SACOL1903 is a 374-amino-acid membrane protein from S. aureus strain COL (UniProt ID: Q5HES9) with a theoretical molecular weight of 42.7 kDa and an isoelectric point (pI) of 6.27 . Its recombinant form is produced in E. coli with an N-terminal His tag, enabling purification via affinity chromatography .
Recombinant SACOL1903 is commercially available for research purposes. Key specifications include:
Membrane complex association: SACOL1903’s localization and DUF445 domain suggest potential roles in membrane protein assemblies, akin to ESS (ESAT-6 secretion system) components like EsaA and EssB .
Immune evasion: Though unconfirmed, other S. aureus membrane proteins (e.g., SdrE) bind host factors like complement regulator fH , raising questions about SACOL1903’s immunological interactions.
Functional validation: No direct studies link SACOL1903 to virulence, toxin secretion, or metabolic pathways.
Structural studies: The DUF445 domain’s architecture and ligand-binding potential remain uncharacterized.
Interaction mapping: Proteomic screens could identify binding partners in S. aureus membranes .
KEGG: sac:SACOL1903
STRING: 93062.SACOL1903
SACOL1903 is currently classified as a protein of unknown function (UPF), specifically in the UPF0754 family. While its precise biological role remains to be fully elucidated, structural analysis suggests it is an integral membrane protein that likely plays a role in membrane organization or transport.
Given the importance of membrane proteins in S. aureus pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance, SACOL1903 may be involved in processes such as nutrient acquisition, stress response, or cell envelope maintenance. Recent research on S. aureus membrane proteins has revealed their involvement in functional membrane microdomains (FMMs) that organize membrane complexes essential for bacterial survival and virulence .
For expressing recombinant SACOL1903, researchers typically use one of the following systems:
Cell-free expression systems: These are particularly useful for membrane proteins like SACOL1903 because they avoid toxicity issues often encountered with traditional cellular expression systems .
E. coli expression systems with specific membrane protein vectors: When using E. coli, consider vectors designed for membrane protein expression that include:
C-terminal fusion tags for detection/purification
Inducible promoters for controlled expression
Signal sequences for proper membrane targeting
Alternative hosts such as Lactococcus lactis or Bacillus subtilis may provide a more natural membrane environment for proper folding of Gram-positive bacterial proteins.
The choice of expression system should be determined by experimental requirements, particularly whether the protein will be used for structural studies, functional assays, or antibody production.
Purification of membrane proteins like SACOL1903 requires specialized approaches:
Membrane isolation:
Harvest cells at mid-logarithmic phase
Disrupt cells using mechanical methods (sonication or French press)
Separate membranes by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g for 1 hour)
Solubilization:
Screen detergents (DDM, LDAO, or Triton X-100) at concentrations 2-3× their critical micelle concentration
Incubate at 4°C with gentle agitation for 1-2 hours
Remove insoluble material by ultracentrifugation
Affinity chromatography:
Utilize the His-tag commonly incorporated in recombinant SACOL1903 for immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC)
Use mild elution conditions (imidazole gradient 20-300 mM)
Include detergent in all purification buffers
Size exclusion chromatography:
Final polishing step to separate monomeric protein from aggregates
Assess protein homogeneity and oligomeric state
For structural biology applications, consider using amphipols or nanodiscs to stabilize the protein in a lipid environment after purification.
Liposome reconstitution protocol for SACOL1903:
Prepare lipid mixture:
Use a mixture of E. coli polar lipids and POPG (7:3 ratio)
Dissolve lipids in chloroform, evaporate to form a thin film
Rehydrate with buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl)
Sonicate to form unilamellar vesicles
Protein incorporation:
Add purified SACOL1903 (protein:lipid ratio of 1:100 to 1:50)
Destabilize liposomes with detergent (0.1% Triton X-100)
Remove detergent using Bio-Beads SM-2 or dialysis
Verification of incorporation:
Sucrose density gradient centrifugation to separate proteoliposomes
Western blot analysis to confirm protein presence
Freeze-fracture electron microscopy to visualize protein distribution
Functional assays:
Measure changes in liposome properties (size, charge)
Perform transport assays if applicable
Analyze protein-lipid interactions via fluorescence spectroscopy
This methodology allows researchers to study SACOL1903 in a controlled membrane environment that mimics its natural context.
Several techniques are particularly effective for investigating SACOL1903 interactions:
Bacterial two-hybrid assays:
Pull-down assays with membrane fractions:
Immobilize purified SACOL1903 on affinity resin
Incubate with solubilized S. aureus membrane fractions
Identify binding partners via mass spectrometry
Fluorescence microscopy with protein fusions:
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry:
Treat intact cells with membrane-permeable cross-linkers
Isolate SACOL1903 complexes
Identify cross-linked peptides via LC-MS/MS
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR):
Immobilize purified SACOL1903 on sensor chips
Measure binding kinetics with potential interaction partners
Determine affinity constants for specific interactions
These methods can reveal whether SACOL1903 forms part of larger protein complexes involved in membrane organization, transport, or signaling pathways in S. aureus.
