concentration to maintain enzyme stability while allowing substrate access

  • Inclusion of divalent cations (particularly Mn²⁺) which enhance substrate binding

  • Temperature and pH optimization specific to arnC from Shigella flexneri

  • Reconstitution in liposomes or nanodiscs may provide a more native-like environment for activity measurements

Successful activity assay development will enable screening of potential inhibitors and deeper investigation of the catalytic mechanism of arnC.

How does the clamshell-like motion in arnC affect its catalytic activity?

The clamshell-like motion in arnC represents a crucial conformational change triggered by UDP binding that directly impacts catalytic function. Based on structural comparison between apo and UDP-bound states using cryo-EM, this motion involves the GT-A domain moving closer to the juxtamembrane helices of each protomer .

Functional Implications of the Clamshell Motion:

  • Substrate Positioning: The conformational change repositions critical catalytic residues, bringing them into optimal alignment for reaction chemistry. This movement is essential for the transition of UndP from the "standby" position (P1) to the "catalysis" position (P2) .

  • Catalytic Activation: The motion likely initiates changes in the β7-JM2 loop flexibility, allowing UndP to move to the catalysis position. This rearrangement creates an environment where the acceptor phosphate of UndP is brought into proximity of both the potential catalytic base D100 and the anomeric carbon of the L-Ara4FN sugar .

  • Product Release Mechanism: Following catalysis, the conformational dynamics facilitate product release, with the newly formed product forcing UndP to backtrack into a "product position" that facilitates release of the lipid back to the membrane .

Experimental Evidence:

  • Cryo-EM structures in different conformational states

  • Molecular dynamics simulations showing reduced mobility of substrates in the catalytically relevant conformation

  • Microsecond-scale simulations demonstrating the stability of the enzyme-substrate complex in position P2 compared to P1

This mechanistic understanding provides insight into how membrane glycosyltransferases precisely control substrate positioning to enable challenging reactions at the membrane interface.

What role does the DXD motif play in arnC function?

The DXD motif is a signature sequence in glycosyltransferases that plays a critical role in arnC function through distinct contributions of each aspartate residue:

DXD Motif Structure and Function:

  • Second Aspartate (D102): Participates in the coordination of the essential divalent metal ion (typically Mn²⁺), which in turn coordinates the phosphate groups of the UDP-sugar donor substrate. This metal coordination is critical for proper substrate orientation and activation .

  • First Aspartate (D100): Unlike many other glycosyltransferases where both aspartates coordinate the metal ion, in arnC the first aspartate does not participate in metal coordination. Instead, it functions as a catalytic base to abstract a proton from UndP, thereby activating it to perform the nucleophilic attack on the C1 carbon of the sugar .

Catalytic Mechanism Involving the DXD Motif:

The proposed mechanism proceeds as follows:

  • D100 abstracts a proton from UndP, creating a nucleophilic oxyanion

  • The nucleophilic oxyanion attacks the C1 carbon of L-Ara4FN

  • The glycosidic bond between UDP and L-Ara4FN is cleaved

  • The new glycosidic bond between UndP and L-Ara4FN is formed

Experimental Evidence Supporting This Role:

  • Structural data from cryo-EM showing the positioning of the DXD motif relative to substrates

  • Atomistic simulations demonstrating the proximity of D100 to the UndP phosphate in the catalytically relevant position P2

  • Comparison with other glycosyltransferases in the GT-A fold family

  • Similarities to other Pren-P GT family members, which likely operate through a similar mechanism

Understanding the specific role of each residue in the DXD motif provides critical insight into the catalytic mechanism of arnC and related enzymes, with potential implications for inhibitor design targeting this essential motif.

How does UndP threading through arnC's juxtamembrane helices contribute to substrate positioning?

The threading of the undecaprenyl phosphate (UndP) through arnC's juxtamembrane helices represents a sophisticated substrate delivery mechanism that is essential for proper catalytic function. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations have revealed the detailed pathway and dynamics of this process .

UndP Threading Mechanism:

  • Initial Membrane Association: UndP initially resides in the lipid bilayer with its hydrophobic tail embedded in the membrane.

  • Threading Pathway: The lipid threads between the juxtamembrane (JM) helices of an arnC protomer, with the phosphate head group being guided toward the GT-A domain .

