Recombinant Staphylococcus epidermidis Na (+)/H (+) antiporter subunit F1 (mnhF1)

Shipped with Ice Packs
In Stock

Description

Catalytic Properties

  • Substrate Specificity:

    • S. aureus Mnh1 (analogous to mnhF1) exhibits Na⁺/H⁺ exchange at pH 7.5 .

    • Mnh2 (another subunit) shows dual Na⁺/H⁺ and K⁺/H⁺ exchange at pH 8.5 .

  • PMF Dependency:
    Antiporter activity relies on the membrane’s proton gradient, distinguishing it from primary Na⁺ pumps .

Physiological Impact

Experimental ConditionPhenotypeStrain/Model
ΔmnhA1 (Mnh1 deletion)Reduced growth in 1 M NaCl at pH 7.5–9.0 .S. aureus SH1000
ΔmnhA1 ΔmnhA2Severe growth impairment at pH >8.5 .S. aureus Newman
High Salt + Alkaline pHIncreased staphyloxanthin pigmentation (stress response) .S. aureus SH1000

Infection Models

Deletion of mnhA1 in S. aureus reduces virulence in murine models, highlighting the antiporter’s role in pathogenesis .

Comparative Analysis with Other Subunits

SubunitSourceLength (aa)TagExpression HostKey Features
mnhF1S. epidermidis97N/AE. coliHydrophobic, membrane-bound .
mnhC1S. epidermidis115HisE. coliFull-length, His-tagged .
MnhAS. aureus~400N/AE. coliOperon leader, essential for Na⁺ efflux .

Applications in Research and Industry

mnhF1 is primarily used in:

  1. Structural Studies: Hydropathy analysis and cryo-EM studies to elucidate antiporter topology .

  2. Functional Assays: Membrane vesicle experiments to measure Na⁺/H⁺ exchange kinetics .

  3. Drug Development: Targeting antiporters to combat antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus strains .

Product Specs

Form
Lyophilized powder
Note: We will prioritize shipping the format that is currently in stock. However, if you have a specific format preference, please indicate it in your order remarks, and we will accommodate your request.
Lead Time
Delivery time may vary depending on the purchasing method and location. For precise delivery time, please consult your local distributors.
Note: All our proteins are shipped with standard blue ice packs by default. If you require dry ice shipping, please inform us in advance as additional fees will apply.
Notes
Repeated freezing and thawing is not recommended. For optimal preservation, store working aliquots at 4°C for up to one week.
Reconstitution
For optimal reconstitution, we recommend briefly centrifuging the vial before opening to ensure all contents settle to the bottom. Please reconstitute the protein in deionized sterile water to a concentration between 0.1-1.0 mg/mL. To enhance long-term storage, we recommend adding 5-50% glycerol (final concentration) and aliquotting the solution for storage at -20°C/-80°C. Our standard final concentration of glycerol is 50%, which can be used as a reference.
Shelf Life
The shelf life is influenced by various factors, including storage conditions, buffer composition, storage temperature, and the inherent stability of the protein itself. Generally, the shelf life of the liquid form is 6 months at -20°C/-80°C. The shelf life of the lyophilized form is 12 months at -20°C/-80°C.
Storage Condition
Upon receipt, store at -20°C/-80°C. For multiple uses, aliquoting is recommended. To maintain optimal protein integrity, avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles.
Tag Info
Tag type will be determined during the manufacturing process.
The tag type will be determined during the production process. If you have a specific tag type preference, please inform us, and we will prioritize developing the specified tag.
Synonyms
mnhF1; SERP0533; Na(+/H(+ antiporter subunit F1; Mnh complex subunit F1
Buffer Before Lyophilization
Tris/PBS-based buffer, 6% Trehalose.
Datasheet
Please contact us to get it.
Expression Region
1-97
Protein Length
full length protein
Species
Staphylococcus epidermidis (strain ATCC 35984 / RP62A)
Target Names
mnhF1
Target Protein Sequence
MPFKIFIITALIIVVLSMLAMLIRVILGPSLADRVVALDAIGLQLMAVIALFSILLNIKY MLVVILMVGILAFLGTAVFSKFMDEGKVIKHDSNDRH
Uniprot No.

