UbiB facilitates CoQ biosynthesis through:
Hydroxylation Regulation: Indirectly supports the hydroxylation of 2-octaprenylphenol to 2-octaprenyl-6-hydroxy-phenol, a key step in CoQ synthesis .
ATPase Activity: Exhibits ATP hydrolysis activated by cardiolipin-containing membranes and phenolic intermediates . This activity stabilizes CoQ biosynthetic complexes .
Membrane Interaction: Anchors to the inner mitochondrial membrane (eukaryotes) or bacterial cell membrane to access hydrophobic CoQ intermediates .
Key Insight: Unlike E. coli UbiB, Shigella sonnei UbiB is not strictly oxygen-dependent, enabling CoQ synthesis bypass mechanisms under anaerobic or stationary-phase conditions .
ATPase Mechanism: COQ8A (human UbiB homolog) uses ATP hydrolysis to extract CoQ intermediates from membranes, suggesting a conserved "ATP-driven substrate access" model .
Disease Links: Mutations in human UbiB homologs (e.g., COQ8A) cause neurological and renal disorders due to CoQ deficiency .
Biotechnological Relevance: Recombinant UbiB is used to study CoQ biosynthesis defects and screen potential therapeutics for CoQ-related diseases .
The structural and functional conservation of UbiB across species underscores its central role in cellular energetics. Ongoing research aims to:
This protein likely functions as a protein kinase regulator of UbiI activity, which is involved in aerobic coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) biosynthesis.
KEGG: ssn:SSON_4010
UbiB in Shigella sonnei likely functions as a key component in the ubiquinone (UQ) biosynthesis pathway. While specific research on S. sonnei UbiB is limited, studies on related Enterobacteriaceae suggest UbiB participates in the early steps of UQ biosynthesis, potentially functioning as a monooxygenase or hydroxylase. UbiB appears to be involved in the aerobic hydroxylation reactions required for ubiquinone synthesis, though its exact biochemical mechanism requires further characterization. The protein likely works in conjunction with other Ubi proteins to facilitate electron transport in the bacterial respiratory chain, making it essential for cellular bioenergetics .
UbiB, as part of the ubiquinone biosynthesis pathway, indirectly contributes to S. sonnei virulence by supporting bacterial metabolism and survival under varying oxygen conditions. S. sonnei exhibits multiple virulence mechanisms, including the production of toxins, resistance to host antimicrobial peptides, and expression of colicins that kill phylogenetically related bacteria . The ubiquinone biosynthesis pathway likely supports these virulence mechanisms by enabling metabolic flexibility, particularly when S. sonnei encounters oxygen-limited environments within the host intestinal tract. While UbiB is not directly linked to the type III secretion system (a primary virulence factor in Shigella), its role in cellular bioenergetics makes it important for sustaining the energy requirements needed for bacterial invasion and survival within host cells .
The protein structure of S. sonnei UbiB has not been fully characterized, but comparative analysis with homologous proteins suggests it likely contains:
A conserved kinase-like domain with an ATP-binding site
Multiple transmembrane regions anchoring it to the cytoplasmic membrane
Conserved motifs common to the ABC1 family of atypical kinases
A putative protein structural analysis would predict that UbiB contains around 6-7 transmembrane domains and likely forms oligomeric structures in the membrane. Multiple sequence alignments would reveal highly conserved residues across proteobacteria that are essential for function, particularly those involved in ATP binding and potential hydroxylase activity. Researchers should consider these structural elements when designing experiments for protein purification and functional characterization .
Recent research has uncovered the existence of parallel O₂-dependent and O₂-independent pathways for ubiquinone biosynthesis in proteobacteria, which allows bacteria to synthesize this essential electron carrier under varying oxygen conditions. In the O₂-dependent pathway, molecular oxygen serves as a co-substrate for hydroxylation reactions. In contrast, the O₂-independent pathway utilizes alternative hydroxylases, specifically the UbiU-UbiV complex containing 4Fe-4S clusters, to perform similar reactions without requiring molecular oxygen .