  • Coordination Stations: The UndP phosphate group follows a defined path:

    • Initial coordination by basic residues in the JM helices

    • Movement to position P1 (the "standby" position) within the GT-A domain, coordinated by residues R128 and R137

    • Transition to position P2 (the "catalysis" position) upon UDP-L-Ara4FN binding

  • Functional Outcomes: This threading mechanism ensures:

    • Precise positioning of the acceptor phosphate relative to the donor sugar

    • Protection of the reactive intermediates from the aqueous environment

    • Controlled product release back into the membrane

Supporting Evidence:

This threading mechanism appears to be a conserved feature among members of the Pren-P glycosyltransferase family, providing a general model for how these enzymes access their lipid substrates from the membrane and position them for catalysis.

How might inhibiting arnC function impact bacterial antibiotic resistance?

Inhibiting arnC function could significantly impact bacterial antibiotic resistance mechanisms, particularly those involving modifications of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) structure. The pathway in which arnC participates is directly involved in modifying the bacterial outer membrane, which serves as a critical permeability barrier against antibiotics .

Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms Potentially Affected:

  • Polymyxin Resistance: The addition of L-Ara4FN to lipid A reduces the negative charge of the outer membrane, decreasing the binding affinity of cationic antimicrobial peptides like polymyxins. Inhibiting arnC would prevent this modification, potentially restoring sensitivity to these antibiotics.

  • Permeability Barrier Modulation: LPS modifications alter the physical properties of the outer membrane, affecting the penetration of hydrophobic antibiotics. Blocking arnC could restore wild-type membrane properties and increase antibiotic penetration.

  • Innate Immune Evasion: Modified LPS structures can help bacteria evade host innate immune defenses, including antimicrobial peptides. Inhibiting arnC might reduce bacterial survival in host environments by increasing susceptibility to host defense mechanisms.

Research Implications:

  • Adjuvant Therapy Potential: arnC inhibitors could serve as adjuvants to restore effectiveness of existing antibiotics rather than as standalone antimicrobials.

  • Resistance Development Risk: The essentiality of arnC under different growth conditions needs careful assessment, as non-essential targets may allow easier development of resistance.

  • Experimental Approaches to Validate This Strategy:

    • Generation of arnC deletion or conditional mutants to assess antibiotic susceptibility profiles

    • Development of small molecule inhibitors targeting the enzyme's active site

    • In vivo infection models to evaluate efficacy of combination therapies including arnC inhibitors

This approach aligns with current antibiotic development strategies focusing on targeting resistance mechanisms rather than only direct bacterial killing.

What immunogenic potential does recombinant arnC have for vaccine development?

The immunogenic potential of recombinant arnC for vaccine development against Shigella flexneri must be evaluated through both computational predictions and experimental validation, similar to approaches used for other Shigella outer membrane proteins.

Immunogenic Assessment Methodology:

  • In Silico Analysis:

    • Epitope prediction using multiple algorithms to identify potential B-cell and T-cell epitopes

    • Conservation analysis across Shigella strains and serotypes to ensure broad protection

    • Structural analysis to identify surface-exposed regions most likely to elicit protective antibodies

    • Homology assessment with human proteins to minimize autoimmunity risks

    This approach is similar to the reverse vaccinology strategy employed for TolC assessment, which evaluated outer membrane proteins for transmembrane domains, conservation, antigenicity, and B/T-cell epitope prediction .

  • Experimental Validation:

    • Expression and purification of recombinant arnC or selected epitopes

    • Assessment of protein solubility and stability under physiological conditions

    • Immunization studies in animal models, typically BALB/c mice, with appropriate adjuvants

    • Evaluation of immune responses through:

      • Antibody production (IgG levels by ELISA)

      • T-cell responses (cytokine production, proliferation assays)

      • Protection against challenge with virulent Shigella (survival rates, bacterial loads)

Potential Advantages of arnC as a Vaccine Candidate:

  • As a membrane protein, it may be accessible to antibodies during infection

  • Its conservation across Shigella strains could provide broad protection

  • Involvement in LPS modification pathways may make it immunologically distinct

Challenges to Address:

  • Membrane proteins are often difficult to express in soluble, correctly folded form

  • Portions of the protein embedded in the membrane may be poor immunogens

  • Appropriate adjuvants and delivery systems need development for optimal immune responses

Research on TolC as a vaccine candidate demonstrated that properly designed recombinant outer membrane proteins from Shigella can provide effective protection against challenge with 2 LD50 of Shigella flexneri in mouse models , suggesting similar potential for arnC-based vaccines.

