KEGG: sha:SH2271
STRING: 279808.SH2271
For optimal purification of recombinant mnhE2 protein:
Affinity Chromatography: Utilize the N-terminal His-tag for immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with Ni-NTA resins. Optimize imidazole concentration in binding and elution buffers to minimize non-specific binding while maximizing target protein recovery.
Buffer Composition: Maintain protein stability by including appropriate detergents (e.g., n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside or LMNG) in all purification buffers to preserve the native structure of this membrane protein.
Post-Purification Processing: Following elution, consider buffer exchange to remove imidazole and concentrate the protein using centrifugal filters with appropriate molecular weight cut-offs.
Storage and Reconstitution: Store the purified protein as lyophilized powder. For reconstitution, use deionized sterile water to a concentration of 0.1-1.0 mg/mL, adding glycerol (typically to a final concentration of 50%) for long-term storage stability at -20°C/-80°C .
Quality Assessment: Verify purity using SDS-PAGE (expected >90% purity) and assess structural integrity via circular dichroism or limited proteolysis before proceeding with functional studies.
Mutations in conserved residues significantly impact the conformational dynamics of the Mrp antiporter complex, particularly affecting its proton-conducting function. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and site-directed mutagenesis studies have revealed that point mutations directly influence transport activity by altering the conformational dynamics of key residues .
A critical finding is how mutations affect the histidine molecular switch mechanism. In the MrpA subunit, histidine 248 (H248) acts as a molecular switch with two distinct conformational states (A and B). Mutations in residues that interact with H248 significantly impact these conformational states:
T306V mutation: Eliminates the population of the A conformation of H248, impairing antiport function by altering proton transfer pathways from the periplasmic side .
S146A/T mutations: Cause loss of the B conformation, with S146A showing a complete drop in occupancy from 40% to zero, corresponding with decreased sodium tolerance in functional assays .
L247H mutation: Eliminates the B conformation entirely, resulting in loss of sodium tolerance and partial dequenching in experimental analysis .
This table summarizes the effects of key mutations on H248 conformational states and antiporter function:
| Mutation | Effect on H248 Conformation | Functional Impact |
|---|---|---|
| T306V | Loss of A conformation | Impaired antiport function |
| S146A | Loss of B conformation (0% occupancy) | Decreased sodium tolerance |
| S146T | Loss of B conformation | Decreased sodium tolerance |
| A250V | Maintains both A and B states (26% and 52%) | Wild-type-like behavior |
| W232A | Reduced but present A and B conformations | Wild-type-like behavior |
| S249A | Reduced but present A and B conformations | Wild-type-like behavior |
These findings demonstrate that the ability of histidine to adopt different conformational states is crucial for antiporter function, with mutations disrupting hydrogen bonding networks and altering the dynamics of this molecular switch .
Characterizing proton-conducting pathways in the Mrp antiporter requires a multi-faceted methodological approach combining computational, structural, and functional techniques:
Large-Scale Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulations:
Site-Directed Mutagenesis:
Functional Assays:
Cryo-EM in Different Conditions:
Hydrogen-Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry (HDX-MS):
Map solvent-accessible regions and conformational flexibility
Identify regions undergoing significant conformational changes during ion transport
The integration of these approaches has revealed that the histidine switch mechanism involving H248 is central to proton translocation, with specific conformational states (A and B) differentially stabilized based on the protonation states of key residues like K299 and the K223/E140 pair .
The histidine molecular switch mechanism in Mrp antiporters represents a distinct yet conceptually related approach to proton translocation compared to other enzymes. Based on the available research, the following comparisons can be drawn:
Similarity to Respiratory Complex I:
The Mrp antiporter's histidine switch shares homology with mitochondrial respiratory complex I
Both systems utilize conformationally mobile histidine residues as key elements for directional proton movement
The histidine (H248) in MrpA adopts discrete conformational states (A and B) that gate proton transfer pathways
Distinction from F₁F₀-ATP Synthase:
While F₁F₀-ATP synthase utilizes a rotary mechanism coupled to proton translocation through a c-ring
Mrp antiporters employ a reciprocating conformational change in the histidine switch without large-scale rotary movements
Both mechanisms ensure unidirectional proton movement but through fundamentally different structural arrangements
Comparison to Bacteriorhodopsin:
Bacteriorhodopsin uses light energy to drive a sequence of protonation changes in key residues
The Mrp histidine switch is driven by changes in charge and protonation states that reorganize hydrogen bonding networks
Both mechanisms feature water molecules as part of the proton relay system
The Mrp antiporter's histidine switch mechanism is characterized by:
Charge-driven conformational changes
Coupled sidechain and backbone conformational shifts
Hydration changes in the protein interior
A fail-safe directional gating system that prevents short-circuiting
This mechanism ensures efficient proton translocation against membrane gradients, with the histidine switch functioning as a central element for controlling proton movement directionality - a feature critical for energy-transducing membrane proteins.