UbiB's role in this dual pathway system likely involves:
Potential interaction with both pathways as a regulatory protein
Differential expression under aerobic versus anaerobic conditions
Possible functional redundancy with components of the O₂-independent pathway
Researchers investigating this interaction should design experiments comparing the expression and activity of UbiB under precisely controlled oxygen concentrations, possibly using continuous culture systems with oxygen monitoring. Co-immunoprecipitation studies could identify protein-protein interactions between UbiB and components of both pathways. Additionally, comparative metabolomic profiling of ubiquinone intermediates in wild-type versus ΔubiB mutants under varying oxygen conditions would provide insight into which specific biosynthetic steps are affected .
Expressing and purifying membrane proteins like UbiB presents significant challenges. Based on current approaches for similar proteins, a recommended methodology would include:
Expression System Selection:
E. coli BL21(DE3) strain is often suitable due to its reduced protease activity
C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) strains are specifically engineered for membrane protein expression
Codon optimization should be performed based on E. coli usage patterns, targeting a Codon Adaptation Index (CAI) of at least 0.8 to enhance expression levels
Vector Design:
Incorporate an N-terminal His₆ or His₁₀ tag for purification
Include a tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site for tag removal
Consider fusion partners like maltose-binding protein (MBP) to enhance solubility
Expression Conditions:
Induction at lower temperatures (16-20°C) for 16-18 hours
IPTG concentration optimization between 0.1-0.5 mM
Addition of 0.5-1% glucose to reduce leaky expression
Purification Protocol:
Membrane fraction isolation using differential centrifugation
Solubilization with appropriate detergents (recommended initial screening of DDM, LMNG, and DMNG)
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Size exclusion chromatography for further purification
Stability Enhancement:
Addition of lipids (E. coli total lipid extract at 0.1-0.2 mg/ml)
Buffer optimization containing 10-15% glycerol
Use of cholesteryl hemisuccinate (CHS) at 0.01-0.05% to stabilize the protein
Protein activity should be assessed using ATP binding assays and functional complementation in ΔubiB strains to confirm that the purified protein retains its native functionality .
A comprehensive genetic approach to studying UbiB function should employ both knockout and controlled complementation strategies:
Knockout Strategy:
Use lambda Red recombineering or CRISPR-Cas9 to precisely delete the ubiB gene
Confirm deletion by PCR, sequencing, and Western blot
Create marker-free deletions to avoid polar effects on adjacent genes
Complementation Approaches:
Chromosomal Complementation: Integrate the wild-type ubiB gene back into the chromosome at a neutral site using Tn7-based systems
Plasmid-Based Complementation: Use low-copy plasmids (pWSK29 or pACYC184 derivatives) with native promoters for physiological expression levels
Controlled Expression: Employ inducible promoters (like arabinose-inducible pBAD) to create an expression gradient for dose-response studies
Advanced Genetic Manipulations:
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues to identify essential functional domains
Construction of chimeric proteins with UbiB from related species to determine region-specific functionality
Creation of fluorescent protein fusions for localization studies (ensuring C-terminal fusions to avoid disrupting membrane insertion)
Phenotypic Analysis:
Growth curve comparison under aerobic, microaerobic, and anaerobic conditions
Ubiquinone quantification using HPLC-MS/MS
Metabolic profiling using 13C-labeled precursors
Measurement of membrane potential and ATP synthesis rates
This comprehensive genetic approach should be combined with biochemical validation to establish conclusive structure-function relationships for UbiB .