Challenges:
Membrane protein crystallization barriers:
Hydrophobic nature limits solubility
Detergent micelles create heterogeneous samples
Conformational flexibility reduces crystal formation
NMR limitations:
Size constraints for traditional solution NMR
Complexity of membrane mimetics
Solutions:
X-ray crystallography approaches:
Lipidic cubic phase (LCP) crystallization
Antibody fragment co-crystallization to increase polar surface area
Systematic detergent screening (vapor diffusion with detergent/lipid mixtures)
Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM):
Single-particle analysis of purified protein in nanodiscs
Use of Volta phase plates to enhance contrast
Classification algorithms to address conformational heterogeneity
Solution NMR strategies:
Selective isotope labeling of specific domains
TROSY techniques for large membrane proteins
Solid-state NMR for proteins in native-like lipid environments
Hybrid approaches:
Combining computational modeling with low-resolution experimental data
Integrating hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) with molecular dynamics simulations
Cross-linking mass spectrometry to obtain distance constraints
Recent advances in membrane protein structural biology make it increasingly feasible to determine SACOL1903's structure, which would provide valuable insights into its function.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations offer powerful insights into SACOL1903's behavior within the membrane environment:
System preparation:
Build homology model based on related proteins if structure is unknown
Embed protein in phospholipid bilayer matching S. aureus membrane composition
Solvate system with explicit water and physiological ion concentrations
Simulation protocols:
Equilibration phase (10-50 ns) with position restraints on protein
Production runs (minimum 500 ns) to observe conformational changes
Enhanced sampling techniques (metadynamics, umbrella sampling) for energy barriers
Analysis approaches:
Protein-lipid interactions and preferential binding sites
Conformational flexibility and domain movements
Water/ion permeation through potential channels
Electrostatic potential maps across the membrane
Specific phenomena to investigate:
| Simulation Type | Duration | System Size (atoms) | Key Insights |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equilibrium MD | 500 ns - 1 μs | ~100,000 | Stable conformations, lipid interactions |
| Coarse-grained MD | 5-10 μs | ~20,000 | Large-scale movements, oligomerization |
| Steered MD | 50-100 ns | ~100,000 | Force-induced conformational changes |
| Replica exchange | 200-500 ns | ~100,000 | Energy landscapes, rare conformations |
These simulations can generate testable hypotheses about SACOL1903's functional mechanisms and membrane interactions that can guide experimental design.
Based on studies of other S. aureus membrane proteins, SACOL1903 may participate in functional membrane microdomains (FMMs) that organize protein complexes essential for bacterial processes . To investigate this possibility:
Hypothesis testing for FMM association:
Create fluorescent protein fusions (SACOL1903-GFP)
Examine co-localization with known FMM markers like FloA
Use FRET to measure proximity to other FMM-associated proteins
Isolate detergent-resistant membrane fractions and identify SACOL1903 by immunoblotting
Mutational analysis to identify critical domains:
Generate deletion or point mutations in potential interaction domains
Assess effects on protein localization and function
Identify residues required for FMM association
Phenotypic characterization of knockout mutants:
Create SACOL1903 deletion strain
Compare growth under various stress conditions
Assess membrane permeability and antibiotic susceptibility
Evaluate virulence in infection models
Proteomic analysis of protein complexes:
Perform immunoprecipitation of tagged SACOL1903
Identify co-precipitating proteins by mass spectrometry
Compare complexes under different growth conditions
These approaches can reveal whether SACOL1903 plays a role similar to other membrane proteins like IsdF, which requires proper FMM localization for function in iron acquisition .
Membrane proteins often contribute to bacterial stress responses and antibiotic resistance. To investigate SACOL1903's potential role:
Transcriptional regulation analysis:
Monitor SACOL1903 expression under various stresses (oxidative, pH, osmotic, antibiotic exposure)
Use qRT-PCR and reporter gene fusions
Identify transcription factors regulating expression
Phenotypic characterization:
Compare wild-type and SACOL1903 mutant strains for:
Survival under membrane stress conditions
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of various antibiotics
Ability to form biofilms
Membrane permeability changes using fluorescent dyes
Membrane composition analysis:
Assess lipid profiles in wild-type vs. mutant strains
Examine changes in membrane fluidity using fluorescence anisotropy
Investigate membrane potential differences
Potential mechanisms to investigate:
Role in membrane integrity maintenance
Contribution to proton motive force
Involvement in cell wall synthesis or remodeling
Function in detoxification or efflux systems
| Condition | Parameters to Measure | Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Oxidative stress | Survival, ROS levels | H₂O₂ challenge, DCF fluorescence |
| Antibiotic exposure | Growth inhibition, killing kinetics | Broth microdilution, time-kill assays |
| Membrane stress | Membrane integrity, fluidity | SYTOX Green uptake, DPH anisotropy |
| Biofilm formation | Biomass, structure | Crystal violet assay, confocal microscopy |
Understanding SACOL1903's role in stress response could reveal new targets for antimicrobial development against S. aureus.