The relationship between mnhE2 function and antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus presents a complex and potentially significant research area, with several mechanistic connections:
pH Homeostasis and Antibiotic Efficacy:
The Mrp antiporter complex, including mnhE2, is crucial for maintaining pH homeostasis in bacteria
Many antibiotics show pH-dependent efficacy, with altered intracellular pH potentially reducing their activity
Proper functioning of mnhE2 within the Mrp antiporter may indirectly modulate antibiotic susceptibility by maintaining optimal intracellular pH
Connection to Multidrug Resistance:
S. haemolyticus clinical isolates show high rates of multidrug resistance (88% of clinical isolates versus 11% of commensal isolates)
Ion homeostasis systems like Mrp antiporters can affect membrane potential, which in turn influences the activity of certain antibiotic efflux pumps
Altered expression or function of mnhE2 might contribute to adaptive responses affecting drug accumulation
Environmental Adaptation:
S. haemolyticus strains adapted to hospital environments show specific genomic signatures
Mrp antiporters are critical for bacterial adaptation to challenging conditions like high salt or alkaline environments
The ability to maintain ion homeostasis through mnhE2 function may support survival under antibiotic selection pressure
Potential Therapeutic Target:
Inhibition of mnhE2 function could potentially sensitize resistant S. haemolyticus to certain antibiotics
The histidine switch mechanism in the Mrp complex represents a novel target for antibiotic development
The evolutionary conservation of key functional elements in the Mrp antiporter suggests inhibitors might have broad-spectrum activity
For optimal functional characterization of recombinant mnhE2 protein, researchers should consider the following experimental parameters and approaches:
Reconstitution System Selection:
Proteoliposomes: Reconstitute purified mnhE2 into liposomes composed of E. coli polar lipids or synthetic lipid mixtures matching bacterial membrane composition
Nanodiscs: Consider MSP-based nanodiscs for a more native-like membrane environment with defined size
Continuous membrane systems: GUVs (Giant Unilamellar Vesicles) may be appropriate for certain fluorescence-based assays
Buffer and pH Conditions:
Test multiple pH ranges (pH 6.0-9.0) to assess pH-dependent activity
Include physiologically relevant concentrations of Na+ (typically 100-300 mM) and K+ (typically 100-150 mM)
Consider adding Mg2+ (1-5 mM) to stabilize the protein structure
Assay Methods for Transport Activity:
pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (BCECF, pyranine) to monitor ΔpH across membranes
22Na+ uptake assays for direct measurement of sodium transport
Stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy for kinetic measurements
Solid-supported membrane (SSM)-based electrophysiology for direct electrical measurements
Experimental Controls:
Include inactive mutants as negative controls
Test mnhE2 alongside other Mrp complex subunits to assess cooperative effects
Employ ionophores (monensin, CCCP) as positive controls for membrane permeabilization
Data Analysis Parameters:
Calculate initial rates of transport under varying substrate concentrations
Determine Km and Vmax values for both Na+ and H+ transport
Assess the effects of membrane potential using valinomycin-induced K+ diffusion potentials
For reliable results, express the protein with the complete amino acid sequence (1-160) and consider the role of the His-tag in potentially affecting function, with parallel experiments using tag-cleaved protein preparations when possible .