Target Background

Function
The Mnh complex is a Na(+)/H(+) antiporter that plays a role in Na(+) excretion.
Database Links
Protein Families
CPA3 antiporters (TC 2.A.63) subunit F family
Subcellular Location
Cell membrane; Multi-pass membrane protein.

Q&A

What is the molecular function of the Na(+)/H(+) antiporter subunit F1 in Staphylococcus epidermidis?

The Na(+)/H(+) antiporter subunit F1 in S. epidermidis is part of a multisubunit membrane protein complex involved in sodium and proton exchange across the bacterial cell membrane. Based on homology to similar antiporters in S. aureus, this protein likely plays a crucial role in:

  • Establishment of electrochemical potential of Na+ across the cytoplasmic membrane

  • Extrusion of toxic Na+ and Li+ ions that may accumulate in cells

  • Intracellular pH regulation, particularly under alkaline conditions

  • Cell volume regulation

The mnhF1 subunit is specifically part of the Mnh complex, which forms a functional unit with multiple subunits working together to facilitate ion exchange .

How does the mnhF1 subunit compare structurally to other antiporter subunits in Staphylococcus species?

The mnhF1 subunit shares structural similarities with other subunits in the Mnh complex, such as mnhA1. While specific structural data for mnhF1 is limited in the provided literature, comparative analysis with the better-characterized Na(+)/H(+) antiporter subunits in S. aureus suggests:

  • It likely contains multiple transmembrane domains typical of membrane transport proteins

  • The protein functions as part of a multisubunit complex rather than as a single-protein antiporter

  • Unlike single-protein antiporters such as NhaA, NhaB, and ChaA found in other bacteria, the Mnh complex represents a distinct class of multisubunit cation/proton antiporters

What are the optimal expression systems for recombinant production of S. epidermidis mnhF1?

Based on successful expression of related proteins, the following expression systems can be considered for recombinant production of S. epidermidis mnhF1:

Expression SystemAdvantagesChallengesOptimization Strategies
E. coliHigh yield, well-established protocols, economicalPotential improper folding of membrane proteinsUse specialized strains (C41/C43), optimize codon usage, lower expression temperature (16-25°C)
Yeast (P. pastoris)Eukaryotic post-translational modifications, high-density growthLonger production timeOptimize methanol induction protocol, use multi-copy integrants
BaculovirusSuperior folding of complex proteinsMore complex setup, higher costOptimize infection conditions (MOI optimization)
Mammalian cellsNative-like folding and processingHighest cost, low yieldUse inducible expression systems, optimize cell line selection

When designing the expression system, it's critical to include appropriate purification tags that won't interfere with the protein's function. For membrane proteins like mnhF1, detergent screening is also essential for maintaining proper folding after extraction from membranes .

How should I design experiments to measure the activity of recombinant mnhF1 in vitro?

To measure the activity of recombinant mnhF1 effectively:

  • Preparation of everted membrane vesicles:

    • Prepare everted membrane vesicles from cells expressing the recombinant protein

    • Ensure proper orientation by using established protocols for membrane inversion

  • Antiport activity measurement:

    • Monitor Na+/H+ exchange using fluorescent pH-sensitive probes (e.g., acridine orange)

    • Establish a pH gradient across the membrane and measure its dissipation upon addition of Na+ or Li+

    • Quantify ion exchange rates at various pH values (pH 6.0-9.0) to determine pH dependency

  • Controls and validation:

    • Include membranes from cells without the recombinant protein as negative controls

    • Test with known Na+/H+ antiporter inhibitors to confirm specificity

    • Measure activity with various cations (Na+, Li+, Ca2+) to determine substrate specificity

When analyzing results, it's important to note that multisubunit antiporters may have different pH optima compared to single-protein antiporters like NhaA, which typically shows highest activity at alkaline pH (>8.5) .