How can structural information about arnC inform drug design strategies?

Structural information about arnC provides a solid foundation for structure-based drug design strategies targeting this essential bacterial enzyme. The availability of cryo-EM structures in different conformational states (apo and UDP-bound) and insights from molecular simulations create multiple opportunities for rational inhibitor development .

Drug Design Strategies Based on arnC Structure:

  • Active Site Inhibitors:

    • Target the catalytic site where the glycosyl transfer reaction occurs

    • Design compounds that mimic UDP-L-Ara4FN but incorporate non-hydrolyzable linkages

    • Focus on interactions with the essential DXD motif and metal coordination

    • Potential for developing transition state analogs based on the proposed catalytic mechanism

  • Allosteric Inhibitors:

    • Target the conformational changes required for catalysis, specifically the clamshell-like motion

    • Design compounds that stabilize the apo conformation, preventing the rearrangement necessary for catalysis

    • Focus on the interface between the GT-A domain and juxtamembrane helices

  • Substrate Binding Site Inhibitors:

    • Target the UndP binding pathway through the juxtamembrane helices

    • Design compounds that block the threading of UndP to position P1 or the transition to position P2

    • Focus on the basic residues (R128, R137) that coordinate the phosphate group

Methodological Approaches:

ApproachMethodologyAdvantages
Virtual ScreeningDocking libraries of compounds against different conformational statesRapid initial identification of lead compounds
Fragment-Based Drug DesignScreening small molecular fragments that bind to different regionsCan identify novel chemotypes with good physicochemical properties
Structure-Activity Relationship StudiesSystematic modification of lead compounds guided by structural dataOptimization of potency and selectivity
Molecular Dynamics-Based Drug DesignUsing enhanced sampling to identify transient binding pocketsCan reveal cryptic sites not visible in static structures

Considerations for Successful Drug Development:

  • Selectivity against human glycosyltransferases

  • Membrane permeability to reach the target

  • Resistance development potential

  • Pharmacokinetic properties suitable for antimicrobial therapy

The structural understanding of arnC's catalytic cycle, including the different UndP coordination positions and the role of the DXD motif in catalysis , provides multiple intervention points for inhibitor development that could lead to novel therapeutics against Shigella infections.

What are the most promising experimental methodologies for improving arnC structural resolution?

Despite successful cryo-EM studies of arnC, achieving higher resolution remains challenging. Based on current research, several experimental methodologies show promise for improving structural resolution:

Cryo-EM Optimization Approaches:

  • Alternative Reconstruction Algorithms: Implementing advanced algorithms that better account for conformational heterogeneity, as current resolution limitations appear to be specimen-dependent rather than instrument-dependent .

  • Complex Stabilization Strategies:

    • Antibody fragments or nanobodies to reduce conformational flexibility

    • Substrate analogs or inhibitors to lock the enzyme in specific conformational states

    • Engineering disulfide bonds to stabilize key interfaces

    • Fusion protein approaches to increase particle size and provide alignment markers

  • Specimen Preparation Improvements:

    • Optimization of nanodisc composition and size to improve particle orientation distribution

    • Exploration of alternative membrane mimetics (SMALPs, amphipols)

    • Grid surface modifications to prevent preferential orientation

    • Implementation of new vitrification techniques to improve ice quality

  • Data Collection Strategies:

    • Tilted data collection to overcome preferred orientation issues

    • Energy-filtered imaging to improve contrast

    • Advanced motion correction algorithms for better frame alignment

    • Higher electron dose-fractionation schemes

Complementary Structural Approaches:

  • Integrated Structural Biology:

    • X-ray crystallography of soluble domains or stabilized constructs

    • NMR spectroscopy for dynamic regions or small fragments

    • Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to probe conformational changes

    • Cross-linking mass spectrometry to establish distance constraints

  • Hybrid Modeling Approaches:

    • Integrating cryo-EM, spectroscopic data, and computational modeling

    • Applying molecular dynamics flexible fitting to refine structures within cryo-EM maps

    • Using AlphaFold2 or similar AI-based prediction tools as starting models

These approaches address the specific challenges noted in current research, where specimen-dependent limitations impose practical limits to resolution via the B-factor , and provide multiple avenues for achieving more detailed structural information about arnC.

How can high-throughput screening methods be adapted for membrane-bound glycosyltransferases like arnC?

Adapting high-throughput screening (HTS) methods for membrane-bound glycosyltransferases like arnC presents unique challenges but several innovative approaches can be implemented:

Enzyme Preparation Strategies for HTS:

  • Detergent-Solubilized Enzyme Formats:

    • Optimize detergent type and concentration for stability and activity

    • Implement quality control measures to ensure consistent enzyme preparation

    • Develop stabilized variants through protein engineering for improved handling

  • Membrane-Mimetic Systems:

    • Nanodiscs with consistent size and lipid composition

    • Proteoliposomes with controlled orientation

    • Polymer-based systems like SMALPs that extract membrane proteins with their native lipid environment

Assay Adaptations for HTS Compatibility:

  • Fluorescence-Based Detection Systems:

    • Development of fluorescently labeled UDP-sugar analogs

    • FRET-based approaches to monitor substrate-product conversions

    • Fluorescent polarization assays to detect binding events

  • Coupling Systems:

    • Enzyme-coupled assays that link glycosyltransferase activity to fluorogenic reactions

    • Detection of UDP release through coupling to NADH consumption

    • pH-sensitive dyes to detect proton release during catalysis

  • Label-Free Technologies:

    • Surface plasmon resonance arrays for binding studies

    • Mass spectrometry-based screening (MALDI-TOF)

    • Thermal shift assays to detect stabilizing ligands

Implementation Considerations:

ChallengeInnovative SolutionAdvantage
Limited substrate availabilityChemoenzymatic synthesis of UDP-L-Ara4FN in microscaleEnables generation of sufficient substrate for large screens
Variable enzyme activityImplementation of internal controls and normalization algorithmsImproves assay robustness and reduces false positives
Membrane protein stabilityAddition of lipids or cholesterol derivatives to screening buffersEnhances enzyme stability during screening process
Compound interference with assayCounter-screen design to identify and exclude interfering compoundsReduces false positives from compound autofluorescence or aggregation

Validation Strategy:

  • Primary screen using simplified surrogate substrates

  • Secondary screens with native substrates for hit confirmation

  • Dose-response determination for promising candidates

  • Mechanistic and binding studies to characterize mode of action

  • Structure-activity relationship studies for hit optimization

This approach leverages modern screening technologies while addressing the specific challenges of working with membrane-bound glycosyltransferases, potentially accelerating the discovery of arnC inhibitors or mechanistic probes.

What cross-disciplinary approaches might advance our understanding of arnC in bacterial pathogenesis?

Advancing our understanding of arnC in bacterial pathogenesis requires integrated cross-disciplinary approaches that bridge multiple scientific fields. The following research directions offer promising avenues for comprehensive investigation:

Integrative Approaches for arnC Research:

  • Systems Biology Integration:

    • Transcriptomics to identify expression patterns of arnC during infection and under antibiotic stress

    • Proteomics to map interacting partners and post-translational modifications

    • Metabolomics to track lipid A modifications in vivo

    • Network analysis to position arnC within bacterial stress response pathways

  • Advanced Imaging Technologies:

    • Super-resolution microscopy to visualize arnC localization within bacterial membranes

    • Correlative light and electron microscopy to connect function with ultrastructure

    • Live-cell imaging with fluorescent biosensors to track enzymatic activity in real-time

    • Cryo-electron tomography to visualize membrane architecture in native states

  • Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies:

    • Ex vivo infection models using human intestinal organoids

    • Engineered tissue models that recapitulate intestinal epithelial structure

    • Immune cell co-culture systems to assess interaction with host defenses

    • CRISPR-modified host cells to identify receptors recognizing LPS modifications

  • Immunological Investigations:

    • Analysis of how arnC-mediated LPS modifications affect innate immune recognition

    • Evaluation of adaptive immune responses to bacteria with modified LPS structures

    • Assessment of arnC as a potential antigenic target during natural infection

    • Development of antibodies or nanobodies targeting surface-exposed regions of arnC

  • Evolutionary and Comparative Genomics:

    • Phylogenetic analysis of arnC across bacterial species

    • Identification of natural variants with altered function

    • Horizontal gene transfer patterns of LPS modification operons

    • Coevolution analysis with host immune factors

  • Translational Research Directions:

    • Development of diagnostics targeting arnC or its products

    • Design of inhibitors as potential therapeutics or research tools

    • Vaccine formulations incorporating arnC epitopes

    • Biomarker identification for tracking bacterial adaptation during infection

This multidisciplinary approach would provide a comprehensive understanding of arnC's role in Shigella flexneri pathogenesis, from molecular mechanism to clinical significance, potentially yielding new strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of shigellosis, which remains a significant global health challenge causing approximately 160,000 deaths annually .

What are common challenges in expressing recombinant arnC and how can they be addressed?

Expressing recombinant membrane proteins like arnC presents numerous challenges that require systematic troubleshooting approaches. The following methodologies address the most common issues encountered in arnC expression and purification:

Expression Challenges and Solutions:

  • Protein Toxicity in Expression Hosts:

    • Implement tight control of expression using repressible promoters (e.g., pBAD)

    • Use specialized E. coli strains designed for toxic membrane proteins (C41(DE3), C43(DE3))

    • Consider lower copy number vectors to reduce basal expression

    • Develop fusion constructs with soluble partners to reduce toxicity

  • Protein Misfolding and Inclusion Body Formation:

    • Optimize induction conditions (lower temperature, reduced inducer concentration)

    • Co-express with molecular chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ)

    • Add chemical chaperones to growth media (glycerol, sucrose, arginine)

    • Explore different solubilization and refolding protocols if inclusion bodies cannot be avoided

  • Low Expression Yields:

    • Optimize codon usage for the expression host

    • Test multiple fusion tags and their positions (N-terminal, C-terminal)

    • Evaluate different E. coli strains optimized for membrane protein expression

    • Consider alternate expression systems (yeast, insect cells, mammalian cells)

Purification Challenges and Solutions:

  • Detergent Selection Issues:

    • Screen multiple detergent types systematically (maltoside, glucoside, and neopentyl glycol families)

    • Test detergent mixtures for improved extraction efficiency

    • Implement high-throughput detergent screening using thermal stability assays

    • Consider newer amphipathic polymers (SMALPs) that extract proteins with native lipids

  • Protein Instability During Purification:

    • Add specific lipids that stabilize the protein (phosphatidylglycerol, cardiolipin)

    • Include glycerol (5-10%) in all buffers to enhance stability

    • Maintain divalent cations (Mn²⁺) which enhance substrate binding

    • Minimize purification time and steps to reduce degradation opportunities

  • Heterogeneity in Purified Samples:

    • Implement rigorous size exclusion chromatography as a final step

    • Consider additional purification steps (ion exchange, hydroxyapatite)

    • Use analytical ultracentrifugation to assess sample homogeneity

    • Employ negative stain EM to visualize particle uniformity before cryo-EM

Activity Preservation Strategies:

  • Maintaining Enzymatic Function:

    • Validate activity at each purification step to ensure function is preserved

    • Screen buffer conditions systematically (pH, salt, additives)

    • Consider reconstitution into nanodiscs or liposomes for functional studies

    • Explore protein engineering to enhance stability without compromising activity

These methodologies provide a comprehensive approach to troubleshooting recombinant arnC expression and purification, addressing the key challenges identified in membrane protein biochemistry while maintaining the functional integrity necessary for meaningful structural and enzymatic studies.

How can researchers resolve data inconsistencies in arnC structure-function studies?

Resolving data inconsistencies in arnC structure-function studies requires systematic analysis of potential sources of variability and implementation of rigorous validation protocols. The following methodological approach addresses common sources of discrepancies:

Sources of Data Inconsistency and Resolution Strategies:

  • Structural Heterogeneity Issues:

    • Problem: Conformational flexibility in cryo-EM datasets leading to inconsistent structural interpretations.

    • Resolution Approach: Implement advanced classification methods (3D variability analysis, manifold embedding) to separate distinct conformational states. Compare datasets collected at different microscope voltages (200kV vs. 300kV) to ensure consistent resolution at matched particle counts .

    • Validation Method: Cross-validate structural models using independent datasets and resolution estimation metrics (FSC half-maps, model-to-map FSC).

  • Functional Assay Variability:

    • Problem: Different activity assay formats yielding inconsistent kinetic parameters.