Investigating interactions between mnhE2 and other components of the Mrp antiporter complex requires a strategic combination of biochemical, biophysical, and computational approaches:
Co-purification and Co-immunoprecipitation:
Express mnhE2 with affinity-tagged partner subunits
Perform pull-down assays to identify stable interactions
Analyze co-purifying proteins by mass spectrometry to identify interaction partners
Cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to map interaction interfaces
Biophysical Interaction Analysis:
Microscale thermophoresis (MST) to measure binding affinities between purified components
Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for real-time interaction kinetics
Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine thermodynamic parameters of binding
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) using labeled protein components to assess proximity in reconstituted systems
Structural Biology Approaches:
Cryo-electron microscopy of the intact complex to visualize the position of mnhE2
Hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) to identify protected regions at interfaces
NMR spectroscopy of isotopically labeled mnhE2 in the presence of partner proteins
Functional Complementation Studies:
Create mnhE2 knockout mutants and assess restoration of function with wild-type or mutant versions
Perform functional assays in the presence or absence of other Mrp complex components
Analyze proton transport activity in reconstituted systems with varying subunit compositions
Computational Modeling:
Molecular dynamics simulations of mnhE2 within the complete Mrp complex
Protein-protein docking to predict interaction interfaces
Evolutionary coupling analysis to identify co-evolving residues between subunits
This multifaceted approach allows researchers to build a comprehensive understanding of how mnhE2 integrates structurally and functionally within the Mrp antiporter complex, particularly focusing on interactions that may influence the histidine switch mechanism central to proton translocation .
The conformational dynamics of mnhE2 within the Mrp antiporter complex present promising opportunities for novel antimicrobial development strategies:
Structure-Based Inhibitor Design:
Target the histidine switch mechanism by developing small molecules that lock H248 in nonproductive conformations
Design peptidomimetics that disrupt critical hydrogen bonding networks between conserved residues
Develop allosteric inhibitors that bind to interfaces between mnhE2 and other Mrp complex subunits
Exploiting Bacterial Adaptation Mechanisms:
Clinical isolates of S. haemolyticus show high rates of multidrug resistance (88%) compared to commensal isolates (11%)
The Mrp antiporter is critical for bacterial adaptation to challenging environments
Inhibiting mnhE2 function could potentially compromise the bacterium's ability to survive in hospital environments
Combination Therapy Approaches:
Pair conventional antibiotics with Mrp antiporter inhibitors to enhance efficacy
Target multiple ion homeostasis systems simultaneously to prevent compensatory mechanisms
Exploit pH-dependent antibiotic activities by disrupting bacterial pH regulation via mnhE2 inhibition
Rational Mutation Design:
Mutations like T306V and S146A significantly impact antiporter function by disrupting H248 conformational dynamics
Identify equivalent "weak points" in the conformational mechanism that could be targeted by inhibitors
Screen for compounds that mimic the structural effects of these function-disrupting mutations
Translational Research Potential:
The current understanding of mnhE2's conformational dynamics, particularly the histidine switch mechanism, provides a scientifically grounded foundation for rational drug design approaches targeting this essential component of bacterial ion homeostasis.
Recent discoveries about the histidine switch mechanism in the Mrp antiporter have significant implications for understanding respiratory complex I function, potentially resolving longstanding questions about energy transduction:
Evolutionary Relationship and Structural Parallels:
Several subunits of the Mrp antiporter complex are closely related to membrane-bound subunits of mitochondrial respiratory complex I
The Mrp antiporter serves as a simpler model system for studying the more complex mechanisms in respiratory complex I
The conservation of key functional elements suggests shared mechanistic principles for proton translocation
Mechanistic Insights from the Histidine Switch:
The histidine switch mechanism identified in the Mrp antiporter may explain how proton pumping occurs in complex I
Charge-driven conformational changes in conserved histidine residues create a gating system ensuring directional proton movement
The coupled sidechain and backbone conformational changes provide a molecular basis for long-range energy coupling in complex I
Implications for Disease-Related Mutations:
Many mitochondrial diseases involve mutations in complex I
Understanding how mutations perturb the histidine switch mechanism in the Mrp antiporter provides a framework for interpreting pathogenic mutations in complex I
The study showed that specific mutations emulating mitochondrial disease mutations affect conformational dynamics of the histidine switch
Novel Experimental Approaches:
The research suggests that cryo-EM experiments performed at low pH might trap histidine residues in unique intermediate positions
This approach could reveal novel proton transfer routes in both the Mrp antiporter and respiratory complex I
The combination of site-directed mutagenesis with large-scale MD simulations represents a powerful methodology for investigating complex I mechanism
Proposed Model Integration:
The histidine switch model provides a specific molecular mechanism that can be integrated with existing models of complex I function
The detailed mechanism explains how charge translocation directionality is maintained against a membrane gradient
Understanding of water dynamics within hydrophilic cavities provides insight into proton transfer pathways in both proteins