The Shigella sonnei Bifunctional protein Aas (Aas) is a protein expressed in E. coli that plays a crucial role in lysophospholipid acylation . It facilitates the transfer of fatty acids to the 1-position of lysophospholipids through an enzyme-bound acyl-ACP intermediate, requiring ATP and magnesium. Its physiological function involves the regeneration of phosphatidylethanolamine from 2-acyl-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (2-acyl-GPE), a byproduct of transacylation reactions or phospholipase A1 degradation.
1.1 Synonyms
Synonyms for the Shigella sonnei Bifunctional protein Aas include :
aas
SSON_2996
Bifunctional protein Aas
2-acylglycerophosphoethanolamine acyltransferase
2-acyl-GPE acyltransferase
Acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein]--phospholipid O-acyltransferase
Acyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthetase
Acyl-ACP synthetase
Lon
The Shigella sonnei Bifunctional protein Aas (Aas) plays a crucial enzymatic role. It functions in the transfer of fatty acids to the 1-position of lysophospholipids, utilizing an enzyme-bound acyl-ACP intermediate, and requires ATP and magnesium for its activity. The enzyme is essential for regenerating phosphatidylethanolamine from 2-acyl-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (2-acyl-GPE).
Recombinant proteins from Shigella sonnei, including Aas, are utilized in vaccine development . These proteins can be designed as chimeric proteins to enhance immunogenicity and offer protection against Shigella infections .
4.1 Chimeric Protein Design
Chimeric proteins, such as those consisting of IpaD, StxB, and TolC from Shigella, have been designed using bioinformatics approaches as potential immunogen candidates . These chimeric proteins can elicit both B and T cell responses and have shown promising results in in silico studies .
4.2 Glycoconjugate Vaccines
Shigella O-polysaccharides can be conjugated to carrier proteins like exotoxin A of P. aeruginosa (EPA) to create glycoconjugate vaccines . These vaccines have shown potential in combating Shigella flexneri 2a, a major serotype causing shigellosis .
Genes encoding Shigella sonnei O-polysaccharides (O-Ps) have been cloned and characterized to develop Salmonella-based live vaccine vector strains . Deletion analysis has helped define the minimal construct required for stable expression of the O antigen .
The expression of certain genes in Shigella sonnei, such as invE, is regulated post-transcriptionally . Temperature-dependent repression of invE expression occurs at the post-transcriptional level, impacting the bacterium's virulence and infectivity .
This protein plays a crucial role in lysophospholipid acylation. It facilitates the transfer of fatty acids to the 1-position of lysophospholipids via an enzyme-bound acyl-ACP intermediate, requiring ATP and magnesium. Its physiological function involves the regeneration of phosphatidylethanolamine from 2-acyl-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (2-acyl-GPE), a byproduct of transacylation reactions or phospholipase A1 degradation.
KEGG: ssn:SSON_2996
Shigella sonnei Bifunctional protein aas(aas) is a 719-amino acid protein that plays a role in bacterial metabolism. The protein has multiple functional domains which contribute to its bifunctional nature. When working with the recombinant version, researchers typically use an N-terminal His-tagged form expressed in E. coli .
For structural studies, begin with:
Secondary structure prediction using algorithms such as PSIPRED
Domain organization analysis using InterPro or SMART
Homology modeling if crystal structure is unavailable
Circular dichroism spectroscopy to experimentally confirm secondary structure elements
Function can be assessed through enzyme activity assays relevant to the bifunctional nature of the protein, complementation studies in knockout strains, and protein-protein interaction analyses.
The recombinant protein should be stored at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt, with aliquoting necessary for multiple use. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles as they can compromise protein integrity. For working aliquots, storage at 4°C for up to one week is acceptable .
Methodology for proper storage:
Upon reconstitution in deionized sterile water (concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL), add glycerol to a final concentration of 50%
Prepare small single-use aliquots in screw-cap microcentrifuge tubes
Flash freeze aliquots in liquid nitrogen before transferring to -80°C
Maintain a temperature log of the storage unit
For short-term use, store working aliquots at 4°C for no more than one week
Proper reconstitution ensures optimal protein activity. The lyophilized protein should be briefly centrifuged prior to opening to bring contents to the bottom. Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. For long-term storage, add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% .
Reconstitution protocol:
Equilibrate the lyophilized protein to room temperature
Centrifuge the vial at 10,000 × g for 1 minute
Add appropriate volume of sterile deionized water
Gently mix by inversion or mild vortexing until completely dissolved
Aliquot immediately after reconstitution
Verify protein concentration using Bradford or BCA assays
Assess protein activity using functional assays
Comparison of expression systems:
| Expression System | Advantages | Limitations | Yield | Post-translational Modifications |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid growth | Limited post-translational modifications | High | Minimal |
| Yeast | Eukaryotic modifications, proper folding | Longer production time | Medium | Moderate |
| Baculovirus | Complex eukaryotic modifications | Technical complexity, cost | Medium-High | Extensive |
| Mammalian Cell | Native-like modifications | Highest cost, technical demand | Low-Medium | Complete |
Select the expression system based on your specific requirements for protein yield, purity, and functional characteristics.
Purity and integrity assessment is crucial for reliable experimental outcomes. The recombinant protein should achieve greater than 90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE .
Comprehensive purity analysis methodology:
SDS-PAGE analysis: Run protein samples on 10-12% gels with appropriate molecular weight markers
Western blot analysis: Use anti-His antibodies to confirm identity of the recombinant protein
Size exclusion chromatography: Analyze oligomeric state and detect aggregates
Mass spectrometry: Confirm molecular weight and sequence coverage
Dynamic light scattering: Assess homogeneity and detect aggregates
Analytical ultracentrifugation: Determine sedimentation coefficient and molecular weight in solution
For assessing functional integrity, develop enzyme activity assays specific to the bifunctional nature of the protein.
Obtaining high yields of soluble recombinant protein is often challenging. Similar to other Shigella proteins that have traditionally been produced in cell-based heterologous expression systems, aas protein production may face limitations regarding recovery and solubility .
Optimization strategies:
Expression temperature modulation (16-30°C)
IPTG concentration titration (0.1-1.0 mM)
Use of specialized E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Origami)
Co-expression with chaperones (GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ)
Fusion tags beyond His-tag (MBP, GST, SUMO)
Alternative approaches:
Monitor expression using small-scale test expressions before scaling up to production levels.
Functional characterization requires assays specific to the bifunctional nature of the protein. While the specific functions of aas in Shigella sonnei aren't detailed in the search results, functional analysis should include:
Enzyme kinetics assays for both functional domains
Substrate specificity determination
pH and temperature optimum characterization
Cofactor requirements assessment
Inhibitor screening
Protein-protein interaction studies using:
Pull-down assays with potential binding partners
Surface plasmon resonance for binding kinetics
Isothermal titration calorimetry for thermodynamic parameters
Structural changes upon substrate binding using circular dichroism or fluorescence spectroscopy
Develop positive and negative controls for each assay to ensure validity of results.
While the specific role of aas protein in vaccine development isn't directly mentioned in the search results, Shigella sonnei proteins have been extensively studied for vaccine applications. Recent advances in Shigella vaccine development include multiplex binding assays and chimeric protein approaches .
Methodological considerations for aas protein in vaccine development:
Epitope mapping to identify immunogenic regions:
Use computational prediction tools
Experimental validation with peptide arrays
B-cell and T-cell epitope identification
Chimeric protein design strategies:
Adjuvant selection and formulation optimization
Animal model testing:
Immunogenicity assessment
Protection studies
Dosing optimization
Assessment of cross-protection against multiple Shigella serotypes
Structural studies of recombinant proteins face several challenges, particularly for multifunctional bacterial proteins like aas.
Methodological approach to overcome structural study challenges:
Limited solubility and aggregation:
Screen multiple buffer conditions using differential scanning fluorimetry
Employ detergents for stabilization if membrane-associated
Test truncated constructs focusing on individual domains
Crystallization difficulties:
High-throughput crystallization screening (1000+ conditions)
Surface entropy reduction mutations
Crystallization chaperones or antibody fragments
LCP (Lipidic Cubic Phase) crystallization if membrane-associated
Alternative structural methods:
Cryo-electron microscopy for larger assemblies
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) for solution structure
NMR spectroscopy for dynamic regions
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry for conformational changes
Computational approaches:
AlphaFold2 or RoseTTAFold prediction
Molecular dynamics simulations
Integrative structural modeling combining experimental and computational data
Understanding host-pathogen interactions is crucial for vaccine development and therapeutic interventions. While specific information about aas protein's interaction with the immune system isn't provided in the search results, the methodology for studying such interactions follows established approaches.
Comprehensive experimental workflow:
In silico analysis:
Prediction of potential immunogenic epitopes
Homology to known immunomodulatory proteins
Structural analysis for potential PAMPs (Pathogen-Associated Molecular Patterns)
In vitro immune cell studies:
Dendritic cell activation and maturation assays
Cytokine production profiling using ELISA or multiplex assays
T-cell proliferation and differentiation analysis
Phagocytosis assays with macrophages
NET formation with neutrophils
Signaling pathway analysis:
NF-κB activation assays
MAPK pathway analysis
Pattern recognition receptor engagement studies
In vivo models:
Transgenic mouse models
Infection studies with recombinant Shigella strains expressing modified aas protein
Adoptive transfer experiments to assess specific immune cell contributions
Human studies:
Analysis of immune responses in infected individuals
HLA binding and T-cell epitope validation
Site-directed mutagenesis is a powerful approach to dissect protein function. For a bifunctional protein like aas, this technique can help understand the contribution of each domain and identify critical residues.
Systematic mutagenesis protocol:
Structure-guided target selection:
Conserved residues identified through sequence alignment
Catalytic site residues predicted through structural analysis
Interface residues between domains
Surface-exposed residues potentially involved in protein-protein interactions
Mutagenesis strategy design:
Alanine scanning of selected regions
Conservative vs. non-conservative substitutions
Domain swapping with homologous proteins
Creation of truncated constructs
Functional analysis of mutants:
Expression and solubility assessment
Activity assays for each functional domain
Structural integrity verification (CD spectroscopy, thermal stability)
In vivo complementation studies
Data integration:
Correlation of structural features with functional outcomes
Computational modeling of mutant effects
Evolutionary analysis of mutated positions
Understanding protein-protein interactions is essential for elucidating cellular functions. For studying aas protein interactions, employ both in vitro and in vivo methodologies.
Comprehensive interaction analysis workflow:
In silico prediction of potential interaction partners:
Sequence-based prediction tools
Structural docking simulations
Co-evolution analysis
In vitro interaction studies:
In vivo interaction validation:
Bacterial two-hybrid systems
Co-immunoprecipitation from Shigella lysates
Proximity labeling approaches (BioID, APEX)
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)
Functional validation of interactions:
Co-expression and co-purification studies
Activity assays in presence and absence of partners
Mutational analysis of interaction interfaces
Troubleshooting expression and purification problems requires systematic analysis of each step in the workflow.
Systematic troubleshooting methodology:
Expression issues:
Verify plasmid sequence integrity
Test multiple E. coli strains (BL21, Rosetta, Arctic Express)
Optimize induction conditions (temperature, IPTG concentration, duration)
Examine protein solubility in different lysis buffers
Consider codon optimization for E. coli expression
Purification challenges:
Optimize lysis conditions (detergents, sonication parameters)
Adjust imidazole concentration in binding and elution buffers
Test different pH conditions for His-tag binding
Consider on-column refolding if protein is in inclusion bodies
Add stabilizing agents (glycerol, reducing agents, specific ions)
Protein quality issues:
Analyze by dynamic light scattering for aggregation
Perform thermal shift assays to identify stabilizing buffer conditions
Check for proteolytic degradation with protease inhibitors
Verify protein identity by mass spectrometry
Assess activity immediately after purification vs. after storage
Alternative strategies:
Consider cell-free protein synthesis systems
Explore fusion partners beyond His-tag (MBP, GST, SUMO)
Test expression of individual domains separately
Antibody development requires careful antigen design and validation strategies. For aas protein, consider both polyclonal and monoclonal approaches.
Antibody development workflow:
Antigen preparation strategies:
Immunization protocols:
Animal selection (rabbits for polyclonal, mice for monoclonal)
Adjuvant selection and optimization
Immunization schedule (primary and boosters)
Serum collection and titer monitoring
Antibody purification methods:
Protein A/G affinity chromatography
Antigen-specific affinity purification
Ion exchange chromatography for IgG subclass separation
Validation studies:
Western blot against recombinant protein and native Shigella lysates
Immunoprecipitation efficiency
Immunofluorescence for localization studies
Epitope mapping to confirm specificity
Cross-reactivity testing with related bacterial proteins
Application optimization:
Antibody concentration determination for each application
Buffer optimization for storage stability
Conjugation strategies for detection applications
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact protein function. Analysis of PTMs requires specialized techniques and careful sample preparation.
Comprehensive PTM analysis protocol:
Predictive analysis:
In silico prediction of potential modification sites
Evolutionary conservation of modification sites
Structural context of predicted sites
Mass spectrometry-based approaches:
Sample preparation optimization (enrichment strategies)
Proteolytic digestion optimization
LC-MS/MS analysis with multiple fragmentation methods
Data analysis with PTM-specific search algorithms
Site-specific validation:
Site-directed mutagenesis of modified residues
Antibodies specific for the modification
Functional assays comparing wild-type and mutant proteins
PTM-specific analytical techniques:
Phosphorylation: Phos-tag gels, phospho-specific antibodies
Glycosylation: Lectin blotting, glycosidase treatments
Acetylation: Acetyl-lysine antibodies
Ubiquitination: Ubiquitin pull-down assays
Comparative analysis:
Native protein from Shigella vs. recombinant protein
Modification patterns under different growth conditions
Temporal dynamics of modifications
Comparative analysis provides insights into evolutionary conservation and functional importance. For aas protein, systematic comparison with homologs is essential.
Comparative analysis methodology:
Homolog identification:
BLAST searches against bacterial genomes
Profile-based methods (HMMer, PSI-BLAST)
Structural homology detection (DALI, FATCAT)
Sequence-based comparison:
Multiple sequence alignment with MUSCLE or MAFFT
Conservation analysis with ConSurf or Rate4Site
Functional domain prediction and comparison
Identification of species-specific insertions/deletions
Structural comparison:
Homology modeling of uncharacterized homologs
Superposition and RMSD calculation
Active site geometry comparison
Surface electrostatics analysis
Functional comparison:
Enzymatic activity assays across species
Substrate specificity profiling
Complementation studies in knockout strains
Temperature and pH optima determination
Evolutionary analysis:
Phylogenetic tree construction
Selection pressure analysis (dN/dS ratio)
Ancestral sequence reconstruction
Correlation of functional differences with evolutionary distance
Understanding the role of specific proteins in pathogenicity provides valuable insights for therapeutic development. While specific information about aas protein's role in virulence isn't provided in the search results, Shigella sonnei employs several virulence mechanisms .
Investigation methodology:
Mutant construction and analysis:
Virulence phenotype assessment:
Invasion assays in cell culture models
Intracellular replication quantification
Cell-to-cell spread assays
Animal infection models
Interaction with host factors:
Pull-down experiments with host cell lysates
Yeast two-hybrid screening
Proximity labeling in infected cells
Co-localization studies during infection
Expression analysis during infection:
qRT-PCR for transcriptional changes
Western blot for protein expression levels
Reporter fusions for temporal expression patterns
Single-cell analysis in infection models
Comparative analysis across Shigella species:
Presence and conservation in S. flexneri and other species
Function in different genetic backgrounds
Contribution to species-specific virulence traits
Gene expression and regulation are influenced by genomic context and regulatory networks. Understanding these aspects for the aas gene requires integrated analysis approaches.
Investigation protocol:
Genomic context analysis:
Operon structure determination
Identification of adjacent genes and potential functional relationships
Comparative genomics across Shigella strains and related species
Mobile genetic element identification in proximity
Promoter and regulatory element characterization:
Promoter mapping using 5' RACE
Transcription start site determination
Identification of transcription factor binding sites
Reporter gene assays to assess promoter strength
Expression analysis under various conditions:
qRT-PCR under different growth phases
Response to environmental stresses (pH, temperature, oxygen)
Changes during infection models
Single-cell expression heterogeneity
Regulatory network mapping:
Transcriptomics following deletion/overexpression
ChIP-seq to identify direct regulators
Protein-DNA interaction studies
Integration with known Shigella regulatory networks
Post-transcriptional regulation:
mRNA stability assessment
Identification of small RNAs affecting expression
Ribosome profiling for translation efficiency
RNA structure probing for regulatory elements