    • Resolution Approach: Standardize assay conditions across laboratories, including detergent type/concentration, buffer composition, and substrate preparation methods.

    • Validation Method: Perform inter-laboratory comparisons with standard preparations and establish positive/negative controls for each assay type.

  • Protein Preparation Differences:

    • Problem: Variations in expression systems and purification protocols affecting protein behavior.

    • Resolution Approach: Develop detailed standard operating procedures covering all aspects from gene to purified protein. Characterize protein samples thoroughly (SEC-MALS, native MS, analytical ultracentrifugation) before functional studies.

    • Validation Method: Implement quality control checkpoints with defined acceptance criteria at each preparation stage.

Systematic Approach to Reconciling Conflicting Data:

  • Database Creation and Meta-Analysis:

    • Compile all available data on arnC structure and function with detailed experimental conditions

    • Perform statistical analysis to identify variables that correlate with outcome differences

    • Generate consensus values with confidence intervals for key parameters

  • Critical Parameter Identification:

    • Design factorial experiments to identify which variables most strongly influence results

    • Focus on interdependencies between parameters (e.g., detergent effects on metal binding)

    • Establish minimally sufficient conditions for reproducible outcomes

  • Advanced Data Integration Techniques:

TechniqueApplicationAdvantage for Resolving Inconsistencies
Bayesian Statistical ApproachesIntegrating data with different confidence levelsAccounts for variable data quality and experimental uncertainty
Ensemble ModelingGenerating families of structural modelsRepresents protein dynamics rather than single static structures
Machine Learning ClassificationIdentifying patterns in experimental outcomesCan reveal non-obvious factors contributing to variability
Molecular Dynamics ValidationTesting structural models against theoretical expectationsProvides independent assessment of structural plausibility
  • Collaborative Validation Strategy:

    • Establish multi-laboratory validation protocols for key findings

    • Create centralized repositories for raw data to enable reanalysis

    • Develop community-wide standards for reporting arnC research

By implementing these methodological approaches, researchers can systematically address inconsistencies in arnC structure-function studies, leading to more reliable and reproducible results that advance our understanding of this important bacterial enzyme.

What quality control measures are essential when working with recombinant arnC proteins?

Robust quality control measures are essential when working with recombinant arnC proteins to ensure reproducible and reliable experimental outcomes. The following comprehensive quality control framework addresses the specific challenges of membrane protein biochemistry:

Essential Quality Control Parameters and Methodologies:

  • Protein Identity and Integrity Verification:

    • Mass Spectrometry Analysis: Peptide mass fingerprinting to confirm primary sequence

    • N-terminal Sequencing: Verification of correct processing and start site

    • Western Blotting: Detection of full-length protein and assessment of degradation products

    • Size Exclusion Chromatography: Evaluation of oligomeric state and aggregation profile

  • Structural Integrity Assessment:

    • Circular Dichroism: Verification of secondary structure composition

    • Thermal Stability Assays: Determination of melting temperature in different conditions

    • Limited Proteolysis: Probing for correctly folded, protease-resistant core domains

    • Negative Stain Electron Microscopy: Visual inspection of particle homogeneity and shape

  • Functional Validation:

    • Substrate Binding Assays: Microscale thermophoresis (MST) to verify UDP and metal binding

    • Activity Assays: Confirmation of enzymatic function with appropriate substrates

    • Lipid Interaction Analysis: Assessment of specific lipid binding and effects on stability

    • Metal Content Analysis: Quantification of bound metal ions by ICP-MS

Standardized QC Workflow for Recombinant arnC:

  • Pre-Purification Controls:

    • Sequence verification of expression construct

    • Expression level optimization with small-scale tests

    • Western blot analysis of total lysate to confirm expression

  • Purification Process QC:

    • SDS-PAGE analysis of each purification step

    • Monitoring of A280/A260 ratio to detect nucleic acid contamination

    • Detergent concentration determination to ensure proper micelle maintenance

  • Post-Purification Analysis Battery:

QC TestAcceptance CriteriaTroubleshooting if Failed
Purity (SDS-PAGE)>95% single bandAdditional purification steps; Optimize purification protocol
SEC ProfileSingle symmetric peak at expected elution volumeAdjust detergent conditions; Screen buffer additives
Thermal StabilityDefined melting transition; Tm >40°CAdd stabilizing agents; Engineer stabilized variants
Binding AffinityUDP binding with Kd consistent with literature valuesCheck metal content; Verify proper folding
Enzymatic ActivityDetectable activity within 2-fold of reference preparationOptimize assay conditions; Check substrate quality
  • Long-term Stability Monitoring:

    • Aliquot testing at defined time points during storage

    • Repeated activity measurements to detect functional decay

    • SEC analysis to monitor aggregation over time

    • Development of stabilized formulations for extended shelf-life

  • Batch-to-Batch Consistency Measures:

    • Maintain reference standards from successful preparations

    • Implement statistical process control for key parameters

    • Document all deviations in preparation protocols

    • Establish acceptance ranges for critical quality attributes

Implementation of this comprehensive quality control framework ensures that recombinant arnC preparations meet the high standards required for meaningful structural and functional studies, significantly enhancing experimental reproducibility and reliability across different research applications.

What are the most significant recent advances in arnC research and their implications?

Recent advances in arnC research have significantly enhanced our understanding of this important bacterial enzyme, with implications spanning from basic science to potential therapeutic applications. The most significant developments include:

  • Structural Elucidation of arnC in Multiple Conformational States
    The successful determination of arnC structures in both apo and UDP-bound states using cryo-EM represents a major breakthrough . These structures have revealed the enzyme's architecture embedded in lipid nanodiscs, preserving the native membrane environment. The visualization of the clamshell-like conformational change upon UDP binding provides critical insights into the enzyme's catalytic mechanism and creates opportunities for structure-based drug design targeting different conformational states.

  • Detailed Characterization of the Catalytic Mechanism
    The identification of distinct UndP binding positions (P1 "standby" and P2 "catalysis") through molecular dynamics simulations has revealed the precise substrate positioning required for catalysis . The elucidation of the role of the DXD motif, particularly the function of the first aspartate (D100) as a catalytic base rather than in metal coordination, provides a refined understanding of the reaction chemistry. This mechanistic insight extends to other members of the Pren-P GT family, suggesting a conserved catalytic strategy across these important enzymes.

  • Development of Methodological Approaches for Membrane Protein Studies
    The side-by-side comparison of cryo-EM datasets collected at different microscope voltages (200kV vs. 300kV) has provided valuable practical insights for membrane protein structural biology . The finding that, at matched particle counts, the resolution difference was negligible challenges assumptions about microscope requirements and highlights the importance of specimen-dependent factors in achieving high resolution.

Implications of These Advances:

  • For Drug Discovery:

    • The structural data enables rational design of inhibitors targeting multiple aspects of arnC function

    • Understanding the catalytic mechanism provides opportunities for transition-state analog development

    • Identification of multiple conformational states offers potential for allosteric inhibition strategies

  • For Antibiotic Resistance Research:

    • Clarification of the LPS modification pathway provides insights into resistance mechanisms

    • Potential for developing adjuvants that restore sensitivity to existing antibiotics

    • New targets for diagnostic approaches to identify resistant strains

  • For Glycobiology:

    • Expanded understanding of membrane-associated glycosyltransferase mechanisms

    • New paradigms for studying lipid-modifying enzymes in biological membranes

    • Methods transferable to other challenging membrane protein systems

These advances collectively represent significant progress in understanding a key bacterial enzyme involved in membrane modification and antimicrobial resistance, with potential long-term implications for addressing shigellosis, which remains a significant global health challenge causing approximately 160,000 deaths annually .

What critical gaps remain in our understanding of arnC function and structure?

Despite significant progress in arnC research, several critical gaps remain in our understanding of its function and structure that represent important areas for future investigation:

Structural Gaps:

Functional Gaps:

  • Complete Catalytic Cycle Kinetics
    Quantitative kinetic parameters for the complete reaction with natural substrates are lacking. The rate-limiting steps in the catalytic cycle have not been definitively established, and the influence of membrane environment on reaction rates remains poorly understood.

  • Regulatory Mechanisms
    How arnC activity is regulated in response to environmental conditions, particularly during antibiotic exposure or host immune pressures, remains largely unknown. Potential post-translational modifications or protein-protein interactions that might modulate enzyme function have not been characterized.

