STK4 functions as a stress-activated, pro-apoptotic kinase that plays crucial roles in multiple signaling pathways:
Hippo Signaling Pathway: STK4 serves as a key component of this pathway, which plays a pivotal role in organ size control and tumor suppression by restricting proliferation and promoting apoptosis . The pathway consists of a kinase cascade where STK4/MST1 (and its homolog STK3/MST2), in complex with regulatory protein SAV1, phosphorylates and activates LATS1/2, which then phosphorylates and inactivates YAP1 oncoprotein and WWTR1/TAZ .
Apoptotic Signaling: Following caspase-cleavage, STK4 enters the nucleus and induces chromatin condensation followed by internucleosomal DNA fragmentation . It phosphorylates 'Ser-14' of histone H2B during apoptosis, a critical step in the apoptotic process .
Immune Regulation: STK4 regulates T cell immunity by forming a complex with Foxp3 and NF-κB p65, which controls Foxp3 and p65-dependent transcriptional programs in regulatory T cells .
Methodologically, researchers investigating these pathways should employ phosphorylation assays, protein interaction studies, and gene expression analyses to fully characterize STK4's role in specific cellular contexts.
Measuring STK4 kinase activity requires careful experimental design and consideration of several methodological approaches:
Substrate-based assays: Utilize known substrates such as histone H2B or LATS1/2. The reaction typically contains:
Purified recombinant STK4 (50-100 ng)
Substrate protein (1-2 μg)
Kinase buffer (commonly containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM DTT)
ATP (50-100 μM, including trace amounts of [γ-³²P]ATP for radioactive assays)
ATP consumption measurement: Using non-radioactive methods such as ADP-Glo™ or NADH-coupled assays to measure ATP consumption or ADP production.
Specific Activity Measurement:
Human STK4/MST1 demonstrates a specific activity of approximately 73 pmole/min/μg , which can serve as a reference point for comparative analyses.
Autophosphorylation Assays:
STK4 undergoes robust autoactivation in vitro through intramolecular autophosphorylation on the activation loop of an STK4 dimer . This property can be leveraged to assess kinase functionality.
Include positive and negative controls (kinase-dead mutant such as STK4 K59R)
Test multiple substrate concentrations to determine Km values
Consider time-course experiments to establish linear reaction rates
Ensure proper protein storage conditions to maintain enzymatic activity
When reporting activity, specify the exact assay conditions and quantification methods to enable reproducibility.
Given STK4's critical role in T cell function, several specialized approaches are recommended:
Isolate primary T cells from peripheral blood using negative selection methods
For regulatory T cells (Tregs), use CD4+CD25+CD127low sorting criteria
Culture in complete RPMI medium supplemented with IL-2 (100 U/ml) for Tregs
CRISPR-Cas9 system targeting STK4 in primary T cells or cell lines
Conditional knockout mice (e.g., Foxp3-Cre × STK4flox/flox) for Treg-specific deletion
siRNA or shRNA approaches for transient knockdown
Co-immunoprecipitation assays following T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation
Proximity ligation assays to visualize protein interactions in situ
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to identify target genes
Suppression assays using STK4-deficient Tregs
T cell proliferation assays using CFSE dilution
Flow cytometry to assess activation markers (CD25, CD69)
Cytokine production measurement using ELISA or intracellular staining
Western blotting to assess phosphorylation of STK4 targets
Subcellular fractionation to track STK4 nuclear translocation following TCR stimulation
Phospho-flow cytometry for single-cell resolution of signaling events
Research has shown that STK4 nuclear translocation in Treg cells can be inhibited by XMU-MP-1, a specific STK4 kinase inhibitor , providing a useful tool for mechanistic studies.
STK4 deficiency significantly alters interferon signaling pathways and gene expression profiles:
Defective type I/II and III interferon responses to TLR agonists and pathogens
Impaired phosphorylation of TBK1 and transcription factor IRF3
Dysregulated, but not completely abrogated, interferon-regulated gene expression
Transcriptional Dysregulation:
Whole blood and PBMC analyses from STK4-deficient patients reveal:
Impaired T cell immunity:
Dysregulated innate immune signaling:
To properly analyze these effects, researchers should employ:
RNA sequencing of primary cells from STK4-deficient and control subjects
Comparative analysis of stimulated vs. unstimulated conditions
Pathway enrichment analysis using tools like ClueGO, Cytoscape, and IPA
Validation of key findings using RT-qPCR and protein-level assays
A recent study identified two regulatory networks of IFN-α/IFN-β-responsive genes encompassing cytokine, chemokine, and adhesion factor/receptor genes that are indirectly regulated by STK4 . These genes are involved in cytotoxicity and death of immune cells, as well as adhesion and migration of lymphocytes and mononuclear leukocytes.