Investigating protein-protein interactions involving membrane proteins like UbiB requires specialized approaches:
In Vivo Interaction Methods:
Split-Protein Complementation Assays: Using split-GFP or split-luciferase systems adapted for membrane proteins
Bacterial Two-Hybrid Systems: Modified for membrane protein analysis using BACTH (Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid) system
In Vivo Crosslinking: Using photo-activatable or chemical crosslinkers followed by pulldown and mass spectrometry
In Vitro Methods:
Co-Purification Assays: Using tandem affinity purification with different tags on potential interacting partners
Surface Plasmon Resonance: For quantitative binding kinetics, requiring purified components in appropriate detergent/lipid environments
Native Mass Spectrometry: To identify intact membrane protein complexes preserved in micelles or nanodiscs
Structural Analysis:
Cryo-EM: For structural characterization of UbiB-containing complexes
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry: To map interaction interfaces
FRET-Based Assays: Using site-specific labeling to measure proximity between purified components
Computational Approaches:
Molecular docking simulations to predict protein-protein interaction interfaces
Coevolution analysis to identify potentially interacting residues across the ubiquinone biosynthesis pathway
The combination of these complementary approaches would provide robust evidence for specific interactions between UbiB and other components of the ubiquinone biosynthesis machinery, with particular attention to potential interactions with UbiA, UbiX, and components of the O₂-independent pathway (UbiT, UbiU, UbiV) .
A comprehensive comparative genomic analysis of ubiB should follow this methodological framework:
Sequence Retrieval and Alignment:
Obtain ubiB sequences from multiple Shigella isolates (all four species), E. coli strains, and other related enterobacteria
Perform multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE or MAFFT algorithms
Calculate sequence conservation scores for each position
Phylogenetic Analysis:
Construct phylogenetic trees using maximum likelihood methods with appropriate substitution models
Perform bootstrap analysis (>1000 replicates) to assess branch support
Compare ubiB phylogeny with species phylogeny to identify potential horizontal gene transfer events
Comparative Genomic Context:
Analyze gene neighborhood conservation around ubiB
Identify syntenic regions and gene order conservation
Detect potential operonic structures using intergenic distance analysis
Selection Pressure Analysis:
Calculate dN/dS ratios to identify positions under purifying or positive selection
Perform codon-based Z-test of selection
Use branch-site models to detect lineage-specific selection patterns
Protein Domain Analysis:
Identify conserved domains and motifs across species
Map conservation onto predicted structural models
Compare with experimental structural data when available
Table 1. Comparative analysis of key features in UbiB proteins across selected enterobacterial species
| Species | Protein Length (aa) | Identity to S. sonnei (%) | Key Conserved Motifs | Predicted Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S. sonnei | 545-550* | 100 | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
| S. flexneri | 545-550* | 99.8* | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
| S. boydii | 545-550* | 99.6* | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
| S. dysenteriae | 545-550* | 99.4* | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
| E. coli K-12 | 545-550* | 98-99* | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
| Salmonella enterica | 545-550* | 95-97* | P-loop, ABC1 domain | Ubiquinone biosynthesis |
*Note: Values are approximate based on typical conservation patterns in enterobacterial proteins; exact values would require specific sequence analysis .
This comparative approach will reveal evolutionary patterns and functional constraints acting on ubiB, providing insights into its role across different ecological niches and pathogenic lifestyles .
A comprehensive analysis of ubiB mutations requires an integrated approach combining biochemical, genetic, and phenotypic methods:
Ubiquinone Quantification:
LC-MS/MS Analysis: For precise quantification of ubiquinone and biosynthetic intermediates
Internal standards using isotope-labeled ubiquinone
Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) for specific detection
Extraction protocol optimization with 2-propanol:hexane (3:5, v/v)
HPLC Analysis with Electrochemical Detection:
For routine quantification and isolation of intermediates
Standard curve ranging from 0.1-100 μM ubiquinone
Sample preparation using methanol:hexane extraction
Respiratory Chain Analysis:
Oxygen Consumption Rates:
High-resolution respirometry using Oroboros or similar systems
Substrate-dependent respiration with NADH, succinate, and glycerol-3-phosphate
Inhibitor profiling with rotenone, antimycin A, and cyanide
Membrane Potential Measurements:
Flow cytometry using DiOC2(3) or JC-1 dyes
Microplate fluorimetry for high-throughput screening
Real-time monitoring during growth phase transitions
Virulence Assessment:
Tissue Culture Invasion Assays:
HeLa or Caco-2 cell infection models
Quantification of invasion efficiency by gentamicin protection assay
Immunofluorescence microscopy for actin polymerization visualization
Animal Models:
Guinea pig keratoconjunctivitis (Serény test)
Murine pulmonary infection model
Quantification of bacterial loads in tissues and histopathological scoring
Gene Expression Analysis:
RNA-Seq:
Differential expression analysis between wild-type and ubiB mutants
Pathway enrichment focusing on metabolism and virulence genes
Time-course analysis during oxygen transition
qRT-PCR Validation:
Targeted analysis of key genes in ubiquinone biosynthesis
Virulence gene expression (esp. T3SS components)
Normalization with validated reference genes for S. sonnei
Table 2. Expected phenotypic consequences of ubiB mutations in S. sonnei
| Mutation Type | Expected Ubiquinone Levels | Growth in Aerobic Conditions | Growth in Anaerobic Conditions | Virulence in Cell Culture | Antibiotic Susceptibility Changes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete deletion | Severely reduced | Compromised | Nearly normal | Attenuated | Increased sensitivity to oxidative stress agents |
| Point mutations in ATP-binding site | Moderately reduced | Moderately affected | Minimally affected | Partially attenuated | Moderate sensitivity increase |
| C-terminal truncations | Moderately to severely reduced | Significantly affected | Minimally affected | Moderately attenuated | Increased sensitivity to multiple antibiotics |
| N-terminal modifications | Variable (location-dependent) | Variable | Minimally affected | Variable | Variable |
This integrated approach provides a comprehensive assessment of how ubiB mutations affect both bacterial physiology and virulence capabilities, establishing clear structure-function relationships for this important protein .
Differentiating UbiB function from other ubiquinone biosynthesis proteins presents several technical challenges that require specialized approaches:
Challenge 1: Functional Redundancy
UbiB may share functional overlap with other proteins in the pathway, particularly those involved in the recently discovered O₂-independent pathway .
Solution Approaches:
Generate combination knockouts (e.g., ΔubiB/ΔubiU, ΔubiB/ΔubiV) to identify synthetic phenotypes
Perform metabolic flux analysis using 13C-labeled precursors to identify pathway-specific bottlenecks
Use complementation assays with heterologous proteins to identify function-specific domains
Challenge 2: Membrane Protein Localization and Interaction
As a membrane protein, traditional interaction assays may not accurately capture UbiB's native interactions.
Solution Approaches:
Use proximity-labeling approaches (BioID or APEX2) fused to UbiB to identify nearby proteins in their native membrane environment
Employ nanodiscs or liposomes with defined lipid compositions for in vitro reconstitution
Develop split-GFP systems specifically optimized for membrane protein topology
Challenge 3: Distinguishing Primary from Secondary Effects
Disruption of ubiquinone biosynthesis has pleiotropic effects, making it difficult to identify UbiB's specific role.
Solution Approaches:
Generate conditional depletion strains using destabilization domains or degron systems for acute UbiB depletion
Perform time-course -omics analysis (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) after UbiB depletion
Use chemical genetic approaches with small-molecule inhibitors specific to different steps in the pathway
Challenge 4: Separating Enzymatic from Structural Roles
UbiB may have both catalytic and structural/scaffolding functions.
Solution Approaches:
Design separation-of-function mutations based on structural predictions
Use chemical crosslinking followed by mass spectrometry to identify structural interactions
Perform in vitro activity assays with reconstituted components to verify direct enzymatic activity
By systematically addressing these challenges, researchers can more precisely define UbiB's unique contributions to ubiquinone biosynthesis and distinguish its role from other pathway components .
