KEGG: sae:NWMN_1126
Methionyl-tRNA formyltransferase (fmt) catalyzes the transfer of a formyl group from 10-formyltetrahydrofolate to the amino group of methionine attached to initiator tRNA, producing formylmethionyl-tRNAifMet. This formylation is crucial for bacterial protein synthesis as it enables specific recognition by initiation factor IF2 and facilitates proper assembly of the initiation complex on the ribosome. In S. aureus, research has revealed that the T-box riboswitch mechanism regulates methionine biosynthesis, with specific interactions occurring between the met leader RNA and initiator formylmethionyl-tRNA (tRNAifMet) .
To investigate fmt function in S. aureus protein synthesis, researchers typically employ:
In vitro formylation assays with purified components
Pulse-chase experiments to measure protein synthesis rates
Ribosome profiling to assess translation initiation efficiency
Fmt depletion or mutation studies to evaluate effects on protein synthesis
The relationship between methionine biosynthesis and fmt activity in S. aureus involves complex regulatory mechanisms:
In S. aureus, methionine biosynthesis is regulated through a T-box riboswitch mechanism rather than the S-box riboswitches found in other Bacillales. The met leader RNA specifically interacts with uncharged initiator formylmethionyl-tRNA (tRNAifMet), suggesting a direct regulatory connection between methionine availability and protein synthesis initiation .
Experimental approaches to study this interaction include:
RNA-protein binding assays demonstrating that the met leader RNA interacts strongly with tRNAifMet compared to other methionyl-tRNAs
Northern blot analysis to assess transcript stability of methionine biosynthesis genes
Mutational analysis of the T-box riboswitch to evaluate effects on fmt expression
Metabolic labeling to track methionine flux through protein synthesis
The metICFE-mdh mRNA stability is regulated by RNase activity, with evidence suggesting RNase J2 involvement in its degradation . This post-transcriptional regulation adds another layer of control that may indirectly impact fmt activity by affecting methionine availability.
Optimizing expression of recombinant S. aureus fmt requires careful consideration of factors that maintain protein solubility and enzymatic activity:
Recommended expression systems:
E. coli BL21(DE3) with pET vectors:
Culture at 18-22°C after induction with 0.1-0.5 mM IPTG
Include 10 μM folate in growth media to enhance cofactor incorporation
Codon optimization may improve expression due to different codon usage patterns
E. coli SHuffle strains:
Provides improved disulfide bond formation if necessary for fmt structure
Useful for obtaining correctly folded protein with higher activity
Fusion tags and optimization strategies:
| Tag | Position | Advantages | Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6×His-SUMO | N-terminal | Enhanced solubility, easy removal | Minimal interference with activity |
| MBP | N-terminal | High solubility, affinity purification | Larger size may affect some assays |
| Strep-tag | C-terminal | Gentle elution conditions | Verify that tag doesn't affect tRNA binding |
Critical parameters for optimal expression:
Induction at OD600 = 0.6-0.8
Post-induction temperature: 18-20°C
Expression time: 16-20 hours
Addition of 1-5% glucose to reduce basal expression
Supplementation with folate to ensure proper cofactor incorporation
S. aureus fmt shares structural features common to bacterial methionyl-tRNA formyltransferases, consisting of:
N-terminal domain:
Contains the binding site for 10-formyltetrahydrofolate donor
Highly conserved across bacterial species
Folate binding pocket characterized by positively charged residues
Catalytic core:
Contains the active site where formyl transfer occurs
Key catalytic residues include conserved histidine (His) and asparagine (Asn)
Coordination of both methionyl-tRNA and formyl donor
C-terminal domain:
Responsible for tRNA recognition and binding
Contains specificity-determining residues that distinguish initiator tRNA
The structural features of bacterial formyltransferases have been extensively studied, as seen in related research on FmtA, another S. aureus protein that contains catalytic serine, lysine, and tyrosine residues in its active site . While FmtA is a different protein with esterase activity, it demonstrates how careful structural characterization can reveal functional mechanisms of S. aureus enzymes.
For structure-function studies, researchers employ:
Site-directed mutagenesis of conserved residues
X-ray crystallography of fmt alone and in complex with substrates
Molecular dynamics simulations to understand conformational changes
Comparative analysis with fmt from other bacterial species
In vitro analysis of fmt activity requires sensitive and specific assays:
Radiometric assays:
Incubation of fmt with [³H]-methionyl-tRNAifMet and 10-formyltetrahydrofolate
Precipitation of tRNA with trichloroacetic acid and filter binding
Quantification by scintillation counting
Advantages: High sensitivity, direct measurement of product formation
HPLC-based methods:
Separation of formylmethionyl-tRNA from methionyl-tRNA
Detection by UV absorbance at 260 nm
Quantification by peak area integration
Advantages: No radioactivity, ability to monitor reaction progress
Mass spectrometry approaches:
LC-MS analysis of aminoacyl-tRNA before and after fmt reaction
Detection of mass shift corresponding to formyl addition
Advantages: High specificity, potential for high-throughput analysis
Coupled enzyme assays:
Link fmt activity to production of tetrahydrofolate
Monitor through changes in absorbance or fluorescence
Advantages: Continuous monitoring, adaptable to plate reader format
These methodological approaches are similar to those used for studying RNA-tRNA interactions in S. aureus methionine biosynthesis regulation, where binding between radioactively labeled tRNA and in vitro-transcribed met leader RNA is determined by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis .
Fmt plays significant roles in antibiotic resistance through several mechanisms:
Direct resistance mechanisms:
Peptidyl deformylase (PDF) inhibitor resistance:
Reduced fmt activity decreases dependence on formylated proteins
PDF inhibitors become less effective when formylation is decreased
Experimental approach: Compare MICs of PDF inhibitors in wild-type vs. fmt-attenuated strains
Protein synthesis adaptation:
Alterations in fmt activity modify translation initiation patterns under antibiotic stress
May enable selective synthesis of resistance factors
Methodology: Ribosome profiling and proteomics to identify fmt-dependent changes
Indirect resistance contributions:
Stress response regulation:
Biofilm formation:
Alterations in protein synthesis initiation may affect biofilm-related protein expression
Biofilms significantly increase antibiotic tolerance
Research approach: Compare biofilm formation in fmt mutants vs. wild-type
Resistance analysis methodologies include:
Creation of fmt variants using site-directed mutagenesis
Antibiotic susceptibility testing using broth microdilution
Time-kill kinetics to assess dynamics of antibiotic action
Fitness measurement in presence of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations
Transcriptomics to identify compensatory changes in gene expression
Purification of recombinant S. aureus fmt requires careful optimization to preserve enzymatic function:
Recommended purification workflow:
Cell lysis buffer optimization:
50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol
Addition of protease inhibitors (PMSF, leupeptin, pepstatin A)
Gentle lysis using sonication (5 cycles of 10s on/30s off) or pressure-based methods
Affinity chromatography:
Immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged fmt
Washing with 20-50 mM imidazole to remove non-specific binding
Elution with 250-300 mM imidazole gradient
Include 1 mM DTT and 10% glycerol in all buffers to maintain stability
Ion exchange chromatography:
Anion exchange (Q Sepharose) at pH 8.0 or cation exchange (SP Sepharose) at pH 6.5
Salt gradient elution (100-500 mM NaCl)
Collect fractions and test for activity
Size exclusion chromatography:
Final polishing step using Superdex 75/200
Running buffer: 25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT
Collect monomeric protein fractions
Critical parameters for activity preservation:
| Parameter | Recommended Condition | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 4°C throughout purification | Prevents thermal denaturation |
| Reducing agents | 1-5 mM DTT or 5 mM β-ME | Protects critical cysteine residues |
| Glycerol | 10-20% in final storage buffer | Prevents freeze-thaw damage |
| pH | 7.0-7.5 | Maintains optimal protein stability |
| Storage | Flash-freeze in liquid N₂, store at -80°C | Minimizes freeze-thaw cycles |
Activity validation after purification:
Formylation assay using purified S. aureus tRNAifMet
Thermal shift assay to confirm proper folding
Size exclusion chromatography to verify monomeric state
Circular dichroism to assess secondary structure integrity
Characterizing interactions between fmt and its tRNA substrate employs multiple complementary approaches:
Binding assays:
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA):
Incubate varying concentrations of fmt with radiolabeled methionyl-tRNAifMet
Resolve complexes on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels
Quantify bound vs. unbound fractions to determine binding affinity (Kd)
This approach is similar to methods used for studying met leader RNA interactions with methionyl-tRNAs in S. aureus
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize fmt or tRNA on sensor chip
Flow the binding partner at varying concentrations
Determine association (kon) and dissociation (koff) rate constants
Calculate equilibrium binding constant (Kd = koff/kon)
Microscale thermophoresis (MST):
Label fmt or tRNA with fluorescent dye
Measure changes in thermophoretic mobility upon binding
Determine binding affinity from titration curves
Advantages: Low sample consumption, solution-based measurement
Structural studies:
X-ray crystallography:
Cryo-electron microscopy:
Visualize fmt-tRNA complexes at near-atomic resolution
Capture multiple conformational states
Advantages: No crystallization required, conformational heterogeneity preserved
Functional interaction analysis:
Mutagenesis studies:
Create fmt variants with mutations in predicted tRNA-binding residues
Measure effects on binding affinity and catalytic activity
Map the functional interaction surface
tRNA modification analysis:
Prepare tRNAs with specific modifications or lacking certain modifications
Assess impact on fmt recognition and activity
Determine the contribution of tRNA modifications to specificity
Footprinting assays:
Use chemical or enzymatic probes to identify tRNA regions protected by fmt binding
Compare accessibility patterns in free vs. fmt-bound tRNA
Map the interaction interface on the tRNA molecule
Reconciling contradictory findings in fmt research requires systematic analysis of methodological differences:
Sources of data contradiction:
Enzyme preparation variations:
Different expression systems yielding variable protein conformations
Presence/absence of tags affecting activity measurements
Variable cofactor saturation levels
Assay condition differences:
Buffer composition (pH, ionic strength) affecting enzyme-substrate interactions
Temperature variations altering reaction kinetics
Differences in substrate preparation and quality
Detection method discrepancies:
Varied sensitivities and dynamic ranges across methods
Different data normalization approaches
Time-dependent measurements vs. endpoint analysis
Contradiction resolution strategy:
Standardize methodology:
Develop consensus protocols for fmt expression and purification
Establish standard assay conditions for activity measurements
Create reference standards for inter-laboratory comparisons
Perform side-by-side comparisons:
Test multiple fmt preparations under identical conditions
Apply multiple detection methods to the same reaction
Compare across a range of conditions rather than single-point measurements
Meta-analysis approach:
Systematically analyze published fmt data with attention to methodological details
Identify patterns in results related to specific experimental variables
Develop predictive models to reconcile apparently contradictory data
These approaches align with clinical contradiction detection methodologies that classify contradictions based on their source and systematically resolve them through analysis of underlying factors . The same principles can be applied to contradictions in fmt research data.
Contradiction resolution flowchart:
Identify specific contradictory claims
Catalog methodological differences
Perform controlled experiments to test each variable
Develop unified model that explains condition-dependent differences
Validate model with new experimental data
Studying S. aureus fmt substrate specificity employs multiple complementary methodologies:
tRNA substrate specificity analysis:
Activity screening with diverse tRNAs:
Compare formylation efficiency with initiator vs. elongator tRNAs
Determine kinetic parameters (kcat, Km) for each substrate
Calculate specificity constants (kcat/Km) to quantify preference
Similar approaches have been used to study met leader RNA interactions with different methionyl-tRNAs in S. aureus
tRNA structural determinant mapping:
Generate chimeric tRNAs with swapped domains between initiator and elongator tRNAs
Create point mutations in key identity elements
Correlate structural features with fmt recognition
Methodology: In vitro transcription of tRNA variants followed by aminoacylation and formylation assays
Formyl donor specificity analysis:
Alternative donor testing:
Synthesize structural analogs of 10-formyltetrahydrofolate
Measure fmt activity with each analog
Structure-activity relationship analysis
Methodology: HPLC or radiometric assays to measure product formation
Binding studies:
Isothermal titration calorimetry with different donor molecules
Determine binding affinity (Kd) and thermodynamic parameters
Correlate binding energy with catalytic efficiency
Comprehensive specificity profiling:
| Substrate Feature | Experimental Approach | Analytical Method |
|---|---|---|
| tRNA anticodon | Anticodon mutations | Activity assays + binding studies |
| Acceptor stem | Base pair substitutions | EMSA + activity assays |
| tRNA tertiary structure | Structure probing | SHAPE analysis + activity correlation |
| Methionine attachment | Misacylated tRNAs | LC-MS detection of products |
| Formyl donor structure | Synthetic analogs | Enzyme kinetics + competition assays |
These methodologies enable detailed characterization of fmt substrate preferences, which is crucial for understanding its biological function and developing specific inhibitors.
