Sphingomonas wittichii is a bacterium known for its ability to degrade aromatic compounds, including pollutants like dibenzofuran and dibenzodioxin . ATP synthase is a vital enzyme complex that produces adenosine triphosphate (ATP), the primary energy currency of cells . In bacteria, ATP synthase is crucial for energy production through oxidative phosphorylation. The ATP synthase complex consists of two main parts: the F0 sector, embedded in the membrane, and the F1 sector, which protrudes into the cytoplasm. Subunit b (atpF) is a component of the F0 sector, essential for proton translocation and ATP synthesis .
Recombinant Sphingomonas wittichii ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) refers to the protein produced using recombinant DNA technology. This involves isolating the gene encoding the atpF subunit from Sphingomonas wittichii, cloning it into an expression vector, and expressing it in a host organism, such as E. coli . The recombinant protein can then be purified and used for various research purposes, including studying its structure, function, and interactions with other proteins .
Energy Production: ATP synthase is central to energy production in bacteria. Subunit b is vital for the structural integrity and function of the F0 sector, which is responsible for proton translocation across the membrane .
Pollutant Degradation: Sphingomonas wittichii's ability to degrade pollutants is energy-intensive. Functional ATP synthase is necessary to support these processes .
Drug Target: ATP synthase has been identified as a potential target for antimicrobial drugs. Inhibiting ATP synthase can disrupt cellular energy production, leading to cell death. Certain dietary phytochemicals can inhibit ATP synthase, offering a therapeutic connection to combat antibiotic-resistant microbial infections .
Industrial Applications: Recombinant atpF can be used to develop more efficient bioremediation strategies by understanding and optimizing the energy production pathways in Sphingomonas wittichii .
Gene Isolation: The atpF gene is isolated from the Sphingomonas wittichii genome using PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) with specific primers designed from the known atpF sequence .
Cloning: The amplified atpF gene is inserted into a plasmid vector. The vector is chosen based on the desired expression system (e.g., E. coli) .
Expression: The recombinant plasmid is transformed into a host organism (E. coli). The host cells are cultured under conditions that induce atpF gene expression .
Purification: The recombinant atpF protein is purified from the host cell lysate using affinity chromatography, such as a His-tag . The purity of the protein is assessed using SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis .
Structural Studies: Recombinant atpF allows researchers to determine the protein's three-dimensional structure using X-ray crystallography or cryo-electron microscopy. Understanding the structure is crucial for elucidating its function and interactions .
Functional Analysis: Purified atpF can be used in in vitro assays to study its role in proton translocation and ATP synthesis. These studies can involve measuring ATP production rates under different conditions .
Interaction Studies: Recombinant atpF can be used to identify and study its interactions with other subunits of the ATP synthase complex. Techniques such as co-immunoprecipitation and cross-linking can be employed .
Inhibition Studies: Researchers can use recombinant atpF to screen for and characterize inhibitors of ATP synthase. This is relevant for developing new antimicrobial agents .
Environmental Studies: Understanding the role of atpF in Sphingomonas wittichii's metabolism can aid in optimizing bioremediation strategies for aromatic pollutants .
The following table shows differentially expressed genes of S. wittichii RW1 in short contact sand experiments :
| Gene | Annotation | Fold change in comparison |
|---|---|---|
| SAL-NOTHb vs ctrl SAL | ||
| Swit_0061 | Ribosomal large subunit pseudouridine synthase D | -5.3 |
| Swit_0266 | UspA domain-containing protein | -4.7 |
| Swit_0540 | TonB-dependent receptor | -2.6 |
| Swit_0652 | Methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase | 4.2 |
| Swit_0975 | Muconate cycloisomerase | -21.7 |
| Swit_0976 | Muconolactone Delta-isomerase | -12.9 |
| Swit_0977 | Catechol 1,2-dioxygenase | -11.4 |
| Swit_1124 | Glutaredoxin | 3.7 |
| Swit_1200 | Globin | -21.8 |
| Swit_1327 | 30S ribosomal protein S11 | -2.3 |
| Swit_1328 | 30S ribosomal protein S13 | -2.1 |
| Swit_1336 | 30S ribosomal protein S5 | -6.3 |
| Swit_1346 | 50S ribosomal protein L16 | -5.6 |
| Swit_1799 | Cbb3-type cytochrome oxidase component | -4.4 |
| Swit_1800 | Cytochrome c oxidase, cbb3-type, subunit II | -3.3 |
| Swit_2401 | 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase | -14.3 |
| Swit_2914 | FeS assembly SUF system protein | -6.2 |
| Swit_3044 | TonB-dependent receptor | -3.1 |
| Swit_3144 | TonB-dependent receptor | -3.1 |
| Swit_3256 | TonB-dependent receptor | -2.5 |
| Swit_3587 | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase | 2.5 |
| Swit_3729 | Hypothetical protein Swit_3729 | -3 |
| Swit_3904 | Hypothetical protein Swit_3904 | 11.7 |
| Swit_3960 | Hypothetical protein Swit_3960 | 2.5 |
| Swit_4364 | Methylamine dehydrogenase accessory protein MauD | 9 |
| Swit_4662 | BLUF domain-containing protein | -2.8 |
| Swit_5202 | Hypothetical protein Swit_5202 | -8.7 |
F1F0 ATP synthase synthesizes ATP from ADP using a proton or sodium gradient. This enzyme comprises two domains: the F1 domain, containing the extramembrane catalytic core, and the F0 domain, containing the membrane proton channel. These domains are linked by a central and peripheral stalk. ATP synthesis in the F1 catalytic domain is coupled to proton translocation via a rotary mechanism involving the central stalk subunits. This protein is a component of the F0 channel, forming part of the peripheral stalk that connects F1 and F0.