How can I investigate the stoichiometry and subunit interactions within the complete Mnh complex containing mnhF1?

Investigating the stoichiometry and subunit interactions requires a multi-technique approach:

  • Cross-linking studies:

    • Use membrane-permeable cross-linkers with varying spacer lengths

    • Perform SDS-PAGE and mass spectrometry to identify cross-linked peptides

    • Map interaction interfaces between mnhF1 and other subunits

  • Blue Native PAGE:

    • Solubilize membranes in mild detergents to preserve complex integrity

    • Determine approximate molecular weight of the entire complex

    • Perform second-dimension SDS-PAGE to identify constituent subunits

  • Co-immunoprecipitation:

    • Generate antibodies against mnhF1 or epitope-tag the subunit

    • Perform co-IP to identify interaction partners

    • Validate results with reciprocal pull-downs

  • Cryo-EM analysis:

    • Purify the intact complex in appropriate detergent micelles or nanodiscs

    • Collect high-resolution structural data

    • Build structural models of subunit organization

How do mutations in the mnhF1 gene affect Na+/H+ antiporter function and bacterial survival under stress conditions?

To investigate the effects of mnhF1 mutations:

  • Site-directed mutagenesis approach:

    • Target conserved residues identified through sequence alignment with related proteins

    • Focus on charged residues likely involved in ion coordination

    • Create systematic alanine-scanning mutants across predicted transmembrane domains

  • Functional characterization:

    • Measure Na+/H+ antiport activity in membrane vesicles from each mutant

    • Determine kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax) for Na+ and H+ transport

    • Assess pH dependency profiles for wild-type vs. mutant proteins

  • Stress response assessment:

    • Evaluate growth under high salt conditions (1-3M NaCl)

    • Measure survival at different pH values (pH 5.5-9.5)

    • Test resistance to lithium toxicity

  • In vivo localization:

    • Create GFP fusions to determine if mutations affect proper membrane localization

    • Verify complex assembly using co-immunoprecipitation

How can I resolve conflicting data between different experimental approaches when studying mnhF1 function?

When facing conflicting experimental results:

  • Systematic methodology comparison:

    • Create a comparative table of all experimental conditions (pH, temperature, buffer composition)

    • Identify key procedural differences that may explain discrepancies

    • Standardize protocols where possible to eliminate methodological variables

  • Statistical reanalysis:

    • Apply appropriate statistical tests to determine if differences are statistically significant

    • Consider multivariate meta-regression approaches for complex datasets

    • Evaluate whether outliers are driving apparent contradictions

  • Experimental validation strategies:

    • Design critical experiments specifically addressing the points of contradiction

    • Use multiple independent techniques to measure the same parameter

    • Consider that apparent contradictions may reveal previously unknown regulatory mechanisms

  • Reconciliation framework:

    • Develop models that can accommodate seemingly contradictory results

    • Consider context-dependency of protein function (pH, membrane composition, presence of other subunits)

    • Evaluate whether post-translational modifications might explain functional differences

What are the key considerations when comparing mnhF1 function between different Staphylococcus species?

When conducting comparative studies across Staphylococcus species:

  • Sequence and structural comparison:

    • Perform comprehensive sequence alignments of mnhF1 homologs

    • Identify conserved domains versus species-specific regions

    • Consider evolutionary relationships between species

  • Experimental standardization:

    • Use identical experimental conditions when comparing proteins from different species

    • Account for differences in optimal growth conditions between species

    • Consider native membrane lipid composition differences

  • Physiological context:

    • Account for different ecological niches of each species (S. epidermidis vs. S. aureus)

    • Consider differential expression patterns of other antiporter subunits

    • Evaluate species-specific stress response mechanisms

  • Functional compensation:

    • Investigate whether other antiporter systems (NhaA, NhaB homologs) might compensate differently across species

    • Consider differences in ion homeostasis requirements between commensal and pathogenic Staphylococci

What strategies can overcome common challenges in purifying functional recombinant mnhF1?

