Recombinant Shigella sonnei Protein AaeX (aaeX) is a bioengineered protein derived from Shigella sonnei, a bacterium responsible for infectious diarrhea globally. This protein is produced via recombinant expression in E. coli, with a His-tag added for purification purposes. The full-length protein spans 67 amino acids (1-67aa) and retains high purity (>90% as confirmed by SDS-PAGE) .
The recombinant AaeX protein is produced via heterologous expression in E. coli, followed by purification using affinity chromatography (His-tag). Key handling recommendations include:
Reconstitution: Dissolve in deionized sterile water at 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, with optional glycerol (5-50% final concentration) for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C .
Stability: Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Working aliquots should be stored at 4°C for ≤1 week .
Lack of Functional Data: No direct studies link aaeX to known virulence mechanisms (e.g., T3SS, adhesion, or toxin production) in S. sonnei.
Antigenic Variation: S. sonnei exhibits genomic plasticity, including structural variations and mobile genetic elements . AaeX’s sequence stability across strains is undocumented.
Therapeutic Relevance: Unlike O-antigen-based vaccines , aaeX’s potential as a protective antigen remains unexplored.
Feature | AaeX | Shigella Virulence Proteins |
---|---|---|
Expression Host | E. coli | Native S. sonnei |
Tag | His-tag | Native (no tag) |
Purity | >90% | Variable (native purification) |
Key Applications | Research reagent | Vaccine targets, pathogenicity studies |
KEGG: ssn:SSON_3384
Shigella sonnei Protein AaeX is a small membrane-associated protein consisting of 67 amino acids with the sequence: MSLFPVIVVFGLSFPPIFFELLLSLAIFWLVRRVLVPTGIYDFVWHPALFNTALYCCLFY LISRLFV . This protein is encoded by the aaeX gene, which is also known as SSON_3384 .
The protein contains hydrophobic regions consistent with a membrane localization, suggesting it may function at the bacterial cell envelope. Based on sequence analysis, AaeX likely contains transmembrane domains that anchor it to the bacterial membrane. While the exact three-dimensional structure has not been fully characterized, its hydrophobic profile indicates it adopts a conformation typical of membrane-integrated proteins.
The most established expression system for recombinant Shigella sonnei AaeX protein is E. coli with an N-terminal His-tag . This approach allows for:
High yield expression due to codon optimization for E. coli
Simplified purification via immobilized metal affinity chromatography
Improved solubility compared to tag-free variants
Alternative expression systems include:
Expression System | Advantages | Limitations |
---|---|---|
E. coli | High yield, cost-effective, rapid growth | May form inclusion bodies requiring refolding |
Yeast | Better post-translational modification, less endotoxin | Longer cultivation time, more complex media |
Baculovirus | Superior folding of complex proteins | More expensive, technically demanding |
Mammalian cells | Native-like folding and modifications | Highest cost, slowest production time |
Methodology recommendation: For most research applications, E. coli BL21(DE3) with IPTG induction at OD600 0.6-0.8, followed by expression at 18°C overnight provides optimal balance between yield and proper folding .
Based on established protocols for recombinant Shigella sonnei proteins, AaeX stability can be optimized through the following storage conditions:
Initial preparation: Lyophilized powder form provides maximum long-term stability
Reconstitution: Use deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL
Short-term storage: Working aliquots can be maintained at 4°C for up to one week
Long-term storage: Store at -20°C/-80°C with 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) to prevent freeze-thaw damage
Important methodological note: Repeated freeze-thaw cycles significantly reduce protein activity. Upon receipt, immediately aliquot the protein in single-use volumes to avoid this issue . For optimal stability, use Tris/PBS-based buffer with 6% trehalose at pH 8.0 as a storage buffer .
Purification of His-tagged recombinant Shigella sonnei AaeX protein can be achieved through a multi-step process to ensure >90% purity as determined by SDS-PAGE :
Initial capture: Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) using Ni-NTA resin with imidazole gradient elution
Intermediate purification: Size exclusion chromatography to separate aggregates and contaminants
Polishing step: Ion exchange chromatography if additional purity is required
Methodological protocol:
Cell lysis: Sonication in buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM PMSF, and protease inhibitor cocktail
IMAC: Bind to Ni-NTA column, wash with 20-50 mM imidazole, elute with 250-500 mM imidazole
Buffer exchange: Dialyze against PBS or Tris buffer to remove imidazole
Quality control: Verify purity by SDS-PAGE and Western blot with anti-His antibodies
This approach consistently yields AaeX protein with greater than 90% purity suitable for immunological and biochemical studies.
Several complementary approaches can be employed to validate both structural integrity and functionality of purified recombinant AaeX:
Structural validation:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to assess secondary structure elements
Size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle light scattering (SEC-MALS) to confirm monomeric state
Limited proteolysis to verify proper folding
Mass spectrometry to confirm protein mass and potential post-translational modifications
Functional validation:
Lipid bilayer integration assays to confirm membrane association properties
Protein-protein interaction studies using pull-down assays to identify binding partners
Cell-based assays measuring bacterial adhesion or invasion when AaeX is present vs. absent
When validating recombinant AaeX, it's essential to compare wild-type protein with the His-tagged version to ensure the tag doesn't interfere with structural properties or function.
While the specific function of AaeX in Shigella sonnei virulence has not been thoroughly characterized in the provided search results, its potential role can be contextualized within the broader virulence mechanisms of S. sonnei:
S. sonnei utilizes a Type 3 Secretion System (T3SS) to inject effector proteins into host cells, facilitating bacterial entry and intracellular spread .
The bacterium possesses a virulence plasmid (pINV) encoding proteins for host cell invasion .
S. sonnei has recently been found to encode Type 6 Secretion System (T6SS), giving it competitive advantages over other enteric bacteria like E. coli and S. flexneri .