KEGG: swi:Swit_4486
STRING: 392499.Swit_4486
ATP synthase subunit b (atpF) is a component of the F₀ sector of the F-type ATP synthase complex in Sphingomonas wittichii. It forms part of the peripheral stalk that connects the F₁ and F₀ sectors, playing a crucial role in the structural stability of the complex and the energy coupling mechanism. The protein is typically expressed as a partial construct when produced recombinantly, which helps overcome challenges related to membrane integration while maintaining functional domains for research applications .
Recombinant atpF proteins are typically expressed as partial constructs that maintain core functional domains while potentially lacking membrane-spanning regions that would complicate expression and purification. When expressed in heterologous systems like E. coli or yeast, these proteins may contain additional tags (such as His-tags or Avi-tags) to facilitate purification and detection. The recombinant versions may also lack post-translational modifications present in the native form, depending on the expression system used . In contrast, native atpF exists as part of the intact ATP synthase complex within the bacterial membrane of S. wittichii, where it functions in the context of cellular bioenergetics.
Recombinant S. wittichii atpF can be produced in two major expression systems:
E. coli-based expression: This bacterial system offers high yield and relatively straightforward protocols. The protein produced is referenced by catalog numbers CSB-EP002358SUF1 and CSB-EP002358SUF1-B (for biotinylated versions) .
Yeast-based expression: This eukaryotic system may provide better folding conditions for complex proteins. Yeast-expressed protein is referenced by catalog number CSB-YP002358SUF1 .
The choice between these systems depends on research requirements, particularly regarding protein folding, post-translational modifications, and downstream applications.
S. wittichii strain RW1 has evolved mechanisms to survive in environments with fluctuating water availability. Transcriptome profiling has shown that when exposed to permeating solutes (sodium chloride) and non-permeating solutes (PEG8000), S. wittichii displays distinct adaptive responses .
Although the specific role of atpF in these responses was not directly detailed in the search results, ATP synthase components are typically involved in cellular energy management under stress conditions. The adaptive strategies include:
Increased expression of genes involved in trehalose and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis
Reduced expression of genes involved in flagella biosynthesis
Differential expression of membrane protein genes
These adaptations likely involve bioenergetic adjustments in which ATP synthase components, including atpF, play significant roles in maintaining energy homeostasis under environmental stress.
Comparative structural analysis of atpF from S. wittichii with homologous proteins from other bacterial species can provide insights into the evolutionary adaptations of energy-transducing systems across different ecological niches.
While S. wittichii atpF shares the fundamental function of other bacterial ATP synthase b subunits, its specific sequence characteristics may reflect adaptations to the organism's lifestyle as an environmental pollutant degrader, particularly of dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans . These adaptations might involve:
Structural modifications that enhance stability under oxidative stress conditions encountered during pollutant degradation
Interface adaptations for optimal interaction with other ATP synthase components
Regulatory features that respond to environmental signals specific to S. wittichii's ecological niche
Researchers can use recombinant atpF to investigate these structural features through crystallography, cryo-electron microscopy, or comparative biochemical analyses.
Based on recommended protocols for similar ATP synthase components from S. wittichii (such as subunit beta and subunit a), the following storage and handling conditions are advised:
Long-term storage: Store at -20°C/-80°C. For extended storage, conserve at -80°C .
Reconstitution: Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening to bring contents to the bottom. Reconstitute in deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL .
Working aliquots: Add glycerol to a final concentration of 5-50% (recommended 50%) and prepare working aliquots for storage at -20°C/-80°C .
Working storage: Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week .
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles: This significantly reduces protein activity .
These conditions help maintain protein stability and functionality for research applications.
While specific purification protocols for atpF were not detailed in the search results, effective strategies can be inferred from standard practices for similar recombinant proteins:
For His-tagged versions:
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC): Using Ni-NTA or Co2+ resins as the primary purification step
Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC): As a polishing step to remove aggregates and achieve >90% purity
For Avi-tag Biotinylated versions (CSB-EP002358SUF1-B):
Streptavidin affinity chromatography: Utilizing the highly specific interaction between biotin and streptavidin
Ion Exchange Chromatography (IEX): As a secondary purification step based on the protein's isoelectric point
The biotinylated version offers advantages for applications requiring oriented immobilization, as the biotinylation occurs in vivo through AviTag-BirA technology, which creates a specific amide linkage between biotin and the lysine residue within the AviTag sequence .
Based on standard practices for recombinant ATP synthase components, the following analytical methods are recommended:
SDS-PAGE: For purity assessment (target >85% purity) and molecular weight confirmation
Western blotting: For identity confirmation using antibodies against the target protein or tag
Mass spectrometry: For accurate molecular weight determination and sequence verification
Dynamic light scattering (DLS): To assess homogeneity and detect aggregation
Functional assays: To confirm biological activity, potentially including:
ATP binding assays
Interaction studies with other ATP synthase components
Structural integrity assessments via circular dichroism
For biotinylated versions, additional quality control should include:
Streptavidin binding assays to confirm successful biotinylation
Quantification of biotin:protein ratio
When designing experiments to study interactions between atpF and other ATP synthase components, researchers should consider:
Co-expression strategies:
Design constructs for co-expression of atpF with interacting partners
Consider using polycistronic expression systems that mimic natural operon organization
Interaction analysis methods:
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) using immobilized atpF
Pull-down assays using tagged versions of atpF
Native PAGE analysis of reconstituted subcomplexes
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC) for thermodynamic parameters
FRET-based approaches for real-time interaction studies
Structural analysis:
Use of cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to capture transient interactions
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to map interaction surfaces
Cryo-EM of reconstituted subcomplexes containing atpF
When using biotinylated atpF (CSB-EP002358SUF1-B), researchers can leverage the highly specific and strong biotin-streptavidin interaction for oriented immobilization on streptavidin-coated surfaces, providing advantages for interaction studies with precise spatial control .
When using recombinant S. wittichii atpF for structural studies, researchers should consider:
Protein stability considerations:
Sample preparation for structural techniques:
For crystallography: Screening of crystallization conditions with and without interacting partners
For cryo-EM: Optimization of grid preparation and vitrification conditions
For NMR: Isotopic labeling strategies if using E. coli expression systems
Construct design considerations:
The partial construct available commercially may be optimized for solubility but might lack key structural elements
Consider custom construct design that includes specific domains of interest
Tag position and linker composition can affect structural studies
Reconstitution with lipids or detergents:
For membrane-associated studies, appropriate lipid/detergent environments may be crucial
Consider nanodiscs or liposomes for more native-like environments
Common challenges and their solutions include:
To distinguish between artifacts and genuine findings:
Include appropriate controls:
Use tag-only proteins to identify tag-mediated effects
Include denatured protein controls to distinguish specific from non-specific interactions
Test multiple batches of protein to ensure reproducibility
Validate with complementary techniques:
Confirm interactions observed in vitro with in vivo approaches when possible
Use multiple biophysical methods to corroborate structural findings
Compare results with homologous proteins from related organisms
Consider native context:
Remember that atpF functions as part of a complex in vivo
Isolated protein behavior may differ from its behavior in the complete ATP synthase complex
When possible, compare with native ATP synthase behavior
Statistical validation:
Apply appropriate statistical tests to distinguish significant differences
Report effect sizes along with p-values
Consider biological significance beyond statistical significance
Research on S. wittichii atpF contributes to understanding bacterial adaptation to environmental stressors in several ways:
Energy metabolism under stress conditions:
S. wittichii strain RW1 demonstrates distinct adaptive responses to different water potential stressors (solute vs. matric stress)
As an ATP synthase component, atpF likely plays a role in modulating energy production under stress
Understanding these adaptations could provide insights into bacterial survival mechanisms in fluctuating environments
Membrane bioenergetics in pollutant-degrading bacteria:
Comparative bioenergetics across bacterial species:
Comparing atpF structure and function across different bacteria can illuminate evolutionary adaptations
This could reveal how ATP synthase components adapt to different ecological niches and metabolic requirements
While not directly addressed in the search results, research on bacterial ATP synthase components, including S. wittichii atpF, has important implications for antimicrobial development:
ATP synthase as a drug target:
Bacterial ATP synthase is structurally distinct from human mitochondrial ATP synthase
These differences can be exploited for selective inhibition
Understanding the structure and function of bacterial ATP synthase components can guide rational drug design
Addressing antimicrobial resistance:
Novel targets are needed to overcome resistance to current antibiotics
ATP synthase represents an essential process with limited redundancy
Targeting different components like atpF could provide new avenues for antimicrobial development
Cross-species applications:
Insights from environmental bacteria like S. wittichii can inform approaches to pathogenic species
Structural and functional conservation across bacterial ATP synthases enables knowledge transfer
Specialized adaptations identified in environmental bacteria may inspire novel inhibition strategies