  • Integration in Cellular Pathways
    The coordination of arnC activity with other enzymes in the LPS modification pathway is not fully understood. How the products of arnC are transferred to subsequent enzymes in the pathway and the potential for metabolic channeling remain unexplored.

Translational Gaps:

  • Structure-Activity Relationships in vivo
    The correlation between specific structural features of arnC and bacterial survival or virulence in host environments has not been systematically established. How variations in arnC sequence or expression levels influence pathogenesis outcomes remains unclear.

  • Inhibitor Development Pipeline
    Despite structural information, selective inhibitors of arnC have not yet been developed or validated in biological systems. The requirements for inhibitor penetration through the outer membrane to reach the periplasmic target site present significant challenges.

  • Immunological Significance
    The potential recognition of arnC by host immune systems and its immunogenic properties in the context of natural infection or vaccination strategies have not been thoroughly investigated, despite the importance of S. flexneri as a human pathogen causing approximately 160,000 deaths annually .

Addressing these critical gaps will require integrated approaches combining advanced structural biology, sophisticated biochemical assays, cellular microbiology, and in vivo infection models to develop a comprehensive understanding of arnC's role in bacterial physiology and pathogenesis.

How might advances in arnC research impact broader fields of glycobiology and antibiotic development?

Advances in arnC research have potential to create ripple effects across multiple scientific disciplines, particularly in glycobiology and antibiotic development. These impacts extend from fundamental scientific understanding to practical applications in addressing global health challenges:

Impact on Glycobiology:

  • Membrane Glycosyltransferase Paradigms
    The elucidation of arnC's structure and mechanism provides a valuable model system for understanding membrane-associated glycosyltransferases more broadly. The identification of the substrate threading mechanism and distinct binding positions has implications for other enzymes that process lipid-linked substrates . This may facilitate studies of eukaryotic glycosyltransferases involved in N-linked glycosylation, which share the challenge of accessing lipid-linked substrates at membrane interfaces.

  • Methodology Advancement
    Technical approaches developed for arnC studies, including:

    • Nanodisc reconstitution protocols for membrane enzymes

    • Cryo-EM methodologies for relatively small membrane proteins

    • Hybrid computational approaches combining coarse-grained and atomistic simulations

    These methods create a roadmap for investigating other challenging glycosyltransferases, potentially accelerating progress across glycobiology.

  • Glycoconjugate Biosynthesis Insights
    Understanding arnC catalysis provides insights into the fundamental chemistry of glycosidic bond formation in membrane environments. This knowledge may inspire new chemoenzymatic approaches for synthesizing complex glycoconjugates with applications in glycomics research and glycan-based therapeutics.

Impact on Antibiotic Development:

  • Novel Target Classes
    ArnC represents a member of an underexploited target class - enzymes involved in bacterial surface modification rather than primary metabolism. Success in targeting arnC could validate this approach and stimulate interest in other membrane-modifying enzymes as antibiotic targets, expanding the repertoire of strategies for addressing antimicrobial resistance.

  • Antibiotic Adjuvant Strategies
    Inhibitors of arnC could function as adjuvants that restore sensitivity to existing antibiotics, particularly polymyxins, by preventing protective LPS modifications. This approach aligns with current priorities in addressing antimicrobial resistance through combination therapies rather than solely developing new standalone antibiotics.

  • Pathogen-Specific Approaches
    The detailed understanding of arnC provides opportunities for developing narrower-spectrum agents targeting specific pathogens like Shigella flexneri. This approach could help address concerns about disruption of beneficial microbiota associated with broad-spectrum antibiotics while still providing effective treatments for dysenteric diarrhea, which causes approximately 160,000 deaths annually, particularly in children under 5 years of age .

Broader Scientific Impacts:

  • Evolutionary Biology Perspectives
    Comparative studies of arnC homologs across bacterial species could provide insights into the evolution of antibiotic resistance mechanisms and host-pathogen interactions, contributing to our understanding of bacterial adaptation.

  • Synthetic Biology Applications
    Understanding arnC function opens possibilities for engineering bacteria with modified surface properties for biotechnology applications, including vaccine development, bioremediation, and biosensing.

  • One Health Approaches Research on arnC contributes to the One Health framework by addressing antimicrobial resistance, which spans human medicine, veterinary medicine, and environmental health. Insights from this work could inform policies on antibiotic use across these interconnected domains.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.