Membrane proteins like mnhF1 present specific purification challenges:

  • Detergent optimization:

    • Screen multiple detergent classes (maltoside, glucoside, fos-choline, neopentyl glycol derivatives)

    • Test detergent concentration effects on protein stability and activity

    • Consider detergent exchange during purification steps

  • Stabilization strategies:

    • Add specific lipids that may be required for function (phosphatidylglycerol, cardiolipin)

    • Include appropriate ions (Na+, K+) in purification buffers

    • Optimize glycerol percentage to enhance stability

  • Alternative solubilization approaches:

    • Evaluate styrene maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs) for native-like environment

    • Test nanodiscs for reconstitution

    • Consider amphipol stabilization for structural studies

  • Quality control metrics:

    • Assess monodispersity using size-exclusion chromatography

    • Monitor thermal stability using differential scanning fluorimetry

    • Verify functional activity at each purification step

What are the methodological considerations for studying mnhF1 interactions with other antiporter subunits?

To effectively study subunit interactions:

  • Co-expression strategies:

    • Design multi-cistronic constructs to ensure proper stoichiometry

    • Use compatible vectors with different selection markers for co-transformation

    • Consider sequential or simultaneous induction protocols

  • Affinity-based approaches:

    • Engineer differential tags on different subunits (His-tag, FLAG, Strep-tag)

    • Perform tandem affinity purification to isolate complete complexes

    • Use proximity labeling methods (BioID, APEX) to identify transient interactions

  • Functional reconstitution:

    • Reconstitute purified subunits into liposomes in controlled ratios

    • Measure activity as a function of subunit composition

    • Determine minimal subunit requirements for function

  • In situ analysis:

    • Apply fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to measure subunit proximity

    • Use split-GFP complementation to visualize interactions

    • Consider super-resolution microscopy to map complex organization in native membranes

How does mnhF1 function contribute to S. epidermidis pathogenesis and biofilm formation?

The Na(+)/H(+) antiporter system including mnhF1 likely contributes to pathogenesis through:

  • Stress adaptation mechanisms:

    • Enables survival in high-salt environments like human skin

    • Contributes to pH homeostasis during host-defense induced pH changes

    • Provides resistance to antimicrobial peptides that disrupt membrane potential

  • Biofilm formation support:

    • Maintains appropriate intracellular ion balance necessary for adhesion processes

    • Contributes to stress signaling pathways that trigger biofilm formation

    • Supports metabolic activities required during the transition to biofilm lifestyle

  • Host colonization factors:

    • Enables adaptation to changing osmotic conditions during infection

    • Contributes to resistance against host defense mechanisms

    • Supports persistence under antibiotic pressure

What experimental approaches can determine if mnhF1 is a viable antimicrobial target?

To evaluate mnhF1 as a potential antimicrobial target:

  • Target validation studies:

    • Generate conditional knockdown strains to verify essentiality

    • Evaluate fitness costs of mnhF1 mutations under various conditions

    • Determine if functional redundancy exists with other antiporter systems

  • High-throughput screening approach:

    • Develop activity-based assays adaptable to screening platforms

    • Design whole-cell assays using reporter systems linked to Na+/H+ antiport function

    • Implement counter-screens to identify specific vs. non-specific inhibitors

  • Structure-based drug design:

    • Obtain structural information through crystallography or cryo-EM

    • Identify potential binding pockets unique to bacterial antiporters

    • Perform virtual screening followed by experimental validation

  • Resistance development assessment:

    • Determine frequency of spontaneous resistance

    • Characterize cross-resistance patterns with existing antibiotics

    • Evaluate potential for horizontal gene transfer of resistance mechanisms

Quick Inquiry

Personal Email Detected
Please use an institutional or corporate email address for inquiries. Personal email accounts ( such as Gmail, Yahoo, and Outlook) are not accepted. *
© Copyright 2025 TheBiotek. All Rights Reserved.