Structural biology offers powerful insights into UbiB function, but membrane proteins present unique challenges requiring specialized approaches:
X-ray Crystallography Approaches:
Construct Optimization:
Design multiple constructs with varying N- and C-terminal boundaries
Screen detergents (DDM, LMNG, GDN) and lipid additives systematically
Consider fusion partners (T4 lysozyme, BRIL) to improve crystal contacts
Crystallization Strategies:
Lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization as primary approach
In meso crystallization with monoolein or other host lipids
Vapor diffusion with bicelles or facial amphiphiles as alternatives
Cryo-EM Approaches:
Sample Preparation:
Reconstitution in nanodiscs with MSP1D1 or MSP1E3D1 scaffolds
Amphipol (A8-35) or SMA copolymer solubilization
GraFix method for stabilizing protein complexes
Data Collection and Processing:
Use of Volta phase plates to enhance contrast
Energy filters to improve signal-to-noise ratio
3D classification to separate conformational states
Integrated Structural Methods:
HDX-MS (Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry):
Map conformational dynamics and ligand-binding sites
Optimize detergent compatibility and back-exchange minimization
Compare exchange patterns with and without substrates/cofactors
EPR Spectroscopy:
Site-directed spin labeling at key residues
DEER measurements for distance constraints
Analysis of conformational changes upon nucleotide binding
NMR Approaches:
Solution NMR of isolated soluble domains
Solid-state NMR of reconstituted samples
Selective isotope labeling strategies for large membrane proteins
Computational Integration:
Homology Modeling:
Using related ABC1 kinase structures as templates
Refinement with molecular dynamics in explicit membrane environments
Validation using evolutionary coupling analysis
Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
All-atom simulations in explicit lipid bilayers
Coarse-grained simulations for longer timescales
Enhanced sampling techniques to capture conformational transitions
In Silico Docking:
Virtual screening of potential substrates and inhibitors
Analysis of cofactor binding sites (ATP, Fe-S clusters)
Protein-protein docking with other ubiquinone biosynthesis components
By integrating these complementary structural approaches, researchers can develop a comprehensive understanding of UbiB's structure-function relationships, including its membrane topology, substrate binding sites, and potential interaction interfaces with other components of the ubiquinone biosynthesis machinery .
Future research on UbiB should focus on its role in helping bacteria adapt to different oxygen conditions, with these promising directions:
Ecological and Evolutionary Studies:
Investigate UbiB expression and function across oxygen gradients in natural microbial communities
Compare UbiB sequence evolution between obligate aerobes, facultative anaerobes, and microaerophiles
Examine horizontal gene transfer patterns of ubiB and related genes across bacterial lineages
Systems Biology Approaches:
Develop genome-scale metabolic models incorporating both O₂-dependent and O₂-independent ubiquinone biosynthesis pathways
Perform multi-omics integration (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics) during oxygen transitions
Apply flux balance analysis to quantify metabolic rewiring during adaptation to oxygen limitation
Advanced Genetic Engineering:
Create oxygen-responsive UbiB expression systems for biotechnological applications
Engineer UbiB variants with enhanced activity under specific oxygen conditions
Develop biosensors based on UbiB activity to monitor cellular energetics
Host-Pathogen Interaction Studies:
Investigate UbiB's role in Shigella adaptation to varying oxygen levels in different intestinal niches
Determine how UbiB activity affects bacterial persistence during infection
Explore UbiB as a potential target for anti-virulence strategies that specifically disrupt adaptation to host environments
Clinical Applications:
Assess correlations between UbiB sequence variants and clinical outcomes in Shigella infections
Investigate UbiB's potential role in antibiotic tolerance under oxygen limitation
Develop screening assays for compounds that specifically target UbiB function
These research directions would significantly advance our understanding of UbiB's role in bacterial adaptation to varying oxygen environments and potentially lead to new strategies for controlling bacterial infections .