Engineering SACOL1903 for vaccine applications requires several strategic approaches:
Immunogenicity enhancement:
Identify immunogenic epitopes using in silico prediction and epitope mapping
Create fusion constructs with known immunostimulatory proteins
Design truncated versions exposing key extracellular domains
Delivery system development:
Adjuvant selection:
Test compatibility with aluminum-based adjuvants
Evaluate TLR agonists for enhanced immune stimulation
Consider combination with other S. aureus antigens for broader protection
Immunological assessment:
Measure antibody titers against native and recombinant forms
Evaluate opsonophagocytic activity of induced antibodies
Assess T cell responses via cytokine profiling and proliferation assays
Test protective efficacy in animal infection models
Research on S. aureus EVs has demonstrated that engineered vesicles containing detoxified membrane proteins can elicit protective immune responses , suggesting a similar approach might be viable for SACOL1903-based vaccine development.
Post-translational modifications (PTMs) can significantly impact membrane protein function. To investigate PTMs in SACOL1903:
Mass spectrometry-based identification:
Purify native SACOL1903 from S. aureus membranes
Perform protease digestion with multiple enzymes for comprehensive coverage
Use high-resolution LC-MS/MS with ETD or ECD fragmentation
Search for common bacterial PTMs (phosphorylation, glycosylation, lipidation)
Site-directed mutagenesis validation:
Create point mutations at identified PTM sites
Assess effects on protein localization, stability, and function
Compare wild-type and mutant phenotypes under various conditions
Targeted analysis of specific modifications:
Phosphorylation: Pro-Q Diamond staining, phospho-specific antibodies
Glycosylation: Lectin blotting, PNGase F treatment
Lipidation: Click chemistry with lipid analogs, hydrophobicity analysis
Regulatory enzyme identification:
Screen for kinases, phosphatases, or other modifying enzymes
Use co-immunoprecipitation to identify physical interactions
Perform in vitro modification assays with purified enzymes
| Potential PTM | Detection Method | Functional Significance to Test |
|---|---|---|
| Phosphorylation | MS/MS with neutral loss scanning | Regulation of protein-protein interactions |
| Lipidation | MS with specialized extraction | Membrane anchoring and microdomain targeting |
| Glycosylation | Periodic acid-Schiff staining, MS | Stability and immunogenicity |
| Proteolytic processing | N-terminal sequencing, MS | Activation or inactivation of function |
Understanding PTMs can provide crucial insights into how SACOL1903's function is regulated in response to changing environmental conditions.
| Challenge | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Low expression yield | Toxicity to host cells | Use tightly regulated inducible promoters; express in C41/C43 E. coli strains |
| Codon bias | Optimize codons for expression host; use strains with rare tRNA genes | |
| Protein instability | Co-express with chaperones; lower induction temperature to 18-20°C | |
| Protein aggregation | Improper folding | Screen multiple detergents; include glycerol in buffers |
| Concentration too high | Keep protein concentration below 2 mg/mL; add stabilizing lipids | |
| Buffer incompatibility | Test pH range 6.5-8.0; optimize salt concentration (150-300 mM) | |
| Poor solubilization | Ineffective detergent | Screen detergent panel (DDM, LMNG, LDAO); test detergent mixtures |
| Insufficient extraction time | Extend solubilization period to 3-4 hours or overnight at 4°C | |
| Incomplete membrane disruption | Increase detergent:protein ratio; ensure thorough homogenization | |
| Loss of activity | Detergent stripping of essential lipids | Add specific lipids to purification buffers; use milder detergents |
| Removal of necessary cofactors | Supplement buffers with potential cofactors (metal ions, etc.) | |
| Oxidation of critical residues | Include reducing agents; perform procedures under nitrogen |
Additional troubleshooting tips:
Store protein in 50% glycerol at -20°C for extended stability
Avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles; store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week
Consider using nanodiscs or amphipols as alternatives to detergent micelles for maintaining native-like environment
Validating the proper folding and function of recombinant SACOL1903 requires multiple complementary approaches:
Structural integrity assessment:
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to confirm secondary structure content
Fluorescence spectroscopy to assess tertiary structure through intrinsic tryptophan emission
Dynamic light scattering to verify monodispersity and absence of aggregation
Thermal shift assays to compare stability profiles of recombinant and native forms
Functional validation:
Develop activity assays based on predicted function
Compare phenotypes of knockout strains complemented with recombinant vs. native gene
Assess membrane integration in proteoliposomes
Test for interaction with known binding partners via pull-down or SPR
Epitope accessibility:
Generate antibodies against multiple domains
Compare antibody recognition patterns between native and recombinant forms
Use limited proteolysis to examine domain accessibility
In vivo localization: