Recombinant Squalus acanthias L-lactate dehydrogenase A chain (ldha)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Definition and Biological Role

Recombinant Squalus acanthias LDHA is a genetically engineered form of the lactate dehydrogenase A enzyme derived from the spiny dogfish shark. It catalyzes the reversible conversion of pyruvate to lactate using NADH as a cofactor, playing a central role in anaerobic respiration . This enzyme is structurally homologous to human LDHA (79.9% sequence identity), making it a valuable model for studying mammalian lactate dehydrogenase mechanisms and inhibitors .

Production and Expression Systems

The enzyme is produced using multiple recombinant platforms to ensure functional fidelity and high yield:

Expression SystemHost OrganismTag/Purification MethodPurity
BacterialEscherichia coliHis tag, GST tag>95% (SDS-PAGE)
EukaryoticYeast, HEK-293 cellsMyc-DYKDDDDK Tag, Biotinylation>80% (Coomassie)
Baculovirus-insect cellInsect cellsNone specified>90%

These systems enable large-scale production for biochemical assays, structural studies, and therapeutic research .

Functional Insights

  • Catalytic Activity: Recombinant Squalus acanthias LDHA demonstrates comparable or higher specific activity than endogenous human LDH5 in pyruvate-to-lactate conversion assays .

  • pH Sensitivity: Structural stability varies with pH; citrate replaces sulfate ions at pH 6.0, altering anion binding without disrupting catalysis .

  • Thermodynamic Flexibility: B-factor analysis highlights increased mobility in the N-terminal and active-site loops, suggesting conformational adaptability during substrate binding .

Applications in Cancer Research

LDHA is overexpressed in tumors to sustain the Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis). Recombinant Squalus acanthias LDHA serves as:

  • A drug discovery target for small-molecule inhibitors to disrupt cancer metabolism .

  • A comparative model for evaluating species-specific differences in LDHA inhibition .

  • A tool for functional studies of mutations linked to pathologies like exertional myoglobinuria .

Research Implications

The enzyme’s structural resolution (e.g., PDB 6LDH) has advanced understanding of:

  • Loop dynamics in catalysis .

  • Evolutionary conservation of NADH-binding domains .

  • pH-dependent anion interactions in enzyme stabilization .

Future studies may leverage its recombinant form to design isoform-specific inhibitors or engineer thermostable variants for industrial applications .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder. We will ship the available format, but you can specify your preferred format when ordering.
Lead Time
Delivery times vary by purchase method and location. Consult your local distributor for details. Proteins are shipped with blue ice packs by default. Request dry ice in advance (extra fees apply).
Notes
Avoid repeated freezing and thawing. Store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
Briefly centrifuge the vial before opening. Reconstitute in sterile deionized water to 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. Add 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquot for long-term storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our default final glycerol concentration is 50%.
Shelf Life
Shelf life depends on storage conditions, buffer, temperature, and protein stability. Liquid form: 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. Lyophilized form: 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Store at -20°C/-80°C upon receipt. Aliquot for multiple uses. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type is determined during manufacturing. If you require a specific tag, please inform us and we will prioritize its development.
Synonyms
ldhaL-lactate dehydrogenase A chain; LDH-A; EC 1.1.1.27; LDH-M
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
2-333
Protein Length
Full Length of Mature Protein
Purity
>85% (SDS-PAGE)
Species
Squalus acanthias (Spiny dogfish)
Target Names
Target Protein Sequence
ATLKDKLIG HLATSQEPRS YNKITVVGVG AVGMACAISI LMKDLADEVA LVDVMEDKLK GEMMDLQHGS LFLHTAKIVS GKDYSVSAGS KLVVITAGAR QQEGESRLNL VQRNVNIFKF IIPDIVKHSP DCIILVVSNP VDVLTYVAWK LSGLPMHRII GSGCNLDSAR FRYLMGERLG VHSSSCHGWV IGEHGDSSVP VWSGMNVAGV SLKELHPELG TDKDKENWKK LHKDVVDSAY EVIKLKGYTS WAIGLSVADL AETIMKNLCR VHPVSTMVKD FYGIKNDVFL SLPCVLDNHG ISNIVKMKLK PDEEQQLQKS ATTLWDIQKD LKF
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Protein Families
LDH/MDH superfamily, LDH family
Subcellular Location
Cytoplasm.

Q&A

What structural features govern the catalytic activity of Squalus acanthias L-LDHA?

The catalytic activity of Squalus acanthias L-LDHA is defined by its conserved active site architecture, which includes critical residues such as His195, Arg171, and Asp168. These residues coordinate substrate binding and proton transfer during the interconversion of pyruvate and lactate . Structural refinements at 2.0 Å resolution revealed a sulfate ion bound near His195, forming hydrogen bonds with Asn140 and Asp168 . This sulfate occupies the putative pyruvate-binding site, mimicking the substrate’s carboxyl group. Researchers analyzing catalytic mechanisms should prioritize mutagenesis of these residues and employ competitive inhibition assays using sulfate analogs.

Key Structural Parameters from Refined Crystallographic Data

ParameterValueImplications
Resolution2.0 ÅEnables atomic-level residue mapping
R-factor0.202High model accuracy
Coordinating residuesHis195, Arg171, Asp168Critical for substrate binding
Bound ions per subunit2 sulfate ionsMimic substrate interactions

How can researchers resolve discrepancies in crystallographic data for L-LDHA?

Discrepancies in L-LDHA structural data often arise from pH-dependent ligand binding or sequence misassignments. For example, the original sequence (WNALKE, residues 207–211) in Squalus acanthias L-LDHA was revised to NVASIK after electron density analysis . To address such issues:

  • Validate sequence alignment using de novo sequencing or cryo-EM density maps.

  • Compare multiple datasets collected under varying conditions (e.g., pH 6.0 vs. 7.8) to assess ligand occupancy .

  • Utilize restrained least-squares refinement to minimize model bias, especially for flexible loops (residues 97–123) .

What methodological approaches are optimal for expressing recombinant L-LDHA in bacterial systems?

The heterologous expression of Squalus acanthias L-LDHA in Escherichia coli requires codon optimization and stringent purification protocols. Key steps include:

  • Vector design: Use pET or pGEX systems with inducible promoters (e.g., T7 or lacUV5).

  • Codon optimization: Replace rare codons in the LDHA gene to match E. coli tRNA abundance.

  • Affinity purification: Employ His-tag or GST-tag systems, followed by size-exclusion chromatography to remove aggregates .

  • Activity validation: Perform coupled assays with NADH and pyruvate, monitoring absorbance at 340 nm .

How do post-translational modifications (PTMs) regulate L-LDHA activity in experimental models?

Lysine acetylation is a critical PTM that inhibits L-LDHA activity by disrupting substrate binding. In Streptococcus mutans, acetylation by ActA reduces lactic acid production by 40–60% . To study PTMs:

  • Overexpress acetyltransferases (e.g., ActA) in host systems and monitor acetylation via anti-acetyllysine immunoblotting .

  • Map acetylation sites using LC-MS/MS after tryptic digestion. Ten acetylation sites were identified in S. mutans LDH, seven of which are conserved in vertebrates .

  • Correlate PTMs with activity: Use enzymatic assays under varying acetylation states (e.g., ±Ac-CoA) .

Impact of Acetylation on L-LDHA Activity

Acetylation SiteConservation (%)Activity Reduction (%)
Lys128522 ± 3.1
Lys789234 ± 2.8
Lys1567641 ± 4.2

What advanced techniques are used to study L-LDHA’s role in hypoxia adaptation?

Comparative studies in hypoxia-tolerant organisms, such as Macrobrachium nipponense, reveal LDH’s regulation by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1). Methodologies include:

  • Promoter analysis: Clone the LDHA promoter upstream of luciferase and quantify hypoxia-induced expression .

  • RNA interference: Knock down HIF-1α/β subunits and measure LDHA mRNA/protein levels via qRT-PCR and Western blotting .

  • Enzymatic profiling: Compare lactate production in normoxic vs. hypoxic conditions using spectrophotometric assays .

How can researchers address contradictions in LDHA kinetic data across studies?

Discrepancies in kinetic parameters (e.g., K<sub>m</sub> for pyruvate) often stem from assay conditions. Standardize protocols by:

  • Buffering systems: Use 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) to avoid pH fluctuations during assays .

  • Cofactor concentrations: Maintain NADH at 0.2–0.4 mM to prevent substrate inhibition .

  • Temperature control: Conduct assays at 25°C for comparability with crystallographic data .

What strategies improve the stability of recombinant L-LDHA during storage?

Protein stability is enhanced by:

  • Cryoprotectants: Add 20% glycerol and store at −80°C .

  • Ligand stabilization: Incubate with 10 mM oxamate or sulfate to stabilize the active site .

  • Avoid freeze-thaw cycles: Aliquot purified protein into single-use volumes.

How does conformational flexibility impact L-LDHA substrate specificity?

The “flexible loop” (residues 97–123) undergoes substrate-induced closure, positioning Arg105 and Gln102 for hydrogen bonding with pyruvate . To study flexibility:

  • Perform molecular dynamics simulations using crystallographic coordinates (PDB: 6LDH) .

  • Use fluorescence quenching to monitor loop movement upon substrate binding.

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.