As a membrane protein, AaeX may potentially contribute to:
Cell envelope integrity during host cell interaction
Membrane-associated virulence mechanisms
Environmental stress responses that enhance survival in the host
Research gap: Experimental studies using AaeX knockout mutants would be valuable to determine its specific contribution to virulence through phenotypic assays measuring adhesion, invasion, intracellular survival, and virulence in animal models.
Comparative analysis of AaeX across Shigella species and related enterobacteria reveals evolutionary relationships that may inform its function:
This comparative approach highlights that while AaeX is conserved across Shigella species, specific variations might contribute to species-specific virulence traits or environmental adaptations. The protein shows sufficient conservation to potentially serve as a pan-Shigella target while having species-specific epitopes that could be exploited for differential detection or targeting.
Understanding AaeX immunogenicity is crucial for evaluating its potential as a vaccine component:
Humoral immunity: While specific data on AaeX immunogenicity is limited in the search results, recombinant Shigella proteins have been shown to elicit significant antibody responses in animal models .
Cross-protection potential: Recent research on multiepitope fusion antigens (MEFA) for Shigella vaccines demonstrates that conserved proteins can induce cross-protective immunity against multiple Shigella species and serotypes .
Delivery strategies: Both intramuscular and intranasal immunization with recombinant Shigella proteins have shown efficacy, with intranasal delivery generating mucosal immunity (IgA) in addition to systemic responses .
Research utilizing a polyvalent Shigella MEFA protein has demonstrated:
Development of serum IgG responses to multiple Shigella antigens
Reduction of invasion by S. sonnei, S. flexneri, S. boydii, and S. dysenteriae in vitro
Protection against lethal pulmonary challenge with various Shigella species in mouse models
If AaeX proves immunogenic, its small size (67 amino acids) makes it an attractive candidate for inclusion in multiepitope fusion vaccines, potentially contributing to a cross-protective formulation.
Recombinant AaeX protein offers several avenues for developing improved diagnostic tools for Shigella sonnei detection:
Antibody-based detection systems:
Development of monoclonal antibodies against unique epitopes of AaeX
Implementation in lateral flow assays for rapid point-of-care testing
ELISA-based detection systems for laboratory settings
Molecular diagnostic applications:
AaeX gene as a PCR target for species-specific identification
Development of aptamers targeting AaeX for biosensor applications
CRISPR-based detection systems using aaeX gene sequences
Multiplexed approaches:
Combination of AaeX with other species-specific markers for differential diagnosis
Integration into antibody arrays for simultaneous detection of multiple enteric pathogens
Methodological considerations for antibody development:
Immunization of mice or rabbits with purified recombinant AaeX
Selection of hybridomas producing antibodies with high specificity and sensitivity
Validation using clinical isolates to ensure specificity among closely related Enterobacteriaceae
While LPS O-antigen remains the dominant antigen for Shigella detection , protein-based markers like AaeX could provide complementary approaches that are less affected by O-antigen phase variation.
Researchers working with recombinant Shigella sonnei AaeX face several technical challenges:
Membrane protein solubility issues:
Challenge: Hydrophobic membrane proteins often have low solubility and form aggregates
Solution: Use detergents (DDM, LDAO, or Triton X-100) during purification; explore fusion partners like MBP or SUMO that enhance solubility
Maintaining native conformation:
Challenge: Ensuring the recombinant protein adopts its biologically relevant structure
Solution: Employ mild solubilization conditions; validate structure using circular dichroism and limited proteolysis
Functional characterization limitations:
Challenge: Determining protein function without clear phenotypes in knockout studies
Solution: Use protein-protein interaction studies (pull-downs, BLI, SPR) to identify binding partners; employ bacterial two-hybrid systems
Expression heterogeneity:
Challenge: Variation in expression levels between batches
Solution: Optimize codon usage; standardize induction parameters; use auto-induction media for consistent expression
Researchers should implement quality control checkpoints throughout the purification process, including SEC-MALS to confirm monodispersity and thermal shift assays to optimize buffer conditions for maximum stability.
While direct evidence linking AaeX to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is not provided in the search results, several contextual factors suggest potential areas for investigation:
Membrane-associated resistance mechanisms:
Small membrane proteins often contribute to envelope stress responses
They may influence membrane permeability, affecting drug uptake
Potential role in proton motive force maintenance, which impacts efflux pump efficiency
Genomic context considerations:
Stress response connections:
AMR is often linked to bacterial stress responses
If AaeX functions in stress signaling, it might indirectly influence resistance phenotypes
Research approach:
Generate aaeX deletion mutants and determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for various antibiotics
Perform transcriptomic analysis of wild-type vs. ΔaaeX strains under antibiotic stress
Investigate protein-protein interactions between AaeX and known AMR-related proteins
The rising prevalence of ciprofloxacin and fluoroquinolone-resistant S. sonnei makes understanding potential connections between membrane proteins like AaeX and resistance mechanisms particularly important.
The evolutionary success of Shigella sonnei as an emerging pathogen globally raises questions about how proteins like AaeX might contribute to its adaptation:
Environmental persistence:
Small membrane proteins often play roles in stress resistance
AaeX might contribute to survival in environmental reservoirs between hosts
Potential involvement in desiccation resistance or tolerance to disinfectants
Host adaptation:
Species competition:
Research methodologies to explore these hypotheses:
Comparative genomics across S. sonnei lineages to identify selection signatures in aaeX
Experimental evolution under various selective pressures to monitor aaeX mutations
Competition assays between wild-type and aaeX mutants in relevant ecological niches
Understanding the functional contributions of individual proteins like AaeX to the ecological success of S. sonnei could provide insights into its emergence as a globally significant pathogen.