Fmt represents a promising antimicrobial target due to its essential role in bacterial protein synthesis and absence in humans:
Target validation approaches:
Genetic validation:
Create conditional fmt knockdown strains
Demonstrate growth inhibition upon fmt depletion
Assess virulence attenuation in animal models
Methodology: Inducible antisense RNA or CRISPR interference
Chemical validation:
Identify tool compounds that inhibit fmt activity
Demonstrate correlation between biochemical and cellular activities
Confirm target engagement through resistant mutant generation
Methodology: Enzyme assays coupled with whole-cell activity testing
Inhibitor discovery strategies:
Structure-based design:
Use crystal structures of fmt to design competitive inhibitors
Focus on formyl donor site or tRNA binding interface
Employ molecular docking and virtual screening
Methodology: Fragment-based lead discovery followed by structure-guided optimization
High-throughput screening:
Develop miniaturized fmt activity assays
Screen diverse chemical libraries
Include counterscreens to eliminate non-specific inhibitors
Methodology: Fluorescence-based activity assays in 384 or 1536-well format
Natural product exploration:
Screen microbial extracts for fmt inhibitory activity
Isolate and characterize active compounds
Optimize leads through semi-synthetic modification
Methodology: Bioassay-guided fractionation coupled with structure elucidation
Lead optimization considerations:
| Parameter | Optimization Goal | Experimental Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Potency | IC50 < 100 nM | Structure-activity relationship studies |
| Selectivity | >100-fold vs. human enzymes | Counter-screening against human orthologs |
| Antimicrobial activity | MIC < 4 μg/mL | Broth microdilution against S. aureus |
| Resistance frequency | < 10^-8 | Spontaneous resistance selection |
| ADME properties | Suitable for in vivo efficacy | In vitro ADME assays and PK studies |
Combination therapy potential:
Test fmt inhibitors with established antibiotics
Identify synergistic combinations
Evaluate prevention of resistance emergence
Methodology: Checkerboard assays and time-kill studies
Structural characterization of S. aureus fmt in complex with its substrates requires specialized techniques:
X-ray crystallography approaches:
Co-crystallization strategies:
Mix purified fmt with methionyl-tRNAifMet and non-hydrolyzable formyl donor
Screen crystallization conditions systematically
Optimize crystals for high-resolution diffraction
Data collection at synchrotron radiation sources
Similar approaches have yielded high-resolution structures of other S. aureus proteins like FmtA
Soaking methods:
Obtain apo-fmt crystals, then soak with substrates or inhibitors
Verify ligand binding by difference electron density
Advantages: Higher success rate than co-crystallization for some ligands
Cryo-electron microscopy methods:
Single-particle analysis:
Prepare fmt-tRNA-formyl donor complexes and vitrify
Collect thousands of particle images
Perform 2D classification and 3D reconstruction
Advantages: No crystallization required, conformational heterogeneity preserved
Time-resolved cryo-EM:
Capture reaction intermediates by rapid mixing and freezing
Visualize structural changes during catalysis
Classify particles by conformational state
Advantages: Provides dynamic view of catalytic mechanism
Solution-based structural methods:
Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS):
Collect scattering data from fmt-substrate complexes in solution
Generate low-resolution envelope models
Dock high-resolution structures into SAXS envelopes
Advantages: Physiological solution conditions, no crystals needed
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR):
Prepare isotope-labeled fmt for chemical shift analysis
Map binding interfaces through chemical shift perturbation
Study dynamics of substrate recognition
Advantages: Provides information on protein dynamics in solution
Integrative structural biology:
Combining multiple structural techniques provides comprehensive understanding of fmt-substrate interactions:
Next-generation sequencing approaches provide powerful tools for studying fmt function and regulation:
Transcriptome analysis:
RNA-Seq to study fmt regulation:
Compare transcriptome profiles under conditions affecting fmt expression
Identify co-regulated genes and regulatory networks
Discover non-coding RNAs involved in fmt regulation
Methodology: Strand-specific RNA-Seq with rRNA depletion
Ribosome profiling for translation analysis:
Measure ribosome occupancy on mRNAs in wild-type vs. fmt-depleted cells
Identify genes with fmt-dependent translation efficiency
Characterize changes in start codon selection
Methodology: Isolate ribosome-protected fragments and sequence
Protein-RNA interaction analysis:
CLIP-Seq for fmt-tRNA interactions:
Crosslink fmt to bound RNAs in vivo
Immunoprecipitate fmt and sequence associated RNAs
Map fmt binding sites on tRNA and potential non-tRNA targets
Methodology: UV crosslinking followed by immunoprecipitation and sequencing
RNA structural probing:
Compare tRNA structure in presence/absence of fmt
Identify structural changes upon binding
Map protection patterns indicative of interaction sites
Methodology: SHAPE-Seq or DMS-Seq approaches
These approaches can complement traditional biochemical studies of RNA-protein interactions, such as those used to characterize interactions between met leader RNA and methionyl-tRNAs in S. aureus .
Genomic approaches:
Transposon sequencing (Tn-Seq):
Create transposon library in S. aureus
Subject to growth with fmt inhibitors or under fmt depletion
Identify genes affecting sensitivity or resistance
Methodology: Transposon insertion site sequencing before and after selection
CRISPR interference screening:
Construct library targeting genes throughout S. aureus genome
Identify genetic interactions with fmt by differential growth analysis
Discover synthetic lethal or suppressor relationships
Methodology: sgRNA abundance quantification by next-generation sequencing
Clinical application of sequencing:
Comparative genomics:
Analyze fmt sequence variation across clinical S. aureus isolates
Correlate polymorphisms with antibiotic resistance phenotypes
Identify potential resistance-associated mutations
Methodology: Whole genome sequencing of clinical isolates
Metatranscriptomics:
Analyze fmt expression in diverse infection models
Compare expression patterns between antibiotic-sensitive and resistant strains
Identify condition-specific regulation of fmt
Methodology: RNA-Seq from infected tissues followed by pathogen transcript mapping