The Stk4-Foxp3-P65 transcriptional complex is critical for regulatory T cell function and can be investigated using the following methodological approaches:
Co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP): Use anti-Stk4, anti-Foxp3, or anti-p65 antibodies to pull down the complex, followed by Western blot analysis to detect interacting partners
Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA): Visualize protein interactions in situ with single-molecule resolution
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation (BiFC): Tag potential interacting proteins with complementary fragments of a fluorescent protein
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Track TCR signaling-induced translocation of Stk4 into the nuclei of Treg cells and its co-localization with Foxp3
Subcellular fractionation: Separate nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions to detect complex formation biochemically
Live-cell imaging: Using fluorescent protein-tagged components to track complex dynamics
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP): Identify genomic binding sites of the complex
Transcriptional reporter assays: Measure the impact of complex formation on target gene expression
Mutagenesis studies: Create phosphomimetic mutants (e.g., Foxp3 S418E) to assess the role of specific phosphorylation events
Key Experimental Control:
Use Stk4 K59R mutant that lacks kinase catalytic activity as a negative control . This mutation prevents the TCR-induced nuclear translocation of Stk4.
Important Finding:
The Stk4-Foxp3-p65 complex is stabilized by Stk4-dependent phosphorylation of Foxp3 serine 418 . This phosphorylation event can be monitored using phospho-specific antibodies or mass spectrometry analysis.
Investigating the impact of STK4 mutations requires a systematic approach combining molecular, cellular, and functional analyses:
In silico analysis: Predict the impact of mutations using tools like CADD scores, which provide evidence of deleteriousness
Structural modeling: Map mutations onto protein structure to predict functional consequences
Conservation analysis: Determine if mutations affect evolutionarily conserved residues
Western blot analysis: Assess protein expression levels using antibodies against specific domains
RT-qPCR and mRNA-Seq: Measure transcript levels to evaluate effects on mRNA stability
Pulse-chase experiments: Determine protein half-life and stability
Kinase activity assays: Compare wild-type and mutant protein catalytic activity
Autophosphorylation analysis: Evaluate the capacity for autoactivation
Substrate phosphorylation: Test ability to phosphorylate known substrates (e.g., LATS1/2)
Nuclear translocation assays: Assess ability to translocate to the nucleus following stimulation
Co-immunoprecipitation: Evaluate interactions with partner proteins
Immunofluorescence microscopy: Visualize subcellular localization
Rescue experiments: Reintroduce wild-type or mutant STK4 into deficient cells to assess restoration of function
Cellular phenotype analysis: Measure apoptosis, proliferation, and other STK4-dependent processes
Case Study:
A homozygous nonsense STK4 mutation (NM_006282.2:c.871C > T, p.Arg291*) identified in a pediatric patient resulted in partial loss of STK4 expression and complete loss of STK4 function . This mutation was associated with recurrent viral and bacterial infections, notably persistent Epstein-Barr virus viremia and pulmonary tuberculosis.
Efficient isolation and purification of recombinant STK4 requires careful consideration of expression systems, purification tags, and chromatographic techniques:
1. Expression System Selection:
For optimal results with STK4, consider:
Sf9 insect cells: Yield properly folded protein with enzymatic activity (≥50% purity)
E. coli: Higher yield but may require refolding for functional studies
Mammalian cells: Better for complex interaction studies but lower yield
2. Fusion Tag Selection:
Common tags for STK4 purification include:
GST-tag: Enhances solubility and enables single-step affinity purification
His-tag: Allows for metal affinity chromatography under native or denaturing conditions
Avi-tag: Enables in vivo biotinylation for streptavidin-based purification and detection
3. Purification Protocol:
A typical workflow for GST-tagged human STK4:
4. Stabilization Considerations:
To maintain STK4 stability and activity:
Include 3-5 mM DTT in all buffers
Add 10-15% glycerol to storage buffers
Flash-freeze in small aliquots and store at -80°C
5. Activity Validation:
Prior to experimental use, validate purified STK4:
Measure specific activity (expect ~73 pmole/min/μg for human STK4)
Confirm autophosphorylation capacity
Verify substrate phosphorylation
When investigating STK4's role in immune disorders, researchers should consider a comprehensive experimental approach:
Genetic screening: Identify STK4 mutations using whole genome/exome sequencing
Protein expression: Quantify STK4 levels in different immune cell populations
Functional assays: Compare immune cell responses between patients and controls
Flow cytometry analysis: Assess distributions of T cell subsets, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and NK cells
Activation marker analysis: Evaluate surface markers like CCR7 and CD62L on T cells
Cell death analysis: Measure apoptosis rates in different immune cell populations
Pathogen challenge experiments: Test responses to viral and bacterial pathogens
Ex vivo stimulation: Use purified PRR agonists (LPS, poly(I:C)) to assess innate immune responses
Cytokine production: Measure IFN-α/IFN-β responses following stimulation
RNA-Seq analysis: Compare gene expression profiles between STK4-deficient and control cells
Pathway enrichment analysis: Identify dysregulated signaling networks
Phosphoproteomics: Map global changes in phosphorylation patterns
Gene complementation: Restore STK4 expression in deficient cells
Small molecule inhibitors: Use STK4 inhibitors like XMU-MP-1 in control cells
Adoptive transfer experiments: Test if STK4-deficient cells can be functionally restored
Key Clinical Correlations:
STK4 deficiency is associated with:
Combined immunodeficiency with severe T cell lymphopenia
Recurrent bacterial and viral infections
Persistent EBV viremia often leading to B cell lymphoma development
Mucocutaneous candidiasis
Understanding these relationships requires careful consideration of both direct STK4 functions and downstream effects on multiple immune pathways.