Understanding UbiB function could reveal several promising avenues for novel antimicrobial strategies against S. sonnei:
Target-Based Drug Discovery:
Structure-Based Design:
Using solved UbiB structures to design specific inhibitors
Focus on unique pockets not present in human homologs
Develop allosteric inhibitors that lock UbiB in inactive conformations
High-Throughput Screening:
Develop cell-based assays measuring ubiquinone production
Screen for compounds that specifically inhibit UbiB function
Prioritize compounds effective under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions
Metabolic Vulnerability Exploitation:
Combination Therapies:
Pair UbiB inhibitors with conventional antibiotics to increase efficacy
Design dual-targeting compounds affecting both UbiB and traditional antibiotic targets
Develop strategies targeting both O₂-dependent and O₂-independent pathways simultaneously
Conditional Lethality:
Identify synthetic lethal interactions with UbiB under specific host conditions
Develop compounds that become activated by bacterial metabolism
Create oxygen-responsive prodrugs that specifically target bacteria in low-oxygen niches
Anti-Virulence Approaches:
Attenuation Strategies:
Develop compounds that modify UbiB function without killing bacteria
Target UbiB to reduce bacterial fitness during infection
Design narrow-spectrum inhibitors specific to Shigella UbiB
Host-Directed Therapies:
Modulate host metabolism to create environments where UbiB inhibition is more effective
Combine UbiB inhibitors with immunomodulatory compounds
Develop nanoparticle delivery systems targeting Shigella-containing vacuoles
Vaccine Development:
Attenuated Strains:
Engineer S. sonnei with modified UbiB for use as live attenuated vaccines
Create strains with oxygen-dependent attenuation for controlled colonization
Develop regulatory-approved defined mutations in UbiB for vaccine production
Table 3. Comparison of potential antimicrobial strategies targeting UbiB
| Strategy | Mechanism | Advantages | Challenges | Development Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct UbiB inhibitors | Competitive binding to active site | High specificity | Membrane penetration issues | Medium-term (3-5 years) |
| Allosteric modulators | Binding to regulatory sites | Novel mechanism of action | Requires detailed structural knowledge | Medium-term (3-5 years) |
| Dual-pathway inhibitors | Targeting both O₂-dependent and O₂-independent pathways | Reduced resistance development | Complex development process | Long-term (5-8 years) |
| Anti-virulence compounds | Modulation of UbiB without killing | Reduced selection pressure | Efficacy validation challenges | Long-term (5-8 years) |
| Live attenuated vaccines | Engineered UbiB mutations | Controlled attenuation | Regulatory approval complexity | Medium-term (3-5 years) |
This multi-faceted approach to targeting UbiB function represents a promising strategy for developing novel antimicrobials against increasingly antibiotic-resistant S. sonnei strains .
Successful heterologous expression of S. sonnei UbiB requires careful optimization of multiple parameters:
Expression Host Selection:
E. coli Strains:
BL21(DE3) for standard expression
C41(DE3) or C43(DE3) for toxic or membrane proteins
Lemo21(DE3) for tunable expression levels
SHuffle strains if disulfide bonds are critical
Alternative Expression Systems:
Lactococcus lactis for difficult membrane proteins
Cell-free expression systems for toxic proteins
Insect cell expression for improved folding
Vector Design Optimization:
Promoter Selection:
T7 for high-level expression
trc or tac for moderate expression
araBAD for titratable expression
Fusion Tags:
N-terminal His₈-MBP for enhanced solubility and purification
C-terminal GFP for expression monitoring and folding assessment
SUMO tag for enhanced expression and native N-terminus after cleavage
Codon Optimization:
Harmonization rather than maximization approach
Adjust GC content to match expression host
Avoid rare codon clusters and RNA secondary structures
Expression Condition Optimization Matrix:
Table 4. Systematic optimization parameters for S. sonnei UbiB expression
| Parameter | Range to Test | Analysis Method | Expected Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 16°C, 20°C, 25°C, 30°C | SDS-PAGE, Western blot | Lower temperatures typically yield better folding |
| IPTG concentration | 0.1 mM, 0.25 mM, 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM | SDS-PAGE, activity assay | Lower concentrations often reduce inclusion bodies |
| Media | LB, TB, M9, auto-induction | Yield quantification | Rich media (TB) typically increases yield |
| Additives | Glycerol (5-10%), Glucose (0.5-2%), ArgU, GroEL/ES | Solubility analysis | Strain-specific improvements in folding |
| Induction OD | 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 | Yield per cell mass | Mid-log phase typically optimal |
| Expression duration | 4h, 8h, 16h, 24h | Time-course analysis | Extended times at lower temperatures often beneficial |
Membrane Extraction and Solubilization:
Cell Lysis Methods:
French press for complete membrane extraction
Sonication with controlled temperature
Enzymatic lysis with lysozyme and DNase
Detergent Screening:
Mild detergents: DDM, LMNG, GDN as primary options
Progressive solubilization trials (0.5%, 1%, 2%)
Detergent exchange during purification
Stabilization Strategies:
Addition of specific lipids (POPE, cardiolipin)
Inclusion of cholesterol hemisuccinate
Buffer optimization with glycerol and salt screening
By systematically optimizing these parameters, researchers can significantly improve the yield and quality of recombinant S. sonnei UbiB for both functional and structural studies. The key is to establish a logical experimental matrix, testing multiple conditions in parallel, and using both quantitative (yield) and qualitative (activity, homogeneity) metrics to identify optimal conditions .
Investigating the potential functional relationship between UbiB and the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) requires specialized methodological approaches that bridge metabolism and virulence:
Genetic Interaction Studies:
Conditional Depletion Systems:
Develop tunable expression systems for both UbiB and key T3SS components
Create dual reporter strains monitoring both UbiB activity and T3SS expression
Employ CRISPRi for titratable repression of target genes
Epistasis Analysis:
Generate double mutants (ΔubiB with various T3SS component deletions)
Perform quantitative phenotyping under various conditions
Use statistical interaction models to identify synthetic phenotypes
Metabolic-Virulence Connections:
Energy Coupling Analysis:
Measure ATP levels and proton motive force in wild-type vs. ΔubiB strains during T3SS activation
Quantify NADH/NAD+ ratios during infection processes
Assess oxygen consumption rates during host cell contact
Metabolic Flux Analysis:
Use 13C-labeled carbon sources to track metabolic rewiring during infection
Compare flux distributions between wild-type and UbiB-deficient strains
Integrate with quantitative proteomics of T3SS components
Infection Models with Controlled Oxygen Conditions:
In Vitro Systems:
Develop cell culture infection models with defined oxygen gradients
Use microfluidic devices to create oxygen-controlled microenvironments
Apply live-cell imaging with oxygen-sensitive probes during infection
Ex Vivo Models:
Intestinal organoid infection under controlled oxygen conditions
Human intestinal enteroid models with oxygen monitoring
Precision-cut tissue slices with defined oxygenation
Molecular Interaction Studies:
Co-localization Analysis:
Fluorescently tag UbiB and T3SS components for co-localization studies
Use super-resolution microscopy to examine spatial relationships
Perform time-lapse imaging during infection progression
Proximity-Based Interactomics:
Apply BioID or APEX2 proximity labeling with UbiB as bait
Identify potential interaction partners related to T3SS regulation
Validate specific interactions with targeted approaches
Systems Biology Integration:
Multi-Omics Integration:
Correlate transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics datasets
Apply network analysis to identify regulatory connections
Develop predictive models of UbiB-T3SS interactions
Temporal Analysis:
Perform time-course studies during infection progression
Map metabolic state transitions to virulence gene expression
Identify key temporal coordination points